Notebookcheck

LG X Power okostelefon rövid értékelés

Hosszan tartó. Az LG X Power hatalmas akkumulátorral és alacsony árral akar meggyőzni minket. A koreai gyártó ezen kívül gyorstöltő funkcióval és USB OTG-vel is ellátta, amellyel barátaink okostelefonjait is tölthetjük. Derítse ki, hogy valójában meddig bírja az akkumulátor, és hogy az okostelefon vajon más dolgokban is jeleskedik-e ebben a jelentésben.
Florian Wimmer, Sven Kloevekorn (fordította Tamás Somogyi),
Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen
LG X Power K220 (X Series Széria)
Processzor
Mediatek MT6735 4 x 1.3 GHz, Cortex-A53
Grafikus adapter
ARM Mali-T720 MP2
Memória
2048 MB 
Kijelző
5.30 hüvelyk 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 277 PPI, IPS LCD kapacitív érintőkijelző, 16 millió színárnyalat, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 3, fényes: igen
Háttértár
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10.8 GB ingyenes
Csatlakozók
1 USB 2.0, Kártyaolvasó: micro-SD max. 2 TB, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Szenzorok: közelségérzékelő, iránytű, gyorsulásmérő
Hálózat
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B38); sávszélesség (letöltés/feltöltés): 150Mbps/​50Mbps (LTE), 42Mbps/​5.76Mbps (UMTS); SAR érték: 0.66 W/kg (fej), 1.38 W/kg (test), LTE, GPS
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 7.9 x 148.9 x 74.9
Akkumulátor
15.6 Wh, 4100 mAh Lítium-Ion, nem kivehető
Operációs rendszer
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/​2.2, AF, LED vaku, 1080p/​30FPS videók
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/​2.4
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: hátsó hangszóró, Billentyűzet: virtuális billentyűzet, töltő, USB kábel, headset, LG Smartworld, QuickMemo+, RemoteCall Service, 24 Hónap Garancia, FM rádió, USB OTG, Mediatek Pump Express Plus, WiFi Direct, Android Beam, fanless
Súly
139 g, Tápegység: 52 g
Ár
199 Euró
Hivatkozások
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

156.3 mm 77.5 mm 8.9 mm 156.3 g151 mm 77 mm 8.5 mm 202 g148.9 mm 74.9 mm 7.9 mm 139 g145 mm 72 mm 9 mm 148 g141 mm 68.88 mm 8.45 mm 149 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Klaus I211)
532 MBit/s ∼100% +1030%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
320 MBit/s ∼60% +579%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
281 MBit/s ∼53% +497%
LG X Power K220
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
47.1 MBit/s ∼9%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Klaus I211)
485 MBit/s ∼100% +807%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
335 MBit/s ∼69% +526%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
323 MBit/s ∼67% +504%
LG X Power K220
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
53.5 MBit/s ∼11%
GPS Garmin Edge – overview
GPS Garmin Edge – overview
GPS Garmin Edge – crossing
GPS Garmin Edge – crossing
GPS Garmin Edge – riverside
GPS Garmin Edge – riverside
GPS LG X Power – overview
GPS LG X Power – overview
GPS LG X Power – crossing
GPS LG X Power – crossing
GPS LG X Power – riverside
GPS LG X Power – riverside

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
322
cd/m²
372
cd/m²
363
cd/m²
343
cd/m²
381
cd/m²
361
cd/m²
330
cd/m²
346
cd/m²
353
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 381 cd/m² Átlag: 352.3 cd/m² Minimum: 3.09 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 85 %
Centrumban: 381 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1905:1 (Fekete: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.3 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 7.4 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
Gamma: 2.26
LG X Power K220
IPS, 1280x720, 5.30
Archos 50 Power
IPS, 1280x720, 5.00
Acer Liquid Z630S
IPS, 1280x720, 5.50
Lenovo ZUK Z2
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.00
UMI Super Euro Edition
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50
Screen
-6%
5%
-1%
13%
Brightness middle
381
304
-20%
350
-8%
512
34%
418
10%
Brightness
352
311
-12%
345
-2%
502
43%
410
16%
Brightness Distribution
85
83
-2%
84
-1%
84
-1%
85
0%
Black Level *
0.2
0.31
-55%
0.27
-35%
0.58
-190%
0.31
-55%
Contrast
1905
981
-49%
1296
-32%
883
-54%
1348
-29%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
7.3
5.9
19%
4.7
36%
3.8
48%
4.4
40%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
21.2
14.3
33%
8.5
60%
11.2
47%
6.5
69%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7.4
4.6
38%
5.6
24%
2.7
64%
3.6
51%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.51 88%
1.84 120%
2.09 105%
2.36 93%
CCT
8417 77%
7088 92%
6795 96%
6076 107%
6993 93%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 27 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
58 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 27 ms rise
↘ 31 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9581 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG X Power K220
30432 Points ∼10%
Archos 50 Power
23996 Points ∼8% -21%
Acer Liquid Z630S
35585 Points ∼12% +17%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
122513 Points ∼42% +303%
UMI Super Euro Edition
50072 Points ∼17% +65%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
LG X Power K220
860 Points ∼16%
Acer Liquid Z630S
1113 Points ∼21% +29%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
1706 Points ∼32% +98%
UMI Super Euro Edition
1144 Points ∼22% +33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
LG X Power K220
165 Points ∼1%
Acer Liquid Z630S
229 Points ∼1% +39%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
4506 Points ∼27% +2631%
UMI Super Euro Edition
523 Points ∼3% +217%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
LG X Power K220
201 Points ∼2%
Archos 50 Power
122 Points ∼1% -39%
Acer Liquid Z630S
278 Points ∼2% +38%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
3302 Points ∼29% +1543%
UMI Super Euro Edition
595 Points ∼5% +196%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
LG X Power K220
10103 Points ∼10%
Archos 50 Power
6981 Points ∼7% -31%
Acer Liquid Z630S
10508 Points ∼11% +4%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
20910 Points ∼22% +107%
UMI Super Euro Edition
11654 Points ∼12% +15%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
LG X Power K220
4330 Points ∼1%
Archos 50 Power
2581 Points ∼0% -40%
Acer Liquid Z630S
6250 Points ∼1% +44%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
32997 Points ∼5% +662%
UMI Super Euro Edition
10567 Points ∼2% +144%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
LG X Power K220
4960 Points ∼2%
Archos 50 Power
3001 Points ∼1% -39%
Acer Liquid Z630S
6868 Points ∼2% +38%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
29241 Points ∼10% +490%
UMI Super Euro Edition
10791 Points ∼4% +118%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
LG X Power K220
8.4 fps ∼0%
Archos 50 Power
4.9 fps ∼0% -42%
Acer Liquid Z630S
12 fps ∼0% +43%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
91 fps ∼1% +983%
UMI Super Euro Edition
17 fps ∼0% +102%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
LG X Power K220
15 fps ∼0%
Archos 50 Power
8.6 fps ∼0% -43%
Acer Liquid Z630S
21 fps ∼1% +40%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
60 fps ∼2% +300%
UMI Super Euro Edition
18 fps ∼1% +20%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
LG X Power K220
3.1 fps ∼0%
Archos 50 Power
1.6 fps ∼0% -48%
Acer Liquid Z630S
4.2 fps ∼0% +35%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
44 fps ∼5% +1319%
UMI Super Euro Edition
7.1 fps ∼1% +129%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
LG X Power K220
6.6 fps ∼2%
Archos 50 Power
3.6 fps ∼1% -45%
Acer Liquid Z630S
9 fps ∼2% +36%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
43 fps ∼12% +552%
UMI Super Euro Edition
7.5 fps ∼2% +14%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
LG X Power K220
2 fps ∼0%
Archos 50 Power
0.87 fps ∼0% -56%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
30 fps ∼1% +1400%
UMI Super Euro Edition
4.7 fps ∼0% +135%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
LG X Power K220
4.1 fps ∼0%
Archos 50 Power
2.5 fps ∼0% -39%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
29 fps ∼1% +607%
UMI Super Euro Edition
5.1 fps ∼0% +24%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
LG X Power K220
3759 Points ∼19%
Archos 50 Power
2824 Points ∼14% -25%
Acer Liquid Z630S
3814 Points ∼19% +1%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
6969 Points ∼35% +85%
UMI Super Euro Edition
4596 Points ∼23% +22%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
LG X Power K220
10 Points ∼0%
Archos 50 Power
9 Points ∼0% -10%
Acer Liquid Z630S
627 Points ∼31% +6170%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
1071 Points ∼53% +10610%
UMI Super Euro Edition
771 Points ∼38% +7610%
Graphics (sort by value)
LG X Power K220
290 Points ∼1%
Archos 50 Power
173 Points ∼1% -40%
Acer Liquid Z630S
416 Points ∼1% +43%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
4335 Points ∼15% +1395%
UMI Super Euro Edition
666 Points ∼2% +130%
Memory (sort by value)
LG X Power K220
521 Points ∼6%
Archos 50 Power
643 Points ∼7% +23%
Acer Liquid Z630S
540 Points ∼6% +4%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
1983 Points ∼22% +281%
UMI Super Euro Edition
1052 Points ∼12% +102%
System (sort by value)
LG X Power K220
1092 Points ∼7%
Archos 50 Power
911 Points ∼6% -17%
Acer Liquid Z630S
1614 Points ∼10% +48%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
2986 Points ∼18% +173%
UMI Super Euro Edition
2187 Points ∼13% +100%
Overall (sort by value)
LG X Power K220
200 Points ∼2%
Archos 50 Power
176 Points ∼2% -12%
Acer Liquid Z630S
691 Points ∼8% +246%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
2290 Points ∼27% +1045%
UMI Super Euro Edition
1043 Points ∼12% +422%
Geekbench 4.0
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
LG X Power K220
810 Points ∼6%
UMI Super Euro Edition
1561 Points ∼12% +93%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
LG X Power K220
1506 Points ∼4%
UMI Super Euro Edition
2818 Points ∼7% +87%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
LG X Power K220
560 Points ∼9%
UMI Super Euro Edition
727 Points ∼11% +30%

Legend

 
LG X Power K220 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Archos 50 Power Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Acer Liquid Z630S Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo ZUK Z2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
UMI Super Euro Edition Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG X Power K220
2657 Points ∼4%
Archos 50 Power
2116 Points ∼3% -20%
Acer Liquid Z630S
2855 Points ∼5% +7%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
8436 Points ∼14% +218%
UMI Super Euro Edition
4117 Points ∼7% +55%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG X Power K220
13196 ms * ∼22%
Archos 50 Power
18480.5 ms * ∼31% -40%
Acer Liquid Z630S
12876 ms * ∼22% +2%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
3290.2 ms * ∼6% +75%
UMI Super Euro Edition
9410.2 ms * ∼16% +29%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG X Power K220
18.133 Points ∼5%
Archos 50 Power
13.16 Points ∼3% -27%
Acer Liquid Z630S
19.028 Points ∼5% +5%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
51.655 Points ∼13% +185%
UMI Super Euro Edition
26.211 Points ∼7% +45%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
LG X Power K220
18.17 MB/s ∼21%
Archos 50 Power
MB/s ∼0% -100%
UMI Super Euro Edition
17.88 MB/s ∼21% -2%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
LG X Power K220
32.08 MB/s ∼33%
Archos 50 Power
MB/s ∼0% -100%
UMI Super Euro Edition
36.22 MB/s ∼38% +13%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
LG X Power K220
7.32 MB/s ∼2%
Archos 50 Power
8.78 MB/s ∼3% +20%
Acer Liquid Z630S
5.82 MB/s ∼2% -20%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
5.64 MB/s ∼2% -23%
UMI Super Euro Edition
11.88 MB/s ∼4% +62%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
LG X Power K220
18.78 MB/s ∼5%
Archos 50 Power
26.47 MB/s ∼7% +41%
Acer Liquid Z630S
28.43 MB/s ∼8% +51%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
21.27 MB/s ∼6% +13%
UMI Super Euro Edition
28.17 MB/s ∼8% +50%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
LG X Power K220
43.74 MB/s ∼3%
Archos 50 Power
41.43 MB/s ∼3% -5%
Acer Liquid Z630S
67.7 MB/s ∼5% +55%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
46.52 MB/s ∼4% +6%
UMI Super Euro Edition
126.95 MB/s ∼10% +190%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
LG X Power K220
196.81 MB/s ∼10%
Archos 50 Power
199.7 MB/s ∼10% +1%
Acer Liquid Z630S
249.01 MB/s ∼12% +27%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
239.42 MB/s ∼12% +22%
UMI Super Euro Edition
257.8 MB/s ∼13% +31%
Max. terhelés
 32.1 °C32.2 °C36 °C 
 32.7 °C34.8 °C36.5 °C 
 34.3 °C36 °C36.4 °C 
Maximum: 36.5 °C
Átlag: 34.6 °C
31.7 °C32.4 °C31.9 °C
33.5 °C35.9 °C34.6 °C
34.1 °C37.3 °C37.7 °C
Maximum: 37.7 °C
Átlag: 34.3 °C
Tápegység (max.)  30.3 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.653.42525.432.93125.3304032.937.25033.640.66331.640.48028.432.41002729.212520.823.81602222.520021.327.725020.834.631521.240.640019.448.950019.55563017.760.480017.969.2100017.874.9125017.380.1160017.477.1200016.773.7250017.275315018.275.5400017.974.2500017.674.9630017.778.7800017.882.71000017.9771250018.166.81600018.264.8SPL3088.5N1.371.5median 17.9median 69.2Delta1.315.532.633.332.432.635.933.431.335.935.124.931.735.135.130.82635.140.137.339.440.132.429.336.232.4272428.62725.227.525.425.224.727.221.324.72723.523.32729.523.322.529.540.425.722.440.448.728.121.348.755.235.518.455.263.343.317.563.367.747.717.567.774.754.717.274.776.75816.876.775.156.217.375.173.153.917.473.17352.716.67371.451.417.371.471.751.717.671.772.751.517.672.774.654.517.774.674.854.617.474.87353.117.77371.85217.971.864.944.718.164.949.729.618.149.785.265.529.885.262.218.61.362.2median 71.4median 51.4median 17.7median 71.41310.51.61331.635.325.432.525.331.832.929.133.634.231.628.928.428.22726.420.825.92224.121.323.220.826.521.232.719.440.919.551.717.755.117.963.917.867.417.368.617.465.616.768.417.267.218.269.217.974.917.66717.763.917.866.117.963.118.151.618.2473080.21.342.3median 17.9median 63.11.314.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLG X Power K220Archos 50 PowerUMI Super Euro Edition
LG X Power K220 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Archos 50 Power audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.16 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 38.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

UMI Super Euro Edition audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.18 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 36.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 92% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 93% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.02 / 0.22 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 0.64 / 1.3 / 1.34 Watt
Terhelés midlight 4.18 / 4.87 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
LG X Power K220
4100 mAh
Archos 50 Power
4000 mAh
Acer Liquid Z630S
4000 mAh
Lenovo ZUK Z2
3500 mAh
UMI Super Euro Edition
4000 mAh
Power Consumption
-85%
-74%
-57%
-46%
Idle Minimum *
0.64
1.66
-159%
1.82
-184%
1.31
-105%
0.84
-31%
Idle Average *
1.3
2.88
-122%
2.35
-81%
2.03
-56%
1.94
-49%
Idle Maximum *
1.34
3.46
-158%
2.6
-94%
2.08
-55%
2.07
-54%
Load Average *
4.18
3.96
5%
3.69
12%
5.45
-30%
5.88
-41%
Load Maximum *
4.87
4.34
11%
5.98
-23%
6.75
-39%
7.67
-57%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
16h 27min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
6h 05min
LG X Power K220
4100 mAh
Archos 50 Power
4000 mAh
Acer Liquid Z630S
4000 mAh
Lenovo ZUK Z2
3500 mAh
UMI Super Euro Edition
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
18%
-31%
-45%
-35%
Reader / Idle
2045
1254
WiFi v1.3
987
592
-40%
681
-31%
546
-45%
638
-35%
Load
365
639
75%
H.264
922

Pro

+ vékony, és könnyű burkolat
+ kiemelkedő üzemidő
+ alacsony energiafogyasztás
+ gyorsan töltődő akkumulátor
+ USB OTG
+ jól használható GPS-modul
+ jó minőségű fényképek
+ nagy kontrasztú kijelző
+ a burkolat nem melegszik

Kontra

- lassú tárhelyelérés
- gyenge WiFi átviteli sebesség
- kékes, és alacsony fényerejű kijelző
- előre telepített adware
- gyenge kamerateljesítmény rossz fényviszonyok esetén
In review: LG X Power. Review sample courtesy of LG Germany.
In review: LG X Power. Review sample courtesy of LG Germany.

Az LG X Power "szuperképessége a hosszú üzemidő kell, hogy legyen, és az LG ezt valóban teljesíti is: a 16:27 óra kiemelkedő, és messze megelőzi a vele összehasonlított készülékeket. A nagy akkumulátoron kívül a hatékony energiagazdálkodás is hozzájárul ehhez. Ezen felül az akkumulátor meglehetősen gyorsan feltöltődik.

Amíg az LG X szériájának más készülékei gyakran csak különleges tulajdonságukban nyújtottak kiemelkedőt, és más szempontokból rosszul teljesítettek, az LG X Powert jó kamerákkal szerelték fel, habár ezek kissé sötét képeket készítenek. Továbbá a készülék hűvös marad, a GPS-modul meglehetősen gyors, és pontos, valamint a burkolat vékony, és könnyű.

Az LG X Power különlegesen hosszú üzemidőt nyújt, és a kamerája is meggyőzően teljesít. Komolyabb hibákkal pedig nem rendelkezik, emiatt a saját árszegmensében erősen ajánlott.

A konfigurációja inkább átlagos mint díjra esélyes, a kijelzőben túlteng a kék szín, és az adware egyáltalán nem volt szükséges bele. Ennek ellenére az okostelefon majdnem örökké tartó akkumulátora, és a használatban mutatott teljesítménye komoly versenytárssá teszi a 200 eurós (~$217) árszegmensben.

Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű értékelés itt olvasható.

LG X Power K220 - 10/17/2016 v5.1(old)
Florian Wimmer

Váz
76%
Billentyűzet
64 / 75 → 85%
Érintőpad
89%
Csatlakoztathatóság
38 / 60 → 64%
Súly
93%
Akkumulátor
100%
Kijelző
81%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
10 / 63 → 15%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
31 / 70 → 44%
Hőmérséklet
89%
Zaj
100%
Audio
55 / 91 → 60%
Camera
65%
Átlag
69%
82%
Smartphone - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > LG X Power okostelefon rövid értékelés
Florian Wimmer, 2016-11- 1 (Update: 2016-11- 2)