Notebookcheck

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Smartphone rövid értékelés - Ár-teljesítmény Sztár

Understated. Mivel a Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Szinte olyan erős, mint csúcskategóriás testvére, a Mi Note 10, és felszerelés tekintetében is szinte ugyanazokkal a funkciókkal rendelkezik, ezért a „Lite” elnevezés inkább megtévesztő mint informatív. A Xiaomi csak a kamerán változtatott, amely még így is egy tiszteletreméltó 64 MP-es felbontást kínál 108 MP helyett. Azonban a Mi Note 10 Lite jóval olcsóbb is - ebben a tekintetben a „Lite” toldalék találó.
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Florian Schmitt (fordította Zoltán Kiss), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android Smartphone Touchscreen
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Mi Note Széria)
Processzor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G 8 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo 470 Gold / Silver
Grafikus adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 618
Memória
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4X
Kijelző
6.47 hüvelyk 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 398 PPI, Kapacitív, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, FHD+, 3D curved, HDR10, fényes: igen, HDR, 60 Hz
Háttértár
64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 64 GB 
, 108.6 GB ingyenes
Csatlakozók
1 USB 2.0, Audió csatlakozók: 3,5 mm-es fülhallgató jack, 1 Ujjlenyomat olvasó, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Szenzorok: Ujjlenyomat-olvasó, vibrációs motor, IR blaster, környezeti fényérzékelő, gyorsulásmérő, giroszkóp, elektronikus iránytű, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, USB OTB, Wi-Fi Direct, Wi-Fi display, DRM Widevine L1
Hálózat
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (sávok 2, 3, 5, 8), UMTS (sávok 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (sávok 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41), fej SAR 1,011 W/kg, test SAR 1,385 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 9.67 x 157.8 x 74.2
Akkumulátor
5260 mAh Lítium-Polimer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operációs rendszer
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix Fő Kamera: 64 MPix négyes kamera: 64-MP fő kamera (Sony IMX686, f/1.89, 1/1.73", 0.8 µm) + 8-MP ultraszéles kamera (f/2.2, 1/4.0", 1.12 µm) + 5-MP mélységérzékelő (f/2.4, 1/1.5", 1.12 µm) + 2-MP makró kamera (f/2.4, 1/1.4", 1.75 µm), videók
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.48, 1/3.06" 1.0 µm, Videók 1080p/30FPS-ig
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: Monó hangszórók a készülék alján, Billentyűzet: virtuális, moduláris 30 wattos töltő, USB kábel (C-ről A-ra), fülhallgató, SIM-kiadó eszköz, védőtok, használati útmutató, MIUI 11, 24 Hónap Garancia, fanless
Súly
204 g, Tápegység: 85 g
Ár
400 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Competing Devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
83 %
12/2020
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
SD 730G, Adreno 618
204 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.47"2340x1080
82 %
07/2020
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6
189 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
81 %
10/2019
Oppo Reno2
SD 730G, Adreno 618
189 g256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.50"2400x1080
80 %
01/2020
Samsung Galaxy A51
Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3
172 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.50"2400x1080
83 %
11/2019
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
SD 730G, Adreno 618
208 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.47"2340x1080

Size Comparison

162.31 mm 75 mm 8.58 mm 189 g160 mm 74.3 mm 9 mm 189 g157.8 mm 74.2 mm 9.7 mm 208 g157.8 mm 74.2 mm 9.67 mm 204 g158.5 mm 73.6 mm 7.9 mm 172 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Oppo Reno2
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
618 (532min - 671max) MBit/s ∼100% +81%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=302, last 2 years)
386 MBit/s ∼62% +13%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
341 (334min - 349max) MBit/s ∼55%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
333 (319min - 345max) MBit/s ∼54% -2%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
331 (317min - 341max) MBit/s ∼54% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
298 (185min - 350max) MBit/s ∼48% -13%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=302, last 2 years)
372 MBit/s ∼100% +15%
Oppo Reno2
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
355 (187min - 387max) MBit/s ∼95% +10%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
327 (321min - 333max) MBit/s ∼88% +1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
324 (310min - 330max) MBit/s ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
297 (189min - 335max) MBit/s ∼80% -8%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
255 (234min - 277max) MBit/s ∼69% -21%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340334341339339341337340338344338346341342340339341346343345336338343349342344343342336342341334341339339341337340338344338346341342340339341346343345336338343349342344343342336342341310327330324324324323327323326325319326321321326317324327321324320324326328321324325329326Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø341 (334-349)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø324 (310-330)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite: Overview
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite: Overview
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite: Bridge
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite: Bridge
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite: Turn
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite: Turn
Garmin Edge 520: Overview
Garmin Edge 520: Overview
Garmin Edge 520: Bridge
Garmin Edge 520: Bridge
Garmin Edge 520: Turn
Garmin Edge 520: Turn

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Tageslicht-Szene 1Tageslicht-Szene 2WeitwinkelLowlight
ColorChecker
28.1 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
35.4 ∆E
40.5 ∆E
55.6 ∆E
48.2 ∆E
31.8 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
25.4 ∆E
56.5 ∆E
58.7 ∆E
29.1 ∆E
45 ∆E
30.7 ∆E
64.2 ∆E
36.7 ∆E
41.9 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
64.6 ∆E
48.6 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite: 41.52 ∆E min: 13.2 - max: 64.74 ∆E
ColorChecker
13.8 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
16 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
11 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
2 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite: 7.38 ∆E min: 1.19 - max: 16.03 ∆E
598
cd/m²
596
cd/m²
615
cd/m²
595
cd/m²
605
cd/m²
623
cd/m²
605
cd/m²
612
cd/m²
626
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 626 cd/m² Átlag: 608.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.81 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 95 %
Centrumban: 605 cd/m²
Kontraszt: ∞:1 (Fekete: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.84 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.211
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50
Oppo Reno2
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50
Samsung Galaxy A51
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
Screen
-80%
-132%
-105%
-153%
Brightness middle
605
466
-23%
679
12%
589
-3%
625
3%
Brightness
608
457
-25%
683
12%
589
-3%
607
0%
Brightness Distribution
95
91
-4%
98
3%
94
-1%
89
-6%
Black Level *
0.61
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
0.84
2.2
-162%
3.5
-317%
2.22
-164%
4.38
-421%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
1.8
4.6
-156%
6.8
-278%
8.24
-358%
6.83
-279%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.3
2.7
-108%
4.2
-223%
2.6
-100%
4.1
-215%
Gamma
2.211 100%
2.24 98%
2.27 97%
2.111 104%
2.251 98%
CCT
6310 103%
6633 98%
6532 100%
6508 100%
7251 90%
Contrast
764

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 176.1 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 176.1 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 176.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9711 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 151500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.5 ms).
Geekbench 5.3
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
903 Points ∼42%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
2137 Points ∼100% +137%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
812 Points ∼38% -10%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
920 Points ∼43% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (812 - 920, n=3)
878 Points ∼41% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 4043, n=61, last 2 years)
1552 Points ∼73% +72%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1090 Points ∼65%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
1080 Points ∼64% -1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1127 Points ∼67% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (1080 - 1127, n=3)
1099 Points ∼66% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (272 - 4739, n=56, last 2 years)
1677 Points ∼100% +54%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1690 Points ∼69%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
2434 Points ∼100% +44%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
1762 Points ∼72% +4%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1727 Points ∼71% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (1646 - 1786, n=5)
1722 Points ∼71% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4201, n=191, last 2 years)
1902 Points ∼78% +13%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
547 Points ∼85%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
642 Points ∼100% +17%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
547 Points ∼85% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
543 Points ∼85% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (543 - 551, n=5)
547 Points ∼85% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1604, n=191, last 2 years)
549 Points ∼86% 0%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
7628 Points ∼80%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
9527 Points ∼100% +25%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
7134 Points ∼75% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5649 Points ∼59% -26%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
7558 Points ∼79% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (7134 - 8683, n=6)
7715 Points ∼81% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=280, last 2 years)
7502 Points ∼79% -2%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
8941 Points ∼68%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
13099 Points ∼100% +47%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
9145 Points ∼70% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
6416 Points ∼49% -28%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
9052 Points ∼69% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (8941 - 10200, n=6)
9422 Points ∼72% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2689 - 19989, n=258, last 2 years)
9565 Points ∼73% +7%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2686 Points ∼81%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
3331 Points ∼100% +24%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2621 Points ∼79% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2161 Points ∼65% -20%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2768 Points ∼83% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2621 - 2775, n=6)
2720 Points ∼82% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=218, last 2 years)
2631 Points ∼79% -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2143 Points ∼47%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4544 Points ∼100% +112%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2155 Points ∼47% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1438 Points ∼32% -33%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2153 Points ∼47% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2143 - 2199, n=6)
2158 Points ∼47% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 11259, n=218, last 2 years)
2955 Points ∼65% +38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2244 Points ∼53%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4204 Points ∼100% +87%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2244 Points ∼53% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1554 Points ∼37% -31%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2265 Points ∼54% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2244 - 2310, n=6)
2262 Points ∼54% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6977, n=218, last 2 years)
2608 Points ∼62% +16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3058 Points ∼66%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4642 Points ∼100% +52%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3162 Points ∼68% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2311 Points ∼50% -24%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3188 Points ∼69% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3058 - 3391, n=6)
3218 Points ∼69% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5780, n=281, last 2 years)
2792 Points ∼60% -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2466 Points ∼50%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4906 Points ∼100% +99%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2434 Points ∼50% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1530 Points ∼31% -38%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2425 Points ∼49% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2425 - 2492, n=6)
2459 Points ∼50% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 12616, n=281, last 2 years)
3205 Points ∼65% +30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2577 Points ∼53%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4845 Points ∼100% +88%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2565 Points ∼53% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1654 Points ∼34% -36%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2561 Points ∼53% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2561 - 2701, n=6)
2598 Points ∼54% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9643, n=281, last 2 years)
2907 Points ∼60% +13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3134 Points ∼68%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4637 Points ∼100% +48%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3112 Points ∼67% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2336 Points ∼50% -25%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3193 Points ∼69% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3112 - 3352, n=6)
3213 Points ∼69% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5765, n=279, last 2 years)
2746 Points ∼59% -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3751 Points ∼59%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
6327 Points ∼100% +69%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3647 Points ∼58% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1993 Points ∼31% -47%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3646 Points ∼58% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3646 - 3773, n=6)
3703 Points ∼59% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 22052, n=281, last 2 years)
4461 Points ∼71% +19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3594 Points ∼61%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
5853 Points ∼100% +63%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3513 Points ∼60% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2060 Points ∼35% -43%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3535 Points ∼60% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3513 - 3704, n=6)
3586 Points ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=281, last 2 years)
3581 Points ∼61% 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3257 Points ∼81%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4031 Points ∼100% +24%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3088 Points ∼77% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2217 Points ∼55% -32%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3171 Points ∼79% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3088 - 3328, n=6)
3216 Points ∼80% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=275, last 2 years)
2700 Points ∼67% -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2298 Points ∼48%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4804 Points ∼100% +109%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2243 Points ∼47% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1473 Points ∼31% -36%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2237 Points ∼47% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2237 - 2310, n=6)
2271 Points ∼47% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=275, last 2 years)
2716 Points ∼57% +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2459 Points ∼53%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4608 Points ∼100% +87%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2388 Points ∼52% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1592 Points ∼35% -35%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2394 Points ∼52% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2388 - 2489, n=6)
2434 Points ∼53% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=275, last 2 years)
2542 Points ∼55% +3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3294 Points ∼81%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4042 Points ∼100% +23%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3075 Points ∼76% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2225 Points ∼55% -32%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3191 Points ∼79% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3075 - 3349, n=6)
3235 Points ∼80% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 5301, n=275, last 2 years)
2662 Points ∼66% -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3610 Points ∼59%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
6158 Points ∼100% +71%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3504 Points ∼57% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2027 Points ∼33% -44%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3498 Points ∼57% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3485 - 3678, n=6)
3567 Points ∼58% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=275, last 2 years)
3815 Points ∼62% +6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3594 Points ∼65%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
5516 Points ∼100% +53%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3399 Points ∼62% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2068 Points ∼37% -42%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3425 Points ∼62% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3399 - 3594, n=6)
3490 Points ∼63% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=275, last 2 years)
3232 Points ∼59% -10%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
20767 Points ∼50%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
41610 Points ∼100% +100%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
14820 Points ∼36% -29%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
20393 Points ∼49% -2%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
22054 Points ∼53% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (14820 - 22054, n=5)
18710 Points ∼45% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 59268, n=251, last 2 years)
22244 Points ∼53% +7%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
53194 Points ∼93%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
57067 Points ∼100% +7%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
50829 Points ∼89% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
25086 Points ∼44% -53%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
51267 Points ∼90% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (50829 - 53548, n=5)
52404 Points ∼92% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2177 - 224130, n=250, last 2 years)
52867 Points ∼93% -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
39491 Points ∼75%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
52715 Points ∼100% +33%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
33007 Points ∼63% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23866 Points ∼45% -40%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
39608 Points ∼75% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (33007 - 39608, n=5)
37271 Points ∼71% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2920 - 117606, n=250, last 2 years)
37157 Points ∼70% -6%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
83 fps ∼74%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
112 fps ∼100% +35%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
85 fps ∼76% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
46 fps ∼41% -45%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
84 fps ∼75% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (83 - 86, n=5)
84.4 fps ∼75% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 322, n=233, last 2 years)
92.8 fps ∼83% +12%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps ∼100%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
40 fps ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (57 - 60, n=5)
59.2 fps ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=233, last 2 years)
51.4 fps ∼86% -14%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps ∼59%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
69 fps ∼100% +68%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
42 fps ∼61% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
24 fps ∼35% -41%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps ∼59% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (41 - 42, n=5)
41.4 fps ∼60% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 180, n=232, last 2 years)
54.2 fps ∼79% +32%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
39 fps ∼71%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
55 fps ∼100% +41%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
36 fps ∼65% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23 fps ∼42% -41%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
38 fps ∼69% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (36 - 39, n=5)
37.8 fps ∼69% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=231, last 2 years)
40 fps ∼73% +3%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps ∼64%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
47 fps ∼100% +57%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
30 fps ∼64% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
15 fps ∼32% -50%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps ∼64% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (30 - 30, n=5)
30 fps ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 117, n=229, last 2 years)
37 fps ∼79% +23%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
29 fps ∼73%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
40 fps ∼100% +38%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
26 fps ∼65% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼35% -52%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
27 fps ∼68% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (26 - 29, n=5)
27.4 fps ∼69% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=229, last 2 years)
31.1 fps ∼78% +7%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps ∼65%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
17 fps ∼100% +55%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
10 fps ∼59% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5.5 fps ∼32% -50%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
10 fps ∼59% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (10 - 11, n=6)
10.3 fps ∼61% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=279, last 2 years)
13.2 fps ∼78% +20%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
6.7 fps ∼56%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
12 fps ∼100% +79%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
6.7 fps ∼56% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.5 fps ∼29% -48%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
10 fps ∼83% +49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (6.3 - 10, n=6)
7.17 fps ∼60% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 101, n=278, last 2 years)
9.11 fps ∼76% +36%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼65%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
26 fps ∼100% +53%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
16 fps ∼62% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9.1 fps ∼35% -46%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼62% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (16 - 17, n=6)
16.3 fps ∼63% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 66, n=280, last 2 years)
19.9 fps ∼77% +17%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼58%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
31 fps ∼100% +72%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
18 fps ∼58% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 fps ∼32% -44%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼58% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (18 - 18, n=6)
18 fps ∼58% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=280, last 2 years)
22.8 fps ∼74% +27%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼63%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
27 fps ∼100% +59%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
17 fps ∼63% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 fps ∼37% -41%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼63% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (17 - 17, n=5)
17 fps ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 75, n=228, last 2 years)
22.3 fps ∼83% +31%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼74%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
23 fps ∼100% +35%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
15 fps ∼65% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.6 fps ∼37% -49%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
15 fps ∼65% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (15 - 17, n=5)
15.8 fps ∼69% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 60, n=228, last 2 years)
19.5 fps ∼85% +15%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
273255 Points ∼74%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
369207 Points ∼100% +35%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
260154 Points ∼70% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
181295 Points ∼49% -34%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
266417 Points ∼72% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (251673 - 273255, n=5)
264147 Points ∼72% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 727247, n=164, last 2 years)
330404 Points ∼89% +21%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
54.792 Points ∼100% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (45.8 - 50.6, n=5)
47.3 Points ∼86% +2%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
46.148 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
46.038 Points ∼84% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (10.9 - 161, n=196, last 2 years)
46 Points ∼84% 0%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)
45.819 Points ∼84% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
27.681 Points ∼51% -40%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
96.293 Points ∼100% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (79.2 - 87.7, n=5)
84 Points ∼87% +2%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)
83.953 Points ∼87% +2%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
82.347 Points ∼86%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 375, n=200, last 2 years)
82.1 Points ∼85% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
79.228 Points ∼82% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
51.257 Points ∼53% -38%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
49.5 runs/min ∼100% +23%
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 196, n=172, last 2 years)
47.9 runs/min ∼97% +19%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)
43.6 runs/min ∼88% +8%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
43.3 runs/min ∼87% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (40.4 - 44.2, n=5)
43 runs/min ∼87% +6%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
40.4 runs/min ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
29.1 runs/min ∼59% -28%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
115 Points ∼100% +64%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
77 Points ∼67% +10%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=215, last 2 years)
74.6 Points ∼65% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (66 - 77, n=5)
70.4 Points ∼61% +1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
70 Points ∼61%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)
66 Points ∼57% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
57 Points ∼50% -19%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
19727 Points ∼100% +22%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)
17345 Points ∼88% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (16197 - 17768, n=5)
16856 Points ∼85% +4%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
16241 Points ∼82% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
16197 Points ∼82%
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=228, last 2 years)
15570 Points ∼79% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
10194 Points ∼52% -37%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=229, last 2 years)
4739 ms * ∼100% -61%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
4375.1 ms * ∼92% -49%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)
3054.3 ms * ∼64% -4%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
2940.5 ms * ∼62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2770 - 3054, n=5)
2900 ms * ∼61% +1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
2769.8 ms * ∼58% +6%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
2254.1 ms * ∼48% +23%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 LiteHuawei P40 Lite 5GOppo Reno2Samsung Galaxy A51Xiaomi Mi Note 10Average 64 GB UFS 2.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
44%
-22%
-12%
-4%
-18%
10%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
67.67 (NM Card)
53.54 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
60.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
55.4 (33.3 - 65.3, n=10)
59 (1.7 - 83.3, n=207, last 2 years)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.35 (NM Card)
74.52 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
73 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
73.4 (36.8 - 85.4, n=10)
76.9 (13.4 - 154, n=207, last 2 years)
Random Write 4KB
125.75
249.66
99%
22
-83%
104.4
-17%
118.9
-5%
78.1 (13.6 - 196, n=15)
-38%
100 (4.31 - 319, n=288, last 2 years)
-20%
Random Read 4KB
134.57
146.07
9%
144.24
7%
110.8
-18%
106.2
-21%
115 (60.6 - 157, n=15)
-15%
121 (13.5 - 325, n=288, last 2 years)
-10%
Sequential Write 256KB
213.22
188.01
-12%
201.78
-5%
184.9
-13%
243.6
14%
182 (135 - 222, n=15)
-15%
285 (11.9 - 1321, n=288, last 2 years)
34%
Sequential Read 256KB
501.29
905.47
81%
469.31
-6%
496.1
-1%
480.5
-4%
491 (272 - 687, n=15)
-2%
681 (41.9 - 2037, n=288, last 2 years)
36%
051015202530303030303030303030292731303029303030303030303129303030303030303030303030303030302928303030293130303030303029313030302930303030303030303030293030303030303030303030302931283129302930302828283129303030303030303030303029303030303030303030302930303030303028303030293030303029303030302930303029303030303030303030303030302931303029313030293030312930303029293030303030303030293030303030303029302829101817283030303030303030303029273130302930303030303030312930303030303030303030303030303030292830303029313030303030302931303030293030303030303030303029303030303030303030303030293128312930293030282828312930303030303030303030302930303030303030303030293030303030302830303029303030302930303030293030302930303030303030303030303030293130302931303029303031293030302929303030303030303029303030303030302930282910181728303130303030302931293030303030303030303030303030293129303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303031283030272729303129313029312931293124312930303030303030303030312930312930312928312931303030293129302630312930303030273130293129293030303030303031293031293129303031302931293030312930303030303028303030302931293129Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; 0.19.0: Ø29.6 (10-31)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; 2.3.4a: Ø29.8 (24-31)
Max. terhelés
 37.3 °C40.1 °C39.4 °C 
 37.6 °C39.3 °C39.8 °C 
 37.6 °C38.5 °C39.1 °C 
Maximum: 40.1 °C
Átlag: 38.7 °C
35.1 °C36.8 °C36.6 °C
35.3 °C36 °C35.6 °C
36.6 °C36.9 °C35.1 °C
Maximum: 36.9 °C
Átlag: 36 °C
Tápegység (max.)  37.6 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.4 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.839.42539.941.63131.935.44038.937.25043.737.96329.829.98025.924.910026.325.912524.927.816021.636.3200194325018.949.131518.154.940016.658.950016.261.463014.963.38001564.2100015.672.6125014.974.5160014.973.3200015.675.7250014.671.7315014.269.5400014.164.2500014.465.8630014.669.9800014.970.31000015.269.21250015.463.61600015.750SPL6666.36470.627.583N18.319.715.825.3152.5median 15.4median 64.2Delta2.11042.946.342.343.934.834.63939.140.842.634.43528.127.125.125.123.627.822.137.120.244.919.650.218.456.418.960.520.163.62065.217.566.316.17515.576.217.874.3167315.971.416.172.316.363.416.564.816.572.116.970.916.663.91764.516.55567.866.429.383.620.818.51.255.5median 17median 64.51.710.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mi Note 10 LiteXiaomi Mi Note 10
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0 / 0.2 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 0.8 / 1.1 / 1.8 Watt
Terhelés midlight 3.7 / 6.1 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
5260 mAh
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
4000 mAh
Oppo Reno2
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A51
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
5260 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-24%
-7%
-23%
-28%
-28%
-27%
Idle Minimum *
0.8
0.65
19%
0.7
12%
0.9
-13%
0.7
12%
0.84 (0.49 - 1.55, n=6)
-5%
0.915 (0.37 - 2.3, n=246, last 2 years)
-14%
Idle Average *
1.1
2.25
-105%
1.25
-14%
1.7
-55%
1.8
-64%
1.953 (0.96 - 4.91, n=6)
-78%
1.827 (0.82 - 3.94, n=246, last 2 years)
-66%
Idle Maximum *
1.8
2.29
-27%
1.36
24%
1.8
-0%
2.2
-22%
2.26 (1 - 5.02, n=6)
-26%
2.12 (0.85 - 4.2, n=246, last 2 years)
-18%
Load Average *
3.7
3.7
-0%
5.38
-45%
5.2
-41%
5.2
-41%
4.51 (3.11 - 5.38, n=6)
-22%
4.39 (1.94 - 8.4, n=246, last 2 years)
-19%
Load Maximum *
6.1
6.46
-6%
6.71
-10%
6.6
-8%
7.5
-23%
6.63 (5.23 - 7.5, n=6)
-9%
7.11 (3.06 - 12.3, n=246, last 2 years)
-17%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
37h 29min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
18h 15min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
22h 50min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
5h 37min
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
5260 mAh
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
4000 mAh
Oppo Reno2
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A51
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
5260 mAh
Battery Runtime
-4%
-24%
-28%
4%
Reader / Idle
2249
2533
13%
1689
-25%
2134
-5%
H.264
1370
1125
-18%
846
-38%
1423
4%
WiFi v1.3
1095
1047
-4%
616
-44%
698
-36%
1127
3%
Load
337
185
-45%
289
-14%
387
15%

Pro

+ prémium minőségű kivitelezés
+ ívelt kijelző
+ világos AMOLED képernyő
+ nappali fényben jó fotók
+ nincs lefojtás
+ jó játékteljesítmény
+ nagyon hosszú üzemidő
+ gyors töltés

Kontra

- sikamlós üveg ház
- gyenge fényben középszerű képminőség
- nincs microSD kártyanyílás
- nincs IP minősítés

Összegzés - Átlagon Felüli Funkciók Alacsony Áron

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Smartphone rövid értékelés: Test devices courtesy of
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Smartphone rövid értékelés: Test devices courtesy of

„Nagyszerű kamera, apró kompromisszumok”, ez az összegzi az értékelésünket a Xiaomi Mi Note 10-ről. Ha ezt tekintjük referenciának, akkor a Mi Note 10 Lite-ra vonatkozó összegzésünk a következő: A Mi Note 10-hez képest a kamera még mindig jó, egyéb kompromisszum pedig nem létezik.

A Lite változatban minden megvan, ami a csúcskategóriás alternatívát nagyszerűvé tette: Minőségi kivitelezés, világos AMOLED képernyő, rendkívül hosszú üzemidő, gyors töltés, gyors nyolcmagos SoC, és végül, de nem utolsósorban nagyon jó ár-teljesítmény arány.

Középkategóriás okostelefonként a Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite átlag feletti, és egyedül a kamera nem éri el a Mi Note 10 szintjét.

Mi Note 10 Lite vagy Mi Note 10? Bár a Mi Note 10 108-MP-es kamerája egyértelműen valamivel jobb képeket készít, de a Mi Note 10 Lite képminősége majdnem olyan jó, legalábbis jó megvilágítású környezetben. Azonban a Lite változat jóval olcsóbb, ami miatt véleményünk szerint összességében egy jobb választás az ártudatos vásárlók számára.

A Mi Note 10 Lite-nak nincs túl sok hátránya. Mivel a belső tárhely microSD kártyával nem bővíthető, ezért a leendő vásárlók jobban teszik, ha alaposan meggondolják, hogy a 64 GB-os vagy a 128 GB-os modellt választják-e. Továbbá a Xiaomi okostelefon nem vízálló, nincs vezeték nélküli töltés, és a sima felülete miatt elég sikamlós is.

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite - 08/06/2020 v7
Manuel Masiero

Váz
86%
Billentyűzet
69 / 75 → 92%
Érintőpad
96%
Csatlakoztathatóság
48 / 70 → 69%
Súly
88%
Akkumulátor
92%
Kijelző
87%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
28 / 64 → 44%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
68 / 86 → 79%
Hőmérséklet
89%
Zaj
100%
Audio
76 / 90 → 84%
Camera
68%
Átlag
77%
83%
Smartphone - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Smartphone rövid értékelés - Ár-teljesítmény Sztár
Manuel Masiero, 2020-12-22 (Update: 2020-12-22)