Notebookcheck

ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G531GW (Core i9-9880H, RTX 2070) Laptop rövid értékelés

Mike Wobker, 👁 Florian Glaser (fordította Zoltán Kiss), 08/01/2019
Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Windows

RGB ihlet. Az ASUS a ROG Strix Star harmadik megtestesülésével nem csak az RGB-világításra fókuszál. A gyártó egy szép, Keystone nevű biztonsági funkciót is beépített, számos nagy teljesítményű hardverrel együtt. A G531GW papíron sokat ígér, de vajon megfelel-e az elvárásoknak?

Asus Strix Scar III G531GW (G531 Széria)
Processzor
Intel Core i9-9880H
Grafikus adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Mag: 1215 MHz, Memória: 1750 MHz, GDDR6, TU106, FoceWare 419.71, Optimus
Memória
32768 MB 
, 2 x 16 GB DDR4-2666 SO-DIMM, dual-channel, minden hely foglalt
Kijelző
15.6 hüvelyk 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, Sharp LQ156M1JW09 (SHP14D3), IPS, Full-HD, 240 Hz, fényes: nem
Alaplap
Intel HM370
Háttértár
Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8, 1024 GB 
, 1 x M.2 2280 foglalat, 1 x 2.5 hüvelykes meghajtó hely, 890 GB ingyenes
Hangkártya
Realtek ALC294 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH
Csatlakozók
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audió csatlakozók: kombinált 3.5 mm fülhallgató és mikrofon jack
Hálózat
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 25 x 360 x 275
Akkumulátor
66 Wh Lítium-Polimer, 4 cellás
Operációs rendszer
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: 2 x 3.5 W sztereó, Billentyűzet: Chiclet RGB, Billentyűzet háttérvilágítás: igen, Keystone chip hordozó pánttal, McAfee Security, különféle gyártói eszközök, 24 Hónap Garancia
Súly
2.324 kg, Tápegység: 844 g
Ár
2600 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G531GW
ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G531GW
ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G531GW
ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G531GW
ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G531GW
ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G531GW
ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G531GW

Size Comparison

397 mm 268 mm 27 mm 2.7 kg396 mm 261 mm 27.5 mm 2.5 kg361 mm 246 mm 24.4 mm 2.4 kg360 mm 275 mm 25 mm 2.3 kg356 mm 250 mm 18.9 mm 2.1 kg
Front: No connections
Front: No connections
Rear: Gigabit LAN, HDMI, 1 x USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-C, power connector
Rear: Gigabit LAN, HDMI, 1 x USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-C, power connector
Left-hand side: 3 x USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-A, combined headphone and microphone jack
Left-hand side: 3 x USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-A, combined headphone and microphone jack
Right-hand side: Keystone slot
Right-hand side: Keystone slot
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
680 MBit/s ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
678 MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
663 MBit/s ∼98% -2%
MSI GE75 8SF
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
658 MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Aorus 15 X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
645 MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 1380, n=283)
614 MBit/s ∼90% -10%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GE75 8SF
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
686 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
680 MBit/s ∼99% +1%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
675 MBit/s ∼98%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
674 MBit/s ∼98% 0%
Aorus 15 X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
622 MBit/s ∼91% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 1160, n=283)
566 MBit/s ∼83% -16%
245
cd/m²
258
cd/m²
255
cd/m²
252
cd/m²
266
cd/m²
261
cd/m²
233
cd/m²
247
cd/m²
253
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
Sharp LQ156M1JW09 (SHP14D3)
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 266 cd/m² Átlag: 252.2 cd/m² Minimum: 15 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 88 %
Kontraszt: 985:1 (Fekete: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.81 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 1.03
ΔE Greyscale 2.44 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
97% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 62% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.42
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
Sharp LQ156M1JW09 (SHP14D3), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Aorus 15 X9
LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB2, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Schenker XMG Neo 17
BOEhydis NV173FHM-N44 (BOE07B6), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
MSI GE75 8SF
Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Response Times
1%
-8%
-37%
19%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
17.2 (9.2, 8)
15.2 (8.4, 6.8)
12%
16.4 (8.8, 7.6)
5%
18.8 (9.6, 9.2)
-9%
9.6 (5.2, 4.4)
44%
Response Time Black / White *
11.2 (6.8, 4.4)
12.4 (7.6, 4.8)
-11%
13.6 (8.4, 5.2)
-21%
12 (6.8, 5.2)
-7%
10.4 (5.2, 5.2)
7%
PWM Frequency
24040 (29)
971 (99)
-96%
25770 (17)
7%
Screen
-14%
5%
-13%
14%
Brightness middle
266
305.1
15%
250
-6%
304
14%
370.4
39%
Brightness
252
295
17%
235
-7%
289
15%
348
38%
Brightness Distribution
88
78
-11%
85
-3%
90
2%
89
1%
Black Level *
0.27
0.33
-22%
0.29
-7%
0.26
4%
0.29
-7%
Contrast
985
925
-6%
862
-12%
1169
19%
1277
30%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.81
2.58
-43%
1.46
19%
2.65
-46%
1.26
30%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.23
4.32
-34%
2.47
24%
6.11
-89%
3.02
7%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.03
1.33
-29%
1.5
-46%
1.21
-17%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.44
3.4
-39%
1.27
48%
2.75
-13%
1.4
43%
Gamma
2.42 91%
2.28 96%
2.4 92%
2.46 89%
2.2 100%
CCT
7005 93%
6374 102%
6749 96%
6763 96%
6747 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
62
60.7
-2%
60
-3%
60
-3%
59.7
-4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
97
95.2
-2%
93
-4%
92
-5%
94.4
-3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-7% / -12%
-2% / 3%
-25% / -19%
17% / 15%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
17.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.2 ms rise
↘ 8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.4 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 24040 Hz ≤ 29 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 24040 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 29 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 24040 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9364 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

 
010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220123012401250126012701280129013001310132013301340135013601370138013901400141014201430144014501460147014801490150015101520153015401550Tooltip
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW Intel Core i9-9880H, Intel Core i9-9880H: Ø1267 (1239.62-1311.65)
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø969 (904.79-1042.12)
MSI GE75 8SF Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø918 (910.89-1045.5)
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 Intel Core i9-9880H, Intel Core i9-9880H: Ø1439 (1417.84-1545.36)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H
196 Points ∼100% +7%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H
  (181 - 197, n=9)
189 Points ∼96% +3%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
Intel Core i9-9880H
183 Points ∼93%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points ∼89% -5%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
166 Points ∼85% -9%
MSI GE75 8SF
Intel Core i7-8750H
166 Points ∼85% -9%
Aorus 15 X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
166 Points ∼85% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 215, n=534)
157 Points ∼80% -14%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H
1545 Points ∼100% +10%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H
  (1317 - 1721, n=9)
1492 Points ∼97% +6%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
Intel Core i9-9880H
1401 Points ∼91%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
1156 Points ∼75% -17%
MSI GE75 8SF
Intel Core i7-8750H
1066 Points ∼69% -24%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Intel Core i7-8750H
1042 Points ∼67% -26%
Aorus 15 X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
1022 Points ∼66% -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2022, n=537)
839 Points ∼54% -40%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
183 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1401 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
129.21 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Segítség
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Aorus 15 X9
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
8408 Points ∼100% +15%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9880H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
7311 Points ∼87%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
7161 Points ∼85% -2%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
6734 Points ∼80% -8%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
6618 Points ∼79% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (1764 - 11245, n=226)
6400 Points ∼76% -12%
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
6161 Points ∼73% -16%
Productivity
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9880H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
8025 Points ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
7315 Points ∼91% -9%
Aorus 15 X9
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
7299 Points ∼91% -9%
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
7218 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (4175 - 9077, n=227)
7186 Points ∼90% -10%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
7113 Points ∼89% -11%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
5986 Points ∼75% -25%
Essentials
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9880H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
9146 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
8980 Points ∼98% -2%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
8961 Points ∼98% -2%
Aorus 15 X9
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
8943 Points ∼98% -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
8600 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (4892 - 11266, n=228)
8555 Points ∼94% -6%
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
8277 Points ∼90% -10%
Score
Aorus 15 X9
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5870 Points ∼100% +1%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9880H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
5826 Points ∼99%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
5411 Points ∼92% -7%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
5353 Points ∼91% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7511, n=230)
5242 Points ∼89% -10%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
5211 Points ∼89% -11%
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
5138 Points ∼88% -12%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9880H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
5919 Points ∼100%
Aorus 15 X9
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5828 Points ∼98% -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
5645 Points ∼95% -5%
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
5338 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6515, n=406)
5051 Points ∼85% -15%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
4482 Points ∼76% -24%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Aorus 15 X9
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
4843 Points ∼100% +6%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9880H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
4578 Points ∼95%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
4338 Points ∼90% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=423)
4265 Points ∼88% -7%
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
3662 Points ∼76% -20%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
3505 Points ∼72% -23%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4578 pontok
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5919 pontok
Segítség
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
MSI GE75 8SF
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
Aorus 15 X9
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
1%
-39%
21%
-9%
Write 4K
135
92.74
-31%
73.33
-46%
147.2
9%
97.13
-28%
Read 4K
54.91
41.4
-25%
33.35
-39%
63.65
16%
53.66
-2%
Write Seq
1649
1363
-17%
848.5
-49%
1573
-5%
1526
-7%
Read Seq
1449
1259
-13%
963.6
-33%
2602
80%
2020
39%
Write 4K Q32T1
507.6
289.7
-43%
236.2
-53%
530.5
5%
285.6
-44%
Read 4K Q32T1
558.9
337.5
-40%
384.7
-31%
597.6
7%
321.8
-42%
Write Seq Q32T1
1759
3332
89%
867.4
-51%
1592
-9%
1533
-13%
Read Seq Q32T1
1826
3477
90%
1586
-13%
2981
63%
2351
29%
AS SSD
109%
-14%
32%
31%
Copy Game MB/s
380.55
1070.93
936.25
Copy Program MB/s
531.71
404.34
362.56
Copy ISO MB/s
1121.28
1328.83
1863.91
Score Total
2033
5248
158%
2109
4%
2544
25%
2722
34%
Score Write
867
2413
178%
799
-8%
859
-1%
957
10%
Score Read
768
1869
143%
869
13%
1116
45%
1180
54%
Access Time Write *
0.043
0.03
30%
0.059
-37%
0.031
28%
0.034
21%
Access Time Read *
0.128
0.048
62%
0.173
-35%
0.049
62%
0.114
11%
4K-64 Write
602.9
2048.1
240%
650.03
8%
584
-3%
702.74
17%
4K-64 Read
583.37
1579.26
171%
748.37
28%
868.5
49%
913.55
57%
4K Write
105.06
117.57
12%
67.12
-36%
119.55
14%
107.12
2%
4K Read
26.79
53.48
100%
25.36
-5%
56.55
111%
55.04
105%
Seq Write
1590.95
2468.54
55%
822.99
-48%
1553.41
-2%
1471.06
-8%
Seq Read
1574.03
2359.28
50%
948.8
-40%
1912.12
21%
2112.83
34%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
55% / 64%
-27% / -25%
27% / 27%
11% / 14%

* ... smaller is better

Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
Sequential Read: 1326 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1519 MB/s
512K Read: 819.6 MB/s
512K Write: 1370 MB/s
4K Read: 29.57 MB/s
4K Write: 117.6 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 563.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 529.9 MB/s
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI GE75 8SF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
7789 Points ∼100% +11%
Aorus 15 X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
7754 Points ∼100% +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
  (7006 - 8000, n=11)
7569 Points ∼97% +8%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
7006 Points ∼90%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6562 Points ∼84% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (368 - 13013, n=173)
5780 Points ∼74% -17%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GE75 8SF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
20236 Points ∼100% +11%
Aorus 15 X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
20227 Points ∼100% +11%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
19800 Points ∼98% +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
  (18169 - 21138, n=12)
19796 Points ∼98% +9%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
18169 Points ∼90%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
17598 Points ∼87% -3%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
16100 Points ∼80% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=561)
11547 Points ∼57% -36%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Aorus 15 X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
26645 Points ∼100% +14%
MSI GE75 8SF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
26097 Points ∼98% +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
  (23335 - 26975, n=14)
25440 Points ∼95% +9%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
25248 Points ∼95% +8%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
23335 Points ∼88%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22089 Points ∼83% -5%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
20837 Points ∼78% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=636)
13686 Points ∼51% -41%
3DMark 11 Performance
19674 pontok
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
37721 pontok
3DMark Fire Strike Score
16068 pontok
3DMark Time Spy Score
6909 pontok
Segítség
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Schenker XMG Neo 17
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
73 fps ∼100% +9%
Aorus 15 X9
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
71.8 fps ∼98% +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
  (64 - 80.6, n=12)
71.7 fps ∼98% +7%
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
70.9 fps ∼97% +6%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9880H
67 (min: 55) fps ∼92%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
58.3 (min: 48) fps ∼80% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=331)
50.5 fps ∼69% -25%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9880H
167.38 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
  (137 - 188, n=6)
167 fps ∼100% 0%
Aorus 15 X9
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
154.3 fps ∼92% -8%
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
136.9 fps ∼82% -18%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
127.7 fps ∼76% -24%
Average of class Gaming
  (9.7 - 266, n=355)
99 fps ∼59% -41%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9880H
117.1 (min: 100.9) fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
  (98.4 - 117, n=3)
108 fps ∼92% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (14 - 125, n=30)
91.7 fps ∼78% -22%
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9880H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8: Ø66.4 (62-71)
alacsony közepes magas ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 362.19 305.42 291.89 167.38 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 67 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 137.4 126.5 122.1 117.1 fps

Zajszint

Üresjárat
30 / 37 / 39 dB(A)
Terhelés
54 / 54 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
csendes
40 dB(A)
hallható
50 dB(A)
hangos
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm távolságról)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
Max. terhelés
 42 °C42 °C51 °C 
 37 °C41 °C50 °C 
 32 °C32 °C31 °C 
Maximum: 51 °C
Átlag: 39.8 °C
45 °C47 °C49 °C
42 °C46 °C43 °C
32 °C33 °C31 °C
Maximum: 49 °C
Átlag: 40.9 °C
Tápegység (max.)  43 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 39.6 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 42.3 °C / 108 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-4.2 °C / -7.6 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.237.52539.442.73131.235.1403043.65030.139.16327.939.98027.241.610026.753.712524.957.716024.76720022.762.825021.967.131520.466.540019.165.950019.27163018.572.980017.274.610001772.3125019.472.2160018.174.8200016.675.3250017.273.1315017.170400016.867.250001769.4630016.762.8800016.568.51000016.5681250016.556.91600016.449.7SPL29.883.8N1.361.8median 17.2median 68Delta2.24.237.246.632.738.32731.232.838.327.335.82643.627.352.225.764.323.669.424.167.323.669.422.56920.468.519.465.31966.817.970.518.572.518.371.317.769.61768.51765.517.664.117.363.517.360.517.458.117.359.217.358.217.262.917.155.417.144.129.9791.348.1median 17.7median 65.51.74.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus Strix Scar III G531GWAsus GL504GS
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Asus GL504GS audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 2.4 / 2.7 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 29 / 32 / 37 Watt
Terhelés midlight 157 / 217 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
Schenker XMG Neo 17
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
MSI GE75 8SF
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
Aorus 15 X9
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
33%
21%
8%
38%
26%
Idle Minimum *
29
13
55%
16.4
43%
26
10%
16
45%
19.4 (3.4 - 113, n=718)
33%
Idle Average *
32
16
50%
21.9
32%
30.8
4%
18
44%
24.8 (6.6 - 119, n=718)
22%
Idle Maximum *
37
21
43%
25.4
31%
34.9
6%
23
38%
30.2 (8.3 - 122, n=718)
18%
Load Average *
157
96
39%
90.7
42%
90.7
42%
88
44%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=709)
34%
Load Maximum *
217
191
12%
222.9
-3%
241.2
-11%
167
23%
172 (21.9 - 590, n=708)
21%
Witcher 3 ultra *
173
172
1%
203.3
-18%
175
-1%
120
31%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
5h 28min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
2h 57min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
1h 21min
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 66 Wh
Schenker XMG Neo 17
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 46.74 Wh
MSI GE75 8SF
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 65 Wh
Aorus 15 X9
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 62 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-3%
20%
-46%
99%
17%
Reader / Idle
328
315
-4%
105
-68%
549
67%
349 (39 - 1174, n=676)
6%
WiFi v1.3
177
224
27%
212
20%
95
-46%
382
116%
259 (78 - 622, n=380)
46%
Load
81
55
-32%
61
-25%
174
115%
79 (18 - 202, n=642)
-2%

Pro

+ jó karbantartási és javítási lehetőségek
+ megfelelő hangszórók
+ szemet gyönyörködtető RGB világítás
+ érintőpadba integrált számbillentyűzet
+ Keystone biztonság

Kontra

- gyenge üzemidő
- nincs Thunderbolt 3
- mennydörgő ventilátorok
- gyenge grafikus teljesítmény RTX 2070 meghajtású notebookként
ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G531GW laptop rövid értékelés. Test device courtesy of ASUS Germany.
ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G531GW laptop rövid értékelés. Test device courtesy of ASUS Germany.

Az ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G531WG egy szolid gamer notebook. Nem meglepő, hogy modern tripla-A játékok simán futnak 240 Hz-es Full HD kijelzőjén, míg az RTX 2070 GPU elég erős ahhoz, hogy 4K-ban, külső monitorokon is futtasson játékokat. A notebook könnyen javítható és karbantartható, és szeretjük a Keystone biztonság beépítését. A numerikus billentyűk érintőpadba való beépítése szintén egy kellemes jellegzetesség, és megkülönbözteti a ROG Strix-t a versenytársaitól.

Az ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G531GW egy szolid 15.6 hüvelykes gamer notebook. A hangos ventilátorok és a gyenge RTX 2070 teljesítmény azonban meggátolják abban, hogy elérje a legmagasabb pontszámot.

Kiábrándító, hogy a  ROG Strix nem teljesített olyan jól a tesztjeinkben, ahogyan vártuk volna. Más notebookok egyszerűen nagyobb teljesítményt hoznak ki hasonló hardverből, mint az általunk tesztelt gép. Emellett az ASUS zavaróan hangos ventilátorokkal szerelte fel a készüléket, amelyek elnyomják a nagyszerű hangszórókat. Sajnos csak olyankor lehet élvezni a hangszórókat, amikor nem játszunk. Kár, hogy az ASUS nem kínál 4K-s kijelző opciót sem, mivel az ROG Strix elég erős ahhoz, hogy modern tripla-A játékokat futtason ezen a felbontáson. Összességében, a ROG Strix SCAR III G531GW sokat kínál, de lehúzza néhány jelentős hiányosság.

Asus Strix Scar III G531GW - 06/03/2019 v6(old)
Mike Wobker

Váz
87 / 98 → 89%
Billentyűzet
85%
Érintőpad
83%
Csatlakoztathatóság
59 / 81 → 73%
Súly
61 / 10-66 → 91%
Akkumulátor
69%
Kijelző
84%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
99%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
96%
Hőmérséklet
83 / 95 → 87%
Zaj
55 / 90 → 61%
Audio
88%
Átlag
79%
86%
Gaming - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G531GW (Core i9-9880H, RTX 2070) Laptop rövid értékelés
Mike Wobker, 2019-08- 1 (Update: 2019-08- 1)