Notebookcheck

OnePlus 7 Pro Smartphone rövid értékelés

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (fordította Zoltán Kiss), 06/30/2019
Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen OnePlus

Mélységesen prémium. A OnePlus 7 Pro a gyártó új zászlóshajója. A készüléknek óriási, bevágásmentes kijelzője van, hármas hátlapi kamerája, és még sok más. Tovább olvasva kiderül, hogy ez az ún. zászlóshajó-verő megfelel-e az elvárásoknak.

OnePlus 7 Pro (7 Széria)
Processzor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
Grafikus adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 640
Memória
12288 MB 
Kijelző
6.67 hüvelyk 19.5:9, 3120 x 1440 pixel 515 PPI, Kapacitív érintőképernyő, AMOLED, 90 Hz, fényes: igen, HDR
Háttértár
256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, 239 GB ingyenes
Csatlakozók
1 USB 3.0, Audió csatlakozók: Audió kimenet USB Type-C, 1 Ujjlenyomat olvasó, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Szenzorok: Gyorsulásmérő, iránytű, girométer, lézer szenzor, közelségérzékelő, szenzor csomópont
Hálózat
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM: Bands 2, 3, 5, 8. UMTS: Bands, 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 19. LTE: Bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 66., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 8.8 x 162.6 x 75.9
Akkumulátor
4000 mAh Lítium-Polimer, Warp Charge 30 W-os gyorstöltéssel
Operációs rendszer
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix Sony IMX586, 1.6 μm, f/1.6, OIS (kamera 1), 8 MP telefotó, 1 μm, OIS, f/2.4 (kamera 2), 16 MP ultraszéles látószögű, f/2.2 (kamera 3), hármas autofókusz: PDAF, lézer, kontraszt; Videók 4K/60 FPS
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix Sony IMX471, 1 μm, f/2.0, fix fókusz, EIS, visszahúzható
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: Sztereó Dolby Atmos-szal, Billentyűzet: virtuális billentyűzet, Töltő, USB kábel, SIM kiadó eszköz, szilikon tok, 24 Hónap Garancia, LTE Sebesség: Cat. 18 letöltés (1.2 Gbps), Cat. 13 feltöltés (150 Mbps), fanless
Súly
206 g, Tápegység: 126 g
Ár
829 Euró
Hivatkozások
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

OnePlus 7 Pro
OnePlus 7 Pro
OnePlus 7 Pro
OnePlus 7 Pro
OnePlus 7 Pro
OnePlus 7 Pro
OnePlus 7 Pro
OnePlus 7 Pro
OnePlus 7 Pro
OnePlus 7 Pro
OnePlus 7 Pro
OnePlus 7 Pro
OnePlus 7 Pro
OnePlus 7 Pro
OnePlus 7 Pro
OnePlus 7 Pro
OnePlus 7 Pro

Size Comparison

162.6 mm 75.9 mm 8.8 mm 206 g158.01 mm 73.37 mm 8.41 mm 192 g157.5 mm 74.8 mm 8.2 mm 185 g157.6 mm 74.1 mm 7.8 mm 198 g157.5 mm 77.4 mm 7.7 mm 208 g157.5 mm 74.67 mm 7.61 mm 173 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
678 (min: 549, max: 725) MBit/s ∼100% +45%
Huawei P30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
661 (min: 624, max: 683) MBit/s ∼97% +42%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Adreno 630, 845, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
633 (min: 619, max: 639) MBit/s ∼93% +36%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
633 (min: 561, max: 684) MBit/s ∼93% +36%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
624 MBit/s ∼92% +34%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
467 (min: 375, max: 519) MBit/s ∼69%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=424)
223 MBit/s ∼33% -52%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei P30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
670 (min: 542, max: 717) MBit/s ∼100% +42%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
602 MBit/s ∼90% +28%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
534 (min: 430, max: 578) MBit/s ∼80% +13%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Adreno 630, 845, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
489 (min: 439, max: 508) MBit/s ∼73% +4%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
471 (min: 438, max: 506) MBit/s ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
457 (min: 398, max: 508) MBit/s ∼68% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=424)
213 MBit/s ∼32% -55%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø467 (375-519)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø471 (438-506)
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Bridge
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Bridge
GPS test: OnePlus 7 Pro - Overview
GPS test: OnePlus 7 Pro - Overview
GPS test: OnePlus 7 Pro - Loop
GPS test: OnePlus 7 Pro - Loop
GPS test: OnePlus 7 Pro - Bridge
GPS test: OnePlus 7 Pro - Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Photographed with the telephoto lens
Photographed with the telephoto lens
Photographed with the regular sensor
Photographed with the regular sensor
Photographed with the ultra-wide sensor
Photographed with the ultra-wide sensor
Photographed using night mode
Photographed using night mode
Photographed with the regular sensor
Photographed with the regular sensor
584
cd/m²
583
cd/m²
589
cd/m²
581
cd/m²
586
cd/m²
597
cd/m²
578
cd/m²
579
cd/m²
580
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 597 cd/m² Átlag: 584.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.16 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 97 %
Centrumban: 586 cd/m²
Kontraszt: ∞:1 (Fekete: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.39 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.243
OnePlus 7 Pro
AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.67
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
OLED, 3040x1440, 6.4
Apple iPhone Xs Max
OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5
Xiaomi Mi 9
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.41
Huawei P30 Pro
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
Screen
-66%
-3%
11%
-189%
-16%
Brightness middle
586
710
21%
656
12%
593
1%
435
-26%
597
2%
Brightness
584
721
23%
659
13%
587
1%
442
-24%
608
4%
Brightness Distribution
97
97
0%
88
-9%
94
-3%
95
-2%
89
-8%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.39
3.7
-166%
1.7
-22%
0.9
35%
6.79
-388%
2.2
-58%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.7
10.3
-281%
2.8
-4%
2
26%
14.93
-453%
3.6
-33%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.6
1.5
6%
1.7
-6%
1.5
6%
5.4
-238%
1.6
-0%
Gamma
2.243 98%
2.1 105%
1.998 110%
2.27 97%
2.252 98%
2.23 99%
CCT
6672 97%
6611 98%
6487 100%
6548 99%
7588 86%
6268 104%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 122 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 122 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 122 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9367 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.8 ms).
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7470 Points ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
10177 Points ∼77% +36%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7482 Points ∼56% 0%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
13260 Points ∼100% +78%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
8574 Points ∼65% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (7372 - 8024, n=10)
7597 Points ∼57% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=322)
4603 Points ∼35% -38%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
10812 Points ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
10259 Points ∼91% -5%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
11244 Points ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10999 Points ∼98% +2%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
8906 Points ∼79% -18%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
9880 Points ∼88% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (10187 - 11388, n=12)
10936 Points ∼97% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3240 - 11598, n=381)
4621 Points ∼41% -57%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
3472 Points ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4505 Points ∼94% +30%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4774 Points ∼100% +38%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3523 Points ∼74% +1%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
2420 Points ∼51% -30%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3306 Points ∼69% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3406 - 3537, n=12)
3482 Points ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (903 - 4824, n=383)
1387 Points ∼29% -60%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9974 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7812 Points ∼78% -22%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9035 Points ∼91% -9%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
8689 Points ∼87% -13%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
9135 Points ∼92% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (8342 - 11440, n=11)
9555 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 11440, n=378)
5073 Points ∼51% -49%
Work performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
11766 Points ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
9793 Points ∼75% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10985 Points ∼85% -7%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
10984 Points ∼85% -7%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
12996 Points ∼100% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (10330 - 14439, n=11)
12008 Points ∼92% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4096 - 14439, n=546)
5569 Points ∼43% -53%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
3317 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2488 Points ∼75% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3288 Points ∼99% -1%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3183 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2104 - 3365, n=11)
2979 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2051 - 15735, n=61)
2372 Points ∼72% -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
5794 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5530 Points ∼95% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5723 Points ∼99% -1%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4688 Points ∼81% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (4236 - 5862, n=11)
5548 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (341 - 14536, n=61)
2389 Points ∼41% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4969 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4348 Points ∼88% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4914 Points ∼99% -1%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4242 Points ∼85% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3800 - 5012, n=11)
4640 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (419 - 14786, n=64)
2076 Points ∼42% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4429 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2925 Points ∼66% -34%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2723 Points ∼61% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3754 Points ∼85% -15%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
3717 Points ∼84% -16%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4171 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (1934 - 4535, n=11)
3733 Points ∼84% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=392)
1844 Points ∼42% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7115 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5371 Points ∼75% -25%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4828 Points ∼68% -32%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7076 Points ∼99% -1%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
5869 Points ∼82% -18%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4361 Points ∼61% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5184 - 7115, n=11)
6745 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=392)
1619 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
6270 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4529 Points ∼72% -28%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4121 Points ∼66% -34%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5913 Points ∼94% -6%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
5200 Points ∼83% -17%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4317 Points ∼69% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3969 - 6312, n=11)
5675 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=395)
1504 Points ∼24% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4352 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3087 Points ∼71% -29%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2961 Points ∼68% -32%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3788 Points ∼87% -13%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
3439 Points ∼79% -21%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4164 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2345 - 4703, n=10)
3878 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=407)
1821 Points ∼42% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
10420 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4449 Points ∼43% -57%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
10374 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10291 Points ∼99% -1%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
8415 Points ∼81% -19%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5767 Points ∼55% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (6358 - 10420, n=10)
9416 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=407)
2194 Points ∼21% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7955 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4052 Points ∼51% -49%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
6667 Points ∼84% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7449 Points ∼94% -6%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
6368 Points ∼80% -20%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5313 Points ∼67% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5268 - 8141, n=10)
7099 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 8141, n=408)
1872 Points ∼24% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4063 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2977 Points ∼73% -27%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
3027 Points ∼75% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3758 Points ∼92% -8%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
3496 Points ∼86% -14%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3849 Points ∼95% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2705 - 4320, n=11)
3756 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4320, n=468)
1781 Points ∼44% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
6248 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5186 Points ∼82% -17%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
3726 Points ∼59% -40%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6355 Points ∼100% +2%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
5246 Points ∼83% -16%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4400 Points ∼69% -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5663 - 6362, n=11)
6235 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=470)
1350 Points ∼21% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
5581 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4452 Points ∼80% -20%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
3544 Points ∼64% -36%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5509 Points ∼99% -1%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
4721 Points ∼85% -15%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4264 Points ∼76% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (4556 - 5734, n=11)
5418 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=478)
1286 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4091 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2875 Points ∼70% -30%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2713 Points ∼66% -34%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3614 Points ∼88% -12%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
3551 Points ∼87% -13%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3828 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3505 - 4454, n=10)
3910 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4454, n=501)
1691 Points ∼41% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9845 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5303 Points ∼53% -46%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
7055 Points ∼71% -28%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9963 Points ∼100% +1%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
8248 Points ∼83% -16%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5431 Points ∼55% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (6122 - 10008, n=10)
9125 Points ∼92% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=501)
1815 Points ∼18% -82%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7501 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4465 Points ∼60% -40%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
5205 Points ∼69% -31%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7166 Points ∼96% -4%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
6374 Points ∼85% -15%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4969 Points ∼66% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5251 - 7820, n=10)
7026 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7820, n=509)
1562 Points ∼21% -79%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
26936 Points ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
32302 Points ∼92% +20%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
27717 Points ∼79% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
25339 Points ∼72% -6%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
35217 Points ∼100% +31%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
31483 Points ∼89% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (23877 - 45072, n=10)
31426 Points ∼89% +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 45072, n=659)
13790 Points ∼39% -49%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
106829 Points ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
70318 Points ∼44% -34%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
159735 Points ∼100% +50%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
106534 Points ∼67% 0%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
84459 Points ∼53% -21%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
63469 Points ∼40% -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (103955 - 110432, n=10)
95143 Points ∼60% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7567 - 162695, n=659)
20320 Points ∼13% -81%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
64389 Points ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
55740 Points ∼72% -13%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
77599 Points ∼100% +21%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
62225 Points ∼80% -3%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
64437 Points ∼83% 0%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
51779 Points ∼67% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (63969 - 83518, n=10)
61470 Points ∼79% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8316 - 83518, n=660)
16844 Points ∼22% -74%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
166 fps ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
96 fps ∼42% -42%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
226 fps ∼100% +36%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
167 fps ∼74% +1%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
151 fps ∼67% -9%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
138 fps ∼61% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (85 - 167, n=12)
160 fps ∼71% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=689)
35.3 fps ∼16% -79%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
60 fps ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
58 fps ∼92% -3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼95% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼95% 0%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
60 fps ∼95% 0%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
60 fps ∼95% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (59 - 91, n=12)
63.3 fps ∼100% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=692)
27.3 fps ∼43% -54%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
101 fps ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
67 fps ∼63% -34%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
107 fps ∼100% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
100 fps ∼93% -1%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
79 fps ∼74% -22%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
91 fps ∼85% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (50 - 102, n=12)
95 fps ∼89% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=608)
19.6 fps ∼18% -81%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
55 fps ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
53 fps ∼88% -4%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
59 fps ∼98% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼99% +9%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
59 fps ∼98% +7%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
59 fps ∼98% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (51 - 85, n=12)
60.5 fps ∼100% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=613)
18.1 fps ∼30% -67%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
71 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
67 fps ∼94% -6%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
69.3 fps ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
69 fps ∼97% -3%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
56 fps ∼79% -21%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
56 fps ∼79% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (35 - 71, n=12)
62.5 fps ∼88% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=469)
16.1 fps ∼23% -77%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
36 fps ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
37 fps ∼63% +3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
58.9 fps ∼100% +64%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
58 fps ∼98% +61%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
50 fps ∼85% +39%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
47 fps ∼80% +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (36 - 58, n=12)
49.2 fps ∼84% +37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=472)
15.4 fps ∼26% -57%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
15 fps ∼47%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
16 fps ∼50% +7%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
32.1 fps ∼100% +114%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps ∼75% +60%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
21 fps ∼65% +40%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
20 fps ∼62% +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (14 - 26, n=11)
21.5 fps ∼67% +43%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=172)
8.99 fps ∼28% -40%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
16 fps ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
17 fps ∼100% +6%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
16.3 fps ∼96% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps ∼94% 0%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
14 fps ∼82% -12%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
14 fps ∼82% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (8.5 - 24, n=12)
16.9 fps ∼99% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=172)
6.24 fps ∼37% -61%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
23 fps ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
26 fps ∼55% +13%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
47 fps ∼100% +104%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37 fps ∼79% +61%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
34 fps ∼72% +48%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
32 fps ∼68% +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22 - 38, n=11)
34.2 fps ∼73% +49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=173)
13.6 fps ∼29% -41%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
42 fps ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
46 fps ∼100% +10%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
36.8 fps ∼80% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
41 fps ∼89% -2%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
37 fps ∼80% -12%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
36 fps ∼78% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22 - 43, n=12)
40.3 fps ∼88% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=173)
14.9 fps ∼32% -65%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
42 fps ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
43 fps ∼100% +2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
40 fps ∼93% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼98% 0%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
34 fps ∼79% -19%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
33 fps ∼77% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22 - 42, n=12)
39.8 fps ∼93% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=398)
10.7 fps ∼25% -75%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
21 fps ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
23 fps ∼61% +10%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
31 fps ∼82% +48%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
38 fps ∼100% +81%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
31 fps ∼82% +48%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
27 fps ∼71% +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (21 - 41, n=12)
32.9 fps ∼87% +57%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=402)
9.74 fps ∼26% -54%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
37.3 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
32.26 (min: 8.31, max: 85.07) fps ∼86% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37.41 fps ∼100% 0%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
27.02 (min: 2.8, max: 80.83) fps ∼72% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (33.1 - 37.4, n=3)
35.9 fps ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.53 - 37.4, n=64)
15.6 fps ∼42% -58%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
22.73 fps ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
27.18 (min: 8.36, max: 46.5) fps ∼84% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
32.2 fps ∼100% +42%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
28.46 (min: 9.24, max: 54.37) fps ∼88% +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22.7 - 32.2, n=2)
27.5 fps ∼85% +21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.91 - 37.3, n=59)
12.7 fps ∼39% -44%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
36.29 fps ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
38.5 (min: 9.69, max: 72.94) fps ∼100% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
35.63 fps ∼93% -2%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
30.67 (min: 5.93, max: 132.19) fps ∼80% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (24.5 - 36.3, n=3)
32.2 fps ∼84% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.2 - 39.7, n=58)
15.1 fps ∼39% -58%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
369294 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
333277 Points ∼89% -10%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
302955 Points ∼81% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
374820 Points ∼100% +1%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
293768 Points ∼78% -20%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
316199 Points ∼84% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (217967 - 398720, n=12)
353615 Points ∼94% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52607 - 398720, n=291)
133058 Points ∼35% -64%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4969 Score ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4967 Score ∼99% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4964 Score ∼99% 0%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5020 Score ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (4486 - 4969, n=3)
4806 Score ∼96% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (552 - 5025, n=61)
1999 Score ∼40% -60%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
1364 Points ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
1383 Points ∼80% +1%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
1731 Points ∼100% +27%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1378 Points ∼80% +1%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
1395 Points ∼81% +2%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
1409 Points ∼81% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (1076 - 1431, n=11)
1321 Points ∼76% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=621)
751 Points ∼43% -45%
Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9421 Points ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
8401 Points ∼54% -11%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
15659 Points ∼100% +66%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9270 Points ∼59% -2%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
7926 Points ∼51% -16%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
7758 Points ∼50% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (8125 - 9477, n=11)
9109 Points ∼58% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=621)
1986 Points ∼13% -79%
Memory (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
5243 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4306 Points ∼82% -18%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
1815 Points ∼35% -65%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4031 Points ∼77% -23%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
3907 Points ∼75% -25%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5210 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2661 - 7500, n=11)
4976 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=621)
1487 Points ∼28% -72%
System (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9143 Points ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
8344 Points ∼71% -9%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
11675 Points ∼100% +28%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8441 Points ∼72% -8%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
8138 Points ∼70% -11%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
8572 Points ∼73% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5993 - 9143, n=11)
8480 Points ∼73% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=621)
2910 Points ∼25% -68%
Overall (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4982 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4520 Points ∼91% -9%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4895 Points ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4595 Points ∼92% -8%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
4330 Points ∼87% -13%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4701 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3847 - 5397, n=11)
4716 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=625)
1450 Points ∼29% -71%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
1425 Points ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
1928 Points ∼80% +35%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2407 Points ∼100% +69%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1415 Points ∼59% -1%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
1627 Points ∼68% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (1075 - 1425, n=4)
1334 Points ∼55% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (35 - 2754, n=104)
716 Points ∼30% -50%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
62.5 Points ∼100%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)
60.469 Points ∼97% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73)
57.207 Points ∼92% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (45.5 - 63.1, n=10)
57.1 Points ∼91% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samung Browser 9.0)
44.128 Points ∼71% -29%
Average of class Smartphone (12.9 - 108, n=97)
30.9 Points ∼49% -51%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)
67.8 runs/min ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
65.7 runs/min ∼97% +7%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chome 74)
61.5 runs/min ∼91%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (42.5 - 67.9, n=9)
60.6 runs/min ∼89% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
56 runs/min ∼83% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (59.7 - 123, n=85)
34.4 runs/min ∼51% -44%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
155 Points ∼100% +40%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)
122 Points ∼79% +10%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
115 Points ∼74% +4%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
111 Points ∼72%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
108 Points ∼70% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (94 - 114, n=12)
106 Points ∼68% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 161, n=152)
63.4 Points ∼41% -43%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
43114 Points ∼100% +74%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
24730 Points ∼57%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
24534 Points ∼57% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (17011 - 25640, n=12)
22912 Points ∼53% -7%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)
22447 Points ∼52% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
20849 Points ∼48% -16%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition (Chrome 71)
16902 Points ∼39% -32%
Average of class Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=682)
6403 Points ∼15% -74%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=702)
10678 ms * ∼100% -443%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition (Chrome 71)
2348 ms * ∼22% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1852 - 2611, n=11)
2141 ms * ∼20% -9%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)
2009.1 ms * ∼19% -2%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
1965 ms * ∼18%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
1873.2 ms * ∼18% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
1856.6 ms * ∼17% +6%
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
603.1 ms * ∼6% +69%

* ... smaller is better

OnePlus 7 ProSamsung Galaxy S10 PlusXiaomi Mi 9OnePlus 6T McLaren EditionHuawei P30 ProAverage 256 GB UFS 3.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-28%
125%
-28%
116%
91%
-62%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
60.74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
68.19 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
59.5
48.7 (9.5 - 87.1, n=413)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
73 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
82.6 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
71
66.7 (8.1 - 96.5, n=413)
Random Write 4KB
24.8
22.7
-8%
165.32
567%
22.3
-10%
159.22
542%
107 (24.8 - 192, n=4)
331%
21.3 (0.14 - 250, n=730)
-14%
Random Read 4KB
174.1
135.16
-22%
149.36
-14%
145.1
-17%
174.36
0%
185 (174 - 196, n=4)
6%
46.1 (1.59 - 196, n=730)
-74%
Sequential Write 256KB
387
249.06
-36%
388.27
0%
253.3
-35%
250.82
-35%
489 (387 - 590, n=4)
26%
94.6 (2.99 - 590, n=730)
-76%
Sequential Read 256KB
1468
811.17
-45%
666.06
-55%
733.1
-50%
849.48
-42%
1478 (1463 - 1504, n=4)
1%
266 (12.1 - 1504, n=730)
-82%
010203040506070Tooltip
; Arena of Valor; min; 1.28.2.2: Ø60 (58-61)
; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.28.2.2: Ø60 (59-61)
; Shadow Fight 3; high; 1.18.3: Ø59.8 (57-61)
; Shadow Fight 3; minimal; 1.18.3: Ø59.8 (52-61)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.5.4a: Ø29.6 (27-31)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.5.4a: Ø30 (29-31)
Max. terhelés
 47 °C45.2 °C40.6 °C 
 46 °C44.7 °C41.4 °C 
 45.2 °C43.8 °C40 °C 
Maximum: 47 °C
Átlag: 43.8 °C
35.4 °C38.9 °C42.9 °C
36.6 °C39.5 °C42.1 °C
37.4 °C40 °C40.9 °C
Maximum: 42.9 °C
Átlag: 39.3 °C
Tápegység (max.)  43 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2047.650.12544.645.13140.239.74037.739.95038.440.86331.933.88028.73010029.137.41252839.616026.349.920025.858.625024.463.73152465.840023.864.450022.568.963022.569.480021.773.5100021.881.8125021.179.8160022.381.3200022.180.2250021.181.4315020.980.7400020.680.6500020.878.9630020.770.6800020.967.7100002168.11250020.969.7160002163.8SPL75.633.790.9N34.92.183.1median 21.8median 69.4Delta29.94028.833.542.139.542.135.133.331.630.824.625.527.128.1262619.828.118.542.618.853.817.355.716.258.815.260.915.260.414.460.315.263.614.466.613.968.713.77213.672.313.573.113.472.313.471.113.469.913.36813.467.113.466.813.556.513.539.462.626.281.915.60.850.5median 13.9median 63.61.58hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOnePlus 7 ProOnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
OnePlus 7 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.8 / 2.9 Watt
Terhelés midlight 5.5 / 8.2 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
OnePlus 7 Pro
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
4100 mAh
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3174 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
3700 mAh
Huawei P30 Pro
4200 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
8%
17%
26%
20%
7%
12%
18%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
0.73
19%
1
-11%
0.67
26%
0.6
33%
0.68
24%
0.897 (0.6 - 1.3, n=11)
-0%
0.878 (0.2 - 3.4, n=757)
2%
Idle Average *
1.8
1.53
15%
1.4
22%
1.26
30%
1.3
28%
2.6
-44%
1.505 (1 - 2.35, n=11)
16%
1.733 (0.6 - 6.2, n=756)
4%
Idle Maximum *
2.9
2.07
29%
1.7
41%
1.29
56%
2.1
28%
2.77
4%
1.875 (1.13 - 2.9, n=11)
35%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=757)
30%
Load Average *
5.5
6.03
-10%
4.6
16%
3.71
33%
4.5
18%
3.74
32%
4.61 (3.64 - 5.8, n=11)
16%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=751)
26%
Load Maximum *
8.2
9.18
-12%
6.7
18%
9.3
-13%
8.6
-5%
6.82
17%
8.87 (7.49 - 10.2, n=11)
-8%
5.9 (1.2 - 14.2, n=751)
28%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
29h 05min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12h 48min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13h 22min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
3h 56min
OnePlus 7 Pro
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
4100 mAh
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3174 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
3700 mAh
Huawei P30 Pro
4200 mAh
Battery Runtime
-14%
-9%
-7%
18%
29%
Reader / Idle
1745
1560
-11%
1305
-25%
1650
-5%
1966
13%
H.264
802
921
15%
801
0%
1008
26%
1193
49%
WiFi v1.3
768
483
-37%
742
-3%
546
-29%
905
18%
838
9%
Load
236
187
-21%
223
-6%
194
-18%
344
46%

Pro

+ bevágásmentes kijelző
+ prémium dizájn
+ bőséges LTE lefedettség
+ 3x optikai zoom
+ gyors belső tároló
+ jó üzemidő
+ ultra gyors töltés

Kontra

- az ívelt kijelző véletlenül könnyen megérinthető
- nincs fülhallgató jack
- nehéz
- nincs IP-tanúsítvány
- nincs vezeték nélküli töltés
- aránylag lassú Wi-Fi
OnePlus 7 Pro Smartphone rövid értékelés. Test device courtesy of OnePlus Germany.
OnePlus 7 Pro Smartphone rövid értékelés. Test device courtesy of OnePlus Germany.

A OnePlus 7 Pro a kínai gyártó lenyűgöző első kísérlete egy igazi zászlóshajó okostelefon létrehozására. A készülék gyors adattárolót, megfelelő üzemidőt, rendkívül gyors töltést, prémium dizájnt, javított ujjlenyomat-olvasót és egy bevágásmentes kijelzőt ad. Ja, és egy 90 Hz-es kijelzője is van. És elfelejtettük a motorizált előugró előlapi kamerát, amelyen biztosan meg fog akadni az emberek figyelme. A sztereó hangszórók szintén lenyűgöztek minket testes és meleg hangzásukkal.

A 7 Pro az eddigi legdrágább OnePlus készülék, de még így is jóval kedvezőbb, mint a zászlóshajó versenytársak, függetlenül attól, hogy melyik verziót választjuk. Egyes területeken még jobb is, mint más versenytársak, a rövid töltési idővel, nagy képernyő-test arányával és 90 Hz-es kijelzőjével.

Van néhány kritikánk. Az ívelt kijelző inkább stílusos, mint hasznos, és az okostelefon nagy és aránylag hoszú. Ezenkívül a 7 Pro aránylag meleg, és egy bizonyos ponton túl egyeseknek kellemetlen lehet kézben tartani a készüléket hosszabb játékidők alatt. Azt is szeretnénk, ha a OnePlus IP tanúsítvánnyal látná el a készülékeit, és vezeték nélküli töltést is adna, mivel ezek miatt könnyen kritizálható a 7 Pro más zászlóshajókkal szemben. Más készülékek gyorsabb Wi-Fi-t is kínálnak, és a OnePlus indoklása a fülhallgató csatlakozó eltávolításával kapcsolatban még mindig gyatrának tűnik.

A OnePlus 7 Pro egy lenyűgöző zászlóshajó számos olyan funkcióval, amelyek kiemelik a kortársai közül.

Egy hőcső beépítése segít megelőzni a SoC fojtást, de nem teszi lehetővé, hogy a Snapdragon 855 jobban teljesítsen, mint a Xiaomi Mi 9-ben. A hármas hátlapi kamerák általában kiváló képeket is készítenek, bár minél kevesebbet mondunk az alapértelmezett kamera alkalmazás éjszakai módjáról, annál jobb. Az automata mód legalább jó képeket készít gyengébb fényben is, szóval nem minden rossz.

Röviden, a 7 Pro-nak van néhány gyengesége, de egyik sem olyan, ami miatt az emberek el kéne kerüljék. A korábbi OnePlus okostelefonok ára nem csökkent néhány hónappal a megjelenés után, mint a Huawei és a Samsung készülékek esetében. Így a 7 Pro év végére a mostaninál rosszabb ár-érték arányt érhet el, mint a Galaxy S10+ vagy a P30 Pro. Ez csak egy valami, amit azért érdemes észben tartani, de ez ne tántorítson el a 7 Pro megvásárlásától, ami egy kiváló zászlóshajó okostelefon.

OnePlus 7 Pro - 09/11/2019 v7
Florian Schmitt

Váz
89%
Billentyűzet
68 / 75 → 90%
Érintőpad
96%
Csatlakoztathatóság
50 / 70 → 72%
Súly
88%
Akkumulátor
89%
Kijelző
91%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
56 / 64 → 88%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
78 / 86 → 91%
Hőmérséklet
85%
Zaj
100%
Audio
72 / 90 → 80%
Camera
67%
Átlag
79%
86%
Smartphone - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > OnePlus 7 Pro Smartphone rövid értékelés
Florian Schmitt, 2019-06-30 (Update: 2019-06-30)