Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
ChineseSchenker XMG Apex 15 (Clevo N950TP6) Laptop rövid értékelés
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Az osztály átlaga Gaming (19 - 202, n=100, az elmúlt 2 évben) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Omen 15t-ce000 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Az osztály átlaga Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=94, az elmúlt 2 évben) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Omen 15t-ce000 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fényerő megoszlás: 91 %
Centrumban: 269 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1170:1 (Fekete: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.25 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 2.51
ΔE Greyscale 3.11 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
83% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
54% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
82.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.36
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), IPS, 1920x1080 | MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider Chi Mei N156HHE-GA1 (CMN15F4), TN LED, 1920x1080 | HP Omen 15t-ce000 AU Optronics AUO23EB, IPS, 3840x2160 | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), IPS, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 62 | 91.3 47% | 66.1 7% | 64.3 4% |
| sRGB Coverage | 82.7 | 100 21% | 91.8 11% | 83 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 60.4 | 86.7 44% | 66.9 11% | 60.6 0% |
| Response Times | 60% | 17% | 3% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 42.4 ? | 9.6 ? 77% | 37.6 ? 11% | 40.8 ? 4% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 32 ? | 7.2 ? 77% | 24.8 ? 22% | 30.4 ? 5% |
| PWM Frequency | 20490 ? | 26000 ? 27% | 20490 ? 0% | |
| Screen | 12% | -5% | -11% | |
| Brightness middle | 269 | 285 6% | 358.5 33% | 297 10% |
| Brightness | 274 | 273 0% | 350 28% | 276 1% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 84 -8% | 95 4% | 87 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.23 | 0.23 -0% | 0.39 -70% | 0.3 -30% |
| Contrast | 1170 | 1239 6% | 919 -21% | 990 -15% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.25 | 3.52 17% | 4.6 -8% | 5.25 -24% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.39 | 5.18 50% | 8.5 18% | 10.3 1% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.51 | |||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.11 | 3.41 -10% | 5.2 -67% | 4.64 -49% |
| Gamma | 2.36 93% | 2.05 107% | 2.28 96% | 2.39 92% |
| CCT | 6851 95% | 7077 92% | 6410 101% | 6600 98% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 54 | 77 43% | 66.9 24% | 54 0% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 83 | 100 20% | 91.8 11% | 83 0% |
| Teljes átlag (program / beállítások) | 36% /
26% | 7% /
1% | -2% /
-6% |
* ... a kisebb jobb
Megjelenítési válaszidők
| ↔ Válaszidő Fekete-fehér | ||
|---|---|---|
| 32 ms ... emelkedés és süllyedés ↘ kombinálva | ↗ 18 ms emelkedés |  |
| ↘ 14 ms ősz | ||
| A képernyő lassú reakciósebességet mutat tesztjeinkben, és nem lesz kielégítő a játékosok számára. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. Ez azt jelenti, hogy a mért válaszidő rosszabb, mint az összes vizsgált eszköz átlaga (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Válaszidő 50% szürke és 80% szürke között | ||
| 42.4 ms ... emelkedés és süllyedés ↘ kombinálva | ↗ 20.4 ms emelkedés |  |
| ↘ 22 ms ősz | ||
| A képernyő lassú reakciósebességet mutat tesztjeinkben, és nem lesz kielégítő a játékosok számára. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better. Ez azt jelenti, hogy a mért válaszidő rosszabb, mint az összes vizsgált eszköz átlaga (33.7 ms). | ||
Képernyő villogása / PWM (impulzusszélesség-moduláció)
| Képernyő villogása / PWM észlelve | 20490 Hz | ≤ 99 % fényerő beállítása |  |
The display backlight flickers at 20490 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 20490 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4697 pontok | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5653 pontok | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5732 pontok | |
Segítség | ||
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe | MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY | HP Omen 15t-ce000 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe | Átlagos Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -59% | -40% | -12% | -4% | |
| Read Seq | 1751 | 507 -71% | 1411 -19% | 1338 -24% | 1642 ? -6% |
| Write Seq | 1375 | 441.4 -68% | 749 -46% | 1188 -14% | 1408 ? 2% |
| Read 512 | 792 | 411.9 -48% | 503 -36% | 780 -2% | 880 ? 11% |
| Write 512 | 1007 | 409.9 -59% | 174 -83% | 1006 0% | 1065 ? 6% |
| Read 4k | 60 | 21.77 -64% | 46.09 -23% | 58.3 -3% | 54.2 ? -10% |
| Write 4k | 164.1 | 88.9 -46% | 130.7 -20% | 134 -18% | 141.9 ? -14% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 676 | 368.8 -45% | 518 -23% | 577 -15% | 617 ? -9% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 571 | 190.3 -67% | 173.9 -70% | 481.9 -16% | 511 ? -11% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 14618 pontok | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 36010 pontok | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 10794 pontok | |
Segítség | ||
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Az osztály átlaga Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=226, az elmúlt 2 évben) | |
| MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 | |
| Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (24 - 42.3, n=60) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 | |
| HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Az osztály átlaga Gaming (17.5 - 449, n=166, az elmúlt 2 évben) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 | |
| HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
| Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (52.6 - 80.6, n=49) | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
| 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x | |
| MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 | |
| Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (51 - 68.8, n=37) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 | |
| HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x | |
| MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 | |
| Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (65.3 - 82, n=24) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 | |
| HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
| The Division | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AF:16x | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 | |
| Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (37.8 - 57.4, n=7) | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AF:8x | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 | |
| Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (46.9 - 73.3, n=6) | |
| For Honor | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 | |
| Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (42.4 - 78.9, n=8) | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:8x | |
| MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 | |
| Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (56.3 - 103.2, n=7) | |
| Ghost Recon Wildlands | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 | |
| Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (34.5 - 38.7, n=6) | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:4x | |
| MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 | |
| Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (60.1 - 67.8, n=6) | |
| Assassin´s Creed Origins | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 | |
| Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (42 - 56, n=5) | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 | |
| Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (49 - 66, n=5) | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | |
| 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Az osztály átlaga Gaming (9.13 - 194.9, n=226, az elmúlt 2 évben) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 | |
| Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (37.2 - 47.3, n=5) | |
| 1920x1080 Standard Quality | |
| Az osztály átlaga Gaming (13 - 230, n=174, az elmúlt 2 évben) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 | |
| Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (58.6 - 62.4, n=2) | |
| Far Cry 5 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Az osztály átlaga Gaming (14 - 218, n=125, az elmúlt 2 évben) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 | |
| Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (59 - 65, n=5) | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T | |
| Az osztály átlaga Gaming (16 - 232, n=115, az elmúlt 2 évben) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 | |
| Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (62 - 69, n=5) | |
| alacsony | közepes | magas | ultra | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 77.6 | 41.9 | ||
| Rainbow Six Siege (2015) | 118 | |||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 76.1 | 67.9 | ||
| The Division (2016) | 72.8 | 56.7 | ||
| For Honor (2017) | 108.3 | 103.2 | 78.9 | |
| Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) | 67.8 | 38.7 | ||
| Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017) | 74 | 66 | 56 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 62.4 | 47.3 | ||
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 75 | 69 | 64 |
Zajszint
| Üresjárat |
| 32 / 33 / 38 dB(A) |
| HDD |
| 33 dB(A) |
| Terhelés |
| 47 / 52 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB csendes 40 dB(A) hallható 50 dB(A) hangos |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm távolságról) környezeti zaj: 30 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 43 °C / 109.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-14.1 °C / -25.4 F).
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Összességében 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.3% difference to median)
Ugyanazon osztályhoz képest
» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Az összes tesztelt eszközzel összehasonlítva
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Összességében 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.9% difference to median)
Ugyanazon osztályhoz képest
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Az összes tesztelt eszközzel összehasonlítva
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Omen 15t-ce000 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (65.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Összességében 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.7% difference to median)
Ugyanazon osztályhoz képest
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Az összes tesztelt eszközzel összehasonlítva
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 10.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Összességében 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Ugyanazon osztályhoz képest
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Az összes tesztelt eszközzel összehasonlítva
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlét | 0.4 / 1.1 Watt |
| Üresjárat | 7 / 10 / 14 Watt |
| Terhelés |
114 / 164 Watt |
   
| |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 i7-8700, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | HP Omen 15t-ce000 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Az osztály átlaga Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -38% | -38% | -57% | -66% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 7 | 11 -57% | 15.4 -120% | 18 -157% | 13.8 ? -97% |
| Idle Average * | 10 | 16 -60% | 22.4 -124% | 22 -120% | 19.2 ? -92% |
| Idle Maximum * | 14 | 21 -50% | 22.4 -60% | 26 -86% | 26.9 ? -92% |
| Load Average * | 114 | 92 19% | 78.1 31% | 93 18% | 111.1 ? 3% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 131 | 185 -41% | 97.5 26% | 119 9% | |
| Load Maximum * | 164 | 224 -37% | 133.52 19% | 175 -7% | 251 ? -53% |
* ... a kisebb jobb
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 i7-8700, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 62 Wh | MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 51 Wh | HP Omen 15t-ce000 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 70 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 82 Wh | Az osztály átlaga Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akkumulátor üzemidő | -49% | -37% | -29% | 3% | |
| Reader / Idle | 575 | 323 -44% | 298 -48% | 300 -48% | 544 ? -5% |
| H.264 | 304 | 234 -23% | 399 ? 31% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 334 | 201 -40% | 208 -38% | 282 -16% | 368 ? 10% |
| Load | 110 | 42 -62% | 83 -25% | 80 -27% | 84.4 ? -23% |
Pro
Kontra
Igen, a Schenker XMG Apex 15 Core i7-8700 CPU-ja túlzásnak tűnik, ha csak a játékot tartjuk szem előtt. Ez viszont nem feltétlenül jelent rosszat, mivel a szokásos problémák, mint a magas fogyasztás és erős zaj gyanúsan hiányoztak ebben az esetben.
Mindent egybevetve, az Apex 15 szórakoztató notebook. Jó lett volna, ha a kijelző/fedél is jobban sikerült volna.
Nagyjából 1 700 euróért egy korrekt gamer notebook-ot kapunk, olyan extrák nélkül, mint például a G-Sync, vagy a Thunderbolt 3. Ha a közeljövőben nem tervezünk az FHD fölé mászni, a GTX 1060 még pár évig bírni fogja, főleg, mert az Apex 15 az egyik leggyorsabb változatát kapta meg.
Ezt a gépet a csatlakozókínálata emeli ki a tömegből, de a karbantartási lehetőségei is az ideálishoz közeliek. Igen, a kijelző nem annyira gamer-központú, mint azt megszoktuk. Ennek ellenére elég jól teljesít. A gyors CPU mellé villámsebes SSD-t is kapunk, és a gép alacsony fogyasztása hosszú üzemidőt eredményez. A legtöbb hátrány a kijelzőt érinti, pontosabban a fedél designját. Ugyan teljesen érthetetlen, hogy miért ezt a gyatra megoldást választották, de a készüléket így is teljes szívvel tudjuk ajánlani. Amennyiben még több 3D teljesítményre vágyunk, az MSI GTX 1070-nel ellátott notebookját érdemes meglesni. Annak a TN paneljével viszont érdemes vigyázni.
Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű cikk itt olvasható.
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15
-
04/28/2018 v6(old)
Sven Kloevekorn
Pricecompare
