Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Smartphone rövid értékelés

Name: Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Brand: Xiaomi

A kompakt, középkategóriás Mi okostelefon? A Mi 9 SE a Mi 8 SE utódja és a Mi 9 középkategóriás testvére. Az SE vékonyabb és kompaktabb, mint a zászlóshajó névrokon, de még így is sikerült pozitívan meglepnie minket. Tovább olvasva kiderül, hogy mi az, ami tetszett, és hogy vannak-e gyenge pontjai a Mi 9 SE-nek.

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (fordította Zoltan Kiss), 06/29/2019

Android Touchscreen Smartphone

Test device courtesy of TradingShenzhen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Mi 9 Széria)

Processzor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 712

Grafikus adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 616

Memória

6144 MB

Kijelző

5.97 hüvelyk 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 432 PPI, Kapacitív multitouch érintőképernyő, AMOLED, fényes: igen, HDR

Háttértár

128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 128 GB

, 109 GB ingyenes

Csatlakozók

1 USB 2.0, Audió csatlakozók: USB Type-C, 1 Ujjlenyomat olvasó, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Szenzorok: Gyorsulásmérő, Iránytű, girométer, hall szenzor, közelségérzékelő, USB Type-C, OTG, Miracast, infrared transmitter

Hálózat

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 4G: B1, B3, B4, B5, B7, B8, B20, B28, B38, B40. 3G: 850, 1,900, 2,100 MHz. 2G: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Méret

magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 7.45 x 147.5 x 70.5

Akkumulátor

3070 mAh Lítium-Polimer

Operációs rendszer

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix , f/1.8, 1/2", 0.8 μm. 13 MPix ultra-széles, f/2.4, 1.12 μm. 8 MPix telefotó lencse, f/2.4, 1.12 μm. Kamera2 API Szint: Teljes.
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix , f/2.0, 0.9 μm

További jellegzetességek

Hangszórók: Monó hangszóró, Billentyűzet: virtuális billentyűzet, USB kábel, töltő, USB Type-C - 3.5 mm jack adapter, szilikon tok, MIUI 10, 12 Hónap Garancia, DRM Widevine: L1 (EU), L3 (China), fanless

Súly

155 g, Tápegység: 42 g

Ár

399 Euró

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Galaxy A50 Motorola Moto G7 Plus Xiaomi Mi 9 Sony Xperia 10 Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Xiaomi Mi 9 SE ❌

» A Top 10 multimédiás noteszgép - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 játékos noteszgép
» A Top 10 belépő szintű üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 notebook munkaállomása
» A Top 10 okostelefon - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 táblagép
» A Top 10 Windows tabletje
» A Top 10 subnotebook - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 300 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 120 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 phabletje (>5.5-inch)
» A Top 10 noteszgép 500 EUR (~160.000 HUF) alatt
» A Top 10 "pehelysúlyú" gaming notebookja

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 9 Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	678 (min: 549, max: 725) MBit/s ∼100% +118%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	675 (min: 630, max: 704) MBit/s ∼100% +117%
Sony Xperia 10 Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash	334 (min: 326, max: 341) MBit/s ∼49% +7%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash	332 (min: 314, max: 341) MBit/s ∼49% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Adreno 616, SD 712, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	311 (min: 214, max: 346) MBit/s ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	294 (min: 278, max: 302) MBit/s ∼43% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash	279 (min: 265, max: 284) MBit/s ∼41% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (5.9 - 1368, n=534)	256 MBit/s ∼38% -18%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	647 (min: 598, max: 665) MBit/s ∼100% +132%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	534 (min: 430, max: 578) MBit/s ∼83% +91%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash	320 (min: 164, max: 362) MBit/s ∼49% +15%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash	288 (min: 138, max: 294) MBit/s ∼45% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Adreno 616, SD 712, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	279 (min: 229, max: 303) MBit/s ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	272 (min: 250, max: 285) MBit/s ∼42% -3%
Sony Xperia 10 Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash	253 (min: 128, max: 283) MBit/s ∼39% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (9.4 - 1544, n=534)	242 MBit/s ∼37% -13%

; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø310 (214-346)

; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø279 (229-303)

GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 – Cycling around a lake

GPS Test: Xiaomi Mi 9 SE – Cycling around a lake

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Xiaomi Mi 9 SE

Canon EOS 70D

Samsung Galaxy S10 PLus

Asus ROG Phone

click to load images

Xiaomi Mi 9 SE

Canon EOS 70D

Samsung Galaxy S10 PLus

Asus ROG Phone

click to load images

Xiaomi Mi 9 SE

Canon EOS 70D

Samsung Galaxy S10 PLus

Asus ROG Phone


581 cd/m²	574 cd/m²	567 cd/m²
585 cd/m²	583 cd/m²	577 cd/m²
586 cd/m²	577 cd/m²	567 cd/m²

Fényerő megoszlás

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 586 cd/m² Átlag: 577.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.22 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 97 %
Centrumban: 583 cd/m²
Kontraszt: ∞:1 (Fekete: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.6 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27

	Xiaomi Mi 9 SE AMOLED, 2340x1080, 5.97	Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 6	Sony Xperia 10 IPS-LCD, 2520x1080, 6	Xiaomi Pocophone F1 IPS, 2246x1080, 6.18	Samsung Galaxy A50 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4	Motorola Moto G7 Plus IPS, 2270x1080, 6.2	Xiaomi Mi 9 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Screen		10%	-77%	-53%	-30%	-109%	23%
Brightness middle	583	570 -2%	547 -6%	489 -16%	644 10%	537 -8%	593 2%
Brightness	577	565 -2%	525 -9%	486 -16%	628 9%	525 -9%	587 2%
Brightness Distribution	97	93 -4%	93 -4%	93 -4%	91 -6%	85 -12%	94 -3%
Black Level *			0.36	0.34		0.58
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	1.6	1.5 6%	4.6 -188%	3.8 -138%	2.64 -65%	6.41 -301%	0.9 44%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	3.9	3.6 8%	12.1 -210%	7.1 -82%	9.23 -137%	10.86 -178%	2 49%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	2.7	1.2 56%	3.9 -44%	4.4 -63%	2.5 7%	6.7 -148%	1.5 44%
Gamma	2.27 ^97%	2.07 ^106%	2.17 ^101%	2.22 ^99%	2.024 ^109%	2.099 ^105%	2.27 ^97%
CCT	6267 ^104%	6504 ^100%	7158 ^91%	7213 ^90%	6649 ^98%	8310 ^78%	6548 ^99%
Contrast			1519	1438		926

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

255 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 255 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 255 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18284 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.8 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2.4 ms rise
4.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.3 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	7282 Points ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	4026 Points ∼28% -45%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	3763 Points ∼26% -48%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	14369 Points ∼100% +97%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	4913 Points ∼34% -33%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	4287 Points ∼30% -41%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7482 Points ∼52% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712	7282 Points ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (663 - 21070, n=347)	4800 Points ∼33% -34%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	5975 Points ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	4429 Points ∼40% -26%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	3986 Points ∼36% -33%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	9182 Points ∼83% +54%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	5605 Points ∼51% -6%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	4992 Points ∼45% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10999 Points ∼100% +84%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712	5975 Points ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 13356, n=409)	4894 Points ∼44% -18%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1875 Points ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1525 Points ∼43% -19%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	837 Points ∼24% -55%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2468 Points ∼70% +32%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1721 Points ∼49% -8%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1337 Points ∼38% -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3523 Points ∼100% +88%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712	1875 Points ∼53% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (390 - 4824, n=409)	1489 Points ∼42% -21%

PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	6832 Points ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	5387 Points ∼60% -21%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	5987 Points ∼66% -12%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8101 Points ∼90% +19%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	5827 Points ∼64% -15%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6277 Points ∼69% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9035 Points ∼100% +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (6832 - 8276, n=2)	7554 Points ∼84% +11%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 12879, n=466)	5703 Points ∼63% -17%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	8346 Points ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	5625 Points ∼51% -33%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	4948 Points ∼45% -41%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	9664 Points ∼88% +16%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	7029 Points ∼64% -16%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	7618 Points ∼69% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10985 Points ∼100% +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (8346 - 11143, n=2)	9745 Points ∼89% +17%
Average of class Smartphone (1077 - 15193, n=626)	6216 Points ∼57% -26%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2338 Points ∼71%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	2167 Points ∼66% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3288 Points ∼100% +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (2069 - 2338, n=2)	2204 Points ∼67% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1740 - 4057, n=127)	2623 Points ∼80% +12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1907 Points ∼33%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	693 Points ∼12% -64%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5723 Points ∼100% +200%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (1885 - 1907, n=2)	1896 Points ∼33% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (203 - 8783, n=127)	2886 Points ∼50% +51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1988 Points ∼40%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	861 Points ∼18% -57%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4914 Points ∼100% +147%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (1923 - 1988, n=2)	1956 Points ∼40% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (253 - 6618, n=127)	2589 Points ∼53% +30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2506 Points ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1845 Points ∼49% -26%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1664 Points ∼44% -34%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2257 Points ∼60% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2266 Points ∼60% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3754 Points ∼100% +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (1982 - 2506, n=2)	2244 Points ∼60% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (573 - 5728, n=471)	2124 Points ∼57% -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2146 Points ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	629 Points ∼9% -71%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	792 Points ∼11% -63%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4468 Points ∼63% +108%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1188 Points ∼17% -45%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7076 Points ∼100% +230%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (2146 - 2147, n=2)	2147 Points ∼30% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (75 - 9542, n=471)	2003 Points ∼28% -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2217 Points ∼37%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	737 Points ∼12% -67%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	896 Points ∼15% -60%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3669 Points ∼62% +65%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1328 Points ∼22% -40%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5913 Points ∼100% +167%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (2108 - 2217, n=2)	2163 Points ∼37% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (93 - 8154, n=472)	1857 Points ∼31% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2506 Points ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1871 Points ∼49% -25%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1732 Points ∼46% -31%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2832 Points ∼75% +13%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2241 Points ∼59% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3788 Points ∼100% +51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (1946 - 2506, n=2)	2226 Points ∼59% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 5718, n=501)	2035 Points ∼54% -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2146 Points ∼21%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	954 Points ∼9% -56%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1299 Points ∼13% -39%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6898 Points ∼67% +221%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1553 Points ∼15% -28%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10291 Points ∼100% +380%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (2146 - 3248, n=2)	2697 Points ∼26% +26%
Average of class Smartphone (70 - 20154, n=501)	2657 Points ∼26% +24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2217 Points ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1071 Points ∼14% -52%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1375 Points ∼18% -38%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5230 Points ∼70% +136%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1667 Points ∼22% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7449 Points ∼100% +236%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (2217 - 2828, n=2)	2523 Points ∼34% +14%
Average of class Smartphone (88 - 10699, n=501)	2230 Points ∼30% +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2480 Points ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1821 Points ∼48% -27%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1645 Points ∼44% -34%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2528 Points ∼67% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2351 Points ∼63% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3758 Points ∼100% +52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (2480 - 2617, n=2)	2549 Points ∼68% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (435 - 5209, n=551)	2014 Points ∼54% -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1980 Points ∼31%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	634 Points ∼10% -68%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	704 Points ∼11% -64%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4746 Points ∼75% +140%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1149 Points ∼18% -42%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6355 Points ∼100% +221%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (1928 - 1980, n=2)	1954 Points ∼31% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (53 - 8469, n=551)	1670 Points ∼26% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2073 Points ∼38%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	741 Points ∼13% -64%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	809 Points ∼15% -61%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3972 Points ∼72% +92%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1296 Points ∼24% -37%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5509 Points ∼100% +166%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (2048 - 2073, n=2)	2061 Points ∼37% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 7305, n=552)	1596 Points ∼29% -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2480 Points ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1829 Points ∼51% -26%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1687 Points ∼47% -32%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2720 Points ∼75% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2432 Points ∼67% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3614 Points ∼100% +46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (2480 - 2619, n=2)	2550 Points ∼71% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (293 - 5054, n=593)	1880 Points ∼52% -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1980 Points ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	845 Points ∼8% -57%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1235 Points ∼12% -38%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8261 Points ∼83% +317%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1279 Points ∼13% -35%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9963 Points ∼100% +403%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (1980 - 3100, n=2)	2540 Points ∼25% +28%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 12494, n=592)	2179 Points ∼22% +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2073 Points ∼29%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	960 Points ∼13% -54%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1315 Points ∼18% -37%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5687 Points ∼79% +174%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1430 Points ∼20% -31%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7166 Points ∼100% +246%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (2073 - 2978, n=2)	2526 Points ∼35% +22%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 9492, n=595)	1879 Points ∼26% -9%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	13686 Points ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	13914 Points ∼40% +2%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	12437 Points ∼36% -9%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	34928 Points ∼100% +155%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	14353 Points ∼41% +5%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	15766 Points ∼45% +15%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	25339 Points ∼73% +85%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (13686 - 13698, n=2)	13692 Points ∼39% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (735 - 57583, n=741)	14974 Points ∼43% +9%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	43514 Points ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	15567 Points ∼15% -64%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	17878 Points ∼17% -59%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	82125 Points ∼77% +89%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	16593 Points ∼16% -62%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	20953 Points ∼20% -52%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	106534 Points ∼100% +145%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (37657 - 43514, n=2)	40586 Points ∼38% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (536 - 209431, n=739)	24747 Points ∼23% -43%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	29316 Points ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	15167 Points ∼24% -48%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	16290 Points ∼26% -44%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	63159 Points ∼100% +115%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	16037 Points ∼25% -45%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	19525 Points ∼31% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	62225 Points ∼99% +112%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (27117 - 29316, n=2)	28217 Points ∼45% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (662 - 110468, n=739)	19625 Points ∼31% -33%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	74 fps ∼44%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	29 fps ∼17% -61%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	150 fps ∼90% +103%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	39 fps ∼23% -47%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	36 fps ∼22% -51%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	167 fps ∼100% +126%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (74 - 74, n=2)	74 fps ∼44% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.5 - 322, n=754)	42.5 fps ∼25% -43%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	58 fps ∼97%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	25 fps ∼42% -57%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	60 fps ∼100% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	36 fps ∼60% -38%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	35 fps ∼58% -40%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps ∼100% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (58 - 58, n=2)	58 fps ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 120, n=763)	29.9 fps ∼50% -48%

GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	36 fps ∼36%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	13 fps ∼13% -64%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	71 fps ∼71% +97%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	23 fps ∼23% -36%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	16 fps ∼16% -56%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	100 fps ∼100% +178%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (36 - 36, n=2)	36 fps ∼36% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.8 - 175, n=659)	25 fps ∼25% -31%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	33 fps ∼55%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	11 fps ∼18% -67%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	58 fps ∼97% +76%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	21 fps ∼35% -36%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	15 fps ∼25% -55%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps ∼100% +82%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (33 - 33, n=2)	33 fps ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 115, n=667)	21.2 fps ∼35% -36%

GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	26 fps ∼38%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	9.5 fps ∼14% -63%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35 fps ∼51% +35%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	14 fps ∼20% -46%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	10 fps ∼14% -62%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	69 fps ∼100% +165%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (26 - 26, n=2)	26 fps ∼38% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.87 - 117, n=522)	20.1 fps ∼29% -23%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	24 fps ∼41%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	7.8 fps ∼13% -67%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	54 fps ∼93% +125%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	13 fps ∼22% -46%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	9.8 fps ∼17% -59%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	58 fps ∼100% +142%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (23 - 24, n=2)	23.5 fps ∼41% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 110, n=524)	18.5 fps ∼32% -23%

GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	9.1 fps ∼38%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	2.7 fps ∼11% -70%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	22 fps ∼92% +142%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	4.9 fps ∼20% -46%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2 fps ∼8% -78%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	24 fps ∼100% +164%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (9 - 9.1, n=2)	9.05 fps ∼38% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.61 - 60, n=264)	10.9 fps ∼45% +20%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	5.8 fps ∼36%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1.7 fps ∼11% -71%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	14 fps ∼88% +141%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	3.1 fps ∼19% -47%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2.3 fps ∼14% -60%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	16 fps ∼100% +176%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (5.8 - 5.9, n=2)	5.85 fps ∼37% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.21 - 68, n=262)	7.71 fps ∼48% +33%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	14 fps ∼38%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	4.4 fps ∼12% -69%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	31 fps ∼84% +121%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	8.2 fps ∼22% -41%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	5.6 fps ∼15% -60%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	37 fps ∼100% +164%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (14 - 14, n=2)	14 fps ∼38% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.4 - 60, n=268)	16.2 fps ∼44% +16%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	16 fps ∼39%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	4.9 fps ∼12% -69%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	32 fps ∼78% +100%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	9 fps ∼22% -44%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	5.4 fps ∼13% -66%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	41 fps ∼100% +156%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (16 - 16, n=2)	16 fps ∼39% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.6 - 165, n=267)	18.2 fps ∼44% +14%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	15 fps ∼36%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	5.3 fps ∼13% -65%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35 fps ∼83% +133%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	8.9 fps ∼21% -41%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6.3 fps ∼15% -58%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	42 fps ∼100% +180%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (15 - 15, n=2)	15 fps ∼36% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.6 - 73, n=447)	13.7 fps ∼33% -9%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	13 fps ∼34%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	4.3 fps ∼11% -67%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	33 fps ∼87% +154%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	8.1 fps ∼21% -38%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6 fps ∼16% -54%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	38 fps ∼100% +192%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (13 - 13, n=2)	13 fps ∼34% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 60, n=451)	12.1 fps ∼32% -7%

Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	14.23 (min: 8.05, max: 26.52) fps ∼38%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	24.51 (min: 11.54, max: 48.55) fps ∼66% +72%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	14.51 fps ∼39% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	37.41 fps ∼100% +163%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712	14.2 fps ∼38% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (7.73 - 85.6, n=73)	19.2 fps ∼51% +35%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	12.76 (min: 7.68, max: 27.7) fps ∼40%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	15.8 (min: 10.44, max: 44.6) fps ∼49% +24%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	11.59 fps ∼36% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	32.2 fps ∼100% +152%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712	12.8 fps ∼40% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.57 - 63, n=63)	16.1 fps ∼50% +26%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	14.18 (min: 8.4, max: 36.6) fps ∼40%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	21.26 (min: 11.26, max: 61.24) fps ∼60% +50%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	13.03 fps ∼37% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	35.63 fps ∼100% +151%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712	14.2 fps ∼40% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.88 - 71.6, n=61)	20.1 fps ∼56% +42%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	179353 Points ∼48%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	122826 Points ∼33% -32%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	88287 Points ∼24% -51%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	263165 Points ∼70% +47%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	144194 Points ∼38% -20%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	117557 Points ∼31% -34%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	374820 Points ∼100% +109%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712	179353 Points ∼48% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 462516, n=297)	143610 Points ∼38% -20%

VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1966 Score ∼40%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4731 Score ∼95% +141%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1656 Score ∼33% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4964 Score ∼100% +152%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712	1966 Score ∼40% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 7649, n=80)	2601 Score ∼52% +32%

BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1172 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1090 Points ∼79% -7%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	815 Points ∼59% -30%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	1296 Points ∼94% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	927 Points ∼67% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1378 Points ∼100% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (1004 - 1172, n=2)	1088 Points ∼79% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1745, n=689)	794 Points ∼58% -32%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	3453 Points ∼37%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1356 Points ∼15% -61%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1409 Points ∼15% -59%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	7945 Points ∼86% +130%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1957 Points ∼21% -43%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9270 Points ∼100% +168%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (3031 - 3453, n=2)	3242 Points ∼35% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 16996, n=689)	2336 Points ∼25% -32%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2969 Points ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	2445 Points ∼61% -18%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	983 Points ∼24% -67%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3239 Points ∼80% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2492 Points ∼62% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4031 Points ∼100% +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (2969 - 3026, n=2)	2998 Points ∼74% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 8398, n=689)	1724 Points ∼43% -42%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	5932 Points ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	4506 Points ∼53% -24%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	3159 Points ∼37% -47%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6506 Points ∼77% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	5112 Points ∼61% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	8441 Points ∼100% +42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (5198 - 5932, n=2)	5565 Points ∼66% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 14189, n=689)	3271 Points ∼39% -45%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2906 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	2009 Points ∼44% -31%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1374 Points ∼30% -53%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3838 Points ∼84% +32%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2193 Points ∼48% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4595 Points ∼100% +58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (2630 - 2906, n=2)	2768 Points ∼60% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 6149, n=689)	1656 Points ∼36% -43%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	517 Points ∼37%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	504 Points ∼36% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1415 Points ∼100% +174%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712	517 Points ∼37% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (35 - 3575, n=125)	837 Points ∼59% +62%

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73)	57.207 Points ∼100% +54%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=153)	39.1 Points ∼68% +5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)	37.214 Points ∼65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712	37.2 Points ∼65% 0%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)	16.254 Points ∼28% -56%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	65.7 runs/min ∼100% +75%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=140)	42.6 runs/min ∼65% +14%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)	37.5 runs/min ∼57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712	37.5 runs/min ∼57% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chome 73)	33.07 runs/min ∼50% -12%

WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	108 Points ∼100% +50%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)	72 Points ∼67%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=215)	68.9 Points ∼64% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)	62 Points ∼57% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (47 - 72, n=2)	59.5 Points ∼55% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)	57 Points ∼53% -21%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus	54 Points ∼50% -25%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)	39 Points ∼36% -46%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	24534 Points ∼100% +81%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)	14514 Points ∼59% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)	13562 Points ∼55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (10328 - 13562, n=2)	11945 Points ∼49% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)	10322 Points ∼42% -24%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)	9165 Points ∼37% -32%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus	8368 Points ∼34% -38%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=747)	7452 Points ∼30% -45%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)	4865 Points ∼20% -64%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)	10256.9 ms * ∼100% -252%
Average of class Smartphone (550 - 59466, n=772)	10082 ms * ∼98% -246%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus	4776 ms * ∼47% -64%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)	4122.8 ms * ∼40% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)	3897 ms * ∼38% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (2912 - 4383, n=2)	3647 ms * ∼36% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)	2911.8 ms * ∼28%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)	2713.6 ms * ∼26% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	1873.2 ms * ∼18% +36%

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi Mi 9 SE	Samsung Galaxy A7 2018	Sony Xperia 10	Xiaomi Pocophone F1	Samsung Galaxy A50	Motorola Moto G7 Plus	Xiaomi Mi 9	Average 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-35%	-28%	-2%	-7%	42%	206%	64%	-23%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard		64.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	63.81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	65.58 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	60.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	62.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)		54 (28.6 - 70.2, n=15)	50.5 (1.7 - 87.1, n=491)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard		78.15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	83.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	85.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	73.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	82.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)		69.7 (30.2 - 86, n=15)	68.6 (8.1 - 96.5, n=491)
Random Write 4KB	21.86	15.45 -29%	14.39 -34%	17.81 -19%	18.2 -17%	73.1 234%	165.32 656%	76.2 (13.5 - 180, n=20) 249%	30 (0.14 - 272, n=831) 37%
Random Read 4KB	115.83	83.98 -27%	53.12 -54%	101.01 -13%	98.9 -15%	76.6 -34%	149.36 29%	122 (88.4 - 173, n=20) 5%	54.6 (1.59 - 265, n=831) -53%
Sequential Write 256KB	190.1	104.87 -45%	232.87 22%	155.57 -18%	192.1 1%	208.7 10%	388.27 104%	192 (143 - 257, n=20) 1%	114 (2.99 - 750, n=831) -40%
Sequential Read 256KB	492.48	295.76 -40%	273.8 -44%	705.38 43%	507.3 3%	283.6 -42%	666.06 35%	494 (409 - 733, n=20) 0%	315 (12.1 - 1781, n=831) -36%

PUBG Compare

: Ø29.8 (25-31)

Asphalt Legends

: Ø29.3 (27-31)

Dead Trigger 2

: Ø59.8 (54-61)

Max. terhelés

Üresjárat


35.1 °C	33.6 °C	32 °C
35.6 °C	34.8 °C	31.8 °C
34.3 °C	31.6 °C	31.2 °C

Maximum: 35.6 °C
Átlag: 33.3 °C


30.9 °C	31.6 °C	33.1 °C
30 °C	32.1 °C	34.2 °C
30.2 °C	32.1 °C	33.9 °C

Maximum: 34.2 °C
Átlag: 32 °C

Tápegység (max.) 27.2 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Mi 9 SE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Mi 9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Energiafogyasztás

Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlét	0.01 / 0.21 Watt
Üresjárat	0.53 / 1.18 / 1.2 Watt
Terhelés	3.04 / 4.83 Watt


Kulcs: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Mi 9 SE 3070 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 3300 mAh	Sony Xperia 10 2870 mAh	Xiaomi Pocophone F1 4000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A50 4000 mAh	Motorola Moto G7 Plus 3000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-41%	-44%	-57%	-57%	-72%	-31%	-4%	-49%
Idle Minimum *	0.53	0.71 -34%	0.72 -36%	0.65 -23%	0.8 -51%	1.1 -108%	0.67 -26%	0.54 (0.53 - 0.55, n=2) -2%	0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=842) -66%
Idle Average *	1.18	1.36 -15%	2.16 -83%	1.97 -67%	1.5 -27%	1.7 -44%	1.26 -7%	1.285 (1.18 - 1.39, n=2) -9%	1.748 (0.6 - 6.2, n=841) -48%
Idle Maximum *	1.2	1.47 -23%	2.17 -81%	2.01 -68%	1.7 -42%	2.1 -75%	1.29 -8%	1.32 (1.2 - 1.44, n=2) -10%	2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=842) -69%
Load Average *	3.04	5.13 -69%	3.32 -9%	4.29 -41%	5.9 -94%	5.1 -68%	3.71 -22%	3.01 (2.97 - 3.04, n=2) 1%	4.09 (0.8 - 10.8, n=836) -35%
Load Maximum *	4.83	7.89 -63%	5.34 -11%	9.05 -87%	8.3 -72%	7.9 -64%	9.3 -93%	4.88 (4.83 - 4.92, n=2) -1%	6.03 (1.2 - 14.2, n=836) -25%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő

Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)		22h 54min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		8h 30min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		14h 13min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)		3h 38min

	Xiaomi Mi 9 SE 3070 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 3300 mAh	Sony Xperia 10 2870 mAh	Xiaomi Pocophone F1 4000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A50 4000 mAh	Motorola Moto G7 Plus 3000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh
Battery Runtime		12%	-10%	30%	20%	8%	9%
Reader / Idle	1374	1467 7%	1006 -27%	2088 52%	1587 16%		1650 20%
H.264	853	836 -2%	620 -27%	936 10%	869 2%	809 -5%	1008 18%
WiFi v1.3	510	605 19%	541 6%	808 58%	701 37%	715 40%	546 7%
Load	218	273 25%	233 7%	220 1%	275 26%	196 -10%	194 -11%

Pro

+ modern dizájn

+ jól felépített

+ jó kamerák

+ egész jó monó hangszóró

+ szolid teljesítmény

Kontra

- nincs IP-tanúsítvány

- nincs Qi vezeték nélküli töltés

- csak Widevine L3 a kínai változatban

- nincs bővíthető memória

- kevés LTE támogatás; nincs LTE 20-as Sáv a kínai változatban

- nincs OIS

Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Smartphone rövid értékelés. Test device courtesy of TradingShenzhen.

A Mi 9 SE-vel a Xiaomi-nak sikerült egy vonzó középkategóriás okostelefont alkotni, kompakt dizájnnal. Az SE magán hordozza nagy testvérének egyes zászlóshajós funkcióit, miközben a költségeket alacsonyan tartja. A Xiaomi egy magas kontrasztú OLED panellel, gyönyörű kamerákkal és egy egész jómonó hangszóróval szerelte fel a készüléket egy prémium kinézetű testben.

A legtöbb dolog, amit kritizáltunk, érvénytelenné válik a Mi 9 SE globális verziójának megvásárlásával. Az akku kapacitása és az LTE lefedettség viszont meglepően alacsony, modelltől függetlenül. Emellett a microSD kártya foglalat, IP tanúsítvány, notifikációs LED vagy a fülhallgató csatlakozó hiánya mind kihagyott lehetőségeknek tűnnek, amelyekkel egy még a jelen Mi 9 SE-nél is nagyszerűbb középkategóriás okostelefont lehetne alkotni.

Aki egy olyan mindenest keres, ami nem egy vagyonba kerül, annak a Xiaomi Mi 9 SE nagyon jó választás lehet.

A Mi 9 SE valamivel több, mint 300 Euróba kerül az írás idején, ami egy nagyszerű ár-érték arány. Viszont már 10%-kal olcsóbban is beszerezhető online, így még annál is jobban megéri. A Mi 9 SE egy fantasztikus középkategóriás okostelefon, bármelyik árat is nézzük.

Xiaomi Mi 9 SE - 2019-05-0605/06/2019 v6^(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Váz

85%

Billentyűzet

65 / 75 → 87%

Érintőpad

92%

Csatlakoztathatóság

43 / 60 → 72%

Súly

92%

Akkumulátor

93%

Kijelző

90%

Játékok alatti teljesítmény

58 / 63 → 92%

Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény

67 / 70 → 95%

Hőmérséklet

92%

Zaj

100%

Audio

68 / 91 → 75%

Camera

77%

Átlag

79%

88%

Smartphone - Súlyozott átlag

Linked Articles

Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Mi 9 Széria)

Teszt

•

Xiaomi Mi 9T Smartphone rövid ...

Teszt

•

Xiaomi Mi 9 Smartphone rövid é...