Notebookcheck

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017 (Core i7, Full-HD) Laptop rövid értékelés

Andreas Osthoff (fordította Tamás Somogyi), 03/17/2017
Business Kaby Lake Notebook Ultrabook Windows

Új üzleti etalon? A 2017-es ThinkPad X1 Carbon már az ötödik generációja az extrém hordozható üzleti laptopnak. A Lenovo nem csak modern, Kaby Lake processzorral, de teljesen újratervezett, modern portokkal ellátott házzal is ellátta zászlóshajóját.

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 (ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017 Széria)
Grafikus adapter
Intel HD Graphics 620
Memória
16384 MB 
, LPDDR3-1866, Dual-Channel, forrasztott
Kijelző
14 hüvelyk 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 157 PPI, B140HAN03_1, IPS, fényes: nem
Alaplap
Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH
Háttértár
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, 512 GB 
, 454 GB ingyenes
Hangkártya
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Csatlakozók
2 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington zár, 1 Dokkoló állomás port, Audió csatlakozók: 3.5 mm kombinált ki- és bemenet, Kártyaolvasó: MicroSD (UHS-II), 1 Ujjlenyomat olvasó
Hálózat
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-V (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 15.95 x 323.5 x 217.1
Akkumulátor
57 Wh, 4830 mAh Lítium-Polimer, Akkumulátor üzemidő (gyártói adat): 15.5 h
Camera
Webkamera: 720p HD
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: sztereo 2x2 Watt, Billentyűzet: chiclet, Billentyűzet háttérvilágítás: igen, 65-Watt USB-C hálózati adapter, HDMI-VGA adapter, LAN (RJ45) adapter, 36 Hónap Garancia
Súly
1.144 kg, Tápegység: 356 g
Ár
1599 Euró
Hivatkozások

 

ThinkPad X270 vs. ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017 vs. ThinkPad T470s
From top: X270 vs. X1 Carbon 2017 vs. T470s
From top: X270 vs. X1 Carbon 2017 vs. T470s
From top: X270 vs. X1 Carbon 2017 vs. T470s
From top: X270 vs. X1 Carbon 2017 vs. T470s
X270 (left) vs. X1 Carbon 2017 (right)
X1 Carbon 2017 (left) vs. T470s (right)

Size Comparison

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
120.5 MB/s ∼100% +97%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00
79.3 MB/s ∼66% +30%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE
76.6 MB/s ∼64% +25%
Fujitsu LifeBook U747
72.6 MB/s ∼60% +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
61.2 MB/s ∼51%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
252.6 MB/s ∼100% +205%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00
90.5 MB/s ∼36% +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE
88.74 MB/s ∼35% +7%
Fujitsu LifeBook U747
83.3 MB/s ∼33% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
82.88 MB/s ∼33%

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6272 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

291
cd/m²
294
cd/m²
264
cd/m²
285
cd/m²
311
cd/m²
270
cd/m²
307
cd/m²
296
cd/m²
271
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 311 cd/m² Átlag: 287.7 cd/m² Minimum: 4.4 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 85 %
Centrumban: 308 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1296:1 (Fekete: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.5 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 6.2 | - Ø
85.77% sRGB (Argyll) 55.96% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.02
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
B140HAN03_1, , 1920x1080
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB-005XUS
1920x1080
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE
VVX14T058J00, , 2560x1440
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00
B140QAN01.5, , 2560x1440
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE
N140HCA-EAB, , 1920x1080
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3
AUO1136, , 2560x1440
Fujitsu LifeBook U747
LG LP140WF3, , 1920x1080
Response Times
0%
9%
-2%
-4%
2%
20%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
41.6 (20.4, 21.2)
47.2 (18.8, 28.4)
-13%
44 (17, 27)
-6%
46.4 (20.4, 26)
-12%
41.6 (20.4, 21.2)
-0%
46.4 (16.4, 30)
-12%
36 (16.4, 19.6)
13%
Response Time Black / White *
31.6 (18.8, 12.8)
27.6 (4.4, 23.2)
13%
24 (5.2, 18.8)
24%
28.8 (16.4, 12.4)
9%
34 (9.6, 24.4)
-8%
26.4 (6.8, 19.6)
16%
23.2 (12.4, 10.8)
27%
PWM Frequency
220 (90)
Screen
5%
8%
-3%
-13%
1%
-1%
Brightness
288
301
5%
268
-7%
311
8%
287
0%
316
10%
296
3%
Brightness Distribution
85
89
5%
95
12%
88
4%
88
4%
87
2%
84
-1%
Black Level *
0.24
0.294
-23%
0.32
-33%
0.25
-4%
0.3
-25%
0.35
-46%
0.32
-33%
Contrast
1296
1094
-16%
850
-34%
1308
1%
1020
-21%
934
-28%
909
-30%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.5
3.96
28%
2.61
53%
6.1
-11%
6.2
-13%
4.39
20%
4.3
22%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.2
3.15
49%
3.31
47%
8.8
-42%
5.8
6%
4.69
24%
4.3
31%
Gamma
2.02 119%
2.34 103%
2.35 102%
2.18 110%
2.04 118%
2.15 112%
2.31 104%
CCT
5950 109%
7082 92%
6360 102%
6172 105%
6277 104%
7101 92%
6529 100%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
55.96
53.8
-4%
63
13%
61.56
10%
39.62
-29%
62.52
12%
55.46
-1%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
85.77
82.7
-4%
95
11%
94.88
11%
61.44
-28%
96.71
13%
84.77
-1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
3% / 4%
9% / 8%
-3% / -3%
-9% / -11%
2% / 1%
10% / 3%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
31.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.8 ms rise
↘ 12.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20.4 ms rise
↘ 21.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).
 
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00
Intel Core i7-7600U
162 Points ∼100% +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
Intel Core i7-7500U
143 Points ∼88%
Fujitsu LifeBook U747
Intel Core i5-7200U
130 Points ∼80% -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE
Intel Core i7-6500U
128 Points ∼79% -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE
Intel Core i5-7200U
126 Points ∼78% -12%
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3
Intel Core i5-6300U
124 Points ∼77% -13%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00
Intel Core i7-7600U
368 Points ∼100% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
Intel Core i7-7500U
360 Points ∼98%
Fujitsu LifeBook U747
Intel Core i5-7200U
331 Points ∼90% -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE
Intel Core i5-7200U
326 Points ∼89% -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE
Intel Core i7-6500U
310 Points ∼84% -14%
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3
Intel Core i5-6300U
303 Points ∼82% -16%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
143 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
360 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
48.6 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.7 %
Segítség
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00
Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE
Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
Fujitsu LifeBook U747
Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
2%
-59%
-0%
-54%
-18%
Write 4k QD32
495.6
532.8
8%
279.2
-44%
376.7
-24%
249.7
-50%
425.4
-14%
Read 4k QD32
601.2
629.8
5%
339.6
-44%
559.2
-7%
399.1
-34%
496.2
-17%
Write 4k
172.2
167.4
-3%
86.48
-50%
159.9
-7%
87.8
-49%
134.6
-22%
Read 4k
60.97
53.15
-13%
34.05
-44%
53.26
-13%
35.73
-41%
55.46
-9%
Write 512
1098
1064
-3%
304.2
-72%
1244
13%
283.4
-74%
861.6
-22%
Read 512
814
832.3
2%
299.5
-63%
1252
54%
396.7
-51%
810.6
0%
Write Seq
1383
1666
20%
308.1
-78%
1265
-9%
497.8
-64%
1076
-22%
Read Seq
1827
1760
-4%
439.3
-76%
1649
-10%
504
-72%
1155
-37%
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
Sequential Read: 1827 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1383 MB/s
512K Read: 814 MB/s
512K Write: 1098 MB/s
4K Read: 60.97 MB/s
4K Write: 172.2 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 601.2 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 495.6 MB/s
Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
20h 52min
WiFi böngészés v1.3
8h 16min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 51min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
1h 50min
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
7500U, HD Graphics 620, 57 Wh, 1920x1080
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE
6500U, HD Graphics 520, 52 Wh, 2560x1440
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00
7600U, HD Graphics 620, 51 Wh, 2560x1440
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh, 1920x1080
Fujitsu LifeBook U747
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 50 Wh, 1920x1080
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3
6300U, HD Graphics 520, 45.6 Wh, 2560x1440
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB-005XUS
6300U, HD Graphics 520, 52 Wh, 1920x1080
Battery Runtime
-5%
-16%
-6%
-4%
-10%
-3%
WiFi v1.3
496
429
-14%
417
-16%
438
-12%
430
-13%
309
-38%
411
-17%
Load
110
115
5%
93
-15%
110
0%
117
6%
131
19%
123
12%

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017 (Core i7, Full-HD) Laptop rövid értékelés
Andreas Osthoff, 2017-03-17 (Update: 2017-03-17)