Notebookcheck

Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Smartphone rövid értékelés

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (fordította Zoltan Kiss), 06/29/2019
Android Touchscreen Smartphone

A kompakt, középkategóriás Mi okostelefon? A Mi 9 SE a Mi 8 SE utódja és a Mi 9 középkategóriás testvére. Az SE vékonyabb és kompaktabb, mint a zászlóshajó névrokon, de még így is sikerült pozitívan meglepnie minket. Tovább olvasva kiderül, hogy mi az, ami tetszett, és hogy vannak-e gyenge pontjai a Mi 9 SE-nek.

Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Mi Széria)
Processzor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
Grafikus adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 616
Memória
6144 MB 
Kijelző
5.97 hüvelyk 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 432 PPI, Kapacitív multitouch érintőképernyő, AMOLED, fényes: igen, HDR
Háttértár
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 109 GB ingyenes
Csatlakozók
1 USB 2.0, Audió csatlakozók: USB Type-C, 1 Ujjlenyomat olvasó, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Szenzorok: Gyorsulásmérő, Iránytű, girométer, hall szenzor, közelségérzékelő, USB Type-C, OTG, Miracast, infrared transmitter
Hálózat
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, 4G: B1, B3, B4, B5, B7, B8, B20, B28, B38, B40. 3G: 850, 1,900, 2,100 MHz. 2G: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 7.45 x 147.5 x 70.5
Akkumulátor
3070 mAh Lítium-Polimer
Operációs rendszer
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix , f/1.8, 1/2", 0.8 μm. 13 MPix ultra-széles, f/2.4, 1.12 μm. 8 MPix telefotó lencse, f/2.4, 1.12 μm. Kamera2 API Szint: Teljes.
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix , f/2.0, 0.9 μm
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: Monó hangszóró, Billentyűzet: virtuális billentyűzet, USB kábel, töltő, USB Type-C - 3.5 mm jack adapter, szilikon tok, MIUI 10, 12 Hónap Garancia, DRM Widevine: L1 (EU), L3 (China), fanless
Súly
155 g, Tápegység: 42 g
Ár
399 Euró
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE

Size Comparison

159.8 mm 76.8 mm 7.5 mm 168 g158.5 mm 74.7 mm 7.7 mm 166 g157 mm 75.3 mm 8.3 mm 176 g157.5 mm 74.67 mm 7.61 mm 173 g156 mm 68 mm 8.4 mm 162 g155.5 mm 75.2 mm 8.8 mm 182 g147.5 mm 70.5 mm 7.45 mm 155 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
678 (min: 549, max: 725) MBit/s ∼100% +118%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
675 (min: 630, max: 704) MBit/s ∼100% +117%
Sony Xperia 10
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
334 (min: 326, max: 341) MBit/s ∼49% +7%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
332 (min: 314, max: 341) MBit/s ∼49% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Adreno 616, 712, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
311 (min: 214, max: 346) MBit/s ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
294 (min: 278, max: 302) MBit/s ∼43% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash
279 (min: 265, max: 284) MBit/s ∼41% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=409)
222 MBit/s ∼33% -29%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
647 (min: 598, max: 665) MBit/s ∼100% +132%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
534 (min: 430, max: 578) MBit/s ∼83% +91%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash
320 (min: 164, max: 362) MBit/s ∼49% +15%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
288 (min: 138, max: 294) MBit/s ∼45% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Adreno 616, 712, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
279 (min: 229, max: 303) MBit/s ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
272 (min: 250, max: 285) MBit/s ∼42% -3%
Sony Xperia 10
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
253 (min: 128, max: 283) MBit/s ∼39% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=409)
212 MBit/s ∼33% -24%
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 – Cycling around a lake
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 – Cycling around a lake
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 - Loop
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 - Loop
GPS Test: Xiaomi Mi 9 SE – Overview
GPS Test: Xiaomi Mi 9 SE – Overview
GPS Test: Xiaomi Mi 9 SE – Cycling around a lake
GPS Test: Xiaomi Mi 9 SE – Cycling around a lake
GPS Test: Xiaomi Mi 9 SE - Loop
GPS Test: Xiaomi Mi 9 SE - Loop
Photo taken with the 48 MP sensor
Photo taken with the 48 MP sensor
Photo taken at 2x zoom
Photo taken at 2x zoom
Wide-angle photo
Wide-angle photo
Default camera app filters
Default camera app filters
Default camera app viewfinder
Default camera app viewfinder
Default camera app settings
Default camera app settings
Default camera app modes
Default camera app modes
Video mode
Video mode
Video settings
Video settings
Manual mode
Manual mode
Video modes
Video modes

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
A photo of our test chart
A photo of our test chart
Our test chart in detail
581
cd/m²		574
cd/m²		567
cd/m²
585
cd/m²		583
cd/m²		577
cd/m²
586
cd/m²		577
cd/m²		567
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 586 cd/m² Átlag: 577.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.22 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 97 %
Centrumban: 583 cd/m²
Kontraszt: ∞:1 (Fekete: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.6 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 5.97		Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 6		Sony Xperia 10
IPS-LCD, 2520x1080, 6		Xiaomi Pocophone F1
IPS, 2246x1080, 6.18		Samsung Galaxy A50
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4		Motorola Moto G7 Plus
IPS, 2270x1080, 6.2		Xiaomi Mi 9
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Screen
10%
-77%
-53%
-30%
-109%
23%
Brightness middle
583
570
-2%
547
-6%
489
-16%
644
10%
537
-8%
593
2%
Brightness
577
565
-2%
525
-9%
486
-16%
628
9%
525
-9%
587
2%
Brightness Distribution
97
93
-4%
93
-4%
93
-4%
91
-6%
85
-12%
94
-3%
Black Level *
0.36
0.34
0.58
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.6
1.5
6%
4.6
-188%
3.8
-138%
2.64
-65%
6.41
-301%
0.9
44%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.9
3.6
8%
12.1
-210%
7.1
-82%
9.23
-137%
10.86
-178%
2
49%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.7
1.2
56%
3.9
-44%
4.4
-63%
2.5
7%
6.7
-148%
1.5
44%
Gamma
2.27 97%
2.07 106%
2.17 101%
2.22 99%
2.024 109%
2.099 105%
2.27 97%
CCT
6267 104%
6504 100%
7158 91%
7213 90%
6649 98%
8310 78%
6548 99%
Contrast
1519
1438
926

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 255 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 255 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 255 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9429 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.1 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.4 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (40.1 ms).
Geekbench 4.3 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench | Basemark GPU | AnTuTu v7 | VRMark | BaseMark OS II | Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
7282 Points ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4026 Points ∼28% -45%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3763 Points ∼26% -48%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14369 Points ∼100% +97%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4913 Points ∼34% -33%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4287 Points ∼30% -41%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7482 Points ∼52% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
7282 Points ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=307)
4559 Points ∼32% -37%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
5975 Points ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4429 Points ∼40% -26%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3986 Points ∼36% -33%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
9182 Points ∼83% +54%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5605 Points ∼51% -6%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4992 Points ∼45% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10999 Points ∼100% +84%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
5975 Points ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=362)
4549 Points ∼41% -24%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1875 Points ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1525 Points ∼43% -19%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
837 Points ∼24% -55%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2468 Points ∼70% +32%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1721 Points ∼49% -8%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1337 Points ∼38% -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3523 Points ∼100% +88%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
1875 Points ∼53% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (691 - 4824, n=364)
1354 Points ∼38% -28%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
6832 Points ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5387 Points ∼60% -21%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
5987 Points ∼66% -12%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8101 Points ∼90% +19%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5827 Points ∼64% -15%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6277 Points ∼69% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9035 Points ∼100% +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
6832 Points ∼76% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 11440, n=357)
4997 Points ∼55% -27%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
8346 Points ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5625 Points ∼51% -33%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4948 Points ∼45% -41%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
9664 Points ∼88% +16%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
7029 Points ∼64% -16%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
7618 Points ∼69% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10985 Points ∼100% +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
8346 Points ∼76% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4096 - 14439, n=525)
5466 Points ∼50% -35%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2338 Points ∼71%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
2167 Points ∼66% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3288 Points ∼100% +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
2338 Points ∼71% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1779 - 15735, n=44)
2435 Points ∼74% +4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1907 Points ∼33%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
693 Points ∼12% -64%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5723 Points ∼100% +200%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
1907 Points ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (209 - 14536, n=44)
2471 Points ∼43% +30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1988 Points ∼40%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
861 Points ∼18% -57%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4914 Points ∼100% +147%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
1988 Points ∼40% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (260 - 14786, n=47)
2125 Points ∼43% +7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2506 Points ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1845 Points ∼49% -26%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1664 Points ∼44% -34%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2257 Points ∼60% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2266 Points ∼60% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3754 Points ∼100% +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
2506 Points ∼67% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=372)
1830 Points ∼49% -27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2146 Points ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
629 Points ∼9% -71%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
792 Points ∼11% -63%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4468 Points ∼63% +108%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1188 Points ∼17% -45%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7076 Points ∼100% +230%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
2146 Points ∼30% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=372)
1598 Points ∼23% -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2217 Points ∼37%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
737 Points ∼12% -67%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
896 Points ∼15% -60%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3669 Points ∼62% +65%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1328 Points ∼22% -40%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5913 Points ∼100% +167%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
2217 Points ∼37% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=375)
1484 Points ∼25% -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2506 Points ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1871 Points ∼49% -25%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1732 Points ∼46% -31%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2832 Points ∼75% +13%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2241 Points ∼59% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3788 Points ∼100% +51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
2506 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=386)
1805 Points ∼48% -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2146 Points ∼21%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
954 Points ∼9% -56%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1299 Points ∼13% -39%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6898 Points ∼67% +221%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1553 Points ∼15% -28%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10291 Points ∼100% +380%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
2146 Points ∼21% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=386)
2194 Points ∼21% +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2217 Points ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1071 Points ∼14% -52%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1375 Points ∼18% -38%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5230 Points ∼70% +136%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1667 Points ∼22% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7449 Points ∼100% +236%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
2217 Points ∼30% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 8141, n=387)
1860 Points ∼25% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2480 Points ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1821 Points ∼48% -27%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1645 Points ∼44% -34%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2528 Points ∼67% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2351 Points ∼63% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3758 Points ∼100% +52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
2480 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4320, n=448)
1760 Points ∼47% -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1980 Points ∼31%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
634 Points ∼10% -68%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
704 Points ∼11% -64%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4746 Points ∼75% +140%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1149 Points ∼18% -42%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6355 Points ∼100% +221%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
1980 Points ∼31% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=450)
1324 Points ∼21% -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2073 Points ∼38%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
741 Points ∼13% -64%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
809 Points ∼15% -61%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3972 Points ∼72% +92%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1296 Points ∼24% -37%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5509 Points ∼100% +166%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
2073 Points ∼38% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=458)
1262 Points ∼23% -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2480 Points ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1829 Points ∼51% -26%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1687 Points ∼47% -32%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2720 Points ∼75% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2432 Points ∼67% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3614 Points ∼100% +46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
2480 Points ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4454, n=480)
1667 Points ∼46% -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1980 Points ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
845 Points ∼8% -57%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1235 Points ∼12% -38%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8261 Points ∼83% +317%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1279 Points ∼13% -35%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9963 Points ∼100% +403%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
1980 Points ∼20% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=480)
1801 Points ∼18% -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2073 Points ∼29%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
960 Points ∼13% -54%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1315 Points ∼18% -37%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5687 Points ∼79% +174%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1430 Points ∼20% -31%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7166 Points ∼100% +246%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
2073 Points ∼29% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7820, n=488)
1541 Points ∼22% -26%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
13686 Points ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
13914 Points ∼40% +2%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
12437 Points ∼36% -9%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
34928 Points ∼100% +155%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14353 Points ∼41% +5%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
15766 Points ∼45% +15%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
25339 Points ∼73% +85%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
13686 Points ∼39% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 45072, n=640)
13636 Points ∼39% 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
43514 Points ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
15567 Points ∼15% -64%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
17878 Points ∼17% -59%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
82125 Points ∼77% +89%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16593 Points ∼16% -62%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
20953 Points ∼20% -52%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
106534 Points ∼100% +145%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
43514 Points ∼41% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (11427 - 162695, n=640)
19988 Points ∼19% -54%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
29316 Points ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
15167 Points ∼24% -48%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
16290 Points ∼26% -44%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
63159 Points ∼100% +115%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16037 Points ∼25% -45%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
19525 Points ∼31% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
62225 Points ∼99% +112%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
29316 Points ∼46% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (11565 - 83518, n=641)
16573 Points ∼26% -43%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
74 fps ∼44%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
29 fps ∼17% -61%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
150 fps ∼90% +103%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
39 fps ∼23% -47%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
36 fps ∼22% -51%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
167 fps ∼100% +126%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
74 fps ∼44% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=669)
35 fps ∼21% -53%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
58 fps ∼97%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
25 fps ∼42% -57%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
36 fps ∼60% -38%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
35 fps ∼58% -40%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
58 fps ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=672)
26.9 fps ∼45% -54%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
36 fps ∼36%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
13 fps ∼13% -64%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
71 fps ∼71% +97%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23 fps ∼23% -36%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
16 fps ∼16% -56%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
100 fps ∼100% +178%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
36 fps ∼36% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=588)
19.3 fps ∼19% -46%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
33 fps ∼55%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
11 fps ∼18% -67%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
58 fps ∼97% +76%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
21 fps ∼35% -36%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
15 fps ∼25% -55%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +82%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
33 fps ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=593)
17.8 fps ∼30% -46%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
26 fps ∼38%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
9.5 fps ∼14% -63%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼51% +35%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼20% -46%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
10 fps ∼14% -62%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
69 fps ∼100% +165%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
26 fps ∼38% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=449)
15.9 fps ∼23% -39%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
24 fps ∼41%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
7.8 fps ∼13% -67%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
54 fps ∼93% +125%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
13 fps ∼22% -46%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
9.8 fps ∼17% -59%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
58 fps ∼100% +142%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
24 fps ∼41% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=452)
15.2 fps ∼26% -37%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
9.1 fps ∼38%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
2.7 fps ∼11% -70%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
22 fps ∼92% +142%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4.9 fps ∼20% -46%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2 fps ∼8% -78%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps ∼100% +164%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
9.1 fps ∼38% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=152)
8.97 fps ∼37% -1%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
5.8 fps ∼36%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1.7 fps ∼11% -71%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14 fps ∼88% +141%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.1 fps ∼19% -47%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2.3 fps ∼14% -60%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps ∼100% +176%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
5.8 fps ∼36% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=152)
6.2 fps ∼39% +7%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
14 fps ∼38%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.4 fps ∼12% -69%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
31 fps ∼84% +121%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.2 fps ∼22% -41%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.6 fps ∼15% -60%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37 fps ∼100% +164%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
14 fps ∼38% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=154)
13.5 fps ∼36% -4%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
16 fps ∼39%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.9 fps ∼12% -69%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
32 fps ∼78% +100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9 fps ∼22% -44%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.4 fps ∼13% -66%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
41 fps ∼100% +156%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
16 fps ∼39% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=153)
14.8 fps ∼36% -7%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
15 fps ∼36%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
5.3 fps ∼13% -65%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼83% +133%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.9 fps ∼21% -41%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.3 fps ∼15% -58%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼100% +180%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
15 fps ∼36% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=378)
10.7 fps ∼25% -29%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
13 fps ∼34%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.3 fps ∼11% -67%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
33 fps ∼87% +154%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.1 fps ∼21% -38%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6 fps ∼16% -54%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
38 fps ∼100% +192%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
13 fps ∼34% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=382)
9.65 fps ∼25% -26%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
14.23 (min: 8.05, max: 26.52) fps ∼38%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
24.51 (min: 11.54, max: 48.55) fps ∼66% +72%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14.51 fps ∼39% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37.41 fps ∼100% +163%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
14.2 fps ∼38% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.53 - 37.4, n=61)
15.1 fps ∼40% +6%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
12.76 (min: 7.68, max: 27.7) fps ∼40%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
15.8 (min: 10.44, max: 44.6) fps ∼49% +24%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
11.59 fps ∼36% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
32.2 fps ∼100% +152%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
12.8 fps ∼40% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.91 - 36.2, n=56)
12.1 fps ∼38% -5%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
14.18 (min: 8.4, max: 36.6) fps ∼40%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
21.26 (min: 11.26, max: 61.24) fps ∼60% +50%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
13.03 fps ∼37% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
35.63 fps ∼100% +151%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
14.2 fps ∼40% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.2 - 38.6, n=56)
14.3 fps ∼40% +1%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
179353 Points ∼48%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
122826 Points ∼33% -32%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
88287 Points ∼24% -51%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
263165 Points ∼70% +47%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
144194 Points ∼38% -20%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
117557 Points ∼31% -34%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
374820 Points ∼100% +109%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
179353 Points ∼48% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52607 - 398720, n=270)
130378 Points ∼35% -27%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1966 Score ∼40%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4731 Score ∼95% +141%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1656 Score ∼33% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4964 Score ∼100% +152%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
1966 Score ∼40% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (552 - 5025, n=58)
1911 Score ∼38% -3%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1172 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1090 Points ∼79% -7%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
815 Points ∼59% -30%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1296 Points ∼94% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
927 Points ∼67% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1378 Points ∼100% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
1172 Points ∼85% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=600)
741 Points ∼54% -37%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
3453 Points ∼37%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1356 Points ∼15% -61%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1409 Points ∼15% -59%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7945 Points ∼86% +130%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1957 Points ∼21% -43%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9270 Points ∼100% +168%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
3453 Points ∼37% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=600)
1942 Points ∼21% -44%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2969 Points ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2445 Points ∼61% -18%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
983 Points ∼24% -67%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3239 Points ∼80% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2492 Points ∼62% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4031 Points ∼100% +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
2969 Points ∼74% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=600)
1446 Points ∼36% -51%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
5932 Points ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4506 Points ∼53% -24%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3159 Points ∼37% -47%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6506 Points ∼77% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5112 Points ∼61% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8441 Points ∼100% +42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
5932 Points ∼70% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=600)
2852 Points ∼34% -52%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2906 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2009 Points ∼44% -31%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1374 Points ∼30% -53%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3838 Points ∼84% +32%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2193 Points ∼48% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4595 Points ∼100% +58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
2906 Points ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=604)
1418 Points ∼31% -51%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
517 Points ∼37%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
504 Points ∼36% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1415 Points ∼100% +174%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
517 Points ∼37% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (35 - 2754, n=102)
709 Points ∼50% +37%
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73)
57.207 Points ∼100% +54%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
37.214 Points ∼65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
37.2 Points ∼65% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (14.6 - 108, n=79)
30.7 Points ∼54% -18%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
16.254 Points ∼28% -56%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
65.7 runs/min ∼100% +75%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
37.5 runs/min ∼57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
37.5 runs/min ∼57% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 123, n=71)
34.6 runs/min ∼53% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chome 73)
33.07 runs/min ∼50% -12%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
108 Points ∼100% +50%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
72 Points ∼67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
72 Points ∼67% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 161, n=132)
63.5 Points ∼59% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
62 Points ∼57% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
57 Points ∼53% -21%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
54 Points ∼50% -25%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
39 Points ∼36% -46%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
24534 Points ∼100% +81%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)
14514 Points ∼59% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
13562 Points ∼55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
13562 Points ∼55% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
10322 Points ∼42% -24%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
9165 Points ∼37% -32%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
8368 Points ∼34% -38%
Average of class Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=661)
6268 Points ∼26% -54%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
4865 Points ∼20% -64%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=681)
10805 ms * ∼100% -271%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
10256.9 ms * ∼95% -252%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
4776 ms * ∼44% -64%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
4122.8 ms * ∼38% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
3897 ms * ∼36% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
2912 ms * ∼27% -0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
2911.8 ms * ∼27%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)
2713.6 ms * ∼25% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
1873.2 ms * ∼17% +36%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Mi 9 SESamsung Galaxy A7 2018 Sony Xperia 10Xiaomi Pocophone F1Samsung Galaxy A50Motorola Moto G7 PlusXiaomi Mi 9Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-35%
-28%
-2%
-7%
42%
206%
87%
-42%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
64.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
63.81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
65.58 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
60.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
62.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
61.5 (27.8 - 72.4, n=17)
48.6 (9.5 - 87.1, n=403)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
78.15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
83.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
85.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
73.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
82.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
77 (31.3 - 88.2, n=17)
66.6 (8.1 - 96.5, n=403)
Random Write 4KB
21.86
15.45
-29%
14.39
-34%
17.81
-19%
18.2
-17%
73.1
234%
165.32
656%
81.6 (18.2 - 250, n=38)
273%
20.1 (0.14 - 250, n=711)
-8%
Random Read 4KB
115.83
83.98
-27%
53.12
-54%
101.01
-13%
98.9
-15%
76.6
-34%
149.36
29%
137 (98.9 - 158, n=38)
18%
44.8 (1.59 - 175, n=711)
-61%
Sequential Write 256KB
190.1
104.87
-45%
232.87
22%
155.57
-18%
192.1
1%
208.7
10%
388.27
104%
205 (182 - 503, n=38)
8%
92.1 (2.99 - 503, n=711)
-52%
Sequential Read 256KB
492.48
295.76
-40%
273.8
-44%
705.38
43%
507.3
3%
283.6
-42%
666.06
35%
741 (427 - 912, n=38)
50%
258 (12.1 - 1468, n=711)
-48%
PUBG Compare
010203040Tooltip
: Ø29.8 (25-31)
Asphalt Legends
010203040Tooltip
: Ø29.3 (27-31)
Dead Trigger 2
010203040506070Tooltip
: Ø59.8 (54-61)
Max. terhelés
 35.1 °C33.6 °C32 °C 
 35.6 °C34.8 °C31.8 °C 
 34.3 °C31.6 °C31.2 °C 
Maximum: 35.6 °C
Átlag: 33.3 °C
30.9 °C31.6 °C33.1 °C
30 °C32.1 °C34.2 °C
30.2 °C32.1 °C33.9 °C
Maximum: 34.2 °C
Átlag: 32 °C
Tápegység (max.)  27.2 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.5392531.931.53122.324.84021.721.95029.228.46326.724.98020.324.410020.526.51252325.316015.64520017.849.125016.359.131515.461.540015.963.550015.864.263013.367.980014.165.9100014.171.412501469.7160013.567.8200013.469250013.972.3315014.271.7400013.967.1500014.672.9630014.267.7800014.766.3100001568.21250014.955.41600015.338SPL26.481.5N0.852.7median 14.7median 66.3Delta0.98.239.432.928.325.418.726.526.725.933.229.422.622.721.822.224.43123.839.218.550.417.149.117.853.815.556.114.162.51467.913.869.114.773.515.47715.276.614.376.514.574.913.971.714.675.914.178.114.374.314.574.614.875.714.87514.864.41558.226.887.10.871.4median 14.8median 71.71.510hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mi 9 SEXiaomi Mi 9
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Mi 9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.01 / 0.21 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 0.53 / 1.18 / 1.2 Watt
Terhelés midlight 3.04 / 4.83 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
3070 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
3300 mAh		Sony Xperia 10
2870 mAh		Xiaomi Pocophone F1
4000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A50
4000 mAh		Motorola Moto G7 Plus
3000 mAh		Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-41%
-44%
-57%
-57%
-72%
-31%
0%
-47%
Idle Minimum *
0.53
0.71
-34%
0.72
-36%
0.65
-23%
0.8
-51%
1.1
-108%
0.67
-26%
0.53
-0%
0.88 (0.2 - 3.4, n=743)
-66%
Idle Average *
1.18
1.36
-15%
2.16
-83%
1.97
-67%
1.5
-27%
1.7
-44%
1.26
-7%
1.18
-0%
1.733 (0.6 - 6.2, n=742)
-47%
Idle Maximum *
1.2
1.47
-23%
2.17
-81%
2.01
-68%
1.7
-42%
2.1
-75%
1.29
-8%
1.2
-0%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=743)
-68%
Load Average *
3.04
5.13
-69%
3.32
-9%
4.29
-41%
5.9
-94%
5.1
-68%
3.71
-22%
3.04
-0%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=737)
-34%
Load Maximum *
4.83
7.89
-63%
5.34
-11%
9.05
-87%
8.3
-72%
7.9
-64%
9.3
-93%
4.83
-0%
5.88 (1.2 - 14.2, n=737)
-22%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
22h 54min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
8h 30min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14h 13min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
3h 38min
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
3070 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
3300 mAh		Sony Xperia 10
2870 mAh		Xiaomi Pocophone F1
4000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A50
4000 mAh		Motorola Moto G7 Plus
3000 mAh		Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
Battery Runtime
12%
-10%
30%
20%
8%
9%
Reader / Idle
1374
1467
7%
1006
-27%
2088
52%
1587
16%
1650
20%
H.264
853
836
-2%
620
-27%
936
10%
869
2%
809
-5%
1008
18%
WiFi v1.3
510
605
19%
541
6%
808
58%
701
37%
715
40%
546
7%
Load
218
273
25%
233
7%
220
1%
275
26%
196
-10%
194
-11%

Pro

+ modern dizájn
+ jól felépített
+ jó kamerák
+ egész jó monó hangszóró
+ szolid teljesítmény

Kontra

- nincs IP-tanúsítvány
- nincs Qi vezeték nélküli töltés
- csak Widevine L3 a kínai változatban
- nincs bővíthető memória
- kevés LTE támogatás; nincs LTE 20-as Sáv a kínai változatban
- nincs OIS
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Smartphone rövid értékelés. Test device courtesy of TradingShenzhen.
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Smartphone rövid értékelés. Test device courtesy of TradingShenzhen.

A Mi 9 SE-vel a Xiaomi-nak sikerült egy vonzó középkategóriás okostelefont alkotni, kompakt dizájnnal. Az SE magán hordozza nagy testvérének egyes zászlóshajós funkcióit, miközben a költségeket alacsonyan tartja. A Xiaomi egy magas kontrasztú OLED panellel, gyönyörű kamerákkal és egy egész jómonó hangszóróval szerelte fel a készüléket egy prémium kinézetű testben.

A legtöbb dolog, amit kritizáltunk,  érvénytelenné válik a Mi 9 SE globális verziójának megvásárlásával. Az akku kapacitása és az LTE lefedettség viszont meglepően alacsony, modelltől függetlenül. Emellett a microSD kártya foglalat, IP tanúsítvány, notifikációs LED vagy a fülhallgató csatlakozó hiánya mind kihagyott lehetőségeknek tűnnek, amelyekkel egy még a jelen Mi 9 SE-nél is nagyszerűbb középkategóriás okostelefont lehetne alkotni.

Aki egy olyan mindenest keres, ami nem egy vagyonba kerül, annak a Xiaomi Mi 9 SE nagyon jó választás lehet.

A Mi 9 SE valamivel több, mint 300 Euróba kerül az írás idején, ami egy nagyszerű ár-érték arány. Viszont már 10%-kal olcsóbban is beszerezhető online, így még annál is jobban megéri.  A Mi 9 SE egy fantasztikus középkategóriás okostelefon, bármelyik árat is nézzük.

Xiaomi Mi 9 SE - 05/06/2019 v6
Marcus Herbrich

Váz
85%
Billentyűzet
65 / 75 → 87%
Érintőpad
92%
Csatlakoztathatóság
43 / 60 → 72%
Súly
92%
Akkumulátor
93%
Kijelző
90%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
58 / 63 → 92%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
67 / 70 → 95%
Hőmérséklet
92%
Zaj
100%
Audio
68 / 91 → 75%
Camera
77%
Átlag
79%
88%
Smartphone - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Smartphone rövid értékelés
Marcus Herbrich, 2019-06-29 (Update: 2019-06-29)