Notebookcheck

Oppo Reno4 Z 5G smartphone rövid értékelés - 5G telefon jó hátlapi kamerával

Rugalmasság nélküli előnyök. A Reno4 Z 5G-vel az Oppo piacra dobott egy olcsó 5G telefont. A 120 Hz-es kijelző és a 300 euró körüli ár vonzónak tűnik, de az értékelésünkben közelebbről is megnézzük ezt a kínai okostelefont.
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (fordította Zoltán Kiss), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android ARM Smartphone
Oppo Reno 4 Z 5G
, , , , , ,
hasonló találatok
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G (Reno Széria)
Processzor
MediaTek Dimensity 800 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Grafikus adapter
ARM Mali-G57 MP4
Memória
8192 MB 
Kijelző
6.57 hüvelyk 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, Kapacitív érintőképernyő, IPS, fényes: igen, 120 Hz
Háttértár
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 128GB, 112 GB ingyenes
Csatlakozók
1 USB 2.0, Audió csatlakozók: 3.5mm, 1 Ujjlenyomat olvasó, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Szenzorok: gyorsulásmérő, giroszkóp, közelségérzékelő, iránytű, USB-C
Hálózat
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G,3G,4G(B1/​2/3/​4/​5/​7/​8/12/​17/18/19/20/26/28/38/39/40/41/66), 5G (n1/​3/5/​7/8/20/28/​38/​40/41/​77/​78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 8.1 x 163.8 x 75.5
Akkumulátor
4000 mAh Lítium-Polimer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operációs rendszer
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (fázis-különbség AF, LED vaku, Videók @2160p/​30fps, f/1.7, 26mm, 1/2.0", 0.8µm) + 8MP széles látószögű lencse (f/2.2, 119˚, 1/4.0", 1.12µm) + 2MP dop (f/2.4) + 2MP b/w (f/2.4)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (videók @1080p/​30fps, f/2.0, 26 mm, 1/3.06", 1,0 µm) + 2 MP dop (f/2.4)
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: mono speaker, Billentyűzet: virtuális, töltő, USB kábel, headset, SIM kiadó eszköz, szilikon tok, 24 Hónap Garancia, fanless
Súly
184 g, Tápegység: 102 g
Ár
300 Euró
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Bewertung
Rating Version
Datum
Modell
Gewicht
Laufwerk
Groesse
Aufloesung
Preis ab
81 %7
07/2021
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4
184 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.57"2400x1080
82 %7
10/2020
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619
215 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
80 %7
01/2021
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619
193 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.60"1600x720
80 %7
08/2020
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
SD 765, Adreno 620
207 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.70"2520x1080

Size comparison

168 mm 74 mm 9 mm 207 g165.38 mm 76.8 mm 9 mm 215 g164.4 mm 75.9 mm 8.6 mm 193 g163.8 mm 75.5 mm 8.1 mm 184 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
646 (590min - 656max) MBit/s ∼100% +95%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
551 (465min - 583max) MBit/s ∼85% +66%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
332 (316min - 339max) MBit/s ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
328 (323min - 332max) MBit/s ∼51% -1%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
667 (339min - 692max) MBit/s ∼100% +93%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
666 (646min - 677max) MBit/s ∼100% +92%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
346 (315min - 357max) MBit/s ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
329 (307min - 340max) MBit/s ∼49% -5%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340315329344342342337340335346344351350351349345354344348350357353349342350352349340347350353315329344342342337340335346344351350351349345354344348350357353349342350352349340347350353333316318328329317319338338338336337337338335338338337338336338339335328329318326336336338Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø345 (315-357)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø332 (316-339)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptobjektiv BlumeHauptobjektiv UmgebungHauptobjektiv Low LightUltraweitwinkel
click to load images
ColorChecker
18.9 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
21.6 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
20 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
11 ∆E
17 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Reno4 Z 5G: 14.62 ∆E min: 5.87 - max: 21.64 ∆E
ColorChecker
23.8 ∆E
32.1 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
25.9 ∆E
27.2 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
35.1 ∆E
21.5 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
23.6 ∆E
32.4 ∆E
39.2 ∆E
27.4 ∆E
30.2 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
35.4 ∆E
25.8 ∆E
30 ∆E
38.9 ∆E
37.7 ∆E
34.7 ∆E
27.2 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Reno4 Z 5G: 28.45 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 39.23 ∆E
450
cd/m²
449
cd/m²
452
cd/m²
446
cd/m²
462
cd/m²
449
cd/m²
418
cd/m²
413
cd/m²
408
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 462 cd/m² Átlag: 438.6 cd/m² Minimum: 3.6 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 88 %
Centrumban: 462 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 797:1 (Fekete: 0.58 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.83 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 6.3 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
98.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.227
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.57
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
AMOLED, 1600x720, 6.60
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
LTPS, 2520x1080, 6.70
Response Times
-36%
68%
1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
42 (23, 19)
52 (27.6, 24.4)
-24%
10 (5, 5)
76%
34 (17, 17)
19%
Response Time Black / White *
22 (11, 11)
32.4 (16, 16.4)
-47%
9 (5, 4)
59%
26 (15, 11)
-18%
PWM Frequency
2358 (42)
242.7
Screen
34%
26%
33%
Brightness middle
462
606
31%
466
1%
461
0%
Brightness
439
574
31%
462
5%
458
4%
Brightness Distribution
88
89
1%
85
-3%
93
6%
Black Level *
0.58
0.44
24%
0.52
10%
Contrast
797
1377
73%
887
11%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.83
2.4
50%
2.06
57%
1.01
79%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.1
5.3
35%
6.14
24%
2.1
74%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.3
4.5
29%
1.8
71%
1.5
76%
Gamma
2.227 99%
2.21 100%
2.105 105%
2.25 98%
CCT
7556 86%
6224 104%
6444 101%
6701 97%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-1% / 20%
47% / 36%
17% / 26%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 14825 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
523 Points ∼79%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
658 Points ∼100% +26%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
658 Points ∼100% +26%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
596 Points ∼91% +14%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
 
523 Points ∼79% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1604, n=234, last 2 years)
566 Points ∼86% +8%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
2143 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2009 Points ∼94% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1979 Points ∼92% -8%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
1954 Points ∼91% -9%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
 
2143 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4455, n=234, last 2 years)
1940 Points ∼91% -9%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
9674 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
8853 Points ∼89% -8%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
9914 Points ∼99% +2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
  (9674 - 9959, n=2)
9817 Points ∼98% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2689 - 19989, n=223, last 2 years)
9982 Points ∼100% +3%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
7511 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7547 Points ∼86% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
8063 Points ∼92% +7%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
8756 Points ∼100% +17%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
  (7511 - 8315, n=2)
7913 Points ∼90% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=267, last 2 years)
7878 Points ∼90% +5%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
32396 Points ∼76%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
40032 Points ∼94% +24%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
39850 Points ∼93% +23%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
42735 Points ∼100% +32%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
 
32396 Points ∼76% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2920 - 117606, n=207, last 2 years)
40247 Points ∼94% +24%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
37882 Points ∼60%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
55911 Points ∼89% +48%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
56286 Points ∼90% +49%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
62756 Points ∼100% +66%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
 
37882 Points ∼60% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2177 - 224130, n=207, last 2 years)
58049 Points ∼92% +53%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
21499 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
20076 Points ∼86% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
19708 Points ∼85% -8%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
20156 Points ∼86% -6%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
 
21499 Points ∼92% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8324 - 59268, n=207, last 2 years)
23323 Points ∼100% +8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
4497 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2825 Points ∼62% -37%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4044 Points ∼89% -10%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4401 Points ∼97% -2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
  (4497 - 4591, n=2)
4544 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=260, last 2 years)
3369 Points ∼74% -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
4722 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4072 Points ∼85% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4189 Points ∼88% -11%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4654 Points ∼98% -1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
  (4722 - 4806, n=2)
4764 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=260, last 2 years)
3943 Points ∼83% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3855 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3523 Points ∼90% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3607 Points ∼92% -6%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3498 Points ∼89% -9%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
  (3855 - 3969, n=2)
3912 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 5301, n=260, last 2 years)
2756 Points ∼70% -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
4259 Points ∼95%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4110 Points ∼92% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4120 Points ∼92% -3%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4484 Points ∼100% +5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
  (4259 - 4659, n=2)
4459 Points ∼99% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=276, last 2 years)
3948 Points ∼88% -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
4497 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4263 Points ∼85% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4298 Points ∼86% -4%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4865 Points ∼98% +8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
  (4497 - 4721, n=2)
4609 Points ∼92% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 22052, n=276, last 2 years)
4986 Points ∼100% +11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3593 Points ∼89%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3651 Points ∼91% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3597 Points ∼89% 0%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3512 Points ∼87% -2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
  (3593 - 4455, n=2)
4024 Points ∼100% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5784, n=274, last 2 years)
2908 Points ∼72% -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3288 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2778 Points ∼83% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2828 Points ∼85% -14%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3015 Points ∼90% -8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
  (3288 - 3380, n=2)
3334 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=258, last 2 years)
2629 Points ∼79% -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3145 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2617 Points ∼82% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2667 Points ∼84% -15%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
2963 Points ∼93% -6%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
  (3145 - 3241, n=2)
3193 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=258, last 2 years)
2786 Points ∼87% -11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3909 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3542 Points ∼90% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3588 Points ∼91% -8%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3445 Points ∼87% -12%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
  (3909 - 3979, n=2)
3944 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=258, last 2 years)
2802 Points ∼71% -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3410 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2973 Points ∼85% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2990 Points ∼86% -12%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3236 Points ∼93% -5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
  (3410 - 3557, n=2)
3484 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=274, last 2 years)
3193 Points ∼92% -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3353 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2823 Points ∼79% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2845 Points ∼80% -15%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3165 Points ∼89% -6%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
  (3353 - 3368, n=2)
3361 Points ∼94% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 12914, n=274, last 2 years)
3570 Points ∼100% +6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3626 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3649 Points ∼91% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3636 Points ∼90% 0%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3457 Points ∼86% -5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
  (3626 - 4427, n=2)
4027 Points ∼100% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5793, n=274, last 2 years)
2959 Points ∼73% -18%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
20 fps ∼61%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
17 fps ∼52% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
33 fps ∼100% +65%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
18 fps ∼55% -10%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
  (20 - 21, n=2)
20.5 fps ∼62% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=280, last 2 years)
22.2 fps ∼67% +11%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
22 fps ∼86%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
20 fps ∼78% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
20 fps ∼78% -9%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
21 fps ∼82% -5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
  (22 - 22, n=2)
22 fps ∼86% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=279, last 2 years)
25.6 fps ∼100% +16%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
12 fps ∼57%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
11 fps ∼52% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
21 fps ∼100% +75%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
11 fps ∼52% -8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
  (12 - 13, n=2)
12.5 fps ∼60% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=280, last 2 years)
14.8 fps ∼70% +23%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
8.2 fps ∼81%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7.4 fps ∼73% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
7.4 fps ∼73% -10%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
7.5 fps ∼74% -9%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800
  (8.2 - 8.2, n=2)
8.2 fps ∼81% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=279, last 2 years)
10.1 fps ∼100% +23%
Oppo Reno4 Z 5GXiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5GSamsung Galaxy A42 5GMotorola Moto G 5G PlusAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
50%
48%
-3%
6%
11%
Sequential Read 256KB
934.9
938.14
0%
963
3%
885.34
-5%
772 (427 - 999, n=84)
-17%
752 (41.9 - 2037, n=285, last 2 years)
-20%
Sequential Write 256KB
201
463.5
131%
476
137%
180.21
-10%
255 (13.6 - 511, n=84)
27%
327 (11.9 - 1321, n=285, last 2 years)
63%
Random Read 4KB
125.2
176.59
41%
168.5
35%
138.14
10%
146 (92.6 - 239, n=84)
17%
134 (13.5 - 325, n=285, last 2 years)
7%
Random Write 4KB
125.7
162.33
29%
147.7
18%
119.3
-5%
119 (18.2 - 290, n=84)
-5%
120 (4.97 - 330, n=285, last 2 years)
-5%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
87.02 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
86.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
87.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
76 (13.4 - 88.3, n=43)
75.9 (13.4 - 154, n=175, last 2 years)
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
65.82 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
67.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
65.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
59.6 (8.4 - 72.4, n=43)
58.2 (8.4 - 83.3, n=175, last 2 years)
Max. terhelés
 46.9 °C42.4 °C40 °C 
 46 °C42.2 °C39.6 °C 
 45.6 °C41.4 °C40 °C 
Maximum: 46.9 °C
Átlag: 42.7 °C
38.3 °C41.8 °C42.4 °C
38.6 °C41.5 °C46.3 °C
38.8 °C42.3 °C45.7 °C
Maximum: 46.3 °C
Átlag: 41.7 °C
Tápegység (max.)  40.2 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.9 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.3 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.934.22539.334.93131.130.84033.531.35034.536.56325.424.98019.219.310018.518.212516.819.916014.928.420011.634.325010.941.931511.648.240010.75550010.76063010.262.380017.765.2100015.271.3125010.768.416009.569.5200010.471250010.671.7315010.969.2400012.270.3500012.671.5630013.267.8800013.865.11000014.569.51250015.461.91600016.147.3SPL67.566.75966.424.981.3N21.119.91220.40.648.8median 12.2median 65.1Delta2.312.538.946.339.337.531.128.433.533.134.537.925.428.119.219.518.519.416.823.814.936.911.643.110.948.311.653.710.758.810.761.810.261.317.764.715.269.810.769.49.57110.470.110.66910.966.412.267.912.673.713.273.913.877.514.570.915.46016.156.966.424.982.920.40.654.1median 12.2median 64.72.39.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOppo Reno4 Z 5GSamsung Galaxy A42 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy A42 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
4820 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
5000 mAh
Average of class Smartphone
 
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing 1.3
903
1096
21%
967
7%
914
1%
898 (425 - 2000, n=295, last 2 years)
-1%
Akkumulátor üzemidő
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
15h 03min

Pro

+ sok RAM
+ gyors 120 Hz-es válaszidejű kijelző
+ aránylag könnyű
+ jó elsődleges kamera
+ nagy teljesítmény
+ jó üzemidő

Kontra

- nagy hőmérséklet-emelkedés terhelés alatt
- középszerű minőségű széles látószögű és az előlapi kamera
- kékes árnyalatú kijelző

Összegzés - Jól felszerelt, de nem való mindenkinek.

Oppo Reno4 Z 5G smartphone rövid értékelés. Test device provided by Oppo Germany.
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G smartphone rövid értékelés. Test device provided by Oppo Germany.

Az Oppo Reno 4 Z 5G alig 300 euró alatt 120 Hz-es képernyőt kínál, ami viszont nem túl világos, és a színpontosságán is lenne mit javítani. Egy egész jó képeket készítő hátlapi kamerával is rendelkezik. A készüléken levő többi kamera lencse viszont nem használható fotózásra, vagy csak középszerű minőségre képes. Ez azt jelenti, hogy az Oppo Reno4 Z 5G abban az esetben jó választás, ha fontos a jó hátlapi kamera, ha viszont rugalmasságra van szükség, akkor nem optimális.

Az akkumulátor aránylag kis kapacitású, ami a készüléket könnyűvé teszi, és az üzemidőre sincs túl nagy hatással. Az sem olyan rossz dolog, hogy a töltő nem képes túl nagy töltési teljesítményre. Az Oppo-nak itt kétségtelenül jól sikerült optimalizálnia.

Oppo Reno4 Z 5G egy olcsó 5G telefon jó hátlapi kamerával.

A teljesítmény is megfelel a kategóriájának, és azok is elégedettek lesznek, akik egy különálló ujjlenyomat-olvasót szeretnének a telefonon.

A nem túl ellenálló ház elég zavaró, a Wi-Fi pedig gyorsabb is lehetne. Így hát a felhasználó igényeitől függ, hogy jó választás-e az Oppo Reno4 Z 5G. Viszont egyértelmű előnyei is vannak a sok memóriával és az egyébként jó felszereltséggel.

Oppo Reno4 Z 5G - 01/02/2021 v7
Florian Schmitt

Váz
84%
Billentyűzet
65 / 75 → 87%
Érintőpad
93%
Csatlakoztathatóság
48 / 70 → 68%
Súly
89%
Akkumulátor
91%
Kijelző
84%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
36 / 64 → 56%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
71 / 86 → 82%
Hőmérséklet
84%
Zaj
100%
Audio
64 / 90 → 71%
Camera
59%
Átlag
74%
81%
Smartphone - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Ninh Duy
Editor of the original article: Ninh Duy - Editorial Assistant - 186207 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017
contact me via: Facebook
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Oppo Reno4 Z 5G smartphone rövid értékelés - 5G telefon jó hátlapi kamerával
Florian Schmitt, 2021-07- 6 (Update: 2021-07- 6)