Google Pixel 4a smartphone rövid értékelés: Nem a megapixelekről szól
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0, 24 mm, 1.12 µm
Comparison devices
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
84 % | 12/2020 | Google Pixel 4a SD 730G, Adreno 618 | 143 g | 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 5.80" | 2340x1080 | |
85 % | 04/2020 | Apple iPhone SE 2020 A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU | 148 g | 128 GB NVMe | 4.70" | 1334x750 | |
78 % | 05/2020 | Sony Xperia 10 II SD 665, Adreno 610 | 151 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.00" | 2520x1080 | |
80 % | 03/2020 | Samsung Galaxy M31 Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3 | 191 g | 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.40" | 2340x1080 | |
83 % | 12/2020 | Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite SD 730G, Adreno 618 | 204 g | 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.47" | 2340x1080 |
» A Top 10 multimédiás noteszgép - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 játékos noteszgép
» A Top 10 belépő szintű üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 notebook munkaállomása
» A Top 10 okostelefon - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 táblagép
» A Top 10 Windows tabletje
» A Top 10 subnotebook - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 300 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 120 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 phabletje (>5.5-inch)
» A Top 10 noteszgép 500 EUR (~160.000 HUF) alatt
» A Top 10 "pehelysúlyú" gaming notebookja
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Google Pixel 4a | |
Apple iPhone SE 2020 | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite | |
Samsung Galaxy M31 | |
Sony Xperia 10 II | |
Average of class Smartphone (5.9 - 1414, n=641) | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Apple iPhone SE 2020 | |
Google Pixel 4a | |
Sony Xperia 10 II | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite | |
Samsung Galaxy M31 | |
Average of class Smartphone (9.4 - 1599, n=641) |
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera (rabbit)Main camera (flower)Zoom (5x)Low light

|
Fényerő megoszlás: 96 %
Centrumban: 705 cd/m²
Kontraszt: ∞:1 (Fekete: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.9 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
95.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
Google Pixel 4a OLED, 2340x1080, 5.80 | Apple iPhone SE 2020 IPS, 1334x750, 4.70 | Sony Xperia 10 II OLED, 2520x1080, 6.00 | Samsung Galaxy M31 Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.40 | Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -12% | -46% | -85% | -3% | |
Brightness middle | 705 | 688 -2% | 591 -16% | 622 -12% | 605 -14% |
Brightness | 707 | 659 -7% | 590 -17% | 615 -13% | 608 -14% |
Brightness Distribution | 96 | 92 -4% | 97 1% | 97 1% | 95 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.28 | ||||
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 0.9 | 1 -11% | 1.42 -58% | 2.25 -150% | 0.84 7% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 1.9 | 2.2 -16% | 3.83 -102% | 6.22 -227% | 1.8 5% |
Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 1.3 | 1.7 -31% | 2.4 -85% | 2.7 -108% | 1.3 -0% |
Gamma | 2.26 97% | 2.25 98% | 2.215 99% | 2.019 109% | 2.211 100% |
CCT | 6576 99% | 6790 96% | 9014 72% | 6810 95% | 6310 103% |
Contrast | 2457 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 255.1 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 255.1 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 255.1 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9725 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise | |
↘ 1.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.4 ms rise | |
↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.7 ms). |
Geekbench 5.3 | |
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value) | |
Google Pixel 4a | |
Sony Xperia 10 II | |
Samsung Galaxy M31 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (987 - 1030, n=2) | |
Average of class Smartphone (72 - 6252, n=69) | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Google Pixel 4a | |
Apple iPhone SE 2020 | |
Sony Xperia 10 II | |
Samsung Galaxy M31 | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (1646 - 1786, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (248 - 4201, n=170) | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Google Pixel 4a | |
Apple iPhone SE 2020 | |
Sony Xperia 10 II | |
Samsung Galaxy M31 | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (543 - 551, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (63 - 1604, n=170) |
PCMark for Android | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Google Pixel 4a | |
Sony Xperia 10 II | |
Samsung Galaxy M31 | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (7134 - 8683, n=6) | |
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 15299, n=567) | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Google Pixel 4a | |
Sony Xperia 10 II | |
Samsung Galaxy M31 | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (8941 - 10200, n=6) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1077 - 19989, n=716) |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value) | |
Google Pixel 4a | |
Apple iPhone SE 2020 | |
Sony Xperia 10 II | |
Samsung Galaxy M31 | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (83 - 86, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.5 - 322, n=834) | |
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value) | |
Google Pixel 4a | |
Apple iPhone SE 2020 | |
Sony Xperia 10 II | |
Samsung Galaxy M31 | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (57 - 60, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 142, n=843) |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Google Pixel 4a | |
Apple iPhone SE 2020 | |
Sony Xperia 10 II | |
Samsung Galaxy M31 | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (41 - 42, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.8 - 180, n=739) | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Google Pixel 4a | |
Apple iPhone SE 2020 | |
Sony Xperia 10 II | |
Samsung Galaxy M31 | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (36 - 39, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 117, n=747) |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Google Pixel 4a | |
Apple iPhone SE 2020 | |
Sony Xperia 10 II | |
Samsung Galaxy M31 | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (30 - 30, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.87 - 117, n=602) | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Google Pixel 4a | |
Apple iPhone SE 2020 | |
Sony Xperia 10 II | |
Samsung Galaxy M31 | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (26 - 29, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 110, n=604) |
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Google Pixel 4a | |
Apple iPhone SE 2020 | |
Sony Xperia 10 II | |
Samsung Galaxy M31 | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (251673 - 273255, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (53335 - 624727, n=152) |
BaseMark OS II | |
Web (sort by value) | |
Google Pixel 4a | |
Sony Xperia 10 II | |
Samsung Galaxy M31 | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (1190 - 1365, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 2169, n=764) | |
Graphics (sort by value) | |
Google Pixel 4a | |
Sony Xperia 10 II | |
Samsung Galaxy M31 | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3840 - 3984, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 16996, n=764) | |
Memory (sort by value) | |
Google Pixel 4a | |
Sony Xperia 10 II | |
Samsung Galaxy M31 | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3678 - 4544, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 8874, n=764) | |
System (sort by value) | |
Google Pixel 4a | |
Sony Xperia 10 II | |
Samsung Galaxy M31 | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (6305 - 6796, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 14189, n=764) | |
Overall (sort by value) | |
Google Pixel 4a | |
Apple iPhone SE 2020 | |
Sony Xperia 10 II | |
Samsung Galaxy M31 | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3268 - 3512, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 6402, n=764) |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (45.8 - 50.6, n=5) | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106) | |
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 161, n=226) | |
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (79.2 - 87.7, n=5) | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106) | |
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 375, n=659) | |
Sony Xperia 10 II (Chrome 84) | |
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 196, n=205) | |
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (40.4 - 44.2, n=5) | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106) | |
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chome 83) |
WebXPRT 3 - --- | |
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=297) | |
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (66 - 77, n=5) | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106) | |
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83) | |
Sony Xperia 10 II (Chrome 84) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (16197 - 17768, n=5) | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106) | |
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83) | |
Sony Xperia 10 II (Chrome 84) | |
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 58632, n=829) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 59466, n=855) | |
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83) | |
Sony Xperia 10 II (Chrome 84) | |
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85) | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2770 - 3054, n=5) | |
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1) |
* ... smaller is better
Google Pixel 4a | Sony Xperia 10 II | Samsung Galaxy M31 | Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite | Average 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -47% | -13% | -16% | -24% | -53% | |
Random Write 4KB | 187.39 | 56.74 -70% | 152.4 -19% | 125.75 -33% | 90.4 (13.5 - 187, n=25) -52% | 40.2 (0.14 - 319, n=935) -79% |
Random Read 4KB | 162.89 | 76.83 -53% | 128.9 -21% | 134.57 -17% | 126 (88.4 - 173, n=25) -23% | 63.1 (1.59 - 325, n=935) -61% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 246.79 | 188.21 -24% | 221.7 -10% | 213.22 -14% | 197 (143 - 257, n=25) -20% | 139 (2.99 - 1321, n=935) -44% |
Sequential Read 256KB | 502.06 | 293.49 -42% | 489.5 -3% | 501.29 0% | 496 (409 - 733, n=25) -1% | 363 (12.1 - 2037, n=935) -28% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
Google Pixel 4a audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlét | ![]() ![]() |
Üresjárat | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Terhelés |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Kulcs:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Google Pixel 4a 3140 mAh | Apple iPhone SE 2020 1822 mAh | Sony Xperia 10 II 3600 mAh | Samsung Galaxy M31 6000 mAh | Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite 5260 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -14% | -118% | -166% | -39% | -45% | -64% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.49 | 0.44 10% | 1.5 -206% | 1.6 -227% | 0.8 -63% | 0.698 (0.49 - 0.8, n=5) -42% | 0.89 (0.2 - 3.4, n=926) -82% |
Idle Average * | 0.96 | 1.56 -63% | 2.1 -119% | 2.3 -140% | 1.1 -15% | 1.362 (0.96 - 1.8, n=5) -42% | 1.758 (0.6 - 6.2, n=925) -83% |
Idle Maximum * | 1 | 1.63 -63% | 2.8 -180% | 3.7 -270% | 1.8 -80% | 1.712 (1 - 2.2, n=5) -71% | 2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=926) -104% |
Load Average * | 3.11 | 2.32 25% | 4.5 -45% | 6.7 -115% | 3.7 -19% | 4.54 (3.11 - 5.38, n=5) -46% | 4.12 (0.8 - 10.8, n=920) -32% |
Load Maximum * | 5.23 | 4.12 21% | 7.2 -38% | 9.4 -80% | 6.1 -17% | 6.59 (5.23 - 7.5, n=5) -26% | 6.13 (1.2 - 14.2, n=920) -17% |
* ... smaller is better
Google Pixel 4a 3140 mAh | Apple iPhone SE 2020 1822 mAh | Sony Xperia 10 II 3600 mAh | Samsung Galaxy M31 6000 mAh | Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite 5260 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -21% | 11% | 47% | 36% | |
Reader / Idle | 2270 | 1938 -15% | 2456 8% | 2249 -1% | |
H.264 | 1045 | 681 -35% | 1432 37% | 1370 31% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 669 | 694 4% | 743 11% | 1324 98% | 1095 64% |
Load | 225 | 143 -36% | 326 45% | 337 50% |
Pro
Kontra
Összegzés - A középkategória királya
A Pixel 4a-val a Google-nak sikerült egy olyan alkalmas okostelefont megalkotni, amelynek számos erőssége és csak egy kevés gyenge pontja van. Középkategóriás telefonhoz képest a rendszer és az akkumulátor teljesítménye egyaránt jó, és a 128 GB belső tárhelynek köszönhetően a microSD kártyanyílás hiánya nem okoz nagy gondot. Emellett a kamera teljesítménye szinte a „nagy” Pixel 4 készülékekével azonos, ami ebben az árkategóriában példátlan. A kijelző „alig” 5,8 hüvelykes mérete szintén az egyik legkompaktabb mai okostelefonná teszi.
A Pixel 4a egy olcsó Google okostelefon, amely várhatóan elsősorban a kisebb okostelefonok rajongóinak fog tetszeni.
A Pixel 4a a nagyon világos képernyőért is plusz pontot érdemel. Az OLED panelnek köszönhetően élénk színekkel és elsőrangú kontrasztaránnyal is rendelkezik. Érzékeny szemű felhasználók viszont észlelni fogják a széles frekvencia-tartományt, amelyen belül vibrál a kijelző. Teljesen szubjektív szemszögből viszont ezeknek a soroknak a szerzője már használt olyan okostelefonokat, amelyek jobban leterhelik a szemeket, mint a Pixel 4a, annak ellenére, hogy azok lényegesen magasabb frekvenciákon vibráltak. Ebben a tekintetben végül csak az segít, ha próbát teszünk vele.
Google Pixel 4a - 09/21/2020 v7
Mike Wobker