Notebookcheck

Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL Tablet rövid értékelés

Andreas Kilian (fordította Tamás Somogyi), 11/07/2016
Android ARM Tablet Touchscreen

Zen álmok? Az Asus új, iPad Mini méretű tabletje nem csak olyan hasznos funkciókat kínál, mint a WWAN modem és a sztereó hangszórók, de viszonylag megfizethető is. A drágább versenytársak bajba kerülhetnek?

Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A (ZenPad Széria)
Processzor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
Grafikus adapter
Memória
4096 MB 
, LPDDR3
Kijelző
7.9 hüvelyk 4:3, 2048 x 1536 pixel 324 PPI, kapacitív érintőkijelző, IPS, fényes: igen
Háttértár
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 22.6 GB ingyenes
Csatlakozók
1 USB 2.0, Audió csatlakozók: 3.5 mm headset aljzat, Kártyaolvasó: microSD 128 GB-ig, Brightness Sensor, Szenzorok: G-Sensor, iránytű, Hall, közelségérzékelő, gyroszenzor, Miracast, USB-OTG, Wi-Fi Direct
Hálózat
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1, 4G (Sávok: 1 3 5 7 18 20 26 28 38 41), 3G (850/900/2100MHz), SAR (fej): 1.420 W/kg, SAR (test): 0.955 W/kg, LTE, GPS
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 7.57 x 205.4 x 136.4
Akkumulátor
18 Wh, 4680 mAh Lítium-Polimer, Akkumulátor üzemidő (gyártói adat): 11 h
Operációs rendszer
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix (autofókusz f/2.0, 1080p videó @ 30 fps)
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix Fix fókusz f/2.2, 720p videó @ 30 fps)
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: 2, az előlapon, Billentyűzet: virtuális, hálózati töltő, USB kábel, ZenUI, Asus Apps, Facebook, Facebook Messenger, Instagram, Puffin Browser, 12 Hónap Garancia, USB Type-C, fanless
Súly
320 g, Tápegység: 79 g

 

Front landscape mode
Front landscape mode
Front portrait mode
Main camera
SIM- & microSD-slots
Power button and volume rocker
USB Type-C port
Power adapter

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Klaus I211)
532 MBit/s ∼100% +63%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
326 MBit/s ∼61%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
279 MBit/s ∼52% -14%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
121 MBit/s ∼23% -63%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Klaus I211)
485 MBit/s ∼100% +84%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
264 MBit/s ∼54%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
185 MBit/s ∼38% -30%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
112 MBit/s ∼23% -58%
ZenPad 3 8.0 – Overview
ZenPad 3 8.0 – Overview
ZenPad 3 8.0 – Crossing
ZenPad 3 8.0 – Crossing
ZenPad 3 8.0 – Turning point
ZenPad 3 8.0 – Turning point
Garmin Edge 500 – Overview
Garmin Edge 500 – Overview
Garmin Edge 500 – Crossing
Garmin Edge 500 – Crossing
Garmin Edge 500 – Turning point
Garmin Edge 500 – Turning point

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
381
cd/m²
364
cd/m²
340
cd/m²
360
cd/m²
386
cd/m²
340
cd/m²
377
cd/m²
374
cd/m²
351
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 386 cd/m² Átlag: 363.7 cd/m² Minimum: 9.57 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 88 %
Centrumban: 386 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 677:1 (Fekete: 0.57 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.3 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
Gamma: 2.42
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
IPS, 2048x1536, 7.9
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
IPS, 2048x1536, 8
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
Super AMOLED, 2048x1536, 8
Huawei MediaPad M2
IPS LCD, 1920x1200, 8
Xiaomi MiPad 2
IPS, 2048x1536, 7.9
Apple iPad Mini 4
IPS, 2048x1536, 7.9
Screen
Brightness middle
386
369
-4%
347
-10%
463
20%
425
10%
411
6%
Brightness
364
346
-5%
348
-4%
445
22%
402
10%
421
16%
Brightness Distribution
88
86
-2%
88
0%
92
5%
91
3%
91
3%
Black Level *
0.57
0.37
35%
0.47
18%
0.4
30%
0.58
-2%
Contrast
677
997
47%
985
45%
1063
57%
709
5%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.3
5.58
-69%
1.67
49%
6.25
-89%
4.98
-51%
2.15
35%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.1
6.61
7%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.7
4.67
-175%
1.75
-3%
6.16
-262%
5.2
-206%
2.72
-60%
Gamma
2.42 99%
2.25 107%
2.27 106%
2.43 99%
2.65 91%
2.29 105%
CCT
6397 102%
7927 82%
6361 102%
7921 82%
7249 90%
7012 93%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
70
95.4
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
86

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8813 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41.3 ms).
Grayscale (Balance, target color space sRGB)
Grayscale (Balance, target color space sRGB)
ColorChecker (Balance, target color space sRGB)
ColorChecker (Balance, target color space sRGB)
Saturation (Balance, target color space sRGB)
Saturation (Balance, target color space sRGB)
Colorspace (Balance, target color space sRGB)
Colorspace (Balance, target color space sRGB)
Grayscale (Vivid, target color space sRGB)
Grayscale (Vivid, target color space sRGB)
ColorChecker (Vivid, target color space sRGB)
ColorChecker (Vivid, target color space sRGB)
Saturation (Vivid, target color space sRGB)
Saturation (Vivid, target color space sRGB)
Colorspace (Vivid, target color space sRGB)
Colorspace (Vivid, target color space sRGB)
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
2885 Points ∼9%
Huawei MediaPad M2
3468 Points ∼11%
32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
931 Points ∼20%
Huawei MediaPad M2
823 Points ∼18%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
3628 Points ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
4195 Points ∼11% +16%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
3170 Points ∼8% -13%
Apple iPad Mini 4
3097 Points ∼8% -15%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
1514 Points ∼31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
1233 Points ∼25% -19%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
990 Points ∼20% -35%
Apple iPad Mini 4
1714 Points ∼35% +13%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
71734 Points ∼31%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
73083 Points ∼32% +2%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
6018 Points ∼59%
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
6419 Points ∼63% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
5564 Points ∼54% -8%
Huawei MediaPad M2
4358 Points ∼42% -28%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
5279 Points ∼51% -12%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
873 Points ∼51%
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
0 Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
952 Points ∼56% +9%
Huawei MediaPad M2
754 Points ∼44% -14%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
952 Points ∼56% +9%
Apple iPad Mini 4
1059 Points ∼62% +21%
Graphics (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
1651 Points ∼18%
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
1321 Points ∼14% -20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
876 Points ∼9% -47%
Huawei MediaPad M2
820 Points ∼9% -50%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1609 Points ∼17% -3%
Apple iPad Mini 4
2668 Points ∼29% +62%
System (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
2076 Points ∼20%
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
1630 Points ∼16% -21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
2764 Points ∼27% +33%
Huawei MediaPad M2
1870 Points ∼18% -10%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1921 Points ∼19% -7%
Apple iPad Mini 4
3132 Points ∼30% +51%
Overall (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
1475 Points ∼34%
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
0 Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
1044 Points ∼24% -29%
Huawei MediaPad M2
1093 Points ∼25% -26%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1419 Points ∼33% -4%
Apple iPad Mini 4
1681 Points ∼39% +14%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
34 fps ∼2%
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
28 fps ∼2% -18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
24 fps ∼1% -29%
Huawei MediaPad M2
15 fps ∼1% -56%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
32 fps ∼2% -6%
Apple iPad Mini 4
47.8 fps ∼3% +41%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
27 fps ∼6%
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
19 fps ∼4% -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
29 fps ∼6% +7%
Huawei MediaPad M2
14 fps ∼3% -48%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
13 fps ∼3% -52%
Apple iPad Mini 4
37 fps ∼8% +37%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
15 fps ∼3%
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
12 fps ∼2% -20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
10.4 fps ∼2% -31%
Huawei MediaPad M2
7.8 fps ∼1% -48%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
8.4 fps ∼2% -44%
Apple iPad Mini 4
21.5 fps ∼4% +43%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
11 fps ∼3%
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
9.9 fps ∼3% -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
11 fps ∼3% 0%
Huawei MediaPad M2
7.8 fps ∼2% -29%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
6.3 fps ∼2% -43%
Apple iPad Mini 4
15.3 fps ∼4% +39%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
9.5 fps ∼2%
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
6.9 fps ∼1% -27%
Huawei MediaPad M2
0 fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
13 fps ∼2% +37%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
6.1 fps ∼3%
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
4.7 fps ∼3% -23%
Huawei MediaPad M2
0 fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
6.3 fps ∼4% +3%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
1385 Points ∼38%
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
0 Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
1586 Points ∼44% +15%
Huawei MediaPad M2
56 Points ∼2% -96%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1580 Points ∼43% +14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
1310 Points ∼16%
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
0 Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
830 Points ∼10% -37%
Huawei MediaPad M2
71 Points ∼1% -95%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1300 Points ∼16% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
1326 Points ∼21%
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
0 Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
929 Points ∼15% -30%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1353 Points ∼21% +2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
11568 Points ∼15%
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
9031 Points ∼11% -22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
17240 Points ∼22% +49%
Huawei MediaPad M2
10447 Points ∼13% -10%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
20142 Points ∼25% +74%
Apple iPad Mini 4
9844 Points ∼12% -15%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
22306 Points ∼5%
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
14670 Points ∼3% -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
20006 Points ∼4% -10%
Huawei MediaPad M2
11984 Points ∼3% -46%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
27537 Points ∼6% +23%
Apple iPad Mini 4
25254 Points ∼5% +13%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
18491 Points ∼9%
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
20201 Points ∼10% +9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
19317 Points ∼9% +4%
Huawei MediaPad M2
11605 Points ∼6% -37%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
25460 Points ∼12% +38%
Apple iPad Mini 4
18737 Points ∼9% +1%

Legend

 
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956, Qualcomm Adreno 510, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA Intel Atom Z3580, PowerVR G6430, 64 GB SSD
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE Samsung Exynos 5433 Octa, ARM Mali-T760 MP6, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei MediaPad M2 HiSilicon Kirin 930, ARM Mali-T628 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi MiPad 2 Intel Atom x5-Z8500, Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPad Mini 4 Apple A8, PowerVR GX6450, 64 GB SSD
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
3803.2 ms * ∼6%
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
4910 ms * ∼8% -29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
6512 ms * ∼11% -71%
Huawei MediaPad M2
11543.5 ms * ∼19% -204%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
4420.4 ms * ∼7% -16%
Apple iPad Mini 4
2557 ms * ∼4% +33%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
8349 Points ∼17%
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
8431 Points ∼17% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
7097 Points ∼14% -15%
Huawei MediaPad M2
3866 Points ∼8% -54%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
7994 Points ∼16% -4%
Apple iPad Mini 4
9962 Points ∼20% +19%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
103 Points ∼13%
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
121 Points ∼15% +17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
79 Points ∼10% -23%
Huawei MediaPad M2
67 Points ∼8% -35%
Apple iPad Mini 4
144 Points ∼18% +40%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
45.9 Points ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
40.298 Points ∼12% -12%
Huawei MediaPad M2
23 Points ∼7% -50%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
43.039 Points ∼13% -6%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
20.61 MB/s ∼24%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
39.62 MB/s ∼41%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
6.91 MB/s ∼4%
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
9.8 MB/s ∼6% +42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
9.68 MB/s ∼6% +40%
Huawei MediaPad M2
13.44 MB/s ∼8% +95%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
13.96 MB/s ∼8% +102%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
52.02 MB/s ∼30%
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
27.5 MB/s ∼16% -47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
25.53 MB/s ∼15% -51%
Huawei MediaPad M2
25.09 MB/s ∼14% -52%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
24.42 MB/s ∼14% -53%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
116.62 MB/s ∼51%
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
75.6 MB/s ∼33% -35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
47.45 MB/s ∼21% -59%
Huawei MediaPad M2
40.72 MB/s ∼18% -65%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
56.37 MB/s ∼25% -52%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
252.3 MB/s ∼30%
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
143 MB/s ∼17% -43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
248.34 MB/s ∼30% -2%
Huawei MediaPad M2
144.99 MB/s ∼17% -43%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
147.85 MB/s ∼18% -41%
BaseMark OS II - Memory (sort by value)
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
1590 Points ∼33%
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
632 Points ∼13% -60%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
593 Points ∼12% -63%
Huawei MediaPad M2
1235 Points ∼26% -22%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1379 Points ∼29% -13%
Apple iPad Mini 4
902 Points ∼19% -43%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 BeállításokÉrték
 high20 fps
 very low29 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 BeállításokÉrték
 high57 fps
Max. terhelés
 38.2 °C38.3 °C34.9 °C 
 37.6 °C38.4 °C35.1 °C 
 38.2 °C36.3 °C35.2 °C 
Maximum: 38.4 °C
Átlag: 36.9 °C
30.6 °C35.5 °C36.9 °C
33.1 °C36.2 °C39 °C
32.2 °C35.8 °C36.6 °C
Maximum: 39 °C
Átlag: 35.1 °C
Tápegység (max.)  36.6 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
Heat map Asus ZenPad 3 8.0
Heat map Asus ZenPad 3 8.0
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.640.52525.431.73125.333.44032.935.35033.649.46331.6348028.426.21002727.112520.827.81602234.820021.343.125020.849.131521.254.740019.458.250019.56663017.765.380017.967.3100017.872.3125017.370.6160017.468.3200016.767.3250017.272.7315018.270.8400017.974.1500017.676.5630017.779.3800017.8791000017.973.11250018.160.41600018.252.3SPL3085.7N1.362.7median 17.9Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001Amedian 67.3Delta1.311.340.735.335.240.739.430.137.839.443.33028.443.346.727.733.846.747.535.639.547.545.426.934.345.445.524.627.345.544.626.330.844.64731.226.24752.943.623.852.956.552.122.956.560.452.122.460.463.854.519.963.866.557.120.466.572.163.818.772.174.667.517.774.677.86917.977.878.9701878.980.47117.880.483.873.51783.885.175.816.985.183.473.317.483.483.473.117.883.483.974.417.583.983.473.517.383.48575.617.38586.6771886.684.674.518.384.681.571.817.981.572.261.217.972.295.185.430.195.1110.763.21.4110.7median 78.9Xiaomi MiPad 2median 70median 17.9median 78.910.49.52.410.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.71 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 16% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 36%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi MiPad 2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (95.07 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 36%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.08 / 0.31 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 1.01 / 2.71 / 2.75 Watt
Terhelés midlight 7.28 / 10.02 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
18 Wh
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
15 Wh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
15 Wh
Huawei MediaPad M2
18 Wh
Xiaomi MiPad 2
23 Wh
Apple iPad Mini 4
19 Wh
Power Consumption
-28%
-38%
-6%
-82%
-4%
Idle Minimum *
1.01
2.5
-148%
2
-98%
1.4
-39%
3.33
-230%
0.8
21%
Idle Average *
2.71
3.2
-18%
3.6
-33%
3.3
-22%
5.01
-85%
3.6
-33%
Idle Maximum *
2.75
3.2
-16%
4
-45%
3.4
-24%
5.19
-89%
3.9
-42%
Load Average *
7.28
6.3
13%
8.2
-13%
5.5
24%
8.32
-14%
6.1
16%
Load Maximum *
10.02
7.1
29%
9.9
1%
7
30%
9.33
7%
8
20%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
19h 07min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 53)
7h 50min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9h 34min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
4h 23min
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
18 Wh
Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA
15 Wh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE
15 Wh
Huawei MediaPad M2
18 Wh
Xiaomi MiPad 2
23 Wh
Apple iPad Mini 4
19 Wh
Battery Runtime
-25%
13%
26%
-10%
12%
Reader / Idle
1147
677
-41%
1399
22%
1546
35%
1488
30%
H.264
574
450
-22%
780
36%
727
27%
643
12%
WiFi v1.3
470
340
-28%
442
-6%
525
12%
421
-10%
539
15%
Load
263
240
-9%
265
1%
343
30%
242
-8%

Pro

+ jól összerakott
+ microSD kártyaolvasó
+ USB Type-C OTG támogatással
+ integrált LTE modem
+ gyors WLAN
+ a kijelző képe éles, színei jók
+ terhelés alatt sem akad
+ ZenUI sok plusz funkcióval...

Kontra

- ...és rengeteg buggal
- nem túl stabil a ház
- a WWAN modemnek nincs 2G támogatása
- középszerű webkamera
- nincs NFC
- nincs ujjlenyomat szenzor
- a microSD kártya nem használható belső tárhelyként
In review: Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 (Z581KL). Test model courtesy of Asus Germany.
In review: Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 (Z581KL). Test model courtesy of Asus Germany.

Az Asusnak sikerült kijavítania a ZenPad S 8.0 néhány hibáját az új ZenPad 3 8.0-val, például a folyamatos terhelés miatti belassulást, valamint az átlag alatti üzemidőt. Sajnálatos módon a korábban kiemelkedő külsőt leegyszerűsítették anélkül, hogy ez javította volna a ház stabilitását, amely így még mindig csak átlagos. Az összeszerelés minőségére ezzel szemben nem lehet panasz.

A tesztpéldány képességei lépést tudnak tartani a drágább riválisokkal is, bár az NFC és az ujjlenyomat-olvasó kimaradt, holott ezek a Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0-ba bekerültek. A kamera minősége is kiábrándító - pedig a ZenPad S 8.0-ban ez kifejezetten tetszett. A tesztgéppel a legnagyobb probléma a szoftver: a ZenUI kezelőfelület ugyan tartalmaz rengeteg hasznos funkciót, de annyira bugos, hogy egy pontot levontunk a végső értékelésből miatta. Szerencsére arra még van esély, hogy az Asus kijavítja az appok hibáit az elkövetkezendő pár hétben.

A ZenPad 3 8.0 jól felszerelt tablet, ehhez képest nem is kerül sokba, de nem állított új mérföldkövet semmilyen kategóriában. A sok kis bug szintén rontott a teszt alatti felhasználói élményen.

Ha az LTE-ről le tud mondani valaki, és mindenképpen Asus modellt szeretne, érdemes megnéznie a ZenPad S 8.0-t, mielőtt a most tesztelt készüléket megveszi. Az ugyanis hasonló a ZenPad 3 8.0-hoz, de 64 GB belső tárhellyel, jobb webkamerával, és egyedi külsővel rendelkezik, és az ára sem tér el jelentősen - főleg, hogy már ez a tablet is Android 6.0-t kapott. Amennyiben pedig valaki többet is rá tud szánni, a  Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0, kiváló AMOLED paneljével megfontolandó alternatíva lehet a tesztelt eszközzel szemben.

Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű értékelés itt olvasható.

Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A - 10/24/2016 v5.1
Andreas Kilian

Váz
70%
Billentyűzet
71 / 80 → 89%
Érintőpad
91%
Csatlakoztathatóság
45 / 65 → 69%
Súly
86 / 40-88 → 96%
Akkumulátor
90%
Kijelző
85%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
45 / 68 → 66%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
55 / 76 → 73%
Hőmérséklet
89%
Zaj
100%
Audio
64 / 91 → 70%
Camera
62 / 85 → 73%
Plusz pont
-1%
Átlag
68%
85%
Tablet - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL Tablet rövid értékelés
Andreas Kilian, 2016-11- 7 (Update: 2016-11- 7)