Notebookcheck

Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e (Wi-Fi) Tablet rövid értékelés

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (fordította Zoltan Kiss), 07/01/2019
Android Tablet Touchscreen

Az új S-osztály A Galaxy Tab S5e nagyon hasonlít a Galaxy Tab S4-hez. Viszont míg az utóbbi jelenleg a Samsung zászlóshajó táblagépe, addig a Tab S5e lényegesen olcsóbb, közel 400 Euró. A középkategóriás táblagép körülbelül 20 %-kal könnyebb is. A Samsung azonban nem takarékoskodott a hardverrel, hogy kedvezőbb árat hozzon ki, ami miatt egyeseknek jobb választás lehet a Tab S5e-t, mint a drágább testvére.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Galaxy Tab S Széria)
Processzor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
Grafikus adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 616
Memória
4096 MB 
, LPDDR4X
Kijelző
10.5 hüvelyk 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 288 PPI, 10 pontos multitouch érintőképernyő, Super AMOLED, WQXGA, adaptív fényerő, Gorilla Glass 3, fényes: igen
Háttértár
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 48.2 GB ingyenes
Csatlakozók
1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audió csatlakozók: USB Type-C, Kártyaolvasó: microSD kártyák 512 GB-ig, 1 Ujjlenyomat olvasó, Brightness Sensor, Szenzorok: Gyorsulásmérő, ujjlenyomat scanner, girométer, hall szenzor, Wi-Fi Direct, USB OTG, ANT +, dokkoló port (Samsung Pogo Pins), Samsung DeX
Hálózat
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GPS
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 5.5 x 245 x 160
Akkumulátor
7040 mAh Lítium-Ion
Operációs rendszer
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix 1/3.4", f/2.0, 8x digitális zoom, fotók max. 4128x3096 (4:3), videók max. 3,840 x 2,160/30 FPS (UHD)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix 1/4.0", f/2.0, széles látószög, fotók max. 3265x2448 (4:3), videók max. 1,920 x 1,080/30 FPS (Full HD)
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: AKG Quad hangszórók Dolby Atmos-szal, Billentyűzet: virtuális, Moduláris töltő (9 V/1.67 A, 5 V/2 A), USB kábel Type-A-ról Type-C-re, 3.5 mm jack adapter (USB Type-C), SIM kiadó eszköz, gyors kezelési útmutató, One UI 1.1, 24 Hónap Garancia, fanless
Súly
400 g, Tápegység: 30 g
Ár
429 Euró
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

262 mm 159 mm 9.8 mm 497 g258.7 mm 171.8 mm 7.3 mm 498 g250.6 mm 174.1 mm 6.1 mm 456 g249 mm 164 mm 7 mm 482 g245 mm 160 mm 5.5 mm 400 g242 mm 167 mm 7 mm 440 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPad Air 2019
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
540 (min: 499, max: 581) MBit/s ∼100% +56%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
Adreno 616, 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash
346 (min: 329, max: 362) MBit/s ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
290 MBit/s ∼54% -16%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
PowerVR GX6250, MT8173, 64 GB eMMC Flash
241 MBit/s ∼45% -30%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
214 MBit/s ∼40% -38%
Lenovo Tab P10
Adreno 506, 450, 64 GB eMMC Flash
214 (min: 206, max: 223) MBit/s ∼40% -38%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
580 MBit/s ∼100% +101%
Apple iPad Air 2019
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
553 (min: 481, max: 580) MBit/s ∼95% +91%
Lenovo Tab P10
Adreno 506, 450, 64 GB eMMC Flash
326 (min: 314, max: 338) MBit/s ∼56% +13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
Adreno 616, 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash
289 (min: 229, max: 300) MBit/s ∼50%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
237 MBit/s ∼41% -18%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
PowerVR GX6250, MT8173, 64 GB eMMC Flash
227 MBit/s ∼39% -21%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø346 (329-362)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø289 (229-300)
GPS Test: Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e – Overview
GPS Test: Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e – Overview
GPS Test: Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e – Cycling around a lake
GPS Test: Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e – Cycling around a lake
GPS Test: Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e - Loop
GPS Test: Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e - Loop
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 – Cycling around a lake
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 – Cycling around a lake
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 – Loop
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 – Loop

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
435
cd/m²
436
cd/m²
440
cd/m²
445
cd/m²
452
cd/m²
460
cd/m²
462
cd/m²
467
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 481 cd/m² Átlag: 453.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.74 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 90 %
Centrumban: 452 cd/m²
Kontraszt: ∞:1 (Fekete: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.7 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
97.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.07
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
Super AMOLED, 2560x1600, 10.5
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Apple iPad Air 2019
IPS, 2224x1668, 10.5
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
IPS, 2560x1600, 10.8
Lenovo Tab P10
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
Super AMOLED, 2560x1600, 10.5
Screen
-69%
-2%
-34%
-131%
-14%
Brightness middle
452
426
-6%
515
14%
382
-15%
522
15%
474
5%
Brightness
453
399
-12%
483
7%
378
-17%
495
9%
477
5%
Brightness Distribution
90
91
1%
90
0%
92
2%
84
-7%
91
1%
Black Level *
0.38
0.41
0.24
0.41
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.7
4.5
-165%
1.6
6%
2.8
-65%
6.7
-294%
2.5
-47%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.7
7.9
-114%
4.4
-19%
6
-62%
12.2
-230%
5.8
-57%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.4
5.2
-117%
2.8
-17%
3.5
-46%
9.1
-279%
2.1
12%
Gamma
2.07 106%
2.23 99%
2.21 100%
2.33 94%
2.14 103%
2.08 106%
CCT
6337 103%
6875 95%
6944 94%
6903 94%
9417 69%
6281 103%
Contrast
1121
1256
1592
1273

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 245.1 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 245.1 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 245.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9266 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.8 ms rise
↘ 2.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.6 ms).
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
11575 Points ∼26% +90%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
7930 Points ∼18% +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (6090 - 6479, n=3)
6348 Points ∼14% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
6090 Points ∼14%
Average of class Tablet (862 - 43802, n=38)
6015 Points ∼14% -1%
Lenovo Tab P10
3261 Points ∼7% -46%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1562 Points ∼4% -74%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Apple iPad Air 2019
11490 Points ∼20% +100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
6477 Points ∼11% +13%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
5809 Points ∼10% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
5742 Points ∼10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (5164 - 5742, n=3)
5359 Points ∼9% -7%
Average of class Tablet (1106 - 18041, n=55)
4639 Points ∼8% -19%
Lenovo Tab P10
3705 Points ∼6% -35%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
3305 Points ∼6% -42%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Apple iPad Air 2019
4758 Points ∼75% +178%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
1893 Points ∼30% +11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
1712 Points ∼27%
Average of class Tablet (429 - 5002, n=55)
1653 Points ∼26% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1616 - 1712, n=3)
1651 Points ∼26% -4%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1634 Points ∼26% -5%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1204 Points ∼19% -30%
Lenovo Tab P10
747 Points ∼12% -56%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (6698 - 7387, n=3)
7154 Points ∼60% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
6698 Points ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
6315 Points ∼53% -6%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
5114 Points ∼43% -24%
Average of class Tablet (2345 - 9615, n=40)
4415 Points ∼37% -34%
Lenovo Tab P10
4250 Points ∼36% -37%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
3678 Points ∼31% -45%
Work performance score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (8126 - 9458, n=3)
8994 Points ∼46% +11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
8126 Points ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
6954 Points ∼35% -14%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
5040 Points ∼26% -38%
Lenovo Tab P10
4949 Points ∼25% -39%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4895 Points ∼25% -40%
Average of class Tablet (1873 - 11644, n=79)
4799 Points ∼24% -41%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Average of class Tablet (2053 - 2992, n=3)
2444 Points ∼16% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2288 - 2314, n=2)
2301 Points ∼15% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2288 Points ∼15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (612 - 5819, n=3)
2613 Points ∼18% +86%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1408 - 1416, n=2)
1412 Points ∼10% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
1408 Points ∼10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (725 - 4809, n=3)
2358 Points ∼16% +53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1540 - 1550, n=2)
1545 Points ∼10% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
1540 Points ∼10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Apple iPad Air 2019
3347 Points ∼42% +38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
2919 Points ∼37% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2424 - 2763, n=3)
2573 Points ∼32% +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2424 Points ∼30%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2323 Points ∼29% -4%
Lenovo Tab P10
1793 Points ∼23% -26%
Average of class Tablet (650 - 3919, n=42)
1768 Points ∼22% -27%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1386 Points ∼17% -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Apple iPad Air 2019
6484 Points ∼77% +302%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
4086 Points ∼49% +153%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2069 Points ∼25% +28%
Average of class Tablet (99 - 6993, n=42)
1921 Points ∼23% +19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
1612 Points ∼19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1611 - 1612, n=3)
1612 Points ∼19% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
528 Points ∼6% -67%
Lenovo Tab P10
414 Points ∼5% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Apple iPad Air 2019
5367 Points ∼78% +208%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3753 Points ∼54% +115%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2121 Points ∼31% +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1742 - 1772, n=3)
1756 Points ∼25% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
1742 Points ∼25%
Average of class Tablet (129 - 5816, n=42)
1670 Points ∼24% -4%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
612 Points ∼9% -65%
Lenovo Tab P10
499 Points ∼7% -71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Apple iPad Air 2019
3493 Points ∼74% +45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
2952 Points ∼63% +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2413 - 2771, n=3)
2560 Points ∼54% +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2413 Points ∼51%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2101 Points ∼45% -13%
Lenovo Tab P10
1793 Points ∼38% -26%
Average of class Tablet (739 - 4700, n=50)
1685 Points ∼36% -30%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1399 Points ∼30% -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Apple iPad Air 2019
15399 Points ∼54% +508%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3682 Points ∼13% +45%
Average of class Tablet (165 - 28751, n=50)
3312 Points ∼12% +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2533 - 2537, n=3)
2535 Points ∼9% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2534 Points ∼9%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2208 Points ∼8% -13%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
754 Points ∼3% -70%
Lenovo Tab P10
711 Points ∼2% -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Apple iPad Air 2019
8763 Points ∼65% +250%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3753 Points ∼28% +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2506 - 2582, n=3)
2539 Points ∼19% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2506 Points ∼19%
Average of class Tablet (207 - 13454, n=50)
2193 Points ∼16% -12%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2183 Points ∼16% -13%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
840 Points ∼6% -66%
Lenovo Tab P10
821 Points ∼6% -67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Apple iPad Air 2019
3312 Points ∼73% +36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
2952 Points ∼65% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2436 - 2728, n=3)
2543 Points ∼56% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2436 Points ∼54%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2419 Points ∼54% -1%
Lenovo Tab P10
1832 Points ∼41% -25%
Average of class Tablet (793 - 3695, n=57)
1694 Points ∼37% -30%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1363 Points ∼30% -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Apple iPad Air 2019
5760 Points ∼81% +297%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3682 Points ∼51% +154%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1504 Points ∼21% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1451 - 1487, n=3)
1473 Points ∼21% +2%
Average of class Tablet (55 - 6128, n=57)
1463 Points ∼20% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
1451 Points ∼20%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
413 Points ∼6% -72%
Lenovo Tab P10
364 Points ∼5% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Apple iPad Air 2019
4949 Points ∼78% +210%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3490 Points ∼55% +119%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1642 Points ∼26% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1594 - 1651, n=3)
1625 Points ∼26% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
1594 Points ∼25%
Average of class Tablet (70 - 5346, n=59)
1348 Points ∼21% -15%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
489 Points ∼8% -69%
Lenovo Tab P10
443 Points ∼7% -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Apple iPad Air 2019
3180 Points ∼70% +29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
2952 Points ∼65% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2456 - 2708, n=3)
2551 Points ∼56% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2456 Points ∼54%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2445 Points ∼54% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10
1814 Points ∼40% -26%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 3678, n=62)
1573 Points ∼35% -36%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1347 Points ∼30% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Apple iPad Air 2019
10647 Points ∼94% +352%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3682 Points ∼33% +56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2357 - 2428, n=3)
2401 Points ∼21% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2357 Points ∼21%
Average of class Tablet (42 - 10647, n=62)
2028 Points ∼18% -14%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1719 Points ∼15% -27%
Lenovo Tab P10
691 Points ∼6% -71%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
598 Points ∼5% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Apple iPad Air 2019
6997 Points ∼86% +194%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3490 Points ∼43% +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2378 - 2477, n=3)
2432 Points ∼30% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2378 Points ∼29%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1840 Points ∼23% -23%
Average of class Tablet (53 - 6997, n=63)
1633 Points ∼20% -31%
Lenovo Tab P10
801 Points ∼10% -66%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
682 Points ∼8% -71%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Apple iPad Air 2019
27663 Points ∼32% +112%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
19037 Points ∼22% +46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (13055 - 18523, n=3)
15403 Points ∼18% +18%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
15117 Points ∼17% +16%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
14698 Points ∼17% +13%
Lenovo Tab P10
14108 Points ∼16% +8%
Average of class Tablet (3675 - 51374, n=154)
13484 Points ∼16% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
13055 Points ∼15%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Apple iPad Air 2019
160399 Points ∼30% +617%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
56368 Points ∼11% +152%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
35210 Points ∼7% +57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (22381 - 35596, n=3)
31126 Points ∼6% +39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
22381 Points ∼4%
Average of class Tablet (2109 - 194856, n=154)
21062 Points ∼4% -6%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
12771 Points ∼2% -43%
Lenovo Tab P10
12400 Points ∼2% -45%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Air 2019
77626 Points ∼33% +302%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
39260 Points ∼17% +103%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
26875 Points ∼11% +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (19315 - 29229, n=3)
25181 Points ∼11% +30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
19315 Points ∼8%
Average of class Tablet (2411 - 106954, n=155)
16463 Points ∼7% -15%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
13227 Points ∼6% -32%
Lenovo Tab P10
12743 Points ∼5% -34%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Apple iPad Air 2019
261 fps ∼2% +467%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
96 fps ∼1% +109%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
69 fps ∼1% +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (46 - 58, n=3)
54 fps ∼0% +17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
46 fps ∼0%
Average of class Tablet (1 - 451, n=177)
33.8 fps ∼0% -27%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
22 fps ∼0% -52%
Lenovo Tab P10
21 fps ∼0% -54%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Apple iPad Air 2019
59.9 fps ∼2% +87%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
58 fps ∼2% +81%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (32 - 53, n=3)
45.7 fps ∼1% +43%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
40 fps ∼1% +25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
32 fps ∼1%
Average of class Tablet (1.1 - 120, n=181)
21.7 fps ∼1% -32%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
21 fps ∼1% -34%
Lenovo Tab P10
20 fps ∼1% -37%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Apple iPad Air 2019
139 fps ∼25% +379%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
60 fps ∼11% +107%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
44 fps ∼8% +52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
29 fps ∼5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (29 - 29, n=3)
29 fps ∼5% 0%
Average of class Tablet (1.6 - 220, n=112)
23.2 fps ∼4% -20%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
9.9 fps ∼2% -66%
Lenovo Tab P10
9.2 fps ∼2% -68%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPad Air 2019
58.5 fps ∼16% +244%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
36 fps ∼10% +112%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
26 fps ∼7% +53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (17 - 28, n=3)
24 fps ∼7% +41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
17 fps ∼5%
Average of class Tablet (1.9 - 110, n=118)
15.6 fps ∼4% -8%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
9.5 fps ∼3% -44%
Lenovo Tab P10
8.7 fps ∼2% -49%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 2019
96 fps ∼2% +405%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
41 fps ∼1% +116%
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 173, n=64)
21.8 fps ∼0% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (19 - 20, n=3)
19.7 fps ∼0% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
19 fps ∼0%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
18 fps ∼0% -5%
Lenovo Tab P10
6 fps ∼0% -68%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4.9 fps ∼0% -74%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad Air 2019
51.2 fps ∼1% +642%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
22 fps ∼1% +219%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
15 fps ∼0% +117%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (6.9 - 19, n=3)
15 fps ∼0% +117%
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 95, n=64)
13.7 fps ∼0% +99%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
6.9 fps ∼0%
Lenovo Tab P10
5.7 fps ∼0% -17%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4.7 fps ∼0% -32%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Air 2019
26.4 fps ∼17% +514%
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 49, n=15)
12.4 fps ∼8% +188%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
8.9 fps ∼6% +107%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (4.3 - 7.2, n=3)
5.3 fps ∼3% +23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
4.3 fps ∼3%
Lenovo Tab P10
1.9 fps ∼1% -56%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 2019
26.3 fps ∼19% +498%
Average of class Tablet (1 - 51.1, n=15)
13.4 fps ∼10% +205%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
9.3 fps ∼7% +111%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (4.4 - 7, n=3)
5.3 fps ∼4% +20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
4.4 fps ∼3%
Lenovo Tab P10
1.1 fps ∼1% -75%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Air 2019
40.4 fps ∼20% +494%
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 58, n=15)
18.1 fps ∼9% +166%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
14 fps ∼7% +106%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (6.8 - 11, n=3)
9.6 fps ∼5% +41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
6.8 fps ∼3%
Lenovo Tab P10
3.2 fps ∼2% -53%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 2019
70.5 fps ∼21% +488%
Average of class Tablet (2.8 - 134, n=15)
36.1 fps ∼11% +201%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
25 fps ∼7% +108%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
12 fps ∼3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (12 - 12, n=3)
12 fps ∼3% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10
3.4 fps ∼1% -72%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 2019
62.8 fps ∼16% +639%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
25 fps ∼6% +194%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
18 fps ∼5% +112%
Average of class Tablet (1.8 - 107, n=41)
15.9 fps ∼4% +87%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (8.5 - 11, n=3)
10.2 fps ∼3% +20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
8.5 fps ∼2%
Lenovo Tab P10
3.4 fps ∼1% -60%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2 fps ∼1% -76%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad Air 2019
35.8 fps ∼21% +459%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
13 fps ∼8% +103%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
10 fps ∼6% +56%
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 47, n=41)
9.27 fps ∼5% +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (6.4 - 11, n=3)
9.13 fps ∼5% +43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
6.4 fps ∼4%
Lenovo Tab P10
3.3 fps ∼2% -48%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2 fps ∼1% -69%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
21.79 (min: 12.48, max: 36) fps ∼0% +66%
Average of class Tablet (8.72 - 21.8, n=3)
14.5 fps ∼0% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (13.1 - 13.8, n=2)
13.4 fps ∼0% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
13.1 fps ∼0%
Vulkan Medium Native
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
14.78 (min: 9.16, max: 37.68) fps ∼1% +93%
Average of class Tablet (7.67 - 14.8, n=2)
11.2 fps ∼0% +46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (7.67 - 11.6, n=2)
9.65 fps ∼0% +26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
7.67 fps ∼0%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
22.71 (min: 13.73, max: 55.41) fps ∼1% +89%
Average of class Tablet (12 - 22.7, n=2)
17.4 fps ∼0% +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (12 - 12.5, n=2)
12.2 fps ∼0% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
12.04 fps ∼0%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 2019
370545 Points ∼65% +136%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
201881 Points ∼36% +29%
Average of class Tablet (20856 - 566378, n=31)
165344 Points ∼29% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
156772 Points ∼28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (153450 - 158868, n=3)
156363 Points ∼28% 0%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
113687 Points ∼20% -27%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
77717 Points ∼14% -50%
Lenovo Tab P10
71739 Points ∼13% -54%
VRMark - Amber Room
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3130 Score ∼62% +120%
Average of class Tablet (1423 - 3130, n=2)
2277 Score ∼45% +60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1423 - 1473, n=2)
1448 Score ∼29% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
1423 Score ∼28%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Apple iPad Air 2019
1734 Points ∼18% +52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
1218 Points ∼13% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1144 - 1229, n=3)
1186 Points ∼13% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
1144 Points ∼12%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1010 Points ∼11% -12%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
811 Points ∼9% -29%
Average of class Tablet (9 - 2034, n=109)
765 Points ∼8% -33%
Lenovo Tab P10
734 Points ∼8% -36%
Graphics
Apple iPad Air 2019
15614 Points ∼54% +454%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
6080 Points ∼21% +116%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2816 Points ∼10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2815 - 2818, n=3)
2816 Points ∼10% 0%
Average of class Tablet (98 - 28853, n=110)
2314 Points ∼8% -18%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1602 Points ∼6% -43%
Lenovo Tab P10
951 Points ∼3% -66%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
833 Points ∼3% -70%
Memory
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2894 - 3316, n=3)
3166 Points ∼42% +9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
2900 Points ∼39% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2894 Points ∼39%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2654 Points ∼35% -8%
Apple iPad Air 2019
2095 Points ∼28% -28%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1513 Points ∼20% -48%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 5617, n=110)
1113 Points ∼15% -62%
Lenovo Tab P10
853 Points ∼11% -71%
System
Apple iPad Air 2019
12591 Points ∼76% +137%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
5537 Points ∼34% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (5315 - 5507, n=3)
5434 Points ∼33% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
5315 Points ∼32%
Lenovo Tab P10
2861 Points ∼17% -46%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2838 Points ∼17% -47%
Average of class Tablet (482 - 16467, n=110)
2516 Points ∼15% -53%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2329 Points ∼14% -56%
Overall
Apple iPad Air 2019
5169 Points ∼61% +95%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3302 Points ∼39% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2653 - 2811, n=3)
2753 Points ∼33% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2653 Points ∼31%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1769 Points ∼21% -33%
Average of class Tablet (150 - 8450, n=109)
1322 Points ∼16% -50%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1312 Points ∼16% -51%
Lenovo Tab P10
1142 Points ∼14% -57%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score
Apple iPad Air 2019
2873 Points ∼54% +547%
Average of class Tablet (301 - 5300, n=15)
1730 Points ∼33% +290%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (444 - 447, n=2)
446 Points ∼8% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
444 Points ∼8%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Qualcomm Adreno 616, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 Mediatek MT8173, PowerVR GX6250, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPad Air 2019 Apple A12 Bionic, Apple A12 Bionic GPU, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 HiSilicon Kirin 960s, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Tab P10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 2019 (Safari Mobile 12)
109.573 Points ∼100% +226%
Average of class Tablet (22.1 - 110, n=6)
69.7 Points ∼64% +107%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136)
33.6 Points ∼31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (32.1 - 33.6, n=3)
33.1 Points ∼30% -1%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPad Air 2019 (Safari Mobile 12)
156 Points ∼100% +136%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (Samsung Browser 8.0)
77 Points ∼49% +17%
Average of class Tablet (23 - 182, n=22)
76.7 Points ∼49% +16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136)
66 Points ∼42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (62 - 66, n=2)
64 Points ∼41% -3%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad Air 2019 (Safari Mobile 12)
123 runs/min ∼100% +265%
Average of class Tablet (11.1 - 132, n=12)
60.1 runs/min ∼49% +78%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136)
33.74 runs/min ∼27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (32.5 - 33.7, n=2)
33.1 runs/min ∼27% -2%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 2019 (Safari Mobile 12)
41770 Points ∼100% +269%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (Samsung Browser 8.0)
12897 Points ∼31% +14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136)
11312 Points ∼27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (10844 - 11312, n=3)
11071 Points ∼27% -2%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
8570 Points ∼21% -24%
Average of class Tablet (1238 - 45734, n=173)
7001 Points ∼17% -38%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)
6802 Points ∼16% -40%
Lenovo Tab P10 (Chrome 71)
4075 Points ∼10% -64%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Lenovo Tab P10 (Chrome 71)
11352 ms * ∼100% -225%
Average of class Tablet (603 - 43092, n=184)
9122 ms * ∼80% -161%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)
5947 ms * ∼52% -70%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
3975.5 ms * ∼35% -14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136)
3496.3 ms * ∼31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (3361 - 3589, n=3)
3482 ms * ∼31% -0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (Samsung Browser 8.0)
2644.7 ms * ∼23% +24%
Apple iPad Air 2019 (Safari Mobile 12)
643.5 ms * ∼6% +82%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720Amazon Fire HD 10 2017Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8Lenovo Tab P10Samsung Galaxy Tab S4Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-38%
29%
-7%
44%
-4%
-53%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
60.76 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
30.14 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-50%
73.84 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
22%
60.95 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
59.08 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
57.4 (11.2 - 74.7, n=103)
-6%
45.9 (14 - 73.8, n=53)
-24%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
76.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
55.49 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-27%
85.14 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
12%
84.28 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
11%
80.07 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
76.4 (21.1 - 87.2, n=103)
0%
63.7 (17.6 - 87.7, n=53)
-16%
Random Write 4KB
18.79
9.37
-50%
60.8
224%
15.75
-16%
24.43
30%
25 (3.4 - 125, n=116)
33%
6.66 (0.13 - 170, n=204)
-65%
Random Read 4KB
79.19
27.72
-65%
54.7
-31%
53.9
-32%
141.96
79%
54.8 (11.4 - 149, n=116)
-31%
19.6 (1.04 - 192, n=204)
-75%
Sequential Write 256KB
197.05
147.67
-25%
126.8
-36%
205.74
4%
195.76
-1%
172 (40 - 246, n=116)
-13%
41.3 (2.04 - 522, n=204)
-79%
Sequential Read 256KB
294.35
262.2
-11%
247.8
-16%
276.7
-6%
740.54
152%
273 (95.6 - 704, n=116)
-7%
117 (6.75 - 1416, n=204)
-60%
PUBG Mobile
010203040Tooltip
; 0.12.0: Ø29.5 (7-31)
Dead Trigger 2
010203040506070Tooltip
; 1.5.5: Ø60.1 (49-61)
Shadow Fight 3
010203040506070Tooltip
; 1.18.3: Ø59.6 (2-61)
Max. terhelés
 32.6 °C29 °C28.1 °C 
 33.1 °C28.8 °C28 °C 
 31.8 °C30.7 °C29.6 °C 
Maximum: 33.1 °C
Átlag: 30.2 °C
27.9 °C29.1 °C29.8 °C
27.6 °C28.4 °C30.4 °C
27.7 °C28.8 °C31.2 °C
Maximum: 31.2 °C
Átlag: 29 °C
Tápegység (max.)  31.1 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.1 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 34.8 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.2 to 51.8 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
Heat map of the front of the device under load
Heat map of the front of the device under load
Heat map of the rear of the device under load
Heat map of the rear of the device under load
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.143.32527.434.43125.525.54024.527.45036.136.56326.127.88024.333.610022.14212519.145.616020.25820019.460.225016.560.331515.168.140015.366.95001471.163014.570.78001473.8100014.573.6125014.572.7160014.374200014.673.225001470315014.765.5400014.365.4500014.870.4630014.671.2800014.470.81000014.671.41250014.764.9160001552.9SPL26.783.3N0.860.4median 14.6median 70Delta1.55.428.630.224.926.624.624.426.422.530.824.623.619.820.221.119.928.817.642.919.159.719.159.617.456.616.961.616.863.515.166.316.567.815.666.41561.915.565.115.367.615.771.515.569.715.572.815.467.915.8641663.815.860.816.154.716.151.617.349.727.979.9146.4median 16median 63.50.65.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.9% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.02 / 0.37 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 2.07 / 3.94 / 3.96 Watt
Terhelés midlight 4.07 / 5.73 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
7040 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
6300 mAh
Apple iPad Air 2019
8134 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
7500 mAh
Lenovo Tab P10
7000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
7300 mAh
Power Consumption
-26%
-60%
-56%
-3%
-8%
Idle Minimum *
2.07
1.55
25%
2.18
-5%
2.01
3%
1.01
51%
1.76
15%
Idle Average *
3.94
4.17
-6%
6.4
-62%
5.4
-37%
4.16
-6%
4.22
-7%
Idle Maximum *
3.96
4.25
-7%
6.43
-62%
5.44
-37%
4.17
-5%
4.25
-7%
Load Average *
4.07
7.13
-75%
7.48
-84%
8.55
-110%
5.45
-34%
4.52
-11%
Load Maximum *
5.73
9.63
-68%
10.65
-86%
11.53
-101%
6.9
-20%
7.35
-28%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
21h 03min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10h 23min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14h 24min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
5h 00min
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
7040 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
6300 mAh
Apple iPad Air 2019
8134 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
7500 mAh
Lenovo Tab P10
7000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
7300 mAh
Battery Runtime
-20%
-3%
-11%
16%
-14%
Reader / Idle
1263
960
-24%
1501
19%
1344
6%
1315
4%
1227
-3%
H.264
864
585
-32%
684
-21%
702
-19%
910
5%
735
-15%
WiFi v1.3
623
542
-13%
738
18%
648
4%
992
59%
495
-21%
Load
300
274
-9%
214
-29%
196
-35%
289
-4%
245
-18%

Pro

+ lapos és merev kialakítás
+ aránylag könnyű ahhoz képest, hogy egy 10,5 hüvelykes táblagép
+ Samsung DeX támogatás
+ gyors Wi-Fi
+ lenyűgöző Super AMOLED kijelző
+ szolid SoC teljesítmény
+ a modern játékok zökkenőmentesen futnak
+ négyes hangszórók
+ Dolby Atmos támogatás
+ alacsony felületi hőmérséklet terhelés alatt is
+ jó üzemidő

Kontra

- nincs IP-tanúsítvány
- nincs NFC
- átlagos kamerák
- PWM kijelző villogás
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e Tablet rövid értékelés. Test device courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de.
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e Tablet rövid értékelés. Test device courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de.

A Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e kitűnő ár-érték arányt nyújt, és egy minden szempontból szolid táblagép. A készülék egy élénk és kontraszt-gazdag Super AMOLED 10.5 hüvelykes kijelzővel rendelkezik, és egy SoC-vel, amely a legkomplexebb modern játékokkal is boldogul. Úgyszintén, a hangszórók magával ragadó játékélményt biztosítanak, míg az üzemidő sem fog csalódást okozni hosszabb játékok vagy filmnézés közben.

A táblagép jól felépített és könnyű, ami nem minden esetben van így a középkategóriás táblagépeknél. A fém szerkezetnek és a vékony kijelző kereteknek köszönhetően drágábbnak is néz ki, mint amilyen. Emellett a beépített DeX támogatás és az opcionális billentyűzet tok miatt a Tab S5e több, mint egy egyszerű multimédia táblagép.

Van néhány gyenge pont, de tényleg kevés. A Samsung átlagos kamerákkal szerelte fel a táblagépet, és az NFC chip kihagyása kiábrándító. Ugyanakkor javasoljuk a Tab S5e személyes kipróbálását azoknak, akik PWM  érzékenyek, mivel a kijelző olyan gyakorisággal villog, hogy hosszantartó használat során fejfájást és a szemek megterhelését okozhatja.

A Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e méltó alternatívája a drágább táblagépeknek, mint amilyen a Tab S4 és az iPad Air (2019).  Gyakorlatilag mindent megad, amit a legtöbb ember egy táblagéptől szeretne, de megfizethetőbb áron és sok kompromisszum nélkül.

Összességében a Tab S5e nemcsak az egyik legjobb ár-érték arányú táblagép, ami jelenleg kapható, hanem még az erősebb táblagépekkel is felveszi a versenyt. Összességében azért a Tab S4 marad a jobbik multimédia tablet, köszönhetően az erősebb SoC-nek, nagyobb RAM kapacitásnak és a gyorsabb belső tárhelynek. A tolltámogatás beépítése is a Tab S4 mellett szól.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 - 09/16/2019 v7
Manuel Masiero

Váz
86 / 98 → 88%
Billentyűzet
75 / 80 → 93%
Érintőpad
88%
Csatlakoztathatóság
55 / 70 → 78%
Súly
85 / 40-88 → 93%
Akkumulátor
89%
Kijelző
88%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
16 / 78 → 21%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
57 / 92 → 62%
Hőmérséklet
93%
Zaj
100%
Audio
89 / 91 → 98%
Camera
45 / 85 → 53%
Átlag
74%
84%
Tablet - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e (Wi-Fi) Tablet rövid értékelés
Manuel Masiero, 2019-07- 1 (Update: 2019-07- 1)