Notebookcheck

Huawei Y7 2018 Smartphone rövid értékelés

Florian Wimmer (fordította Tamás Somogyi), 06/06/2018
Android ARM Touchscreen Smartphone

Fiatal és megfizethető A Huawei Y7 2018 egy 5.99 colos kijelzővel ellátott phablet. Az Y széria legújabb tagjaként, az Y7 2018 vette át azt a feladatot, hogy olcsó legyen, ugyanakkor funkciók és kamerák terén ne kössön komoly kompromisszumokat. Cikkünkből kiderül, hogy vajon a Huawei Y7 2018-nak sikerült-e megtartani elődei jellegzetességeit.

Huawei Y7 2018 (Y Széria)
Grafikus adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 505
Memória
2048 MB 
Kijelző
5.99 hüvelyk 2:1, 1440 x 720 pixel 269 PPI, kapacitív, IPS, fényes: igen
Háttértár
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 11 GB ingyenes
Csatlakozók
1 USB 2.0, Audió csatlakozók: 3.5 mm-es jack, Kártyaolvasó: microSD, max. 256 GB, 1 Ujjlenyomat olvasó, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Szenzorok: gyorsulásmérő, közelségérzékelő, iránytű, környezeti fény szenzor, ujjlenyomat olvasó, USB-OTG, FM rádió
Hálózat
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 7.8 x 158.3 x 76.7
Akkumulátor
11.4 Wh, 3000 mAh Lítium-Ion
Operációs rendszer
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix kontraszt AF, LED vaku, videók: max. 1080p / 30 FPS
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix LED vaku
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: mono, alsó oldali, Billentyűzet: virtuális, töltő, USB kábel, SIM tű, headset, Designs, HiCare, Phone Clone, Game Suite, 24 Hónap Garancia, sávszélesség: le/fel: 150 Mbps / 50 Mbps (LTE); SAR: 0.81 W/kg (fej), 1.16 W/kg (test), fanless
Súly
155 g, Tápegység: 49 g
Ár
199 Euró
Hivatkozások

 

Huawei Y7 2018
Huawei Y7 2018
Huawei Y7 2018
Huawei Y7 2018
Huawei Y7 2018
Huawei Y7 2018
Huawei Y7 2018
Huawei Y7 2018

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 939, n=224)
194 MBit/s ∼100% +253%
Oukitel U18
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 64 GB eMMC Flash
111 MBit/s ∼57% +102%
Ulefone Power 3
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
106 MBit/s ∼55% +93%
Huawei Y7 2018
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
55 MBit/s ∼28%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
53.9 MBit/s ∼28% -2%
Huawei Y7
Adreno 505, 435, 16 GB eMMC Flash
52.4 MBit/s ∼27% -5%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (46.7 - 703, n=224)
188 MBit/s ∼100% +230%
Oukitel U18
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 64 GB eMMC Flash
102 MBit/s ∼54% +79%
Ulefone Power 3
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
99.1 MBit/s ∼53% +74%
Huawei Y7 2018
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
56.9 MBit/s ∼30%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
55.7 MBit/s ∼30% -2%
Huawei Y7
Adreno 505, 435, 16 GB eMMC Flash
50.6 MBit/s ∼27% -11%
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 520 – Overview
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 520 – Overview
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 520 – Small wooded area
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 520 – Small wooded area
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 520 – Bridge
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 520 – Bridge
GPS Test: Huawei Y7 2018 – Overview
GPS Test: Huawei Y7 2018 – Overview
GPS Test: Huawei Y7 2018 – Small wooded area
GPS Test: Huawei Y7 2018 – Small wooded area
GPS Test: Huawei Y7 2018 - Bridge
GPS Test: Huawei Y7 2018 - Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
361
cd/m²
389
cd/m²
336
cd/m²
365
cd/m²
393
cd/m²
347
cd/m²
354
cd/m²
384
cd/m²
354
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 393 cd/m² Átlag: 364.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.44 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 85 %
Centrumban: 334 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1355:1 (Fekete: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.28 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 4.2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
92.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.6
Huawei Y7 2018
IPS, 1440x720, 5.99
Huawei Y7
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.99
Oukitel U18
LCD IPS, 1512x720, 5.85
Ulefone Power 3
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Screen
8%
9%
-20%
8%
Brightness middle
393
467
19%
620
58%
565
44%
494
26%
Brightness
365
456
25%
612
68%
535
47%
485
33%
Brightness Distribution
85
92
8%
96
13%
83
-2%
87
2%
Black Level *
0.29
0.39
-34%
0.57
-97%
0.55
-90%
0.33
-14%
Contrast
1355
1197
-12%
1088
-20%
1027
-24%
1497
10%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.28
4.3
19%
3.46
34%
7.1
-34%
5.1
3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9
6.8
24%
7.88
12%
13.7
-52%
9.9
-10%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.2
3.5
17%
3.9
7%
6.2
-48%
3.5
17%
Gamma
2.6 92%
2.35 102%
2.073 116%
2.85 84%
2.16 111%
CCT
7086 92%
7273 89%
7230 90%
7153 91%
7253 90%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 9091 Hz ≤ 15 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 9091 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 15 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 9091 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 10727 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.4 ms rise
↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
27.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.8 ms rise
↘ 14.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41.6 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018
45687 Points ∼65%
Huawei Y7
43303 Points ∼61% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
60490 Points ∼86% +32%
Ulefone Power 3
54201 Points ∼77% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (42798 - 47066, n=13)
44987 Points ∼64% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (23540 - 230421, n=318)
70716 Points ∼100% +55%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018
59421 Points ∼54%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
76178 Points ∼69% +28%
Oukitel U18
54989 Points ∼50% -7%
Ulefone Power 3
54192 Points ∼49% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (44992 - 59421, n=6)
55448 Points ∼50% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (42032 - 290397, n=93)
110891 Points ∼100% +87%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018
3874 Points ∼79%
Huawei Y7
3928 Points ∼80% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
4905 Points ∼100% +27%
Oukitel U18
3358 Points ∼68% -13%
Ulefone Power 3
4770 Points ∼97% +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (3508 - 3874, n=11)
3685 Points ∼75% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (3210 - 8601, n=182)
4480 Points ∼91% +16%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018
4918 Points ∼78%
Huawei Y7
5365 Points ∼85% +9%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
5801 Points ∼91% +18%
Oukitel U18
4532 Points ∼71% -8%
Ulefone Power 3
6344 Points ∼100% +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (3347 - 5290, n=13)
4592 Points ∼72% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (4711 - 10264, n=345)
4696 Points ∼74% -5%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018
673 Points ∼81%
Huawei Y7
606 Points ∼73% -10%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
722 Points ∼87% +7%
Oukitel U18
698 Points ∼84% +4%
Ulefone Power 3
829 Points ∼100% +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (10 - 866, n=13)
442 Points ∼53% -34%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1682, n=420)
673 Points ∼81% 0%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018
739 Points ∼49%
Huawei Y7
768 Points ∼51% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
1017 Points ∼67% +38%
Oukitel U18
640 Points ∼42% -13%
Ulefone Power 3
855 Points ∼56% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (715 - 788, n=13)
740 Points ∼49% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 9248, n=420)
1514 Points ∼100% +105%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018
1144 Points ∼73%
Huawei Y7
686 Points ∼44% -40%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
961 Points ∼61% -16%
Oukitel U18
798 Points ∼51% -30%
Ulefone Power 3
1566 Points ∼100% +37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (530 - 1144, n=13)
738 Points ∼47% -35%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4423, n=420)
1115 Points ∼71% -3%
System (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018
1906 Points ∼59%
Huawei Y7
1790 Points ∼55% -6%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
3236 Points ∼100% +70%
Oukitel U18
1838 Points ∼57% -4%
Ulefone Power 3
2906 Points ∼90% +52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (1281 - 2154, n=13)
1695 Points ∼52% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 10281, n=420)
2222 Points ∼69% +17%
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018
1020 Points ∼76%
Huawei Y7
869 Points ∼65% -15%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
1229 Points ∼92% +20%
Oukitel U18
899 Points ∼67% -12%
Ulefone Power 3
1340 Points ∼100% +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (263 - 1020, n=13)
674 Points ∼50% -34%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 4308, n=423)
1131 Points ∼84% +11%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018
2133 Points ∼55%
Huawei Y7
2235 Points ∼57% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
3316 Points ∼85% +55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (1731 - 2224, n=8)
2017 Points ∼52% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 14362, n=118)
3891 Points ∼100% +82%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018
2889 Points ∼67%
Huawei Y7
2866 Points ∼67% -1%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
4292 Points ∼100% +49%
Oukitel U18
2617 Points ∼61% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (2270 - 2889, n=11)
2572 Points ∼60% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 10558, n=164)
4032 Points ∼94% +40%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018
676 Points ∼56%
Huawei Y7
645 Points ∼54% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
870 Points ∼73% +29%
Oukitel U18
608 Points ∼51% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (619 - 681, n=11)
654 Points ∼55% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 4265, n=165)
1200 Points ∼100% +78%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018
1258 Points ∼62%
Huawei Y7
1340 Points ∼66% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
2038 Points ∼100% +62%
Oukitel U18
1195 Points ∼59% -5%
Ulefone Power 3
1240 Points ∼61% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (1034 - 1360, n=13)
1197 Points ∼59% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (531 - 3669, n=272)
1552 Points ∼76% +23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018
255 Points ∼24%
Huawei Y7
281 Points ∼26% +10%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
379 Points ∼36% +49%
Oukitel U18
329 Points ∼31% +29%
Ulefone Power 3
54 Points ∼5% -79%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (240 - 271, n=13)
250 Points ∼23% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (53 - 5212, n=272)
1065 Points ∼100% +318%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018
310 Points ∼30%
Huawei Y7
341 Points ∼33% +10%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
463 Points ∼45% +49%
Oukitel U18
393 Points ∼39% +27%
Ulefone Power 3
69 Points ∼7% -78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (290 - 330, n=13)
304 Points ∼30% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 4732, n=280)
1018 Points ∼100% +228%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018
1280 Points ∼62%
Huawei Y7
1360 Points ∼66% +6%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
2058 Points ∼100% +61%
Oukitel U18
1219 Points ∼59% -5%
Ulefone Power 3
1237 Points ∼60% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (1002 - 1339, n=13)
1197 Points ∼58% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (537 - 3642, n=302)
1449 Points ∼70% +13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018
524 Points ∼37%
Huawei Y7
533 Points ∼37% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
732 Points ∼51% +40%
Oukitel U18
484 Points ∼34% -8%
Ulefone Power 3
57 Points ∼4% -89%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (483 - 533, n=13)
507 Points ∼36% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (54 - 8252, n=302)
1428 Points ∼100% +173%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018
603 Points ∼49%
Huawei Y7
616 Points ∼50% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
854 Points ∼70% +42%
Oukitel U18
559 Points ∼46% -7%
Ulefone Power 3
72 Points ∼6% -88%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (554 - 605, n=13)
581 Points ∼47% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 6378, n=310)
1228 Points ∼100% +104%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018
9153 Points ∼59%
Huawei Y7
9345 Points ∼60% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
15593 Points ∼100% +70%
Oukitel U18
10143 Points ∼65% +11%
Ulefone Power 3
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (8973 - 10364, n=12)
9183 Points ∼59% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (5462 - 36494, n=455)
12109 Points ∼78% +32%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018
9713 Points ∼63%
Huawei Y7
10152 Points ∼65% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
13219 Points ∼85% +36%
Oukitel U18
10100 Points ∼65% +4%
Ulefone Power 3
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (9602 - 10271, n=12)
9756 Points ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2396 - 113380, n=455)
15527 Points ∼100% +60%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018
9583 Points ∼70%
Huawei Y7
9961 Points ∼73% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
13682 Points ∼100% +43%
Oukitel U18
10117 Points ∼74% +6%
Ulefone Power 3
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (9457 - 9977, n=13)
9613 Points ∼70% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2841 - 64405, n=456)
13411 Points ∼98% +40%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018
16 fps ∼60%
Huawei Y7
17 fps ∼63% +6%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
23 fps ∼86% +44%
Oukitel U18
17 fps ∼63% +6%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (16 - 18, n=13)
16.5 fps ∼62% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (4.2 - 177, n=481)
26.8 fps ∼100% +68%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018
27 fps ∼100%
Huawei Y7
24 fps ∼89% -11%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
17 fps ∼63% -37%
Oukitel U18
25 fps ∼93% -7%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (14 - 27, n=13)
19.8 fps ∼73% -27%
Average of class Smartphone (7.5 - 120, n=484)
23.4 fps ∼87% -13%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018
7.1 fps ∼50%
Huawei Y7
7.5 fps ∼52% +6%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
9.9 fps ∼69% +39%
Oukitel U18
6.8 fps ∼48% -4%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (7.1 - 7.7, n=13)
7.19 fps ∼50% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 88.2, n=406)
14.3 fps ∼100% +101%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018
14 fps ∼88%
Huawei Y7
16 fps ∼100% +14%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
9.4 fps ∼59% -33%
Oukitel U18
13 fps ∼81% -7%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (6.6 - 15, n=13)
10.5 fps ∼66% -25%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=408)
14.4 fps ∼90% +3%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018
4.6 fps ∼37%
Huawei Y7
2.3 fps ∼18% -50%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
6.5 fps ∼52% +41%
Oukitel U18
4.6 fps ∼37% 0%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (2.2 - 4.9, n=13)
4.24 fps ∼34% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 60, n=271)
12.5 fps ∼100% +172%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018
10 fps ∼80%
Huawei Y7
12 fps ∼96% +20%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
6.2 fps ∼50% -38%
Oukitel U18
10 fps ∼80% 0%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (4.3 - 11, n=13)
7.29 fps ∼58% -27%
Average of class Smartphone (2.5 - 110, n=273)
12.5 fps ∼100% +25%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018
2.6 fps ∼30%
Huawei Y7
2.7 fps ∼31% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
3.5 fps ∼41% +35%
Oukitel U18
2.4 fps ∼28% -8%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (2.5 - 2.7, n=13)
2.55 fps ∼30% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (0.77 - 35, n=202)
8.61 fps ∼100% +231%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018
5.4 fps ∼69%
Huawei Y7
5.9 fps ∼76% +9%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
3.4 fps ∼44% -37%
Oukitel U18
2.4 fps ∼31% -56%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (2.4 - 5.9, n=13)
3.9 fps ∼50% -28%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 50, n=205)
7.8 fps ∼100% +44%

Legend

 
Huawei Y7 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Y7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Oukitel U18 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Ulefone Power 3 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 224, n=339)
34.4 Points ∼100% +93%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)
23.097 Points ∼67% +29%
Ulefone Power 3 (Standardbrowser 7.1.1)
22.91 Points ∼67% +28%
Huawei Y7 (Chrome 60)
20.6 Points ∼60% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (17.6 - 21.5, n=12)
19.4 Points ∼56% +9%
Oukitel U18 (Chrome 65)
18.33 Points ∼53% +3%
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66)
17.86 Points ∼52%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 35255, n=475)
5013 Points ∼100% +49%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)
4424 Points ∼88% +32%
Oukitel U18 (Chrome 65)
3377 Points ∼67% 0%
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66)
3363 Points ∼67%
Huawei Y7 (Chrome 60)
3209 Points ∼64% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (2604 - 3438, n=13)
3160 Points ∼63% -6%
Ulefone Power 3 (Standardbrowser 7.1.1)
3155 Points ∼63% -6%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Ulefone Power 3 (Standardbrowser 7.1.1)
23714.1 ms * ∼100% -75%
Oukitel U18 (Chrome 65)
14565.8 ms * ∼61% -8%
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66)
13541 ms * ∼57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (10396 - 13730, n=13)
12275 ms * ∼52% +9%
Average of class Smartphone (718 - 59466, n=494)
11873 ms * ∼50% +12%
Huawei Y7 (Chrome 60)
11007 ms * ∼46% +19%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)
10895 ms * ∼46% +20%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)
112 Points ∼100% +37%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=237)
98.3 Points ∼88% +20%
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66)
82 Points ∼73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (42 - 82, n=9)
60.4 Points ∼54% -26%
Huawei Y7 (Chrome 60)
44 Points ∼39% -46%
Ulefone Power 3 (Standardbrowser 7.1.1)
43 Points ∼38% -48%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei Y7 2018Huawei Y7Xiaomi Redmi 5 PlusOukitel U18Ulefone Power 3Average 16 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-16%
42%
5%
69%
-40%
-9%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
61.5
62.61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
59.46
-3%
47.02 (Tosh-iba Exceria Pro M401)
-24%
71.87 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
17%
35.2 (51.5 - 64.3, n=95)
-43%
43 (20.8 - 87.1, n=253)
-30%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
85
82.48 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
84.38
-1%
71.52 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-16%
81.82 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
53.8 (79.7 - 87.7, n=95)
-37%
61.4 (36.5 - 96.5, n=253)
-28%
Random Write 4KB
9.5
6.9
-27%
7.1
-25%
12.96
36%
21.25
124%
7.12 (0.49 - 37.9, n=210)
-25%
13.3 (0.14 - 164, n=528)
40%
Random Read 4KB
38.8
53.15
37%
79.5
105%
28.7
-26%
61.38
58%
19 (2.49 - 61.7, n=210)
-51%
34 (1.59 - 173, n=528)
-12%
Sequential Write 256KB
71.5
33.2
-54%
194.5
172%
109.2
53%
214.88
201%
40.7 (8.74 - 128, n=210)
-43%
70.1 (2.99 - 216, n=528)
-2%
Sequential Read 256KB
256
119.4
-53%
270
5%
273.1
7%
294.58
15%
153 (9.66 - 284, n=210)
-40%
208 (12.1 - 832, n=528)
-19%
Shadow Fight 3
 BeállításokÉrték
 high47 fps
 minimal47 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Arena of Valor
 BeállításokÉrték
 min31 fps
 high HD30 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Max. terhelés
 37.9 °C33.2 °C34.1 °C 
 36.9 °C33.3 °C35.2 °C 
 35.6 °C33.3 °C33.9 °C 
Maximum: 37.9 °C
Átlag: 34.8 °C
31.7 °C34.3 °C38.3 °C
32.4 °C34 °C38.1 °C
32.6 °C33.9 °C36.1 °C
Maximum: 38.3 °C
Átlag: 34.6 °C
Tápegység (max.)  37.8 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
The maximum temp on the upper side is 37.9 °C, compared to the average of 35.9 °C ranging from 21.1 °C to 71 °C for class Smartphone.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2025.917.22528.626.93130.327.54026.819.25031.3216324.516.88024.716.610020.613.612518.112.516022.811.120022.410.425028.69.731534.99.340042.58.250047.36.863055.36.880060.46.4100062.56125064.65.9160063.75.3200063.25.4250064.15.13150665.2400067.95.6500069.95.1630066.35.2800059.85.31000056.55.51250048.75.41600041.65.5SPL21.976.818N0.434.80.1median 56.5Huawei Y7 2018median 5.9Delta14.11.731.637.925.439.225.332.732.92733.627.831.628.828.428.32731.220.8312232.221.337.820.843.621.249.419.457.219.561.617.766.917.971.717.873.317.375.917.475.616.776.917.276.218.270.517.969.217.676.617.77517.875.517.976.318.170.718.260.63085.91.364.9median 17.9Huawei Y7median 70.51.313.5hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei Y7 2018 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei Y7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.2 / 0.6 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.9 / 2.3 Watt
Terhelés midlight 4.7 / 5.7 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei Y7 2018
3000 mAh
Huawei Y7
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
4000 mAh
Oukitel U18
4000 mAh
Ulefone Power 3
6080 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
28%
-18%
-59%
23%
3%
10%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
0.57
37%
0.7
22%
1.12
-24%
0.79
12%
0.824 (0.52 - 1.4, n=14)
8%
0.86 (0.2 - 3.4, n=557)
4%
Idle Average *
1.9
1.61
15%
2.8
-47%
2.27
-19%
1.82
4%
1.964 (1.4 - 4.17, n=14)
-3%
1.694 (0.6 - 6.2, n=556)
11%
Idle Maximum *
2.3
1.62
30%
3.4
-48%
2.49
-8%
1.87
19%
2.14 (1.52 - 4.2, n=14)
7%
1.934 (0.74 - 6.6, n=557)
16%
Load Average *
4.7
3.09
34%
4.2
11%
10.75
-129%
2.7
43%
3.92 (2.85 - 7.5, n=14)
17%
3.97 (0.8 - 10.8, n=551)
16%
Load Maximum *
5.7
4.26
25%
7.2
-26%
12.39
-117%
3.62
36%
6.37 (4.88 - 13.7, n=14)
-12%
5.59 (1.2 - 14.2, n=551)
2%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
21h 45min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10h 24min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 27min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
4h 05min
Huawei Y7 2018
3000 mAh
Huawei Y7
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
4000 mAh
Oukitel U18
4000 mAh
Ulefone Power 3
6080 mAh
Battery Runtime
36%
-20%
2%
121%
Reader / Idle
1305
1914
47%
H.264
687
812
18%
WiFi v1.3
624
716
15%
497
-20%
639
2%
1376
121%
Load
245
402
64%

Pro

+ strapabíró ház
+ dual-SIM és microSD foglalat
+ elég pontos GPS
+ nagy kontraszt
+ jó színvisszaadás
+ nincs lefojtás
+ viszonylag hűvös marad
+ jó üzemidő

Kontra

- elavult Android biztonsági frissítések
- nincs 5 GHz-es WiFi
- nem elég érzékeny mikrofon – csak a hangos zajokat veszi
- sötét kijelző
The Huawei Y7 2018 in review. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de
The Huawei Y7 2018 in review. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

A Huawei Y7 2018 első blikkre jó vételnek tűnik, hála a modern designnak, viszonylag nagy felbontású előlapi kamerának, és az alacsony árnak. Ezeket a pozitívumokat azonban lenyomja pár hátrány. Egész pontosan a kijelző sötétsége, valamint az elavult Android patchek.

Az üzemidő viszont megfelelő, a kivitelezés jó, és a GPS ebben az árfekvésben elég pontosnak számít. A képek is meglepően élesek.

A rendszer teljesítménye is megfelel a kategóriájának, a mono hangszóró is elfogadható. A készülék terhelés alatt sem melegszik túl erősen.

Frusztráló, de az Y7 2018 egyes dolgokban nem jobb elődjénél. Az üzemideje rosszabb, a hangszórója gyengébb, a teljesítménye azonos, valamint a modeme lassabb, kevesebb támogatott LTE sávval.

A Huawei Y7 2017 jó választás lehet azok számára, akik egy nagy kijelzős okostelefont keresnek alacsony áron.

Az Y7 2018 egy olcsó phablet, amely kategóriájában ár/érték arány nyertes maradt, a riválisok erőfeszítései ellenére is.

Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű cikk itt olvasható.

Huawei Y7 2018 - 05/30/2018 v6
Florian Wimmer

Váz
77%
Billentyűzet
65 / 75 → 87%
Érintőpad
83%
Csatlakoztathatóság
37 / 60 → 61%
Súly
92%
Akkumulátor
93%
Kijelző
84%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
20 / 63 → 31%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
44 / 70 → 62%
Hőmérséklet
90%
Zaj
100%
Audio
51 / 91 → 56%
Camera
53%
Átlag
68%
79%
Smartphone - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Huawei Y7 2018 Smartphone rövid értékelés
Florian Wimmer, 2018-06- 6 (Update: 2018-06- 6)