Notebookcheck

Motorola Moto G8 Power Smartphone rövid értékelés: Bőséges üzemidő és jó kamerák

Végtelen üzemidő. A Moto G8 Power-ral a Motorola továbbfejlesztette az olcsó és hosszú üzemidejű okostelefon koncepcióját. A hardver nem csak mindennapi használatra alkalmas, hanem meglepően jó kamerái is vannak. Tovább olvasva kiderül, mi mást kínál a Moto G8 Power az üzemidő és a jó kamerák mellett.
Mike Wobker, Andrea Grüblinger (fordította Zoltán Kiss),
Android Touchscreen Smartphone
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Moto G8 Széria)
Processzor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 8 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo 260
Grafikus adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 610
Memória
4096 MB 
Kijelző
6.4 hüvelyk 19:9, 2300 x 1080 pixel 397 PPI, kapacitív, IPS, fényes: igen, 60 Hz
Háttértár
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 51 GB ingyenes
Csatlakozók
1 USB 2.0, Audió csatlakozók: 3.5mm-es jack, USB-C, Kártyaolvasó: microSD (512 GB-ig, FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Ujjlenyomat olvasó, Brightness Sensor, Szenzorok: Gyorsulásmérő, girométer, közelségérzékelő
Hálózat
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 5, 2G GSM (2/3/5/8), 3G, Dual SIM, LTE
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 10 x 156 x 76
Akkumulátor
5000 mAh Lítium-Polimer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operációs rendszer
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix 16 MP (ƒ/1.7, 1,12 µm) + 2 MP (ƒ/2.2, 1,75 µm) makró + 8 MP (ƒ/2.2, 1,12 µm) ultraszéles látószög, 8 MP (ƒ/2.2, 1,12 µm) telefotó 2x optikai zoom
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix , ƒ/2.0, 1 µm
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: 2 hangszóró, Billentyűzet: képernyőn, USB hálózati adapter, USB-C kábel, SIM-kiadó eszköz, védőborító, 24 Hónap Garancia, AR érték (fej): 0.914 W/kg, SAR érték (test): 1.79 W/kg, LTE sebességek: 400 MBit/s (letöltés), 75 MBit/s (feltöltés)
Súly
197 g, Tápegység: 80 g
Ár
230 Euró
Hivatkozások
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison Devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
78 %
06/2020
Motorola Moto G8 Power
SD 665, Adreno 610
197 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.4"2300x1080
81 %
12/2019
Sharp Aquos V
SD 835, Adreno 540
173 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash5.9"2160x1080
78 %
10/2019
Nokia 6.2
SD 636, Adreno 509
180 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.3"2340x1080
78 %
08/2019
Xiaomi Mi A3
SD 665, Adreno 610
173.8 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.09"1560x720
80 %
01/2020
TCL Plex
SD 675, Adreno 612
192 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.53"2340x1080
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Motorola Moto G8 Power

Size comparison

162.2 mm 76.56 mm 7.99 mm 192 g159.9 mm 75.15 mm 8.25 mm 180 g156 mm 76 mm 10 mm 197 g157 mm 76 mm 9 mm 173 g153.5 mm 71.9 mm 8.5 mm 173.8 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sharp Aquos V
Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
468 (406min - 517max) MBit/s ∼100% +728%
TCL Plex
Adreno 612, SD 675, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
359 (330min - 369max) MBit/s ∼77% +535%
Nokia 6.2
Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
325 (280min - 342max) MBit/s ∼69% +475%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=590)
277 MBit/s ∼59% +390%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
158 (18min - 227max) MBit/s ∼34% +180%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
56.5 (11min - 75max) MBit/s ∼12%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sharp Aquos V
Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
409 (342min - 464max) MBit/s ∼100% +811%
TCL Plex
Adreno 612, SD 675, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
287 (250min - 308max) MBit/s ∼70% +539%
Nokia 6.2
Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
284 (240min - 307max) MBit/s ∼69% +533%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=590)
263 MBit/s ∼64% +486%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
172 (2min - 282max) MBit/s ∼42% +283%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
44.9 (2min - 75max) MBit/s ∼11%
01020304050607080Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø56.4 (11-75)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø44.8 (2-75)
GPS test: Motorola Moto G8 Power - Overview
GPS test: Motorola Moto G8 Power - Overview
GPS test: Motorola Moto G8 Power - Bridge
GPS test: Motorola Moto G8 Power - Bridge
GPS test: Motorola Moto G8 Power - Crossing
GPS test: Motorola Moto G8 Power - Crossing
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Bridge
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Bridge
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Crossing
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Crossing

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker
27.2 ∆E
47.5 ∆E
37 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
41.2 ∆E
54.8 ∆E
45.9 ∆E
32.9 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
56.4 ∆E
55.3 ∆E
29.2 ∆E
43.5 ∆E
31.7 ∆E
63 ∆E
36.7 ∆E
39.5 ∆E
55.9 ∆E
59.9 ∆E
45.8 ∆E
34.2 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G8 Power: 40.39 ∆E min: 12.89 - max: 63.03 ∆E
ColorChecker
11.8 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
12 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
6 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G8 Power: 7.58 ∆E min: 1.73 - max: 12.84 ∆E
A photo of our test chart
A photo of our test chart
A photo of our test chart at 1 lux
490
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
491
cd/m²
486
cd/m²
462
cd/m²
494
cd/m²
495
cd/m²
467
cd/m²
493
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 495 cd/m² Átlag: 483.1 cd/m² Minimum: 3.5 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 93 %
Centrumban: 462 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 711:1 (Fekete: 0.65 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.7 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 6.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6
92.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.303
Motorola Moto G8 Power
IPS, 2300x1080, 6.4
Sharp Aquos V
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.9
Nokia 6.2
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3
Xiaomi Mi A3
AMOLED, 1560x720, 6.09
TCL Plex
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.53
Screen
15%
25%
-15%
21%
Brightness middle
462
507
10%
611
32%
348
-25%
432
-6%
Brightness
483
486
1%
582
20%
355
-27%
418
-13%
Brightness Distribution
93
91
-2%
91
-2%
91
-2%
93
0%
Black Level *
0.65
0.55
15%
0.4
38%
0.43
34%
Contrast
711
922
30%
1528
115%
1005
41%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.7
4.43
22%
5.2
9%
5.86
-3%
3.4
40%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.9
7.13
20%
10.2
-15%
15.6
-75%
6
33%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.5
5
23%
6.1
6%
3.6
45%
3.8
42%
Gamma
2.303 96%
2.18 101%
2.21 100%
2.232 99%
2.14 103%
CCT
8073 81%
7739 84%
8100 80%
7051 92%
6151 106%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 714.3 Hz
≤ 15 cd/m² brightness

The display backlight flickers at 714.3 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 15 cd/m² and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 714.3 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

As the flickering occurs only on very low brightness settings, it should not be an issue in typical office settings. Nonetheless, use in low light conditions may be straining to the eyes.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17612 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 25 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.8 ms).
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
464 Points ∼28%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
369 Points ∼23% -20%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
487 Points ∼30% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (432 - 483, n=5)
455 Points ∼28% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 4043, n=66)
1633 Points ∼100% +252%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
368 Points ∼19%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
1908 Points ∼100% +418%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
351 Points ∼18% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (363 - 368, n=5)
366 Points ∼19% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (272 - 4739, n=61)
1759 Points ∼92% +378%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1385 Points ∼71%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
1669 Points ∼86% +21%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
924 Points ∼48% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1256 - 1405, n=7)
1346 Points ∼69% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 3531, n=109)
1942 Points ∼100% +40%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
311 Points ∼56%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
386 Points ∼70% +24%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
486 Points ∼88% +56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (309 - 313, n=7)
311 Points ∼56% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1342, n=109)
551 Points ∼100% +77%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6963 Points ∼88%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
7510 Points ∼94% +8%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5965 Points ∼75% -14%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6396 Points ∼80% -8%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
7950 Points ∼100% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6189 - 11432, n=11)
7048 Points ∼89% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 15299, n=512)
5918 Points ∼74% -15%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8804 Points ∼89%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
9927 Points ∼100% +13%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6696 Points ∼67% -24%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7984 Points ∼80% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (7437 - 9051, n=10)
8163 Points ∼82% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=670)
6486 Points ∼65% -26%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2354 Points ∼89%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
2559 Points ∼96% +9%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2175 Points ∼82% -8%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2300 Points ∼87% -2%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1952 Points ∼74% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2185 - 2444, n=11)
2284 Points ∼86% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=165)
2653 Points ∼100% +13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
904 Points ∼25%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
3580 Points ∼100% +296%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
789 Points ∼22% -13%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
908 Points ∼25% 0%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
916 Points ∼26% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (897 - 995, n=11)
933 Points ∼26% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 8783, n=165)
2966 Points ∼83% +228%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1047 Points ∼32%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
3288 Points ∼100% +214%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
926 Points ∼28% -12%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1049 Points ∼32% 0%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1038 Points ∼32% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1035 - 1140, n=11)
1074 Points ∼33% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6754, n=165)
2665 Points ∼81% +155%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2488 Points ∼81%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
3062 Points ∼100% +23%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2337 Points ∼76% -6%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2387 Points ∼78% -4%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1684 Points ∼55% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2154 - 2541, n=10)
2378 Points ∼78% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=515)
2200 Points ∼72% -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
988 Points ∼22%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
4468 Points ∼100% +352%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
855 Points ∼19% -13%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
987 Points ∼22% 0%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
955 Points ∼21% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (980 - 999, n=10)
988 Points ∼22% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9567, n=515)
2109 Points ∼47% +113%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1151 Points ∼28%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
4054 Points ∼100% +252%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
977 Points ∼24% -15%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1135 Points ∼28% -1%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1057 Points ∼26% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1097 - 1151, n=10)
1135 Points ∼28% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8269, n=516)
1970 Points ∼49% +71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2493 Points ∼82%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
3047 Points ∼100% +22%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2288 Points ∼75% -8%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2343 Points ∼77% -6%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1657 Points ∼54% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2199 - 2503, n=11)
2365 Points ∼78% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=546)
2112 Points ∼69% -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1678 Points ∼26%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
6417 Points ∼100% +282%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1389 Points ∼22% -17%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1674 Points ∼26% 0%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1611 Points ∼25% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1650 - 1692, n=11)
1668 Points ∼26% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=546)
2826 Points ∼44% +68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1809 Points ∼35%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
5151 Points ∼100% +185%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1568 Points ∼30% -13%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1787 Points ∼35% -1%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1621 Points ∼31% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1754 - 1810, n=11)
1786 Points ∼35% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=546)
2374 Points ∼46% +31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2493 Points ∼83%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
3018 Points ∼100% +21%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2335 Points ∼77% -6%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2477 Points ∼82% -1%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1724 Points ∼57% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2212 - 2580, n=11)
2417 Points ∼80% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=596)
2084 Points ∼69% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
984 Points ∼24%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
4031 Points ∼100% +310%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
809 Points ∼20% -18%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
931 Points ∼23% -5%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
829 Points ∼21% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (927 - 999, n=11)
968 Points ∼24% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=596)
1777 Points ∼44% +81%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1137 Points ∼30%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
3751 Points ∼100% +230%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
945 Points ∼25% -17%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1081 Points ∼29% -5%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
937 Points ∼25% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1076 - 1152, n=11)
1118 Points ∼30% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7400, n=597)
1694 Points ∼45% +49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2507 Points ∼83%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
3009 Points ∼100% +20%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2339 Points ∼78% -7%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2471 Points ∼82% -1%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1708 Points ∼57% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2282 - 2596, n=11)
2429 Points ∼81% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=638)
1949 Points ∼65% -22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1626 Points ∼26%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
6208 Points ∼100% +282%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1322 Points ∼21% -19%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1651 Points ∼27% +2%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1594 Points ∼26% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1564 - 1663, n=11)
1622 Points ∼26% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12611, n=637)
2339 Points ∼38% +44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1764 Points ∼35%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
5022 Points ∼100% +185%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1467 Points ∼29% -17%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1782 Points ∼35% +1%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1618 Points ∼32% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1675 - 1795, n=11)
1750 Points ∼35% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9549, n=640)
2011 Points ∼40% +14%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24652 Points ∼100%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
15876 Points ∼64% -36%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
19552 Points ∼79% -21%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
15461 Points ∼63% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (17865 - 24652, n=10)
20916 Points ∼85% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 58293, n=784)
15422 Points ∼63% -37%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
25161 Points ∼95%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
21067 Points ∼79% -16%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
25219 Points ∼95% 0%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
26320 Points ∼99% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (15403 - 25351, n=10)
23960 Points ∼90% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=782)
26542 Points ∼100% +5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
25046 Points ∼100%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
19635 Points ∼78% -22%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
23693 Points ∼95% -5%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
22767 Points ∼91% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (22445 - 25046, n=10)
23870 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 112989, n=782)
20755 Points ∼83% -17%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
36 fps ∼80%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
35 fps ∼78% -3%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
36 fps ∼80% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (35 - 36, n=9)
35.8 fps ∼80% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=786)
44.9 fps ∼100% +25%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
33 fps ∼63%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
32 fps ∼62% -3%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
52 fps ∼100% +58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (30 - 52, n=9)
35.8 fps ∼69% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 138, n=795)
31 fps ∼60% -6%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
19 fps ∼72%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
16 fps ∼60% -16%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
20 fps ∼75% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (19 - 20, n=9)
19.2 fps ∼72% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=691)
26.5 fps ∼100% +39%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
18 fps ∼53%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
15 fps ∼44% -17%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
34 fps ∼100% +89%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (15 - 34, n=9)
21.1 fps ∼62% +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=699)
22.3 fps ∼66% +24%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼61%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.3 fps ∼30% -52%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼61% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (13 - 13, n=9)
13 fps ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=554)
21.3 fps ∼100% +64%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
12 fps ∼46%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.7 fps ∼22% -52%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
26 fps ∼100% +117%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (10 - 27, n=9)
15 fps ∼58% +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=556)
19.4 fps ∼75% +62%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4.5 fps ∼30%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
15 fps ∼100% +233%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2.3 fps ∼15% -49%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
9.1 fps ∼61% +102%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
4.9 fps ∼33% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (3.9 - 9.1, n=11)
5.65 fps ∼38% +26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=308)
11.3 fps ∼75% +151%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼29%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
9.7 fps ∼100% +246%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
3.5 fps ∼36% +25%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼29% 0%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
3 fps ∼31% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2.7 - 2.8, n=11)
2.77 fps ∼29% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=306)
8.05 fps ∼83% +188%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.6 fps ∼32%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
24 fps ∼100% +216%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.4 fps ∼23% -29%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
15 fps ∼63% +97%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
8.3 fps ∼35% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6.2 - 15, n=11)
9.31 fps ∼39% +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=312)
16.8 fps ∼70% +121%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.1 fps ∼31%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
26 fps ∼100% +221%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6 fps ∼23% -26%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.4 fps ∼32% +4%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
9.1 fps ∼35% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (7.8 - 8.4, n=11)
8.13 fps ∼31% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=311)
19.4 fps ∼75% +140%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.1 fps ∼50%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.3 fps ∼44% -11%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.1 fps ∼50% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6.9 - 7.2, n=9)
7.06 fps ∼49% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=479)
14.3 fps ∼100% +101%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6.6 fps ∼51%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.4 fps ∼42% -18%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼100% +97%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (5.7 - 13, n=9)
7.86 fps ∼60% +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=483)
12.7 fps ∼98% +92%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
168901 Points ∼53%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
145220 Points ∼46% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (167305 - 181432, n=9)
171951 Points ∼54% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 607937, n=108)
317934 Points ∼100% +88%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
935 Points ∼67%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
876 Points ∼63% -6%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1400 Points ∼100% +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (926 - 1400, n=9)
1101 Points ∼79% +18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=725)
818 Points ∼58% -13%
Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1931 Points ∼78%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1632 Points ∼66% -15%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1886 Points ∼76% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1881 - 1932, n=9)
1906 Points ∼77% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=725)
2491 Points ∼100% +29%
Memory (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2864 Points ∼90%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2024 Points ∼64% -29%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
3174 Points ∼100% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1804 - 3174, n=9)
2681 Points ∼84% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=725)
1850 Points ∼58% -35%
System (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4848 Points ∼95%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4498 Points ∼88% -7%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
5089 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (4391 - 5089, n=9)
4825 Points ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=725)
3444 Points ∼68% -29%
Overall (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2238 Points ∼88%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1907 Points ∼75% -15%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2556 Points ∼100% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2001 - 2556, n=9)
2271 Points ∼89% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6273, n=725)
1754 Points ∼69% -22%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
51.046 Points ∼100% +6%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)
48.109 Points ∼94%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (33.4 - 51, n=8)
47.5 Points ∼93% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=616)
47.1 Points ∼92% -2%
Nokia 6.2 (Chrome 79)
44.435 Points ∼87% -8%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=252)
69.8 Points ∼100% +25%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
58 Points ∼83% +4%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)
56 Points ∼80%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (38 - 58, n=9)
50.9 Points ∼73% -9%
Nokia 6.2 (Chrome 79)
46 Points ∼66% -18%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
9260 Points ∼100% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6133 - 9671, n=9)
8901 Points ∼96% +3%
Nokia 6.2 (Chrome 79)
8756 Points ∼95% +1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)
8675 Points ∼94%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=783)
7840 Points ∼85% -10%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1914 - 59466, n=809)
9777 ms * ∼100% -110%
Nokia 6.2 (Chrome 79)
5065.7 ms * ∼52% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (4434 - 6719, n=9)
4783 ms * ∼49% -3%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)
4663.6 ms * ∼48%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
4583.8 ms * ∼47% +2%

* ... smaller is better

Motorola Moto G8 PowerSharp Aquos VNokia 6.2Xiaomi Mi A3TCL PlexAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
40%
-4%
29%
38%
-11%
-14%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
49.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
54.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
10%
61.55 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
24%
50.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
56.21 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13%
57.8 (11.2 - 74.7, n=127)
16%
51.1 (1.7 - 87.1, n=530)
3%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
69.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
78.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13%
83.36 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
20%
67.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
74.91 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
76.9 (21.1 - 87.2, n=127)
11%
69.1 (8.1 - 96.5, n=530)
0%
Random Write 4KB
132.63
16.8
-87%
14.88
-89%
117.4
-11%
130.11
-2%
27.5 (3.4 - 147, n=145)
-79%
35.5 (0.14 - 319, n=881)
-73%
Random Read 4KB
57.7
157.2
172%
78.83
37%
126.9
120%
130.75
127%
56.2 (11.4 - 149, n=145)
-3%
58.9 (1.59 - 324, n=881)
2%
Sequential Write 256KB
181.88
206.2
13%
158.54
-13%
184
1%
199.74
10%
175 (40 - 254, n=145)
-4%
127 (2.99 - 911, n=881)
-30%
Sequential Read 256KB
300.9
650.9
116%
296.76
-1%
502.2
67%
522.31
74%
273 (95.6 - 704, n=145)
-9%
339 (12.1 - 1802, n=881)
13%
Max. terhelés
 41.3 °C38.3 °C37.4 °C 
 41.5 °C38.3 °C37.6 °C 
 40 °C37.8 °C37.4 °C 
Maximum: 41.5 °C
Átlag: 38.8 °C
36.5 °C38.2 °C41.6 °C
36.2 °C38.4 °C41.1 °C
36 °C38.2 °C40.2 °C
Maximum: 41.6 °C
Átlag: 38.5 °C
Tápegység (max.)  37.9 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated); Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.6 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2045.247.52543.745.23134.836.94037.640.75039.542.16336.636.38029.130.110028.429.112530.533.916024.742.320022.851.625021.955.431521.559.340019.962.150020.767.763019.271.180018.772.410002275.5125018.274.3160017.873.3200017.770.2250017.872315017.676400017.877.4500017.772.2630018.167.5800018.359.21000018.767.9125001972.61600019.464SPL66.13185.1N191.662.4median 19median 67.9Delta28.429.832.825.224.321.623.124.722.629.631.822.519.825.120.620.120.619.92220.830.217.631.817.638.917.445.216.151.813.957.714.559.616.167.314.572.414.470.613.668.613.972.814.576.114.475.214.871.414.77514.869.214.963.315.1611550.615.144.326.983.90.952.3median 14.9median 611.514.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto G8 PowerNokia 6.2
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto G8 Power audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Nokia 6.2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.1 / 0.4 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.3 / 1.6 Watt
Terhelés midlight 3.2 / 7.1 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Motorola Moto G8 Power
5000 mAh
Nokia 6.2
3500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi A3
4030 mAh
TCL Plex
3820 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-22%
-37%
-21%
-27%
-15%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
0.72
20%
0.8
11%
0.73
19%
1.036 (0.62 - 1.7, n=10)
-15%
0.89 (0.2 - 3.4, n=884)
1%
Idle Average *
1.3
2.22
-71%
2
-54%
2.17
-67%
1.942 (1.3 - 2.3, n=10)
-49%
1.756 (0.6 - 6.2, n=883)
-35%
Idle Maximum *
1.6
2.23
-39%
3.3
-106%
2.23
-39%
2.43 (1.6 - 3.5, n=10)
-52%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=884)
-28%
Load Average *
3.2
3.98
-24%
4.1
-28%
4.56
-43%
3.88 (3.2 - 4.7, n=10)
-21%
4.1 (0.8 - 10.8, n=878)
-28%
Load Maximum *
7.1
6.86
3%
7.7
-8%
5.22
26%
6.82 (6.09 - 7.7, n=10)
4%
6.08 (1.2 - 14.2, n=878)
14%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
16h 42min
Motorola Moto G8 Power
5000 mAh
Sharp Aquos V
3160 mAh
Nokia 6.2
3500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi A3
4030 mAh
TCL Plex
3820 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
1002
718
-28%
611
-39%
985
-2%
616
-39%

Pro

+ hosszú üzemidő
+ jó kamerák
+ robusztus kialakítás
+ majdnem tiszta Android

Kontra

- lassú Wi-Fi
- gyenge kontrasztú kijelző

Verdict - Good value for money

The Motorola Moto G8 Power smartphone review. Test device courtesy of Motorola Germany.
The Motorola Moto G8 Power smartphone review. Test device courtesy of Motorola Germany.

A Moto G8 Power-ban a felhasználók elsősorban egy nagyon jó üzemidejű okostelefont kaphatnak. A készülék ebből a szempontból nem kritizálható, mivel több mint 16 órán keresztül bírta az ezt megcélzó Wi-Fi tesztjeinkben. A Moto G8 Power viszont nem csak üzemidőben jeleskedik. Kamerái például meglepően jók, és majdnem stock Android élményt is kínál. Összességében, a Moto G8 Power egy szolid hardvercsomagot nyújt az árkategóriájához képest.

A Moto G8 Power elsősorban az üzemidejével fogja meggyőzni az embereket.

Bár jól megépített, de a nagy akkumulátornak köszönhetően elég vastag. Ízlés kérdése, hogy valakit ez zavar-e vagy sem, de a készülék alulmarad a versenytársakkal szemben a Wi-Fi csatlakozást illetően. A csak Wi-Fi 4-es szabványig való támogatottság a legtöbb otthoni hálózatra elégséges, viszont ez azt jelenti, hogy a Moto G8 Power ebből a szempontból lemarad a versenyben. Végül is a Motorola Moto G8 Power egy jó és megfizethető telefon, de hogy a hátrányai zavaróak-e, az attól függ, mit értékelünk egy okostelefonban.

Motorola Moto G8 Power - 03/21/2020 v7
Mike Wobker

Váz
80%
Billentyűzet
65 / 75 → 87%
Érintőpad
95%
Csatlakoztathatóság
41 / 70 → 59%
Súly
88%
Akkumulátor
91%
Kijelző
83%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
13 / 64 → 21%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
59 / 86 → 68%
Hőmérséklet
90%
Zaj
100%
Audio
75 / 90 → 84%
Camera
59%
Átlag
72%
78%
Smartphone - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Motorola Moto G8 Power Smartphone rövid értékelés: Bőséges üzemidő és jó kamerák
Mike Wobker, 2020-06-24 (Update: 2020-06-24)
Alex Alderson
Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - News Editor - @aldersonaj