Notebookcheck

Motorola Moto G Pro Smartphone rövid értékelés - Olcsó Tollas Okostelefon

A Motorola első tollas telefonja. Egy megfizethető okostelefon érintőceruzával - ez általában ritka látvány. A Motorola viszont felkavarja a vizet a Moto G Pro-val, amely egy érdekes ajánlat: 330 euróért a vásárlók egy 6.4 hüvelykes középkategóriás okostelefont kapnak, integrált érintőceruzával és Android One-nal.
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Florian Schmitt, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (fordította Zoltán Kiss),
Android Smartphone Touchscreen
jó (77%) Motorola Moto G Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 665Qualcomm Adreno 610 Smartphone - 07/14/2020 - v7
Test device courtesy of Motorola Deutschland
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
Motorola Moto G Pro (Moto G Széria)
Processzor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 8 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo 260
Grafikus adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 610
Memória
4096 MB 
Kijelző
6.4 hüvelyk 19.2:9, 2300 x 1080 pixel 399 PPI, Kapacitív, IPS, FHD+, fényes: igen
Háttértár
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
, 109.2 GB ingyenes
Csatlakozók
1 USB 2.0, Audió csatlakozók: 3,5 mm-es fülhallgató jack, Kártyaolvasó: microSD 512 GB-ig, 1 Ujjlenyomat olvasó, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Szenzorok: Gyorsulásmérő, girométer, közelségérzékelő, környezeti fényérzékelő, szenzor készlet, ujjlenyomat-olvasó, Wi-Fi Direct
Hálózat
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (sáv 2, 3, 5, 8), UMTS (sáv 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE (sáv 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71), fej SAR 1.52 W/kg, test SAR 1.58 W/kg, Dual SIM, GPS
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 9.2 x 158.6 x 75.8
Akkumulátor
4000 mAh Lítium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operációs rendszer
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix 48 MP (f/1.7, 1.6 µm) + 16 MP széles látószögű lencse (f/2.2, 2.0 µm) + 2-MP makró lencse (f/2.2), lézer autofókusz, videók [email protected]
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.0, 1 µm, videók Full [email protected]
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: Dolby sztereó hangszórók, Billentyűzet: virtuális, Stylus toll, moduláris 18 wattos töltő, USB kábel (C-ről A-ra), SIM kiadó eszköz, gyors kezelési útmutató, garancia információ, Android One, 24 Hónap Garancia, fanless
Súly
192 g, Tápegység: 35 g
Hivatkozások
Motorola honlap
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Competing Devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
77 %
09/2020
Motorola Moto G Pro
SD 665, Adreno 610		192 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.4"2300x1080
79 %
04/2020
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
SD 665, Adreno 610		200 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.3"2340x1080
78 %
06/2020
Motorola Moto G8 Power
SD 665, Adreno 610		197 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.4"2300x1080
82 %
02/2020
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18		199 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.7"2400x1080
80 %
07/2018
LG Q Stylus
MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2		172 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.2"2160x1080

Size Comparison

❌
163.7 mm 76.1 mm 8.7 mm 199 g161.15 mm 75.4 mm 8.6 mm 200 g160.2 mm 77.8 mm 8.4 mm 172 g158.6 mm 75.8 mm 9.2 mm 192 g156 mm 76 mm 10 mm 197 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
370 (342min - 372max) MBit/s ∼100% +12%
Motorola Moto G Pro
Adreno 610, SD 665, 128 GB eMMC Flash
329 (313min - 345max) MBit/s ∼89%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
315 (157min - 352max) MBit/s ∼85% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=604)
284 MBit/s ∼77% -14%
LG Q Stylus
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750S, 32 GB eMMC Flash
61.5 (43min - 58max) MBit/s ∼17% -81%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
56.5 (11min - 75max) MBit/s ∼15% -83%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
415 (295min - 452max) MBit/s ∼100% +24%
Motorola Moto G Pro
Adreno 610, SD 665, 128 GB eMMC Flash
334 (326min - 340max) MBit/s ∼80%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
278 (218min - 305max) MBit/s ∼67% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=604)
270 MBit/s ∼65% -19%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
44.9 (2min - 75max) MBit/s ∼11% -87%
LG Q Stylus
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750S, 32 GB eMMC Flash
36 (2min - 52max) MBit/s ∼9% -89%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø329 (313-345)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø334 (326-340)
Motorola Moto G Pro: Overview
Motorola Moto G Pro: Overview
Motorola Moto G Pro: Turn
Motorola Moto G Pro: Turn
Motorola Moto G Pro: Bridge
Motorola Moto G Pro: Bridge
Garmin Edge 520: Overview
Garmin Edge 520: Overview
Garmin Edge 520: Turn
Garmin Edge 520: Turn
Garmin Edge 520: Bridge
Garmin Edge 520: Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight scene 1Daylight scene 2Low-light environment
ColorChecker
25.2 ∆E
41 ∆E
30.8 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
32.6 ∆E
42.7 ∆E
40.3 ∆E
25.5 ∆E
27.8 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
46.3 ∆E
49.3 ∆E
23 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
49.6 ∆E
29.6 ∆E
33.1 ∆E
41.2 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
41.8 ∆E
33.2 ∆E
23 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G Pro: 33.64 ∆E min: 13.2 - max: 49.61 ∆E
ColorChecker
16.4 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
9 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
1.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G Pro: 10.72 ∆E min: 1.62 - max: 17.25 ∆E
723
cd/m²		720
cd/m²		743
cd/m²
730
cd/m²		735
cd/m²		739
cd/m²
725
cd/m²		732
cd/m²		738
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 743 cd/m² Átlag: 731.7 cd/m² Minimum: 7.2 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 97 %
Centrumban: 735 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1470:1 (Fekete: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.84 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 5.9 | 0.64-98 Ø6
92.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.342
Motorola Moto G Pro
IPS, 2300x1080, 6.4		Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3		Motorola Moto G8 Power
IPS, 2300x1080, 6.4		Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7		LG Q Stylus
IPS, 2160x1080, 6.2
Screen
11%
-19%
-16%
-7%
Brightness middle
735
628
-15%
462
-37%
510
-31%
458
-38%
Brightness
732
631
-14%
483
-34%
536
-27%
441
-40%
Brightness Distribution
97
93
-4%
93
-4%
91
-6%
94
-3%
Black Level *
0.5
0.54
-8%
0.65
-30%
0.51
-2%
Contrast
1470
1163
-21%
711
-52%
898
-39%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.84
2
66%
5.7
2%
6.6
-13%
4.5
23%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.2
5.1
50%
8.9
13%
17.56
-72%
7.1
30%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.9
3.7
37%
6.5
-10%
2.9
51%
5.1
14%
Gamma
2.342 94%
2.17 101%
2.303 96%
2.242 98%
2.33 94%
CCT
7897 82%
6230 104%
8073 81%
6989 93%
7381 88%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 59.52 Hz ≤ 15 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 59.52 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 15 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 59.52 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9595 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (38.7 ms).
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench | AnTuTu v8 | BaseMark OS II
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
450 Points ∼28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
432 Points ∼26% -4%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
464 Points ∼28% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (432 - 483, n=5)
455 Points ∼28% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 4043, n=66)
1633 Points ∼100% +263%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
365 Points ∼21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
368 Points ∼21% +1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
368 Points ∼21% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (363 - 368, n=5)
366 Points ∼21% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (272 - 4739, n=61)
1759 Points ∼100% +382%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1358 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1390 Points ∼71% +2%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1385 Points ∼71% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1256 - 1405, n=7)
1346 Points ∼69% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 4160, n=129)
1964 Points ∼100% +45%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
310 Points ∼55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
313 Points ∼55% +1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
311 Points ∼55% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (309 - 313, n=7)
311 Points ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1604, n=129)
567 Points ∼100% +83%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6962 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6587 Points ∼93% -5%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6963 Points ∼99% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
5851 Points ∼83% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6189 - 11432, n=11)
7048 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 15299, n=529)
5991 Points ∼85% -14%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8952 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8804 Points ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
6571 Points ∼73% -27%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
4101 Points ∼46% -54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (7437 - 9051, n=10)
8163 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=687)
6576 Points ∼73% -27%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2185 Points ∼70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2232 Points ∼72% +2%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2354 Points ∼75% +8%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3120 Points ∼100% +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2185 - 2444, n=11)
2284 Points ∼73% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=180)
2667 Points ∼85% +22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
908 Points ∼22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
897 Points ∼21% -1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
904 Points ∼22% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4201 Points ∼100% +363%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (897 - 995, n=11)
933 Points ∼22% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 9104, n=180)
3071 Points ∼73% +238%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1044 Points ∼29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1035 Points ∼29% -1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1047 Points ∼29% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3613 Points ∼100% +246%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1035 - 1140, n=11)
1074 Points ∼30% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6977, n=180)
2735 Points ∼76% +162%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2369 Points ∼76%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2410 Points ∼77% +2%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2488 Points ∼80% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3120 Points ∼100% +32%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
1110 Points ∼36% -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2154 - 2541, n=10)
2378 Points ∼76% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=533)
2240 Points ∼72% -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
990 Points ∼21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
990 Points ∼21% 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
988 Points ∼21% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4806 Points ∼100% +385%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
319 Points ∼7% -68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (980 - 999, n=10)
988 Points ∼21% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 10348, n=533)
2192 Points ∼46% +121%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1137 Points ∼26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1139 Points ∼27% 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1151 Points ∼27% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4291 Points ∼100% +277%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
379 Points ∼9% -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1097 - 1151, n=10)
1135 Points ∼26% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8386, n=534)
2039 Points ∼48% +79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2344 Points ∼74%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2399 Points ∼76% +2%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2493 Points ∼79% +6%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3148 Points ∼100% +34%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
1112 Points ∼35% -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2199 - 2503, n=11)
2365 Points ∼75% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=566)
2162 Points ∼69% -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1668 Points ∼42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1663 Points ∼42% 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1678 Points ∼42% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3958 Points ∼100% +137%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
495 Points ∼13% -70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1650 - 1692, n=11)
1668 Points ∼42% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20511, n=566)
2989 Points ∼76% +79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1782 Points ∼48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1785 Points ∼48% 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1809 Points ∼48% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3744 Points ∼100% +110%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
565 Points ∼15% -68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1754 - 1810, n=11)
1786 Points ∼48% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 11895, n=566)
2489 Points ∼66% +40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2399 Points ∼79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2468 Points ∼81% +3%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2493 Points ∼82% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3056 Points ∼100% +27%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
1172 Points ∼38% -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2212 - 2580, n=11)
2417 Points ∼79% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=615)
2119 Points ∼69% -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
978 Points ∼22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
927 Points ∼21% -5%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
984 Points ∼22% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4422 Points ∼100% +352%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
89 Points ∼2% -91%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (927 - 999, n=11)
968 Points ∼22% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 9167, n=615)
1853 Points ∼42% +89%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1126 Points ∼28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1076 Points ∼27% -4%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1137 Points ∼28% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4022 Points ∼100% +257%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
112 Points ∼3% -90%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1076 - 1152, n=11)
1118 Points ∼28% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7678, n=616)
1757 Points ∼44% +56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2395 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2412 Points ∼78% +1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2507 Points ∼81% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3087 Points ∼100% +29%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
1172 Points ∼38% -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2282 - 2596, n=11)
2429 Points ∼79% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=657)
1991 Points ∼64% -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1607 Points ∼29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1616 Points ∼29% +1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1626 Points ∼29% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
5586 Points ∼100% +248%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
98 Points ∼2% -94%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1564 - 1663, n=11)
1622 Points ∼29% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 16670, n=656)
2456 Points ∼44% +53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1734 Points ∼37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1744 Points ∼37% +1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1764 Points ∼37% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4734 Points ∼100% +173%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
123 Points ∼3% -93%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1675 - 1795, n=11)
1750 Points ∼37% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 11256, n=659)
2100 Points ∼44% +21%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
23884 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
19349 Points ∼78% -19%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24652 Points ∼100% +3%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
10050 Points ∼41% -58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (17865 - 24652, n=10)
20916 Points ∼85% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 59268, n=802)
15698 Points ∼64% -34%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24804 Points ∼89%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24871 Points ∼89% 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
25161 Points ∼90% +1%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
9864 Points ∼35% -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (15403 - 25351, n=10)
23960 Points ∼86% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 221179, n=800)
27832 Points ∼100% +12%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24593 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
23388 Points ∼93% -5%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
25046 Points ∼100% +2%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
9905 Points ∼40% -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (22445 - 25046, n=10)
23870 Points ∼95% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 117606, n=800)
21512 Points ∼86% -13%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
36 fps ∼45%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
36 fps ∼45% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
80 fps ∼100% +122%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
17 fps ∼21% -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (35 - 36, n=9)
35.8 fps ∼45% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=803)
46.8 fps ∼59% +30%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
35 fps ∼60%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
33 fps ∼57% -6%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
58 fps ∼100% +66%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
16 fps ∼28% -54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (30 - 52, n=9)
35.8 fps ∼62% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 138, n=812)
31.7 fps ∼55% -9%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
19 fps ∼26%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
19 fps ∼26% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
73 fps ∼100% +284%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
7.1 fps ∼10% -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (19 - 20, n=9)
19.2 fps ∼26% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 180, n=708)
27.8 fps ∼38% +46%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
20 fps ∼35%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
18 fps ∼32% -10%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
57 fps ∼100% +185%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
6.7 fps ∼12% -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (15 - 34, n=9)
21.1 fps ∼37% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=716)
23 fps ∼40% +15%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼54%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼54% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
24 fps ∼100% +85%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
4.7 fps ∼20% -64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (13 - 13, n=9)
13 fps ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=571)
22.3 fps ∼93% +72%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
14 fps ∼30%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
12 fps ∼26% -14%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
46 fps ∼100% +229%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
4.5 fps ∼10% -68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (10 - 27, n=9)
15 fps ∼33% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=573)
20 fps ∼43% +43%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
5.1 fps ∼30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4.4 fps ∼26% -14%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4.5 fps ∼26% -12%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
17 fps ∼100% +233%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
1.3 fps ∼8% -75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (3.9 - 9.1, n=11)
5.65 fps ∼33% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=327)
11.7 fps ∼69% +129%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼25% 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼25% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
11 fps ∼100% +293%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
0.86 fps ∼8% -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2.7 - 2.8, n=11)
2.77 fps ∼25% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=325)
8.27 fps ∼75% +195%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.6 fps ∼31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.4 fps ∼26% -14%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.6 fps ∼27% -12%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
28 fps ∼100% +226%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
2 fps ∼7% -77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6.2 - 15, n=11)
9.31 fps ∼33% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=331)
17.4 fps ∼62% +102%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.1 fps ∼26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.1 fps ∼26% 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.1 fps ∼26% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
31 fps ∼100% +283%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
2.3 fps ∼7% -72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (7.8 - 8.4, n=11)
8.13 fps ∼26% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=330)
20.1 fps ∼65% +148%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.1 fps ∼24%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.1 fps ∼24% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
29 fps ∼100% +308%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
2.5 fps ∼9% -65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6.9 - 7.2, n=9)
7.06 fps ∼24% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 75, n=496)
14.9 fps ∼51% +110%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.7 fps ∼31%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6.6 fps ∼26% -14%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
25 fps ∼100% +225%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
2.4 fps ∼10% -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (5.7 - 13, n=9)
7.86 fps ∼31% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=500)
13.2 fps ∼53% +71%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
173930 Points ∼53%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
168901 Points ∼51% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
329860 Points ∼100% +90%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (167305 - 181432, n=9)
171951 Points ∼52% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 622888, n=125)
326445 Points ∼99% +88%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1168 Points ∼90%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
935 Points ∼72% -20%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
1300 Points ∼100% +11%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
657 Points ∼51% -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (926 - 1400, n=9)
1101 Points ∼85% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=740)
829 Points ∼64% -29%
Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1907 Points ∼30%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1931 Points ∼30% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
6444 Points ∼100% +238%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
633 Points ∼10% -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1881 - 1932, n=9)
1906 Points ∼30% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=740)
2561 Points ∼40% +34%
Memory (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2765 Points ∼97%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2864 Points ∼100% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
2771 Points ∼97% 0%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
778 Points ∼27% -72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1804 - 3174, n=9)
2681 Points ∼94% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=740)
1914 Points ∼67% -31%
System (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4666 Points ∼82%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4848 Points ∼85% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
5707 Points ∼100% +22%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
1868 Points ∼33% -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (4391 - 5089, n=9)
4825 Points ∼85% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=740)
3513 Points ∼62% -25%
Overall (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2315 Points ∼68%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2238 Points ∼66% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3393 Points ∼100% +47%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
882 Points ∼26% -62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2001 - 2556, n=9)
2271 Points ∼67% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6273, n=740)
1799 Points ∼53% -22%
Jetstream 2 | JetStream 1.1 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 161, n=199)
41.7 Points ∼100% +34%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)
32.259 Points ∼77% +3%
Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
31.216 Points ∼75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (22.9 - 31.2, n=6)
29.2 Points ∼70% -6%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)
62.949 Points ∼100% +29%
Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
48.855 Points ∼78%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 343, n=630)
48.3 Points ∼77% -1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)
48.109 Points ∼76% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (33.4 - 51, n=8)
47.5 Points ∼75% -3%
LG Q Stylus (hrome 69)
19.174 Points ∼30% -61%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=179)
43.1 runs/min ∼100% +50%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chome 80)
39 runs/min ∼90% +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (25.4 - 30.8, n=6)
28.9 runs/min ∼67% +1%
Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
28.73 runs/min ∼67%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)
72 Points ∼100% +31%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=266)
69.9 Points ∼97% +27%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)
56 Points ∼78% +2%
Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
55 Points ∼76%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (38 - 58, n=9)
50.9 Points ∼71% -7%
LG Q Stylus (Chrome 69)
25 Points ∼35% -55%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)
12933 Points ∼100% +41%
Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
9153 Points ∼71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6133 - 9671, n=9)
8901 Points ∼69% -3%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)
8675 Points ∼67% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=798)
7998 Points ∼62% -13%
LG Q Stylus (hrome 69)
3474 Points ∼27% -62%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
LG Q Stylus (hrome 69)
13202.5 ms * ∼100% -198%
Average of class Smartphone (1854 - 59466, n=824)
9681 ms * ∼73% -118%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (4434 - 6719, n=9)
4783 ms * ∼36% -8%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)
4663.6 ms * ∼35% -5%
Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
4433.6 ms * ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)
3188.8 ms * ∼24% +28%

* ... smaller is better

Motorola Moto G ProXiaomi Redmi Note 8TMotorola Moto G8 PowerSamsung Galaxy Note10 LiteLG Q StylusAverage 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
2%
0%
52%
-30%
-9%
-18%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
55.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
52.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
49.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-11%
59.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
7%
63.55 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
14%
62.2 (26.1 - 73.5, n=24)
11%
51.2 (1.7 - 87.1, n=538)
-8%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
73.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
71.63 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
69.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
73.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
83.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13%
75.5 (29.2 - 85.9, n=24)
3%
69.2 (8.1 - 96.5, n=538)
-6%
Random Write 4KB
89.36
91.15
2%
132.63
48%
142
59%
12.07
-86%
45.2 (8.48 - 151, n=25)
-49%
37.1 (0.14 - 319, n=895)
-58%
Random Read 4KB
65.51
90.38
38%
57.7
-12%
132
101%
31.45
-52%
68.8 (20.7 - 108, n=25)
5%
60.3 (1.59 - 324, n=895)
-8%
Sequential Write 256KB
233.63
173.95
-26%
181.88
-22%
190.8
-18%
121.4
-48%
186 (90 - 258, n=25)
-20%
131 (2.99 - 911, n=895)
-44%
Sequential Read 256KB
294.07
315.75
7%
300.9
2%
776.7
164%
241.7
-18%
289 (144 - 499, n=25)
-2%
348 (12.1 - 1802, n=895)
18%
0102030Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; 0.19.0: Ø24.8 (16-27)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; 2.3.4a: Ø11.6 (4-25)
Max. terhelés
 43.7 °C39.9 °C38.2 °C 
 43.9 °C39.6 °C38.4 °C 
 42.1 °C39 °C38.4 °C 
Maximum: 43.9 °C
Átlag: 40.4 °C
37.6 °C39.7 °C44.1 °C
36.8 °C39.7 °C42.6 °C
35.9 °C38.9 °C41.3 °C
Maximum: 44.1 °C
Átlag: 39.6 °C
Tápegység (max.)  40.9 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 21.7 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.836.62539.940.13131.933.44038.936.65043.739.26329.830.38025.926.810026.326.512524.933.116021.644.82001950.725018.954.431518.155.440016.659.650016.265.563014.969.78001570.6100015.671.2125014.973.6160014.972.8200015.669.8250014.667.3315014.270.5400014.170.7500014.469.6630014.667.2800014.962.41000015.265.21250015.461.91600015.760.9SPL59.568.76666.36470.627.581.9N12.922.418.319.715.825.3152.5median 15.4median 65.5Delta2.18.745.247.543.745.234.836.937.640.739.542.136.636.329.130.128.429.130.533.924.742.322.851.621.955.421.559.319.962.120.767.719.271.118.772.42275.518.274.317.873.317.770.217.87217.67617.877.417.772.218.167.518.359.218.767.91972.619.46466.13185.1191.662.4median 19median 67.928.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto G ProMotorola Moto G8 Power
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto G Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Motorola Moto G8 Power audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 1.6 / 2.3 / 2.8 Watt
Terhelés midlight 4.2 / 6.9 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Motorola Moto G Pro
4000 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
4000 mAh		Motorola Moto G8 Power
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
4500 mAh		LG Q Stylus
3300 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
30%
30%
-9%
34%
15%
22%
Idle Minimum *
1.6
0.62
61%
0.9
44%
0.9
44%
0.69
57%
1.036 (0.62 - 1.7, n=10)
35%
0.89 (0.2 - 3.4, n=900)
44%
Idle Average *
2.3
1.77
23%
1.3
43%
1.6
30%
1.7
26%
1.942 (1.3 - 2.3, n=10)
16%
1.755 (0.6 - 6.2, n=899)
24%
Idle Maximum *
2.8
1.8
36%
1.6
43%
1.9
32%
1.73
38%
2.43 (1.6 - 3.5, n=10)
13%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=900)
27%
Load Average *
4.2
3.42
19%
3.2
24%
8.4
-100%
3.21
24%
3.88 (3.2 - 4.7, n=10)
8%
4.11 (0.8 - 10.8, n=894)
2%
Load Maximum *
6.9
6.14
11%
7.1
-3%
10.3
-49%
5.31
23%
6.82 (6.09 - 7.7, n=10)
1%
6.1 (1.2 - 14.2, n=894)
12%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
40h 50min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
13h 12min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14h 42min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
4h 50min
Motorola Moto G Pro
4000 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
4000 mAh		Motorola Moto G8 Power
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
4500 mAh		LG Q Stylus
3300 mAh
Battery Runtime
-4%
27%
5%
-39%
Reader / Idle
2450
2205
-10%
1529
-38%
H.264
882
1071
21%
527
-40%
WiFi v1.3
792
764
-4%
1002
27%
904
14%
419
-47%
Load
290
274
-6%
200
-31%

Pro

+ integrált toll
+ Android One
+ NFC
+ gyors Wi-Fi
+ jó kamera
+ világos IPS kijelző
+ jó Dolby hangszórók

Kontra

- csak egy hibrid dual SIM kártyahely
- PWM
- korlátozott alkalmasság játszásra

Összegzés - A Motorola Moto G Pro-t Nem Lehet Figyelmen Kívül Hagyni

Motorol Moto G Pro rövid értékelés. Test device courtesy of Motorola Germany
Motorol Moto G Pro rövid értékelés. Test device courtesy of Motorola Germany

Egy olcsó okostelefon érintőceruzával - a Moto G Pro-val a Motorola megtalálta a helyét, és kiadott egy olyan készüléket, amely a Samsung's Galaxy Note sorozat komoly versenytársa lehet.

330 euróért a vásárlók kapnak egy jól felszerelt középkategóriás okostelefont érintőceruzával, amely, bár nem képes olyan pontosságra, mint a Samsung, de a mindennapi használatra megfelelő.

Aki egy olcsó, érintőceruzás okostelefont keres, annak feltétlenül érdemes megfontolni a Motorola Moto G Pro-t.

Egyetlen panaszunk az érintőceruzát illetően a telefon nevéhez fűződik - a „Moto G Pro” semmilyen módon nem utal arra, hogy az okostelefon felhasználói élvezhetik azokat az előnyöket, amelyeket az érintőceruzás bementek nyújthatnak. Habár, érdekes módon, a Moto G Pro amerikai verzióját „Moto G Stylus”-nak hívják, de funkciók terén rosszabb: Nincs sem dual SIM, sem NFC támogatás, és a 18 wattos töltő helyett csak egy 10 wattos modellel jön.

Visszatérve a Moto G Pro-hoz: Az érintőceruzáján és egyéb említett előnyökön kívül a felhasználói élmény tovább fokozódik olyan funkciókkal, mint a Dolby hangszórók, világos IPS kijelző, jó kamera is gyors Wi-Fi. Android One készülékként garantáltan fog szoftverfrissítéseket kapni az elkövetkező két évben.

Motorola Moto G Pro - 07/14/2020 v7
Manuel Masiero

Váz
82%
Billentyűzet
60 / 75 → 81%
Érintőpad
87%
Csatlakoztathatóság
43 / 70 → 61%
Súly
89%
Akkumulátor
90%
Kijelző
82%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
13 / 64 → 20%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
59 / 86 → 68%
Hőmérséklet
87%
Zaj
100%
Audio
77 / 90 → 86%
Camera
63%
Átlag
72%
77%
Smartphone - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Motorola Moto G Pro Smartphone rövid értékelés - Olcsó Tollas Okostelefon
Manuel Masiero, 2020-09-23 (Update: 2020-09-23)