Motorola Moto G Pro Smartphone rövid értékelés - Olcsó Tollas Okostelefon
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.0, 1 µm, videók Full [email protected]
Competing Devices
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
77 % | 09/2020 | Motorola Moto G Pro SD 665, Adreno 610 | 192 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.40" | 2300x1080 | |
79 % | 04/2020 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T SD 665, Adreno 610 | 200 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.30" | 2340x1080 | |
78 % | 06/2020 | Motorola Moto G8 Power SD 665, Adreno 610 | 197 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.40" | 2300x1080 | |
82 % | 02/2020 | Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18 | 199 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.70" | 2400x1080 | |
80 % | 07/2018 | LG Q Stylus MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2 | 172 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.20" | 2160x1080 |
» A Top 10 multimédiás noteszgép - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 játékos noteszgép
» A Top 10 belépő szintű üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 notebook munkaállomása
» A Top 10 okostelefon - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 táblagép
» A Top 10 Windows tabletje
» A Top 10 subnotebook - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 300 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 120 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 phabletje (>5.5-inch)
» A Top 10 noteszgép 500 EUR (~160.000 HUF) alatt
» A Top 10 "pehelysúlyú" gaming notebookja
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.5 - 1414, n=302, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite | |
Motorola Moto G Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T | |
LG Q Stylus | |
Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite | |
Average of class Smartphone (5.59 - 1599, n=302, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Moto G Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T | |
Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
LG Q Stylus |
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Daylight scene 1Daylight scene 2Low-light environment

|
Fényerő megoszlás: 97 %
Centrumban: 735 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1470:1 (Fekete: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.84 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 5.9 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
92.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.342
Motorola Moto G Pro IPS, 2300x1080, 6.40 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T IPS, 2340x1080, 6.30 | Motorola Moto G8 Power IPS, 2300x1080, 6.40 | Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.70 | LG Q Stylus IPS, 2160x1080, 6.20 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 11% | -19% | -16% | -7% | |
Brightness middle | 735 | 628 -15% | 462 -37% | 510 -31% | 458 -38% |
Brightness | 732 | 631 -14% | 483 -34% | 536 -27% | 441 -40% |
Brightness Distribution | 97 | 93 -4% | 93 -4% | 91 -6% | 94 -3% |
Black Level * | 0.5 | 0.54 -8% | 0.65 -30% | 0.51 -2% | |
Contrast | 1470 | 1163 -21% | 711 -52% | 898 -39% | |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 5.84 | 2 66% | 5.7 2% | 6.6 -13% | 4.5 23% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 10.2 | 5.1 50% | 8.9 13% | 17.56 -72% | 7.1 30% |
Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 5.9 | 3.7 37% | 6.5 -10% | 2.9 51% | 5.1 14% |
Gamma | 2.342 94% | 2.17 101% | 2.303 96% | 2.242 98% | 2.33 94% |
CCT | 7897 82% | 6230 104% | 8073 81% | 6989 93% | 7381 88% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 59.52 Hz | ≤ 15 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 59.52 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 15 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 59.52 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9711 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 151500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9 ms rise | |
↘ 11 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.2 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise | |
↘ 23 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (38.5 ms). |
Geekbench 5.3 | |
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto G Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T | |
Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (432 - 483, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (70 - 4043, n=61, last 2 years) | |
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto G Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T | |
Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (363 - 368, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (272 - 4739, n=56, last 2 years) | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto G Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T | |
Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1256 - 1421, n=8) | |
Average of class Smartphone (248 - 4201, n=189, last 2 years) | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto G Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T | |
Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (309 - 314, n=8) | |
Average of class Smartphone (58 - 1604, n=189, last 2 years) |
PCMark for Android | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto G Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T | |
Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6189 - 11432, n=12) | |
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 15299, n=278, last 2 years) | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto G Pro | |
Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite | |
LG Q Stylus | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (7437 - 9051, n=10) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2689 - 19989, n=256, last 2 years) |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto G Pro | |
Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite | |
LG Q Stylus | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (35 - 37, n=10) | |
Average of class Smartphone (4.3 - 322, n=231, last 2 years) | |
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto G Pro | |
Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite | |
LG Q Stylus | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (30 - 52, n=10) | |
Average of class Smartphone (8.2 - 143, n=231, last 2 years) |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto G Pro | |
Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite | |
LG Q Stylus | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (19 - 20, n=10) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 180, n=230, last 2 years) | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto G Pro | |
Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite | |
LG Q Stylus | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (15 - 34, n=10) | |
Average of class Smartphone (4.5 - 120, n=229, last 2 years) |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto G Pro | |
Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite | |
LG Q Stylus | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (13 - 13, n=10) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.4 - 117, n=227, last 2 years) | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto G Pro | |
Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite | |
LG Q Stylus | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (10 - 27, n=10) | |
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 106, n=227, last 2 years) |
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto G Pro | |
Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (167305 - 181432, n=9) | |
Average of class Smartphone (53335 - 727247, n=162, last 2 years) |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (10.9 - 161, n=195, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80) | |
Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (22.9 - 31.2, n=6) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 375, n=199, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80) | |
Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106) | |
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (33.4 - 51, n=8) | |
LG Q Stylus (hrome 69) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 196, n=170, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chome 80) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (25.4 - 30.8, n=6) | |
Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106) |
WebXPRT 3 - --- | |
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=214, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80) | |
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80) | |
Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (38 - 58, n=9) | |
LG Q Stylus (Chrome 69) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=226, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80) | |
Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6133 - 9671, n=9) | |
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80) | |
LG Q Stylus (hrome 69) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score | |
LG Q Stylus (hrome 69) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (4434 - 6719, n=9) | |
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80) | |
Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106) | |
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80) |
* ... smaller is better
Motorola Moto G Pro | Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T | Motorola Moto G8 Power | Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite | LG Q Stylus | Average 128 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 2% | 0% | 52% | -30% | -6% | 44% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 55.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | 52.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -5% | 49.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -11% | 59.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 7% | 63.55 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 14% | 62.5 (26.1 - 81.9, n=33) 12% | 59 (1.7 - 83.3, n=207, last 2 years) 6% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 73.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | 71.63 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -2% | 69.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -5% | 73.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0% | 83.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 13% | 78 (29.2 - 154, n=33) 6% | 76.9 (13.4 - 154, n=207, last 2 years) 5% |
Random Write 4KB | 89.36 | 91.15 2% | 132.63 48% | 142 59% | 12.07 -86% | 44.3 (8.48 - 151, n=36) -50% | 100 (4.31 - 319, n=287, last 2 years) 12% |
Random Read 4KB | 65.51 | 90.38 38% | 57.7 -12% | 132 101% | 31.45 -52% | 76.2 (20.7 - 247, n=36) 16% | 121 (13.5 - 325, n=287, last 2 years) 85% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 233.63 | 173.95 -26% | 181.88 -22% | 190.8 -18% | 121.4 -48% | 191 (90 - 314, n=36) -18% | 286 (11.9 - 1321, n=287, last 2 years) 22% |
Sequential Read 256KB | 294.07 | 315.75 7% | 300.9 2% | 776.7 164% | 241.7 -18% | 288 (107 - 501, n=36) -2% | 683 (41.9 - 2037, n=287, last 2 years) 132% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
Motorola Moto G Pro audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Motorola Moto G8 Power audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlét | ![]() ![]() |
Üresjárat | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Terhelés |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Motorola Moto G Pro 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T 4000 mAh | Motorola Moto G8 Power 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite 4500 mAh | LG Q Stylus 3300 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 30% | 30% | -9% | 34% | 17% | 16% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.6 | 0.62 61% | 0.9 44% | 0.9 44% | 0.69 57% | 1.017 (0.62 - 1.7, n=11) 36% | 0.915 (0.37 - 2.3, n=246, last 2 years) 43% |
Idle Average * | 2.3 | 1.77 23% | 1.3 43% | 1.6 30% | 1.7 26% | 1.893 (1.3 - 2.3, n=11) 18% | 1.827 (0.82 - 3.94, n=246, last 2 years) 21% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.8 | 1.8 36% | 1.6 43% | 1.9 32% | 1.73 38% | 2.36 (1.6 - 3.5, n=11) 16% | 2.12 (0.85 - 4.2, n=246, last 2 years) 24% |
Load Average * | 4.2 | 3.42 19% | 3.2 24% | 8.4 -100% | 3.21 24% | 3.77 (2.61 - 4.7, n=11) 10% | 4.39 (1.94 - 8.4, n=246, last 2 years) -5% |
Load Maximum * | 6.9 | 6.14 11% | 7.1 -3% | 10.3 -49% | 5.31 23% | 6.66 (5.12 - 7.7, n=11) 3% | 7.11 (3.06 - 12.3, n=246, last 2 years) -3% |
* ... smaller is better
Motorola Moto G Pro 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T 4000 mAh | Motorola Moto G8 Power 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite 4500 mAh | LG Q Stylus 3300 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -4% | 27% | 5% | -39% | |
Reader / Idle | 2450 | 2205 -10% | 1529 -38% | ||
H.264 | 882 | 1071 21% | 527 -40% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 792 | 764 -4% | 1002 27% | 904 14% | 419 -47% |
Load | 290 | 274 -6% | 200 -31% |
Pro
Kontra
Összegzés - A Motorola Moto G Pro-t Nem Lehet Figyelmen Kívül Hagyni
Egy olcsó okostelefon érintőceruzával - a Moto G Pro-val a Motorola megtalálta a helyét, és kiadott egy olyan készüléket, amely a Samsung's Galaxy Note sorozat komoly versenytársa lehet.
330 euróért a vásárlók kapnak egy jól felszerelt középkategóriás okostelefont érintőceruzával, amely, bár nem képes olyan pontosságra, mint a Samsung, de a mindennapi használatra megfelelő.
Aki egy olcsó, érintőceruzás okostelefont keres, annak feltétlenül érdemes megfontolni a Motorola Moto G Pro-t.
Egyetlen panaszunk az érintőceruzát illetően a telefon nevéhez fűződik - a „Moto G Pro” semmilyen módon nem utal arra, hogy az okostelefon felhasználói élvezhetik azokat az előnyöket, amelyeket az érintőceruzás bementek nyújthatnak. Habár, érdekes módon, a Moto G Pro amerikai verzióját „Moto G Stylus”-nak hívják, de funkciók terén rosszabb: Nincs sem dual SIM, sem NFC támogatás, és a 18 wattos töltő helyett csak egy 10 wattos modellel jön.
Visszatérve a Moto G Pro-hoz: Az érintőceruzáján és egyéb említett előnyökön kívül a felhasználói élmény tovább fokozódik olyan funkciókkal, mint a Dolby hangszórók, világos IPS kijelző, jó kamera is gyors Wi-Fi. Android One készülékként garantáltan fog szoftverfrissítéseket kapni az elkövetkező két évben.
Motorola Moto G Pro - 07/14/2020 v7
Manuel Masiero