Notebookcheck

Lenovo Moto C Smartphone rövid értékelés

Marcus Herbrich (fordította Tamás Somogyi), 08/30/2017
Android Touchscreen Smartphone

Új gazdaságos eszköz? A kínai Lenovo új C szériájával próbálja felkavarni az okostelefon piac alsó szegmensének állóvizét. Cikkünkből kiderül, hogy vajon sikerül-e neki.

Lenovo Moto C (Moto C Széria)
Processzor
Grafikus adapter
ARM Mali-T720
Memória
1024 MB 
Kijelző
5 hüvelyk 16:9, 854x480 pixel 196 PPI, kapacitív, LCD, TFT, kapacitív, fényes: igen
Háttértár
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10.4 GB ingyenes
Csatlakozók
1 USB 2.0, Audió csatlakozók: 3.5 mm-es audio jack, Kártyaolvasó: microSD, max. 32 GB, Szenzorok: gyorsulásmérő, Miracast
Hálózat
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM / GPRS / EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz) UMTS / HSPA+ (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz) 4G LTE (1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 9 x 145.5 x 73.6
Akkumulátor
2350 mAh Lítium-Polimer, removeable
Operációs rendszer
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 5 MPix ƒ / 2.4 rekesz, 1.4 µm 74° lencse, fix fókusz, LED vaku, Burst Mode, Panorama, HDR videók: 720p (30 fps), képfeldolgozás
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix f / 2.8 rekesz, 1.0 µm 63° lencse, FF, LED vaku, Burst Mode, HDR képfeldolgozás
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: mono, Billentyűzet: virtuális, moduláris hálózati adapter, USB kábel, Lenovo UI, SAR: 0.644 W/kg (fej) , fanless
Súly
154 g
Ár
85 Euró
Hivatkozások

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
394 MBit/s ∼100% +802%
Lenovo C2
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash
50.5 MBit/s ∼13% +16%
ZTE Blade A510
Mali-T720, MT6735P, 8 GB eMMC Flash
48.7 MBit/s ∼12% +11%
Lenovo Moto C
Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
43.7 MBit/s ∼11%
Gretel A9
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
42.3 MBit/s ∼11% -3%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
639 MBit/s ∼100% +1254%
Lenovo C2
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash
53.3 MBit/s ∼8% +13%
Gretel A9
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
51.4 MBit/s ∼8% +9%
ZTE Blade A510
Mali-T720, MT6735P, 8 GB eMMC Flash
47.9 MBit/s ∼7% +1%
Lenovo Moto C
Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
47.2 MBit/s ∼7%
GPS test Garmin Edge 500
GPS test Garmin Edge 500
GPS test Garmin Edge 500
GPS test Lenovo Moto C
GPS test Lenovo Moto C
GPS test Lenovo Moto C

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
342
cd/m²
354
cd/m²
371
cd/m²
340
cd/m²
364
cd/m²
360
cd/m²
345
cd/m²
361
cd/m²
361
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 371 cd/m² Átlag: 355.3 cd/m² Minimum: 6.34 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 92 %
Centrumban: 364 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1174:1 (Fekete: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 10.4 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 12.7 | - Ø
89.5% sRGB (Calman)
Gamma: 2.04
Lenovo Moto C
TFT, 854x480, 5
ZTE Blade A510
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Huawei Y5 II
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Lenovo C2
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Gretel A9
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Ulefone Metal
IPS, 1280x720, 5
HTC U11
Super LCD5, 2560x1440, 5.5
Screen
5%
-12%
-24%
17%
3%
-12%
34%
Brightness
355
524
48%
349
-2%
443
25%
449
26%
370
4%
315
-11%
472
33%
Brightness Distribution
92
94
2%
89
-3%
90
-2%
92
0%
90
-2%
87
-5%
90
-2%
Black Level *
0.31
0.62
-100%
0.65
-110%
0.84
-171%
0.35
-13%
0.39
-26%
0.56
-81%
0.33
-6%
Contrast
1174
852
-27%
529
-55%
554
-53%
1309
11%
974
-17%
557
-53%
1461
24%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
10.4
5.2
50%
5.8
44%
7.8
25%
6.5
37%
8
23%
6.8
35%
3.2
69%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
12.7
5.7
55%
5.7
55%
8.4
34%
7.7
39%
8.5
33%
7.1
44%
2.2
83%
Gamma
2.04 118%
1.99 121%
2.1 114%
2.07 116%
2.15 112%
2.8 86%
2.77 87%
2.22 108%
CCT
12904 50%
6631 98%
7792 83%
8438 77%
8518 76%
8337 78%
7402 88%
6581 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6285 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
86 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 66 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
94 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 52 ms rise
↘ 42 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto C
25338 Points ∼11%
ZTE Blade A510
24338 Points ∼11% -4%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
23657 Points ∼10% -7%
Huawei Y5 II
23795 Points ∼10% -6%
Lenovo C2
23825 Points ∼10% -6%
Gretel A9
29237 Points ∼13% +15%
Ulefone Metal
37103 Points ∼16% +46%
HTC U11
175032 Points ∼77% +591%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto C
2313 Points ∼34%
ZTE Blade A510
2109 Points ∼31% -9%
Gretel A9
2436 Points ∼36% +5%
HTC U11
6828 Points ∼100% +195%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto C
2877 Points ∼35%
ZTE Blade A510
2675 Points ∼32% -7%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2807 Points ∼34% -2%
Huawei Y5 II
3237 Points ∼39% +13%
Lenovo C2
1908 Points ∼23% -34%
Gretel A9
3293 Points ∼40% +14%
Ulefone Metal
4079 Points ∼49% +42%
HTC U11
8295 Points ∼100% +188%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto C
534 Points ∼35%
ZTE Blade A510
10 Points ∼1% -98%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
9 Points ∼1% -98%
Huawei Y5 II
10 Points ∼1% -98%
Lenovo C2
9 Points ∼1% -98%
Gretel A9
10 Points ∼1% -98%
Ulefone Metal
10 Points ∼1% -98%
HTC U11
1221 Points ∼79% +129%
Graphics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto C
177 Points ∼2%
ZTE Blade A510
174 Points ∼2% -2%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
175 Points ∼2% -1%
Huawei Y5 II
283 Points ∼3% +60%
Lenovo C2
177 Points ∼2% 0%
Gretel A9
209 Points ∼2% +18%
Ulefone Metal
433 Points ∼5% +145%
HTC U11
5976 Points ∼69% +3276%
Memory (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto C
419 Points ∼9%
ZTE Blade A510
285 Points ∼6% -32%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
354 Points ∼8% -16%
Huawei Y5 II
375 Points ∼8% -11%
Lenovo C2
332 Points ∼8% -21%
Gretel A9
468 Points ∼11% +12%
Ulefone Metal
802 Points ∼18% +91%
HTC U11
2085 Points ∼47% +398%
System (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto C
883 Points ∼13%
ZTE Blade A510
829 Points ∼13% -6%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
838 Points ∼13% -5%
Huawei Y5 II
1094 Points ∼17% +24%
Lenovo C2
826 Points ∼13% -6%
Gretel A9
1030 Points ∼16% +17%
Ulefone Metal
1691 Points ∼26% +92%
HTC U11
5570 Points ∼85% +531%
Overall (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto C
432 Points ∼11%
ZTE Blade A510
141 Points ∼4% -67%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
148 Points ∼4% -66%
Huawei Y5 II
183 Points ∼5% -58%
Lenovo C2
147 Points ∼4% -66%
Gretel A9
176 Points ∼5% -59%
Ulefone Metal
273 Points ∼7% -37%
HTC U11
3034 Points ∼80% +602%
Geekbench 4.1
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto C
1254 Points ∼7%
Gretel A9
1468 Points ∼8% +17%
HTC U11
6443 Points ∼35% +414%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto C
450 Points ∼9%
Gretel A9
537 Points ∼11% +19%
HTC U11
1906 Points ∼39% +324%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto C
7209 Points ∼10%
ZTE Blade A510
7025 Points ∼10% -3%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
6902 Points ∼10% -4%
Huawei Y5 II
Points ∼0% -100%
Gretel A9
8339 Points ∼12% +16%
Ulefone Metal
10371 Points ∼14% +44%
HTC U11
20140 Points ∼28% +179%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto C
2706 Points ∼1%
ZTE Blade A510
2682 Points ∼1% -1%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2681 Points ∼1% -1%
Huawei Y5 II
Points ∼0% -100%
Gretel A9
3235 Points ∼1% +20%
Ulefone Metal
6469 Points ∼1% +139%
HTC U11
55725 Points ∼12% +1959%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto C
3142 Points ∼2%
ZTE Blade A510
3109 Points ∼2% -1%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
3103 Points ∼2% -1%
Huawei Y5 II
Points ∼0% -100%
Lenovo C2
Points ∼0% -100%
Gretel A9
3744 Points ∼2% +19%
Ulefone Metal
7059 Points ∼4% +125%
HTC U11
40014 Points ∼20% +1174%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto C
5.1 fps ∼0%
ZTE Blade A510
4.9 fps ∼0% -4%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
8.7 fps ∼1% +71%
Huawei Y5 II
8.4 fps ∼1% +65%
Lenovo C2
5 fps ∼0% -2%
Gretel A9
6 fps ∼0% +18%
Ulefone Metal
19 fps ∼1% +273%
HTC U11
91 fps ∼7% +1684%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto C
13 fps ∼3%
ZTE Blade A510
8.5 fps ∼2% -35%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
4.9 fps ∼1% -62%
Huawei Y5 II
15 fps ∼3% +15%
Lenovo C2
8.5 fps ∼2% -35%
Gretel A9
10 fps ∼2% -23%
Ulefone Metal
12 fps ∼3% -8%
HTC U11
58 fps ∼13% +346%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto C
1.6 fps ∼0%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
3.6 fps ∼1% +125%
Huawei Y5 II
fps ∼0% -100%
Lenovo C2
fps ∼0% -100%
Gretel A9
2.2 fps ∼0% +38%
Ulefone Metal
2.9 fps ∼1% +81%
HTC U11
51 fps ∼9% +3088%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto C
7.8 fps ∼2%
ZTE Blade A510
3.5 fps ∼1% -55%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
1.2 fps ∼0% -85%
Huawei Y5 II
6.1 fps ∼2% -22%
Lenovo C2
3.7 fps ∼1% -53%
Gretel A9
4.5 fps ∼1% -42%
Ulefone Metal
6.4 fps ∼2% -18%
HTC U11
29 fps ∼8% +272%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto C
5.5 fps ∼1%
ZTE Blade A510
1.1 fps ∼0% -80%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2.7 fps ∼1% -51%
Huawei Y5 II
fps ∼0% -100%
Lenovo C2
1.2 fps ∼0% -78%
Gretel A9
1.4 fps ∼0% -75%
Ulefone Metal
8.9 fps ∼2% +62%
HTC U11
33 fps ∼8% +500%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto C
1.2 fps ∼1%
ZTE Blade A510
2.5 fps ∼1% +108%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
1.2 fps ∼1% 0%
Huawei Y5 II
fps ∼0% -100%
Lenovo C2
2.7 fps ∼2% +125%
Gretel A9
3.2 fps ∼2% +167%
Ulefone Metal
4.5 fps ∼3% +275%
HTC U11
15 fps ∼9% +1150%
Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto C
36.6 fps ∼59%
HTC U11
60 fps ∼97% +64%

Legend

 
Lenovo Moto C Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade A510 Mediatek MT6735P, ARM Mali-T720, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Archos 50 Platinum 4G Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Y5 II Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo C2 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Gretel A9 Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Ulefone Metal Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC U11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
69.51 Points ∼100% +495%
Huawei Y5 II (Chrome 50)
18.47 Points ∼27% +58%
Ulefone Metal (Chrome Version 52)
17.831 Points ∼26% +53%
Gretel A9 (Chrome 58)
16.2 Points ∼23% +39%
Lenovo C2 (Chrome 55)
13.502 Points ∼19% +16%
ZTE Blade A510 (Chrome Version 56)
12.784 Points ∼18% +9%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G (Chrome Browser Version 52)
12.755 Points ∼18% +9%
Lenovo Moto C (Chrome Version 60)
11.676 Points ∼17%
Octane V2 - Total Score
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
11781 Points ∼100% +581%
Ulefone Metal (Chrome Version 52)
2738 Points ∼23% +58%
Huawei Y5 II (Chrome 50)
2707 Points ∼23% +56%
Gretel A9 (Chrome 58)
2392 Points ∼20% +38%
Lenovo C2 (Chrome 55)
2159 Points ∼18% +25%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G (Chrome Browser Version 52)
2122 Points ∼18% +23%
ZTE Blade A510 (Chrome Version 56)
2102 Points ∼18% +22%
Lenovo Moto C (Chrome Version 60)
1730 Points ∼15%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Lenovo Moto C (Chrome Version 60)
19879.3 ms * ∼100%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G (Chrome Browser Version 52)
19092.2 ms * ∼96% +4%
ZTE Blade A510 (Chrome Version 56)
17364.1 ms * ∼87% +13%
Lenovo C2 (Chrome 55)
16585 ms * ∼83% +17%
Gretel A9 (Chrome 58)
15146 ms * ∼76% +24%
Ulefone Metal (Chrome Version 52)
13397.3 ms * ∼67% +33%
Huawei Y5 II (Chrome 50)
12505 ms * ∼63% +37%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
2760.3 ms * ∼14% +86%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
162 Points ∼100% +315%
Lenovo Moto C (Chrome Version 60)
39 Points ∼24%

* ... smaller is better

Lenovo Moto CZTE Blade A510Archos 50 Platinum 4GHuawei Y5 IILenovo C2Gretel A9Ulefone MetalHTC U11
AndroBench 3-5
-9%
-2%
23%
-11%
18%
73%
406%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
10.7
16.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
54%
15.58 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
46%
18.03 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
69%
16.1
50%
14.81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
38%
27.6
158%
46.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
332%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
13.5
25.55 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
89%
31.85 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
136%
29.47 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
118%
24.2
79%
23.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
77%
49.6
267%
68.82 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
410%
Random Write 4KB
10.9
4.69
-57%
4.35
-60%
6
-45%
4.7
-57%
10.1
-7%
7.87
-28%
79.97
634%
Random Read 4KB
18.37
14.03
-24%
14.31
-22%
27.3
49%
14.5
-21%
18.1
-1%
22.18
21%
91.45
398%
Sequential Write 256KB
44.55
9.94
-78%
7.56
-83%
21.6
-52%
8
-82%
44.5
0%
39.91
-10%
206.41
363%
Sequential Read 256KB
179.28
111.91
-38%
125.37
-30%
173.3
-3%
120.7
-33%
176.2
-2%
228.84
28%
717.33
300%
Dead Trigger 2
 BeállításokÉrték
 high29 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 BeállításokÉrték
 high12 fps
 very low22 fps
Max. terhelés
 31.1 °C29.9 °C29.4 °C 
 31.9 °C30.2 °C30 °C 
 32.3 °C30.3 °C30 °C 
Maximum: 32.3 °C
Átlag: 30.6 °C
29.4 °C30.9 °C32.1 °C
29.4 °C31.3 °C33.1 °C
29.6 °C31.2 °C34.4 °C
Maximum: 34.4 °C
Átlag: 31.3 °C
Tápegység (max.)  32.6 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.630.832.62528.730.428.73128.329.828.34031.932.731.9502830.9286327.728.727.78026.232.126.210026.334.126.312532.628.832.616025.923.725.92003321.13325040.12040.131547.819.647.840054.32254.350061.223.661.26306718.46780072.217.872.2100073.718.773.7125072.717.672.7160073.216.373.2200071.616.571.6250070.416.470.4315068.916.268.940007016.170500070.51670.5630072.216.272.2800075.616.175.61000075.11675.1125006815.8681600055.415.955.4SPL83.729.983.7N57.31.457.3median 68.9Lenovo Moto Cmedian 17.6median 68.9Delta12.22.912.231.636.725.435.425.33932.935.233.633.731.635.428.434.9272720.823.8222421.322.820.824.621.222.219.425.419.533.417.746.617.960.617.868.217.369.317.47216.773.717.268.418.268.317.969.417.667.517.756.217.852.917.95818.156.718.2403080.31.338.2median 17.9ZTE Blade A510median 56.21.319.432.441.331.337.831.735.42634.939.440.336.232.928.632.525.424.321.323.723.322.422.525.822.426.221.336.518.444.417.55617.560.817.269.516.870.117.372.817.472.316.672.217.368.717.665.417.667.117.76717.467.817.769.217.968.618.162.718.151.329.881.21.346.6median 17.7Archos 50 Platinum 4Gmedian 65.41.614.2hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Lenovo Moto C audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

ZTE Blade A510 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.26 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | very high mids - on average 15.8% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (16.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (44.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 99% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 99% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Archos 50 Platinum 4G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.17 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 8.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Lenovo Moto C
2350 mAh
Lenovo Moto C Plus
4000 mAh
ZTE Blade A510
2200 mAh
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2200 mAh
Huawei Y5 II
2200 mAh
Lenovo C2
2750 mAh
Gretel A9
2300 mAh
Ulefone Metal
3050 mAh
HTC U11
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
Idle Minimum *
0.8
0.61
0.59
0.54
0.71
0.77
1.41
0.73
Idle Average *
1.87
1.75
1.68
1.58
1.62
1.99
2.46
1.96
Idle Maximum *
1.89
1.83
1.79
1.7
1.64
2.2
2.83
1.98
Load Average *
2.18
4.49
4.22
2.98
3.24
4.99
5.15
4.82
Load Maximum *
3.61
5.14
4.26
4.98
3.36
5.14
7.05
7.15

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
19h 19min
WiFi böngészés v1.3
8h 37min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 49min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
4h 38min
Lenovo Moto C
2350 mAh
ZTE Blade A510
2200 mAh
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2200 mAh
Huawei Y5 II
2200 mAh
Lenovo C2
2750 mAh
Gretel A9
2300 mAh
Ulefone Metal
3050 mAh
HTC U11
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-20%
-26%
-6%
16%
-24%
-22%
-4%
Reader / Idle
1159
1102
-5%
1250
8%
H.264
529
498
-6%
WiFi v1.3
517
416
-20%
384
-26%
503
-3%
662
28%
458
-11%
403
-22%
560
8%
Load
278
253
-9%
287
3%
174
-37%
212
-24%

Pro

+ ár
+ jó üzemidő
+ jó képminőség (az árához képest)
+ Dual Sim + SD olvasó
+ kivehető telep

Kontra

- sötét TFT panel
- GPS modul
- gyenge lapkakészlet
- lassú eMMC tárhely
Reviewed: Lenovo Moto C. Test unit provided by Lenovo Germany.

A Lenovo tényleg jó kis alsó kategóriás telefont hozott össze...ha a kijelzőjét nem számítjuk. Számunkra még a meglepően jó kamera (a fix fókusz ellenére), az árához képest remek hang, a hosszú üzemidő, a cserélhető telep, a dual-SIM képesség nyújtotta rugalmasság és az SD slot sem ellensúlyozta a pocsék TFT kijelzőt, és annak felbontását. A design és a rossz kijelző/készülékméret arány ízlés kérdése, de amúgy jól összerakott készülék.

A kijelzőt leszámítva, nincs panaszunk a Moto C-re. A memória és a lapkakészlet sebessége is olyan, amilyet ebben az árfekvésben várhatunk.

Némileg meglepő, hogy egy olyan gyártó, mint a Lenovo, 2017-ben még egy ilyen gyatra és alacsony felbontású panelt építsen akár egy £100-os telefonba is.

Ugyan TFT panelhez képest nem rossz a kijelző, mégsem ajánljuk a Moto C-t - legalábbis nem a gyártó által ajánlott eladási áron.

Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű cikk itt olvasható.

Lenovo Moto C - 08/28/2017 v6
Marcus Herbrich

Váz
79%
Billentyűzet
63 / 75 → 84%
Érintőpad
83%
Csatlakoztathatóság
34 / 60 → 56%
Súly
92%
Akkumulátor
91%
Kijelző
77%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
9 / 63 → 15%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
25 / 70 → 35%
Hőmérséklet
93%
Zaj
100%
Audio
55 / 91 → 60%
Camera
56%
Átlag
66%
77%
Smartphone - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Lenovo Moto C Smartphone rövid értékelés
Marcus Herbrich, 2017-08-30 (Update: 2017-08-30)