Notebookcheck

LG Q6 Smartphone rövid értékelés

Florian Wimmer (fordította Tamás Somogyi), 08/25/2017

Lecsiszolt. A LG Q6 külseje nagyon hasonlít az LG G6-éra, csak éppen sokkal olcsóbb. Ezért cserébe a teljesítményéből is lefaragtak. Emiatt ebben az árfekvésben nincs könnyű dolga a telefonnak. Cikkünkből kiderül, vajon így is ajánlani tudjuk-e.

LG Q6 (Q Széria)
Processzor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
Grafikus adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 505
Memória
3072 MB 
Kijelző
5.5 hüvelyk 18:9, 2160x1080 pixel 439 PPI, kapacitív, IPS, fényes: igen
Háttértár
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 22.5 GB ingyenes
Csatlakozók
1 USB 2.0, Audió csatlakozók: 3.5 mm kombinált, Kártyaolvasó: microSD, max. 256 GB, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Szenzorok: gyorsulásmérő, giroszenzor, közelségérzékelő, iránytű
Hálózat
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B17/​B20/​B28/​B38), LTE, GPS
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 8.1 x 142.6 x 69.3
Akkumulátor
10.5 Wh, 3000 mAh Lítium-Ion
Operációs rendszer
Android 7.1 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/​2.2, kontraszt-AF, LED vaku, videók @1080p/​30 fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/​2.2, videók @1080p
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: mono, hátoldalon, Billentyűzet: virtuális, hálózati adapter, USB kábel, headset, Msart Doctor, LG Mobile Switch, SmartWorld, QuickMemo+, 24 Hónap Garancia, FM rádió, LTE Cat. 6, sávszélesség: (le/​fel): 300Mbps/​50Mbps; SAR: 0,277 W/Kg (fej), 1.540W/Kg (test), fanless
Súly
149 g, Tápegység: 48 g
Ár
349 Euró
Hivatkozások

 

Size comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
325 MBit/s ∼100% +525%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Mali-T830 MP3, 7880, 32 GB eMMC Flash
214 MBit/s ∼66% +312%
Lenovo P2
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
88.8 MBit/s ∼27% +71%
LG Q6
Adreno 505, 435, 32 GB eMMC Flash
52 MBit/s ∼16%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
32.9 MBit/s ∼10% -37%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
220 MBit/s ∼100% +345%
Lenovo P2
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
216 MBit/s ∼98% +337%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Mali-T830 MP3, 7880, 32 GB eMMC Flash
167 MBit/s ∼76% +238%
LG Q6
Adreno 505, 435, 32 GB eMMC Flash
49.4 MBit/s ∼22%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
31.2 MBit/s ∼14% -37%
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – crossing
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – crossing
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – forest
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – forest
GPS LG Q6 – overview
GPS LG Q6 – overview
GPS LG Q6 – crossing
GPS LG Q6 – crossing
GPS LG Q6 – forest
GPS LG Q6 – forest

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
511
cd/m²
521
cd/m²
490
cd/m²
489
cd/m²
523
cd/m²
483
cd/m²
461
cd/m²
509
cd/m²
496
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 523 cd/m² Átlag: 498.1 cd/m² Minimum: 3.44 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 88 %
Centrumban: 523 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 2179:1 (Fekete: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.4 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 7.4 | - Ø
98.1% sRGB (Calman)
Gamma: 2.4
LG Q6
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.5
LG G6
IPS LCD, 2880x1440, 5.7
Lenovo P2
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Screen
18%
31%
43%
-25%
Brightness
498
611
23%
477
-4%
542
9%
633
27%
Brightness Distribution
88
89
1%
91
3%
93
6%
93
6%
Black Level *
0.24
0.23
4%
0.66
-175%
Contrast
2179
2809
29%
997
-54%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.4
4.5
30%
2.4
62%
1.6
75%
4.9
23%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7.4
6
19%
2.8
62%
1.5
80%
5.8
22%
Gamma
2.4 100%
2.27 106%
2.28 105%
2.28 105%
2.26 106%
CCT
8641 75%
7996 81%
6702 97%
6422 101%
7840 83%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
67.74
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.05

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6272 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG Q6
42718 Points ∼19%
LG G6
151751 Points ∼67% +255%
Lenovo P2
63522 Points ∼28% +49%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
60603 Points ∼27% +42%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
62484 Points ∼27% +46%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
LG Q6
3710 Points ∼54%
LG G6
5152 Points ∼75% +39%
Lenovo P2
4810 Points ∼70% +30%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
4060 Points ∼59% +9%
Work performance score (sort by value)
LG Q6
5081 Points ∼61%
LG G6
5703 Points ∼69% +12%
Lenovo P2
4810 Points ∼58% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5035 Points ∼61% -1%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6785 Points ∼82% +34%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
LG Q6
10 Points ∼1%
LG G6
1073 Points ∼70% +10630%
Lenovo P2
783 Points ∼51% +7730%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
659 Points ∼43% +6490%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
702 Points ∼46% +6920%
Graphics (sort by value)
LG Q6
591 Points ∼7%
LG G6
5138 Points ∼60% +769%
Lenovo P2
1016 Points ∼12% +72%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1528 Points ∼18% +159%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1019 Points ∼12% +72%
Memory (sort by value)
LG Q6
736 Points ∼17%
LG G6
1930 Points ∼44% +162%
Lenovo P2
1451 Points ∼33% +97%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1508 Points ∼34% +105%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1042 Points ∼24% +42%
System (sort by value)
LG Q6
1489 Points ∼23%
LG G6
3646 Points ∼55% +145%
Lenovo P2
1960 Points ∼30% +32%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
2593 Points ∼39% +74%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2923 Points ∼44% +96%
Overall (sort by value)
LG Q6
282 Points ∼7%
LG G6
2496 Points ∼66% +785%
Lenovo P2
1226 Points ∼32% +335%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1408 Points ∼37% +399%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1215 Points ∼32% +331%
Geekbench 4.1
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
LG Q6
1840 Points ∼22%
LG G6
7080 Points ∼83% +285%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
LG Q6
2210 Points ∼12%
LG G6
4369 Points ∼24% +98%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
LG Q6
647 Points ∼13%
LG G6
1831 Points ∼38% +183%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
LG Q6
1016 Points ∼34%
LG G6
1955 Points ∼65% +92%
Lenovo P2
1673 Points ∼55% +65%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1713 Points ∼57% +69%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2109 Points ∼70% +108%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
LG Q6
188 Points ∼3%
LG G6
2980 Points ∼55% +1485%
Lenovo P2
380 Points ∼7% +102%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
710 Points ∼13% +278%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
380 Points ∼7% +102%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
LG Q6
230 Points ∼6%
LG G6
2669 Points ∼69% +1060%
Lenovo P2
459 Points ∼12% +100%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
816 Points ∼21% +255%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
465 Points ∼12% +102%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
LG Q6
995 Points ∼33%
LG G6
1961 Points ∼65% +97%
Lenovo P2
1682 Points ∼56% +69%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1752 Points ∼58% +76%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2112 Points ∼70% +112%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
LG Q6
404 Points ∼5%
LG G6
4121 Points ∼53% +920%
Lenovo P2
726 Points ∼9% +80%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1053 Points ∼14% +161%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
719 Points ∼9% +78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
LG Q6
465 Points ∼9%
LG G6
3282 Points ∼66% +606%
Lenovo P2
831 Points ∼17% +79%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1155 Points ∼23% +148%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
842 Points ∼17% +81%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
LG Q6
8983 Points ∼12%
LG G6
22335 Points ∼31% +149%
Lenovo P2
15462 Points ∼21% +72%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13057 Points ∼18% +45%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
15984 Points ∼22% +78%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
LG Q6
7924 Points ∼2%
LG G6
32128 Points ∼7% +305%
Lenovo P2
13398 Points ∼3% +69%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13314 Points ∼3% +68%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
13466 Points ∼3% +70%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
LG Q6
8137 Points ∼4%
LG G6
29276 Points ∼15% +260%
Lenovo P2
13808 Points ∼7% +70%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13256 Points ∼7% +63%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
13955 Points ∼7% +72%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
LG Q6
13 fps ∼1%
LG G6
75 fps ∼6% +477%
Lenovo P2
23 fps ∼2% +77%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
34 fps ∼3% +162%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
23 fps ∼2% +77%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
LG Q6
12 fps ∼3%
LG G6
46 fps ∼10% +283%
Lenovo P2
23 fps ∼5% +92%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
33 fps ∼7% +175%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
21 fps ∼5% +75%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
LG Q6
5.8 fps ∼1%
LG G6
38 fps ∼7% +555%
Lenovo P2
10 fps ∼2% +72%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
15 fps ∼3% +159%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
9.9 fps ∼2% +71%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
LG Q6
5.4 fps ∼1%
LG G6
27 fps ∼7% +400%
Lenovo P2
10 fps ∼3% +85%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
15 fps ∼4% +178%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
9.7 fps ∼3% +80%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
LG Q6
3.8 fps ∼1%
LG G6
29 fps ∼7% +663%
Lenovo P2
6.2 fps ∼1% +63%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
9.1 fps ∼2% +139%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6.2 fps ∼1% +63%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
LG Q6
3.5 fps ∼2%
LG G6
16 fps ∼9% +357%
Lenovo P2
6.7 fps ∼4% +91%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
9 fps ∼5% +157%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6.1 fps ∼3% +74%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
LG Q6
2.2 fps ∼1%
LG G6
20 fps ∼6% +809%
Lenovo P2
3.4 fps ∼1% +55%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5.2 fps ∼1% +136%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3.4 fps ∼1% +55%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
LG Q6
2.1 fps ∼0%
LG G6
11 fps ∼0% +424%
Lenovo P2
3.7 fps ∼0% +76%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5.2 fps ∼0% +148%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3.4 fps ∼0% +62%

Legend

 
LG Q6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Lenovo P2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 Samsung Exynos 7880, ARM Mali-T830 MP3, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
LG G6 (Chrome 57)
56.628 Points ∼100% +243%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
32.222 Points ∼57% +95%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
31.118 Points ∼55% +88%
Lenovo P2 (Chrome 56)
28.883 Points ∼51% +75%
LG Q6 (Chrome 59)
16.53 Points ∼29%
Octane V2 - Total Score
LG G6 (Chrome 57)
9113 Points ∼100% +239%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
5256 Points ∼58% +95%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
4905 Points ∼54% +82%
Lenovo P2 (Chrome 56)
4435 Points ∼49% +65%
LG Q6 (Chrome 59)
2689 Points ∼30%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
LG Q6 (Chrome 59)
13102 ms * ∼100%
Lenovo P2 (Chrome 56)
8463 ms * ∼65% +35%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
8041.4 ms * ∼61% +39%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
6442.4 ms * ∼49% +51%
LG G6 (Chrome 57)
2464.2 ms * ∼19% +81%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
LG G6 (Chrome 57)
122 Points ∼100% +122%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
89 Points ∼73% +62%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
84 Points ∼69% +53%
Lenovo P2
84 Points ∼69% +53%
LG Q6 (Chrome 59)
55 Points ∼45%

* ... smaller is better

LG Q6LG G6Lenovo P2Samsung Galaxy A5 2017Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
AndroBench 3-5
31%
50%
-21%
6%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.6
53.33 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-15%
59.41 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-5%
55.98 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-11%
50.07 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-20%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
84.8
77.61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-8%
79.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-7%
73.71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-13%
79.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-7%
Random Write 4KB
9.2
16.58
80%
44.4
383%
12.13
32%
7.4
-20%
Random Read 4KB
54.3
95.19
75%
38.2
-30%
22.41
-59%
74
36%
Sequential Write 256KB
133.5
122.85
-8%
76.74
-43%
77.1
-42%
188
41%
Sequential Read 256KB
263.1
428.67
63%
270.14
3%
182.03
-31%
282
7%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 BeállításokÉrték
 high25 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 BeállításokÉrték
 high30 fps
Max. terhelés
 31.7 °C32.5 °C34 °C 
 32.5 °C33.3 °C34.1 °C 
 33.6 °C34.1 °C34.6 °C 
Maximum: 34.6 °C
Átlag: 33.4 °C
30.6 °C32.3 °C30.3 °C
32.1 °C34 °C31.5 °C
32.4 °C33.7 °C31.7 °C
Maximum: 34 °C
Átlag: 32.1 °C
Tápegység (max.)  37.9 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2028.931.128.92528.832.228.83127.529.927.54035.73535.75030.129.630.16326.226.126.28026.432.726.41002732.72712535.536.535.516024.323.524.320023.422.523.425027.122.927.131530.620.930.640035.919.835.950043.221.843.263051.618.551.680061.918.461.9100070.918.270.9125074.316.974.3160076.716.576.7200074.516.774.5250071.616.371.6315071.516.171.5400072.616.272.6500073.716.173.7630072.41672.4800073.916.173.91000067.516.167.5125006415.9641600055.51655.5SPL84.53084.5N53.71.453.7median 64LG Q6median 16.9median 64Delta17.73.517.731.641.125.44025.336.732.93633.635.631.630.628.432.92733.820.841.72244.421.348.420.850.521.256.619.462.519.566.217.766.117.974.217.877.317.374.317.473.816.771.817.269.318.269.517.966.517.661.417.755.817.854.517.959.918.152.218.249.530831.350.1median 17.9Samsung Galaxy A5 2017median 61.41.39.5hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
LG Q6 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 36% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 13% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (35.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 92% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.96 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.11 / 0.13 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 0.92 / 2.19 / 2.24 Watt
Terhelés midlight 3.38 / 4 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
LG Q6
3000 mAh
LG G6
3300 mAh
Lenovo P2
5100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
3000 mAh
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
-25%
39%
28%
-4%
Idle Minimum *
0.92
0.62
33%
0.54
41%
0.64
30%
0.83
10%
Idle Average *
2.19
1.43
35%
1.01
54%
1.36
38%
2.11
4%
Idle Maximum *
2.24
1.48
34%
1.03
54%
1.4
37%
2.12
5%
Load Average *
3.38
5.52
-63%
1.78
47%
2.53
25%
3.41
-1%
Load Maximum *
4
10.47
-162%
3.98
-0%
3.63
9%
5.46
-37%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
22h 47min
WiFi böngészés v1.3
8h 22min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 23min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
4h 11min
LG Q6
3000 mAh
LG G6
3300 mAh
Lenovo P2
5100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
3000 mAh
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
24%
101%
72%
39%
Reader / Idle
1367
1789
31%
2841
108%
2418
77%
1502
10%
H.264
623
779
25%
1199
92%
984
58%
905
45%
WiFi v1.3
502
692
38%
978
95%
843
68%
797
59%
Load
251
252
0%
528
110%
467
86%
352
40%

Pro

+ keskeny oldalsó keret
+ nagyon merev ház
+ friss Android
+ sok LTE sáv
+ elég jó hívásminőség
+ stabil betekintési szögek
+ gyors háttértár
+ alig melegszik

Kontra

- nem biztonságos arcfelismerő
- alacsony teljesítmény
- átlagos előlapi kamera
- viszonylag magas fogyasztás
- lassú töltődés
Tested: LG Q6. Test device supplied by LG Germany.
Tested: LG Q6. Test device supplied by LG Germany.

Az LG a Q6 esetében kicsit túl sokat csiszolt le a teljesítményből, az árból viszont túl keveset. Az LG Q6 árcímkéje olyan készülékekével vetekszik, amelyek teljesítmény és üzemidő terén is többet nyújtanak – két igen fontos szempont. Ezen kívül is van még pár terület, ahol a Q6 lemarad: a hangszórók átlag alattiak, a  WiFi modul elég lassú és a felszereltség is éppen csak elégséges.

Ugyanakkor, az LG néhány remek dolgot is hozott: a nagyon stabil és egyedi ház, szokatlan arányokkal és keskeny oldalsó keretekkel, kifejezetten vonzóvá teszi a telefont. A hívásminőség rendben van, a fő kamera jól teljesít, és a készülék terhelés alatt is alig melegszik.

Az LG sok dologból faragott le. A Q6 teljesítménye különösen alacsonyra sikerült, az árához képest. A stabil ház, a kicsivel átlag feletti üzemidő és a nagyon jó kijelző mentik meg a telefont az elmerüléstől.

A leendő vevőknek azt tanácsoljuk, hogy várjanak egy kicsit, amíg az LG a Q6 árát egy reálisabb szintre igazítja. Sok jobb készüléket találunk a 400 dolláros szegmensben, ahol jelenleg helyet foglal. Amennyiben a karcsú design megtetszett, a gyengébb teljesítmény pedig nem zavar, úgy egy remek társat szerezhetünk be a mindennapokra.

Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű cikk itt olvasható.

LG Q6 - 08/21/2017 v6
Florian Wimmer

Váz
89%
Billentyűzet
65 / 75 → 87%
Érintőpad
88%
Csatlakoztathatóság
36 / 60 → 60%
Súly
92%
Akkumulátor
91%
Kijelző
85%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
16 / 63 → 25%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
38 / 70 → 54%
Hőmérséklet
91%
Zaj
100%
Audio
54 / 91 → 59%
Camera
72%
Átlag
71%
82%
Smartphone - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > LG Q6 Smartphone rövid értékelés
Florian Wimmer, 2017-08-25 (Update: 2017-08-25)