Notebookcheck

Lenovo P2 Smartphone rövid értékelés

Florian Wimmer, Stefanie Voigt (fordította Tamás Somogyi), 03/02/2017
Android ARM Touchscreen Smartphone

P, mint "potens telep". A Lenovo P2 néven piacra dobott egy erős középkategóriás telefont. Legfőbb erényének a viszonylag kis házba pakolt brutális akkut szánták. Az akksi valóban kiváló, de mi a helyzet a telefon többi részével?

Lenovo P2
Grafikus adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 506
Memória
4096 MB 
Kijelző
5.5 hüvelyk 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, kapacitív érintőkijelző, AMOLED, fényes: igen
Háttértár
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 23.87 GB ingyenes
Csatlakozók
1 USB 2.0, Audió csatlakozók: 3.5 mm audio jack, Kártyaolvasó: microSD max. 128 GB, 1 Ujjlenyomat olvasó, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Szenzorok: gyorsulásmérő, giroszenzor, közelségérzékelő, iránytű, USB OTG
Hálózat
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40); Sávszél.: (le/​fel): 300Mbps/​50Mbps (LTE), 42Mbps/​5.76Mbps (UMTS); SAR: 0.818 W/kg (fej); 1.6 W/kg (test), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 8.3 x 153 x 76
Akkumulátor
19.38 Wh, 5100 mAh Lítium-Ion, Beszédidő 3G (gyártói adat): 78 h, Készenlét 3G (gyártói adat): 768 h
Operációs rendszer
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix PDAF, dupla LED vaku, videók: 1080p
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: hangszóró az alsó oldalon, Billentyűzet: virtuális billentyűzet, töltő, USB kábel, headset, USB-OTG adapter, SIM tű, Theme Center, Lenovo Companion, SHAREit, SYNCit, 24 Hónap Garancia, FM rádió, fanless
Súly
177 g, Tápegység: 87 g
Ár
349 Euró
Hivatkozások
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

156.4 mm 76.4 mm 7 mm 165 g153 mm 76 mm 8.3 mm 177 g153.9 mm 75.4 mm 6.99 mm 149 g152.6 mm 77.4 mm 7.7 mm 155 g146.1 mm 71.4 mm 7.9 mm 159 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Mali-T830 MP3, 7880, 32 GB eMMC Flash
214 MBit/s ∼100% +141%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
121 MBit/s ∼57% +36%
Lenovo P2
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
88.8 MBit/s ∼41%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
Adreno 510, 652 MSM8976, 32 GB eMMC Flash
35.8 MBit/s ∼17% -60%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
32.9 MBit/s ∼15% -63%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo P2
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
216 MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Mali-T830 MP3, 7880, 32 GB eMMC Flash
167 MBit/s ∼77% -23%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
112 MBit/s ∼52% -48%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
Adreno 510, 652 MSM8976, 32 GB eMMC Flash
35.4 MBit/s ∼16% -84%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
31.2 MBit/s ∼14% -86%
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Crossing
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Crossing
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Bridge
GPS Lenovo P2: Overview
GPS Lenovo P2: Overview
GPS Lenovo P2: Crossing
GPS Lenovo P2: Crossing
GPS Lenovo P2: Bridge
GPS Lenovo P2: Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
501
cd/m²
482
cd/m²
456
cd/m²
493
cd/m²
479
cd/m²
455
cd/m²
497
cd/m²
480
cd/m²
454
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 501 cd/m² Átlag: 477.4 cd/m² Minimum: 4.33 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 91 %
Centrumban: 610 cd/m²
Kontraszt: ∞:1 (Fekete: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
Gamma: 2.28
Lenovo P2
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Lenovo Moto Z Play
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
Screen
8%
27%
-34%
-46%
Brightness middle
479
509
6%
539
13%
658
37%
625
30%
Brightness
477
511
7%
542
14%
633
33%
639
34%
Brightness Distribution
91
93
2%
93
2%
93
2%
92
1%
Black Level *
0.66
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.4
2.2
8%
1.6
33%
4.9
-104%
5.9
-146%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.6
5.8
-4%
2.6
54%
9.1
-63%
14.6
-161%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.8
2
29%
1.5
46%
5.8
-107%
3.8
-36%
Gamma
2.28 96%
2.25 98%
2.28 96%
2.26 97%
2.27 97%
CCT
6702 97%
6768 96%
6422 101%
7840 83%
7196 90%
Contrast
997

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240.4 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9439 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.2 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (40.2 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
63522 Points ∼22%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
61345 Points ∼22% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
60603 Points ∼21% -5%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
62484 Points ∼22% -2%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
83564 Points ∼29% +32%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
2875 Points ∼10%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
2525 Points ∼9% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
4098 Points ∼15% +43%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
4042 Points ∼15% +41%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
3427 Points ∼12% +19%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
818 Points ∼14%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
795 Points ∼14% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
775 Points ∼13% -5%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
820 Points ∼14% 0%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
1475 Points ∼26% +80%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
1673 Points ∼39%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1636 Points ∼38% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1713 Points ∼40% +2%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2109 Points ∼49% +26%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
1788 Points ∼41% +7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
380 Points ∼6%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
382 Points ∼6% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
710 Points ∼11% +87%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
380 Points ∼6% 0%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
759 Points ∼12% +100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
459 Points ∼8%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
461 Points ∼8% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
816 Points ∼14% +78%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
465 Points ∼8% +1%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
870 Points ∼15% +90%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
1682 Points ∼38%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1631 Points ∼37% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1752 Points ∼39% +4%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2112 Points ∼47% +26%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
1800 Points ∼40% +7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
726 Points ∼7%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
725 Points ∼7% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1053 Points ∼10% +45%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
719 Points ∼7% -1%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
1275 Points ∼12% +76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
831 Points ∼11%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
827 Points ∼11% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1155 Points ∼15% +39%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
842 Points ∼11% +1%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
1363 Points ∼17% +64%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
15462 Points ∼18%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
15923 Points ∼18% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13057 Points ∼15% -16%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
15984 Points ∼18% +3%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
11020 Points ∼13% -29%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
13398 Points ∼3%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
13437 Points ∼3% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13314 Points ∼3% -1%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
13466 Points ∼3% +1%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
21398 Points ∼4% +60%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
13808 Points ∼6%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
13920 Points ∼6% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13256 Points ∼6% -4%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
13955 Points ∼6% +1%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
17695 Points ∼8% +28%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
23 fps ∼0%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
23 fps ∼0% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
34 fps ∼0% +48%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
23 fps ∼0% 0%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
31 fps ∼0% +35%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
23 fps ∼1%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
23 fps ∼1% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
33 fps ∼1% +43%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
21 fps ∼1% -9%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
22 fps ∼1% -4%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
10 fps ∼2%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
10 fps ∼2% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
15 fps ∼3% +50%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
9.9 fps ∼2% -1%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
15 fps ∼3% +50%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
10 fps ∼3%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
10 fps ∼3% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
15 fps ∼4% +50%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
9.7 fps ∼3% -3%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
9.3 fps ∼3% -7%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
6.2 fps ∼0%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
6.2 fps ∼0% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
9.1 fps ∼0% +47%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6.2 fps ∼0% 0%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
9.4 fps ∼0% +52%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
6.7 fps ∼0%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
6.7 fps ∼0% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
9 fps ∼0% +34%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6.1 fps ∼0% -9%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
4.7 fps ∼0% -30%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
4810 Points ∼25%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
6767 Points ∼35% +41%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5035 Points ∼26% +5%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6785 Points ∼35% +41%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
4852 Points ∼25% +1%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
783 Points ∼38%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
649 Points ∼32% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
659 Points ∼32% -16%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
702 Points ∼35% -10%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
1009 Points ∼50% +29%
Graphics (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
1016 Points ∼4%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1013 Points ∼4% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1528 Points ∼5% +50%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1019 Points ∼4% 0%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
1581 Points ∼5% +56%
Memory (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
1451 Points ∼19%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
795 Points ∼11% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1508 Points ∼20% +4%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1042 Points ∼14% -28%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
1861 Points ∼25% +28%
System (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
1960 Points ∼12%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
2069 Points ∼13% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
2593 Points ∼16% +32%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2923 Points ∼18% +49%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
2338 Points ∼14% +19%
Overall (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
1226 Points ∼15%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1019 Points ∼12% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1408 Points ∼17% +15%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1215 Points ∼14% -1%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
1623 Points ∼19% +32%

Legend

 
Lenovo P2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto Z Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 Samsung Exynos 7880, ARM Mali-T830 MP3, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976, Qualcomm Adreno 510, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
8463 ms * ∼14%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
8168.9 ms * ∼14% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
6442.4 ms * ∼11% +24%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
8041.4 ms * ∼14% +5%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
3401.9 ms * ∼6% +60%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
4435 Points ∼8%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
4979 Points ∼10% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5256 Points ∼10% +19%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
4905 Points ∼9% +11%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
9005 Points ∼17% +103%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
28.883 Points ∼8%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
31.8 Points ∼9% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
32.222 Points ∼9% +12%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
31.118 Points ∼9% +8%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
52 Points ∼15% +80%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
84 Points ∼10%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
83 Points ∼10% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
89 Points ∼11% +6%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
84 Points ∼10% 0%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
59.41 MB/s ∼68%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
50.57 MB/s ∼58% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
55.98 MB/s ∼64% -6%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
50.07 MB/s ∼57% -16%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
56.25 MB/s ∼65% -5%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
79.25 MB/s ∼82%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
74.58 MB/s ∼77% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
73.71 MB/s ∼76% -7%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
79.22 MB/s ∼82% 0%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
74.63 MB/s ∼77% -6%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
44.4 MB/s ∼18%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
45.58 MB/s ∼18% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
12.13 MB/s ∼5% -73%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
7.4 MB/s ∼3% -83%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
14.45 MB/s ∼6% -67%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
38.2 MB/s ∼22%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
38.78 MB/s ∼22% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
22.41 MB/s ∼13% -41%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
74 MB/s ∼42% +94%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
36.53 MB/s ∼21% -4%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
76.74 MB/s ∼15%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
73.14 MB/s ∼15% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
77.1 MB/s ∼15% 0%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
188 MB/s ∼37% +145%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
80.81 MB/s ∼16% +5%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Lenovo P2
270.14 MB/s ∼18%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
254.78 MB/s ∼17% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
182.03 MB/s ∼12% -33%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
282 MB/s ∼19% +4%
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
231.85 MB/s ∼16% -14%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 BeállításokÉrték
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 BeállításokÉrték
 high55 fps
Max. terhelés
 30.8 °C28.1 °C28 °C 
 32 °C29.3 °C27.8 °C 
 31.2 °C28 °C27.9 °C 
Maximum: 32 °C
Átlag: 29.2 °C
28.5 °C29.5 °C29.3 °C
28.6 °C29.5 °C29.2 °C
28.1 °C28.9 °C28.5 °C
Maximum: 29.5 °C
Átlag: 28.9 °C
Tápegység (max.)  27.8 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.642.42525.436.13125.333.74032.926.15033.629.46331.634.38028.429.11002728.412520.829.71602246.220021.359.125020.866.931521.26640019.469.550019.566.263017.762.880017.967.8100017.870125017.372160017.476.6200016.779.3250017.277.7315018.275.7400017.971.8500017.666.7630017.758.2800017.860.51000017.959.91250018.165.61600018.262.1SPL3085.7N1.358.8median 17.9median 66.2Delta1.34.831.641.125.44025.336.732.93633.635.631.630.628.432.92733.820.841.72244.421.348.420.850.521.256.619.462.519.566.217.766.117.974.217.877.317.374.317.473.816.771.817.269.318.269.517.966.517.661.417.755.817.854.517.959.918.152.218.249.530831.350.1median 17.9median 61.41.39.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo P2Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Lenovo P2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.96 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0 / 0.23 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 0.54 / 1.01 / 1.03 Watt
Terhelés midlight 1.78 / 3.98 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo P2
5100 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z Play
3510 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
3000 mAh
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3000 mAh
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
7%
-25%
-80%
-70%
Idle Minimum *
0.54
0.51
6%
0.64
-19%
0.83
-54%
0.76
-41%
Idle Average *
1.01
0.87
14%
1.36
-35%
2.11
-109%
1.02
-1%
Idle Maximum *
1.03
0.9
13%
1.4
-36%
2.12
-106%
1.04
-1%
Load Average *
1.78
1.69
5%
2.53
-42%
3.41
-92%
4.4
-147%
Load Maximum *
3.98
4
-1%
3.63
9%
5.46
-37%
10.4
-161%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
47h 21min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
16h 18min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
19h 59min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
8h 48min
Lenovo P2
5100 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z Play
3510 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
3000 mAh
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3000 mAh
Alcatel One Touch Idol 4S
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-1%
-15%
-31%
-58%
Reader / Idle
2841
2540
-11%
2418
-15%
1502
-47%
H.264
1199
1190
-1%
984
-18%
905
-25%
WiFi v1.3
978
824
-16%
843
-14%
797
-19%
415
-58%
Load
528
652
23%
467
-12%
352
-33%

Pro

+ kiváló hangszóró
+ alig melegszik
+ stabil fém ház
+ nagyon hosszú üzemidő
+ alacsony fogyasztás
+ sok használati opció
+ jó szoftver
+ jó teljesítmény
+ jó betekintésű és színhű kijelző
+ dual-SIM, USB-OTG és NFC
+ elég jó kamera
+ használható teljesítmény
+ gyors tárhelyelérés
+ gyors LTE

Kontra

- kicsit pontatlanul illeszkedő burkolat
- nem tökéletes fordítású szoftver
- a mikrofon torzít
- rosszabb fényviszonyok esetén rosszabb fotók
- elég sötét kijelző
In review: Lenovo P2. Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Lenovo P2. Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

Azt már a bevezetőben is kiemeltük, hogy a Lenovo P2 akkuja nagyon sokáig bírja. Az viszont nagyon meglepett minket, hogy a Lenovo összességében is mennyire jól megvalósított telefont hozott össze. Elegáns, stabil ház, jó teljesítmény, elég éles fotók, jó testre szabhatóság, meglehetősen színhű AMOLED kijelző, remek hangszóró, valamint alacsony működési hőmérséklet. Első pillantásra nem sok panaszunk lehet.

Közelebbről megvizsgálva a telefont, azért találtunk hiányosságokat, például a szoftver tökéletlen fordítását, a kijelző viszonylag alacsony fényerejét és kékes színeit. A mikrofon sem tökéletes, és a kamera sem mindig fókuszál pontosan. Ezek azért összességében apróbb gondok, amelyek egy részét ráadásul szoftveres úton javítani lehet. Egyelőre azonban sajnos ezek megfosztják a Lenovo P2-t a "nagyon jó" értékeléstől.

Lenovo P2 egy erős középkategóriás telefon, amelynek nincs komolyabb hibája, üzemidő és hangminőség terén pedig kifejezetten jól teljesít.

Így is, a Lenovo P2 kiváló készülék, amelyet mindazok, akik középkategóriás okostelefont keresnek, felvehetnek a listájukra. A P2 különösen tetszeni fog azoknak, akiknek a hosszú üzemidő nagyon fontos.

Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű cikk itt olvasható.

Lenovo P2 - 02/24/2017 v6
Florian Wimmer

Váz
88%
Billentyűzet
69 / 75 → 91%
Érintőpad
94%
Csatlakoztathatóság
50 / 60 → 83%
Súly
90%
Akkumulátor
100%
Kijelző
89%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
28 / 63 → 44%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
49 / 70 → 70%
Hőmérséklet
95%
Zaj
100%
Audio
65 / 91 → 71%
Camera
77%
Átlag
76%
87%
Smartphone - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Lenovo P2 Smartphone rövid értékelés
Florian Wimmer, 2017-03- 2 (Update: 2017-03- 2)