Google Pixel 4a smartphone rövid értékelés: Nem a megapixelekről szól

Name: Google Pixel 4a
Brand: Google

Szuper kamera, alacsony ár. A Google Pixel okostelefonok a múltban mindig kritizálhatóak voltak néhány vonatkozásban. A Pixel 4a-val viszont a kritizálható pontok számát minimálisra csökkentették, és megalkottak egy olcsó okostelefont, amelynek az erényi között van a nagyszerű kamera.

Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (fordította Zoltán Kiss), 12/22/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Google Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Google Pixel 4a (Pixel 4 Széria)

Processzor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G 8 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo 470 Gold / Silver

Grafikus adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 618

Memória

6144 MB

, LPDDR4x

Kijelző

5.80 hüvelyk 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 444 PPI, Kapacitív, OLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 3, fényes: igen, HDR, 60 Hz

Háttértár

128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 128 GB

, 113 GB ingyenes

Csatlakozók

1 USB 3.0, Audió csatlakozók: 3,5 mm-es audió jack, 1 Ujjlenyomat olvasó, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Szenzorok: gyorsulásmérő, giroszkóp, közelségérzékelő, elektronikus iránytű, barométer, USB-C

Hálózat

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G GSM (850/900/1,800/1,900 MHz), 3G UMTS (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), 4G LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B38/B39/B40/B41/B66/B71), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Méret

magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 8.2 x 144 x 69.4

Akkumulátor

3140 mAh Lítium-Polimer

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operációs rendszer

Android 11

Camera

Primary Camera: 12.2 MPix f/1.7, 27 mm, 1/2.55", 1.4 µm
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0, 24 mm, 1.12 µm

További jellegzetességek

Hangszórók: sztereó hangszórók, Billentyűzet: képernyőn, Billentyűzet háttérvilágítás: igen, USB hálózati adapter, USB-C kábel, SIM-kiadó eszköz, 24 Hónap Garancia, 1.37 W/kg, SAR érték (test): 1,39 W/kg, fanless

Súly

143 g, Tápegység: 30 g

Ár

350 Euró

Hivatkozások

Google honlap

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Comparison devices

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
84 %	12/2020	Google Pixel 4a SD 730G, Adreno 618	143 g	128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	5.80"	2340x1080
85 %	04/2020	Apple iPhone SE 2020 A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU	148 g	128 GB NVMe	4.70"	1334x750
78 %	05/2020	Sony Xperia 10 II SD 665, Adreno 610	151 g	128 GB eMMC Flash	6.00"	2520x1080
80 %	03/2020	Samsung Galaxy M31 Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3	191 g	64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.40"	2340x1080
83 %	12/2020	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite SD 730G, Adreno 618	204 g	64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.47"	2340x1080

» A Top 10 multimédiás noteszgép - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 játékos noteszgép
» A Top 10 belépő szintű üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 notebook munkaállomása
» A Top 10 okostelefon - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 táblagép
» A Top 10 Windows tabletje
» A Top 10 subnotebook - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 300 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 120 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 phabletje (>5.5-inch)
» A Top 10 noteszgép 500 EUR (~160.000 HUF) alatt
» A Top 10 "pehelysúlyú" gaming notebookja

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Google Pixel 4a Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	668 (592^min - 685^max) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe	618 (321^min - 653^max) MBit/s ∼93% -7%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Adreno 618, SD 730G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	341 (334^min - 349^max) MBit/s ∼51% -49%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	336 (282^min - 350^max) MBit/s ∼50% -50%
Sony Xperia 10 II Adreno 610, SD 665, 128 GB eMMC Flash	326 (263^min - 342^max) MBit/s ∼49% -51%
Average of class Smartphone (5.9 - 1414, n=641)	290 MBit/s ∼43% -57%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone SE 2020 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe	818 (400^min - 892^max) MBit/s ∼100% +32%
Google Pixel 4a Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	620 (560^min - 703^max) MBit/s ∼76%
Sony Xperia 10 II Adreno 610, SD 665, 128 GB eMMC Flash	334 (325^min - 339^max) MBit/s ∼41% -46%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Adreno 618, SD 730G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	324 (310^min - 330^max) MBit/s ∼40% -48%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	297 (258^min - 312^max) MBit/s ∼36% -52%
Average of class Smartphone (9.4 - 1599, n=641)	276 MBit/s ∼34% -55%

; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø667 (592-685)

; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø620 (560-703)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera (rabbit)Main camera (flower)Zoom (5x)Low light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

<a href="https://www.notebookcheck-hu.com/Google-Pixel-4a-smartphone-roevid-ertekeles-Nem-a-megapixelekrol-szol.511503.0.html">Google Pixel 4a</a> — Google Pixel 4a


699 cd/m²	688 cd/m²	704 cd/m²
707 cd/m²	705 cd/m²	716 cd/m²
710 cd/m²	713 cd/m²	720 cd/m²

Fényerő megoszlás

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 720 cd/m² Átlag: 706.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.14 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 96 %
Centrumban: 705 cd/m²
Kontraszt: ∞:1 (Fekete: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.9 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
95.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26

	Google Pixel 4a OLED, 2340x1080, 5.80	Apple iPhone SE 2020 IPS, 1334x750, 4.70	Sony Xperia 10 II OLED, 2520x1080, 6.00	Samsung Galaxy M31 Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.40	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
Screen		-12%	-46%	-85%	-3%
Brightness middle	705	688 -2%	591 -16%	622 -12%	605 -14%
Brightness	707	659 -7%	590 -17%	615 -13%	608 -14%
Brightness Distribution	96	92 -4%	97 1%	97 1%	95 -1%
Black Level *		0.28
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	0.9	1 -11%	1.42 -58%	2.25 -150%	0.84 7%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	1.9	2.2 -16%	3.83 -102%	6.22 -227%	1.8 5%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	1.3	1.7 -31%	2.4 -85%	2.7 -108%	1.3 -0%
Gamma	2.26 ^97%	2.25 ^98%	2.215 ^99%	2.019 ^109%	2.211 ^100%
CCT	6576 ^99%	6790 ^96%	9014 ^72%	6810 ^95%	6310 ^103%
Contrast		2457

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

255.1 Hz

≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 255.1 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 255.1 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9725 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4.4 ms rise
8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.7 ms).

Geekbench 5.3
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	1030 Points ∼61%
Sony Xperia 10 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	457 Points ∼27% -56%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1345 Points ∼80% +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (987 - 1030, n=2)	1009 Points ∼60% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (72 - 6252, n=69)	1678 Points ∼100% +63%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	1646 Points ∼50%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	3281 Points ∼100% +99%
Sony Xperia 10 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1405 Points ∼43% -15%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1325 Points ∼40% -20%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	1690 Points ∼52% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (1646 - 1786, n=5)	1722 Points ∼52% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (248 - 4201, n=170)	1937 Points ∼59% +18%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	549 Points ∼41%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	1336 Points ∼100% +143%
Sony Xperia 10 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	310 Points ∼23% -44%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	348 Points ∼26% -37%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	547 Points ∼41% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (543 - 551, n=5)	547 Points ∼41% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (63 - 1604, n=170)	560 Points ∼42% +2%

PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	8683 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia 10 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	6189 Points ∼71% -29%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	5587 Points ∼64% -36%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	7628 Points ∼88% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (7134 - 8683, n=6)	7715 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 15299, n=567)	6083 Points ∼70% -30%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	10200 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia 10 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	7583 Points ∼74% -26%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	6202 Points ∼61% -39%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	8941 Points ∼88% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (8941 - 10200, n=6)	9422 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (1077 - 19989, n=716)	6702 Points ∼66% -34%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2720 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia 10 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2444 Points ∼90% -10%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	2163 Points ∼80% -20%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2686 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2621 - 2775, n=6)	2720 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1740 - 4061, n=219)	2636 Points ∼97% -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2150 Points ∼71%
Sony Xperia 10 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	981 Points ∼33% -54%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1442 Points ∼48% -33%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2143 Points ∼71% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2143 - 2199, n=6)	2158 Points ∼72% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (203 - 11259, n=219)	3011 Points ∼100% +40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2255 Points ∼85%
Sony Xperia 10 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1132 Points ∼43% -50%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1557 Points ∼59% -31%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2244 Points ∼84% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2244 - 2310, n=6)	2262 Points ∼85% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (253 - 6977, n=219)	2656 Points ∼100% +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3309 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	2898 Points ∼88% -12%
Sony Xperia 10 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2541 Points ∼77% -23%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	2332 Points ∼70% -30%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3058 Points ∼92% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3058 - 3391, n=6)	3218 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (573 - 5780, n=576)	2290 Points ∼69% -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2467 Points ∼31%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	7847 Points ∼100% +218%
Sony Xperia 10 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	985 Points ∼13% -60%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1533 Points ∼20% -38%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2466 Points ∼31% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2425 - 2492, n=6)	2459 Points ∼31% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (75 - 12146, n=576)	2288 Points ∼29% -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2615 Points ∼46%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	5688 Points ∼100% +118%
Sony Xperia 10 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1140 Points ∼20% -56%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1659 Points ∼29% -37%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2577 Points ∼45% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2561 - 2701, n=6)	2598 Points ∼46% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (93 - 9643, n=577)	2113 Points ∼37% -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3329 Points ∼82%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	4052 Points ∼100% +22%
Sony Xperia 10 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2503 Points ∼62% -25%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	2308 Points ∼57% -31%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3134 Points ∼77% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3112 - 3352, n=6)	3213 Points ∼79% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 5765, n=607)	2208 Points ∼54% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3750 Points ∼19%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	20135 Points ∼100% +437%
Sony Xperia 10 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1667 Points ∼8% -56%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1993 Points ∼10% -47%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3751 Points ∼19% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3646 - 3773, n=6)	3703 Points ∼18% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (70 - 22052, n=607)	3140 Points ∼16% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3647 Points ∼34%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	10699 Points ∼100% +193%
Sony Xperia 10 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1801 Points ∼17% -51%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	2055 Points ∼19% -44%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3594 Points ∼34% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3513 - 3704, n=6)	3586 Points ∼34% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (88 - 11895, n=607)	2578 Points ∼24% -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3247 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	2892 Points ∼89% -11%
Sony Xperia 10 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2580 Points ∼79% -21%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	2258 Points ∼69% -30%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3257 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3088 - 3328, n=6)	3216 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (435 - 5318, n=656)	2165 Points ∼66% -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2310 Points ∼51%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	4573 Points ∼100% +98%
Sony Xperia 10 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	984 Points ∼22% -57%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1478 Points ∼32% -36%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2298 Points ∼50% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2237 - 2310, n=6)	2271 Points ∼50% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (53 - 11573, n=656)	1906 Points ∼42% -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2468 Points ∼61%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	4050 Points ∼100% +64%
Sony Xperia 10 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1141 Points ∼28% -54%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1601 Points ∼40% -35%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2459 Points ∼61% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2388 - 2489, n=6)	2434 Points ∼60% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 9138, n=657)	1809 Points ∼45% -27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3273 Points ∼99%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	2857 Points ∼87% -13%
Sony Xperia 10 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2596 Points ∼79% -21%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	2195 Points ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3294 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3075 - 3349, n=6)	3235 Points ∼98% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (293 - 5301, n=698)	2038 Points ∼62% -38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3629 Points ∼39%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	9218 Points ∼100% +154%
Sony Xperia 10 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1642 Points ∼18% -55%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	2020 Points ∼22% -44%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3610 Points ∼39% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3485 - 3678, n=6)	3567 Points ∼39% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 16670, n=697)	2545 Points ∼28% -30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3543 Points ∼57%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	6168 Points ∼100% +74%
Sony Xperia 10 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1788 Points ∼29% -50%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	2056 Points ∼33% -42%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3594 Points ∼58% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3399 - 3594, n=6)	3490 Points ∼57% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 11256, n=700)	2173 Points ∼35% -39%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	15527 Points ∼46%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	33851 Points ∼100% +118%
Sony Xperia 10 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	20024 Points ∼59% +29%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	20128 Points ∼59% +30%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	20767 Points ∼61% +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (14820 - 22054, n=5)	18710 Points ∼55% +20%
Average of class Smartphone (735 - 59268, n=842)	15957 Points ∼47% +3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	53548 Points ∼26%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	209431 Points ∼100% +291%
Sony Xperia 10 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	25351 Points ∼12% -53%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	25160 Points ∼12% -53%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	53194 Points ∼25% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (50829 - 53548, n=5)	52404 Points ∼25% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (536 - 224130, n=840)	29153 Points ∼14% -46%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	34678 Points ∼36%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	97290 Points ∼100% +181%
Sony Xperia 10 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	23936 Points ∼25% -31%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	23836 Points ∼24% -31%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	39491 Points ∼41% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (33007 - 39608, n=5)	37271 Points ∼38% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (662 - 117606, n=840)	22274 Points ∼23% -36%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	84 fps ∼34%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	250 fps ∼100% +198%
Sony Xperia 10 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	36 fps ∼14% -57%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	36 fps ∼14% -57%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	83 fps ∼33% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (83 - 86, n=5)	84.4 fps ∼34% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.5 - 322, n=834)	48.7 fps ∼19% -42%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	59 fps ∼98%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	60 fps ∼100% +2%
Sony Xperia 10 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	30 fps ∼50% -49%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	32 fps ∼53% -46%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	60 fps ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (57 - 60, n=5)	59.2 fps ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 142, n=843)	32.5 fps ∼54% -45%

GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	41 fps ∼28%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	149 fps ∼100% +263%
Sony Xperia 10 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	19 fps ∼13% -54%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	18 fps ∼12% -56%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	41 fps ∼28% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (41 - 42, n=5)	41.4 fps ∼28% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.8 - 180, n=739)	28.9 fps ∼19% -30%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	38 fps ∼63%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	60 fps ∼100% +58%
Sony Xperia 10 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	15 fps ∼25% -61%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	19 fps ∼32% -50%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	39 fps ∼65% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (36 - 39, n=5)	37.8 fps ∼63% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 117, n=747)	23.8 fps ∼40% -37%

GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	30 fps ∼32%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	93 fps ∼100% +210%
Sony Xperia 10 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	13 fps ∼14% -57%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	16 fps ∼17% -47%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	30 fps ∼32% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (30 - 30, n=5)	30 fps ∼32% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.87 - 117, n=602)	23.1 fps ∼25% -23%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	28 fps ∼47%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	60 fps ∼100% +114%
Sony Xperia 10 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	10 fps ∼17% -64%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	14 fps ∼23% -50%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	29 fps ∼48% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (26 - 29, n=5)	27.4 fps ∼46% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 110, n=604)	20.6 fps ∼34% -26%

GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	11 fps ∼18%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	60 fps ∼100% +445%
Sony Xperia 10 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	3.9 (2.7^min) fps ∼7% -65%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	5.7 fps ∼10% -48%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	11 fps ∼18% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (10 - 11, n=6)	10.3 fps ∼17% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (0.61 - 60, n=366)	11.8 fps ∼20% +7%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	6.6 fps ∼21%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	31 fps ∼100% +370%
Sony Xperia 10 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2.7 fps ∼9% -59%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	3.6 fps ∼12% -45%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	6.7 fps ∼22% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (6.3 - 10, n=6)	7.17 fps ∼23% +9%
Average of class Smartphone (0.21 - 101, n=364)	8.23 fps ∼27% +25%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps ∼28%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	60 fps ∼100% +253%
Sony Xperia 10 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	6.7 fps ∼11% -61%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	9.4 fps ∼16% -45%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps ∼28% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (16 - 17, n=6)	16.3 fps ∼27% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1.4 - 60, n=370)	17.6 fps ∼29% +4%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	18 fps ∼25%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	72 fps ∼100% +300%
Sony Xperia 10 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	8.1 fps ∼11% -55%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	10 fps ∼14% -44%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	18 fps ∼25% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (18 - 18, n=6)	18 fps ∼25% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.6 - 257, n=370)	20.1 fps ∼28% +12%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps ∼29%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	59 fps ∼100% +247%
Sony Xperia 10 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	7.1 fps ∼12% -58%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	10 fps ∼17% -41%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps ∼29% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (17 - 17, n=5)	17 fps ∼29% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.6 - 75, n=527)	15.4 fps ∼26% -9%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	16 fps ∼27%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	60 fps ∼100% +275%
Sony Xperia 10 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	5.7 fps ∼10% -64%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	9.1 fps ∼15% -43%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps ∼28% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (15 - 17, n=5)	15.8 fps ∼26% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 60, n=531)	13.6 fps ∼23% -15%

AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	269238 Points ∼55%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	489463 Points ∼100% +82%
Sony Xperia 10 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	170126 Points ∼35% -37%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	187087 Points ∼38% -31%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	273255 Points ∼56% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (251673 - 273255, n=5)	264147 Points ∼54% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (53335 - 624727, n=152)	325323 Points ∼66% +21%

BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	1283 Points ∼94%
Sony Xperia 10 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	947 Points ∼69% -26%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	10 Points ∼1% -99%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	1365 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (1190 - 1365, n=5)	1284 Points ∼94% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 2169, n=764)	843 Points ∼62% -34%
Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3840 Points ∼99%
Sony Xperia 10 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1911 Points ∼49% -50%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	2168 Points ∼56% -44%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3864 Points ∼99% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3840 - 3984, n=5)	3885 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 16996, n=764)	2615 Points ∼67% -32%
Memory (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	4544 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia 10 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1804 Points ∼40% -60%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1775 Points ∼39% -61%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3752 Points ∼83% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3678 - 4544, n=5)	4057 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 8874, n=764)	1976 Points ∼43% -57%
System (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	6796 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia 10 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	4911 Points ∼72% -28%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	4699 Points ∼69% -31%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	6305 Points ∼93% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (6305 - 6796, n=5)	6582 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 14189, n=764)	3587 Points ∼53% -47%
Overall (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3512 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	Points ∼0% -100%
Sony Xperia 10 II Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2001 Points ∼57% -43%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	649 Points ∼18% -82%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3342 Points ∼95% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3268 - 3512, n=5)	3385 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 6402, n=764)	1844 Points ∼53% -47%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)	139.668 Points ∼100% +192%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)	47.798 Points ∼34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (45.8 - 50.6, n=5)	47.3 Points ∼34% -1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)	46.148 Points ∼33% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 161, n=226)	42.9 Points ∼31% -10%
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83)	27.807 Points ∼20% -42%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)	278.62 Points ∼100% +218%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)	87.731 Points ∼31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (79.2 - 87.7, n=5)	84 Points ∼30% -4%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)	82.347 Points ∼30% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 375, n=659)	50.4 Points ∼18% -43%
Sony Xperia 10 II (Chrome 84)	49.315 Points ∼18% -44%
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83)	47.5 Points ∼17% -46%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)	158 runs/min ∼100% +257%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 196, n=205)	45.2 runs/min ∼29% +2%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)	44.2 runs/min ∼28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (40.4 - 44.2, n=5)	43 runs/min ∼27% -3%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)	40.4 runs/min ∼26% -9%
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chome 83)	29.4 runs/min ∼19% -33%

WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)	146 Points ∼100% +106%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=297)	71.1 Points ∼49% 0%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)	71 Points ∼49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (66 - 77, n=5)	70.4 Points ∼48% -1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)	70 Points ∼48% -1%
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83)	56 Points ∼38% -21%
Sony Xperia 10 II (Chrome 84)	47 Points ∼32% -34%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)	48991 Points ∼100% +176%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)	17768 Points ∼36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (16197 - 17768, n=5)	16856 Points ∼34% -5%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)	16197 Points ∼33% -9%
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83)	10434 Points ∼21% -41%
Sony Xperia 10 II (Chrome 84)	9671 Points ∼20% -46%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 58632, n=829)	8416 Points ∼17% -53%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 59466, n=855)	9488 ms * ∼100% -222%
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83)	4786.2 ms * ∼50% -62%
Sony Xperia 10 II (Chrome 84)	4629.3 ms * ∼49% -57%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)	2949.9 ms * ∼31%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)	2940.5 ms * ∼31% -0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2770 - 3054, n=5)	2900 ms * ∼31% +2%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)	549.9 ms * ∼6% +81%

* ... smaller is better

	Google Pixel 4a	Sony Xperia 10 II	Samsung Galaxy M31	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite	Average 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-47%	-13%	-16%	-24%	-53%
Random Write 4KB	187.39	56.74 -70%	152.4 -19%	125.75 -33%	90.4 (13.5 - 187, n=25) -52%	40.2 (0.14 - 319, n=935) -79%
Random Read 4KB	162.89	76.83 -53%	128.9 -21%	134.57 -17%	126 (88.4 - 173, n=25) -23%	63.1 (1.59 - 325, n=935) -61%
Sequential Write 256KB	246.79	188.21 -24%	221.7 -10%	213.22 -14%	197 (143 - 257, n=25) -20%	139 (2.99 - 1321, n=935) -44%
Sequential Read 256KB	502.06	293.49 -42%	489.5 -3%	501.29 0%	496 (409 - 733, n=25) -1%	363 (12.1 - 2037, n=935) -28%

; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø39.7 (36-42)

; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø29.8 (17-31)

; Arena of Valor; min: Ø60.1 (60-61)

; Arena of Valor; high HD: Ø60 (54-61)

Max. terhelés

Üresjárat


36.5 °C	35.5 °C	34 °C
37.9 °C	37.8 °C	35.5 °C
35.2 °C	38.2 °C	35.4 °C

Maximum: 38.2 °C
Átlag: 36.2 °C


33.3 °C	35 °C	34.5 °C
32.3 °C	37.1 °C	36.8 °C
30.7 °C	33.2 °C	36.8 °C

Maximum: 37.1 °C
Átlag: 34.4 °C

Tápegység (max.) 25 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Google Pixel 4a audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple iPhone SE 2020 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Energiafogyasztás

Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlét	0.01 / 0.21 Watt
Üresjárat	0.49 / 0.96 / 1 Watt
Terhelés	3.11 / 5.23 Watt


Kulcs: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Google Pixel 4a 3140 mAh	Apple iPhone SE 2020 1822 mAh	Sony Xperia 10 II 3600 mAh	Samsung Galaxy M31 6000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite 5260 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-14%	-118%	-166%	-39%	-45%	-64%
Idle Minimum *	0.49	0.44 10%	1.5 -206%	1.6 -227%	0.8 -63%	0.698 (0.49 - 0.8, n=5) -42%	0.89 (0.2 - 3.4, n=926) -82%
Idle Average *	0.96	1.56 -63%	2.1 -119%	2.3 -140%	1.1 -15%	1.362 (0.96 - 1.8, n=5) -42%	1.758 (0.6 - 6.2, n=925) -83%
Idle Maximum *	1	1.63 -63%	2.8 -180%	3.7 -270%	1.8 -80%	1.712 (1 - 2.2, n=5) -71%	2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=926) -104%
Load Average *	3.11	2.32 25%	4.5 -45%	6.7 -115%	3.7 -19%	4.54 (3.11 - 5.38, n=5) -46%	4.12 (0.8 - 10.8, n=920) -32%
Load Maximum *	5.23	4.12 21%	7.2 -38%	9.4 -80%	6.1 -17%	6.59 (5.23 - 7.5, n=5) -26%	6.13 (1.2 - 14.2, n=920) -17%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő

Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)		37h 50min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		11h 9min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		17h 25min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)		3h 45min

	Google Pixel 4a 3140 mAh	Apple iPhone SE 2020 1822 mAh	Sony Xperia 10 II 3600 mAh	Samsung Galaxy M31 6000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite 5260 mAh
Battery Runtime		-21%	11%	47%	36%
Reader / Idle	2270	1938 -15%		2456 8%	2249 -1%
H.264	1045	681 -35%		1432 37%	1370 31%
WiFi v1.3	669	694 4%	743 11%	1324 98%	1095 64%
Load	225	143 -36%		326 45%	337 50%

Pro

+ kompakt méret

+ jó teljesítményű kamera

+ jó üzemidő

+ szolid rendszerteljesítmény

+ USB 3.2

Kontra

- nincs microSD kártyaolvasó

- a kijelző alacsony frekvencián vibrál

- nincs arcfelismerés

Összegzés - A középkategória királya

In review: Google Pixel 4a. Test device provided by: Google Germany

A Pixel 4a-val a Google-nak sikerült egy olyan alkalmas okostelefont megalkotni, amelynek számos erőssége és csak egy kevés gyenge pontja van. Középkategóriás telefonhoz képest a rendszer és az akkumulátor teljesítménye egyaránt jó, és a 128 GB belső tárhelynek köszönhetően a microSD kártyanyílás hiánya nem okoz nagy gondot. Emellett a kamera teljesítménye szinte a „nagy” Pixel 4 készülékekével azonos, ami ebben az árkategóriában példátlan. A kijelző „alig” 5,8 hüvelykes mérete szintén az egyik legkompaktabb mai okostelefonná teszi.

A Pixel 4a egy olcsó Google okostelefon, amely várhatóan elsősorban a kisebb okostelefonok rajongóinak fog tetszeni.

A Pixel 4a a nagyon világos képernyőért is plusz pontot érdemel. Az OLED panelnek köszönhetően élénk színekkel és elsőrangú kontrasztaránnyal is rendelkezik. Érzékeny szemű felhasználók viszont észlelni fogják a széles frekvencia-tartományt, amelyen belül vibrál a kijelző. Teljesen szubjektív szemszögből viszont ezeknek a soroknak a szerzője már használt olyan okostelefonokat, amelyek jobban leterhelik a szemeket, mint a Pixel 4a, annak ellenére, hogy azok lényegesen magasabb frekvenciákon vibráltak. Ebben a tekintetben végül csak az segít, ha próbát teszünk vele.

Google Pixel 4a - 2020-09-2109/21/2020 v7
Mike Wobker

Váz

80%

Billentyűzet

65 / 75 → 87%

Érintőpad

94%

Csatlakoztathatóság

51 / 70 → 72%

Súly

93%

Akkumulátor

90%

Kijelző

92%

Játékok alatti teljesítmény

28 / 64 → 43%

Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény

72 / 86 → 83%

Hőmérséklet

92%

Zaj

100%

Audio

78 / 90 → 87%

Camera

67%

Átlag

77%

84%

Smartphone - Súlyozott átlag

Linked Articles

#1 Google Pixel 4a (Pixel 4 Széria), #2 Pixel 4a (Pixel 4 Széria)

Teszt

•

Google Pixel 4 rövid értékelés...

Google Pixel 4a smartphone rövid értékelés: Nem a megapixelekről szól

Comparison devices

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Google Pixel 4a audio analysis

Apple iPhone SE 2020 audio analysis

Pro

Kontra

Összegzés - A középkategória királya

Linked Articles

Pricecompare