Notebookcheck

Huawei MateBook X (i5-7200U, 256 GB) Subnotebook rövid értékelés

Sven Kloevekorn (fordította Tamás Somogyi), 07/31/2017
Kaby Lake Notebook Windows

Újonc, űrtechnológiával. A Huawei első 3:2-es formátumú laptopja főleg a ház és a kijelző miatt lett szimpatikus. Az innovatív hűtési megoldás különösen érdekes. Kezdetben gondjaink voltak a beviteli eszközökkel, és még inkább a rövid üzemidővel. Cikkünkből kiderül, hogy vajon miért gondoljuk ennek ellenére sikeres belépőnek.

Huawei MateBook X (MateBook Széria)
Processzor
Intel Core i5-7200U
Grafikus adapter
Intel HD Graphics 620, Mag: 300 - 1000 MHz, Memória: 1866 MHz, Shared Memory, 21.20.16.4664
Memória
8192 MB 
, LPDDR3, dual channel, beforrasztott, nem bővíthető
Kijelző
13.3 hüvelyk 16:9, 2160x1440 pixel 195 PPI, Chi Mei CMN8201 / P130ZDZ-EF1, fényes: igen
Alaplap
Intel Kaby Lake-U iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH
Háttértár
LITEON CB1-SD256, 256 GB 
, 256 GB / 512 GB SSD, 195 GB ingyenes
Hangkártya
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Csatlakozók
1 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Ujjlenyomat olvasó
Hálózat
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 12.5 x 286 x 211
Akkumulátor
40 Wh Lítium-Polimer
Operációs rendszer
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
További jellegzetességek
Billentyűzet: chiclet, Billentyűzet háttérvilágítás: igen, fanless
Súly
1.05 kg
Hivatkozások

 

Size Comparison

Left side: USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-C with charge function, audio in/out (Photo by Huawei, our own picture came out badly)
Left side: USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-C with charge function, audio in/out (Photo by Huawei, our own picture came out badly)
Right side: USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-C with DisplayPort
Right side: USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-C with DisplayPort
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
608 MBit/s ∼100% +17%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
577 MBit/s ∼95% +11%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
525 MBit/s ∼86% +1%
Huawei MateBook X
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
520 MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei MateBook X
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
644 MBit/s ∼100%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
618 MBit/s ∼96% -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
614 MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
575 MBit/s ∼89% -11%
403
cd/m²
409
cd/m²
403
cd/m²
380
cd/m²
408
cd/m²
383
cd/m²
402
cd/m²
407
cd/m²
361
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 409 cd/m² Átlag: 395.1 cd/m² Minimum: 6.3 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 88 %
Centrumban: 408 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 907:1 (Fekete: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.55 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 1.91 | - Ø
96% sRGB (Argyll) 61% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.34
Huawei MateBook X
Chi Mei CMN8201 / P130ZDZ-EF1, , 2160x1440, 13.3
HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA
Sharp SHP1465, , 3200x1800, 13.3
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Sharp SHP1449 LQ133M1, , 1920x1080, 13.3
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB
LG Philips LP133WF4-SPB1 (LGD04EF), , 1920x1080, 13.3
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
LG Display LP123WQ112604, , 2736x1824, 12.3
Response Times
-18%
-19%
-29%
-24%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
33 (15, 18)
42.4 (17.2, 25.2)
-28%
32.8 (16, 16.8)
1%
45 (12, 33)
-36%
42 (20, 22)
-27%
Response Time Black / White *
24 (12, 12)
25.6 (11.6, 14)
-7%
33.2 (10.8, 22.4)
-38%
29 (6, 23)
-21%
29 (18, 11)
-21%
PWM Frequency
21000
Screen
-26%
-66%
-34%
-6%
Brightness
395
369
-7%
325
-18%
306
-23%
401
2%
Brightness Distribution
88
85
-3%
89
1%
81
-8%
88
0%
Black Level *
0.45
0.35
22%
0.195
57%
0.3
33%
0.29
36%
Contrast
907
1146
26%
1801
99%
1143
26%
1438
59%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.55
3.5
-126%
7.4
-377%
4.73
-205%
3.63
-134%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.91
4.13
-116%
6.71
-251%
3.29
-72%
2.18
-14%
Gamma
2.34 103%
2.28 105%
2.74 88%
2.36 102%
3.09 78%
CCT
6491 100%
6508 100%
7222 90%
6437 101%
6767 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
61
61.56
1%
50.48
-17%
54
-11%
63
3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
96
94.64
-1%
73.31
-24%
83
-14%
99
3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-22% / -24%
-43% / -57%
-32% / -33%
-15% / -9%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12 ms rise
↘ 12 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
33 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.4 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8499 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Intel Core i5-7300U
141 Points ∼100% +22%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Intel Core i5-7200U
124 Points ∼88% +7%
Huawei MateBook X
Intel Core i5-7200U
116 Points ∼82%
HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA
Intel Core m7-6Y75
114 Points ∼81% -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB
Intel Core i7-7500U
110 Points ∼78% -5%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Intel Core i5-7300U
334 Points ∼100% +4%
Huawei MateBook X
Intel Core i5-7200U
322 Points ∼96%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Intel Core i5-7200U
318 Points ∼95% -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB
Intel Core i7-7500U
293 Points ∼88% -9%
HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA
Intel Core m7-6Y75
283 Points ∼85% -12%
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
322 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
116 Points
Segítség
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
4568 Points ∼100% +7%
Huawei MateBook X
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, LITEON CB1-SD256
4276 Points ∼94%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
4184 Points ∼92% -2%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M
3983 Points ∼87% -7%
HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-512G-1006
3784 Points ∼83% -12%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
3535 Points ∼100% +1%
Huawei MateBook X
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, LITEON CB1-SD256
3507 Points ∼99%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
3147 Points ∼89% -10%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M
2936 Points ∼83% -16%
HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-512G-1006
2838 Points ∼80% -19%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3507 pontok
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4276 pontok
Segítség
Huawei MateBook X
LITEON CB1-SD256
HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA
Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-512G-1006
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Samsung PM971 KUS030202M
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-21%
41%
117%
30%
Write 4k QD32
257.5
192.8
-25%
218.3
-15%
321.4
25%
373
45%
Read 4k QD32
498.9
311.3
-38%
479.2
-4%
407.5
-18%
423
-15%
Write 4k
68.14
75.91
11%
116.9
72%
121.5
78%
125
83%
Read 4k
29.48
30.34
3%
29.31
-1%
54.75
86%
46
56%
Write 512
310.3
335.3
8%
439.9
42%
1244
301%
445
43%
Read 512
504.2
239.9
-52%
1036
105%
1165
131%
225
-55%
Write Seq
461.2
348.7
-24%
732.6
59%
1472
219%
853
85%
Read Seq
740.6
387.5
-48%
1233
66%
1577
113%
723
-2%
LITEON CB1-SD256
Sequential Read: 740.6 MB/s
Sequential Write: 461.2 MB/s
512K Read: 504.2 MB/s
512K Write: 310.3 MB/s
4K Read: 29.48 MB/s
4K Write: 68.14 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 498.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 257.5 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-7500U
2447 Points ∼100% +60%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1545 Points ∼63% +1%
Huawei MateBook X
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1528 Points ∼62%
HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m7-6Y75
1132 Points ∼46% -26%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-7500U
1940 Points ∼100% +122%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
963 Points ∼50% +10%
HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m7-6Y75
892 Points ∼46% +2%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7300U
889 Points ∼46% +2%
Huawei MateBook X
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
875 Points ∼45%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-7500U
13075 Points ∼100% +73%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
8177 Points ∼63% +8%
Huawei MateBook X
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
7542 Points ∼58%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7300U
7265 Points ∼56% -4%
HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m7-6Y75
6684 Points ∼51% -11%
3DMark 11 Performance
1667 pontok
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
54224 pontok
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
5691 pontok
3DMark Fire Strike Score
785 pontok
Segítség
alacsony közepes magas ultra
Battlefield 1 (2016) 11.7fps
Farming Simulator 17 (2016) 61.240.814fps
For Honor (2017) 20.2fps
Stress test: Prime95 + FurMark
Stress test: Prime95 + FurMark
Üresjárat
 26.5 °C26.1 °C25.7 °C 
 25 °C25.5 °C25.1 °C 
 24.5 °C24 °C25.1 °C 
Maximum: 26.5 °C
Átlag: 25.3 °C
26.6 °C26.5 °C26.9 °C
26.1 °C26.2 °C26.4 °C
25.5 °C25.5 °C25.5 °C
Maximum: 26.9 °C
Átlag: 26.1 °C
Tápegység (max.)  34.2 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 23 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.435.335.42537.234.637.23137.932.237.94042.632.342.65041.93141.96341.829.841.88044.727.244.71004627.34612545.425.245.416048.82448.820051.923.951.925053.722.853.731562.322.162.340064.420.864.45006620.36663063.819.563.880058.51958.5100058.317.758.3125055.817.455.8160057.616.857.6200062.216.862.2250062.516.662.5315059.216.659.2400058.216.658.250006116.661630063.316.763.3800059.416.759.41000054.116.954.11250052.916.952.9160004716.847SPL72.829.972.8N33.11.333.1median 58.3Huawei MateBook Xmedian 17.4median 58.3Delta5.22.35.238.436.935.938.435.936.83335.936.236.835.936.23838.835.43835.535.935.135.535.335.634.835.33637.136.3363737.738.8373939.538.63937.933.131.737.949.940.331.149.957.346.531.357.363.253.430.563.267.857.229.467.871.961.528.371.976.366.427.876.37666.227.47675.164.826.675.171.460.826.571.476.866.826.376.87463.525.87473.86325.773.87564.625.47571.160.425.371.170.159.525.470.167.25925.367.271.160.924.971.168.458.925.168.465.655.625.865.660.649.624.660.6median 70.1HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EAmedian 59.5median 26.5median 70.17.772.67.736.336.236.336.137.436.134.832.734.834.431.434.432.433.132.433.232.433.236.331.936.336.729.536.742.230.142.252.527.652.552.527.752.556.726.856.756.82756.856.725.756.755.224.955.26124.36160.523.960.561.423.761.461.423.361.459.723.259.759.822.759.855.922.755.950.722.750.757.722.757.758.422.758.454.222.854.255.122.855.153.622.753.649.722.749.741.122.941.170.435.570.4282.528median 55.9Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5median 23.3median 55.93.72.23.732.634.232.642.241.242.24443.34435.836.535.83235.63230.828.830.828.727.828.729.726.429.729.225.629.232.323.832.334.523.634.546.122.346.158.121.458.164.720.764.763.820.363.864.71964.775.718.675.769.518.169.562.717.962.765.217.865.265.117.665.162.517.662.559.618.159.657.218.157.25818.35857.918.557.953.418.453.459.718.559.767.218.367.267.618.367.67830.67838.71.538.7median 59.7Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKBmedian 18.5median 59.77.71.97.736353637.428.237.435.825.435.83729.83737.928.537.940.728.940.740.429.140.440.928.940.943.528.443.545274548.723.848.75022.75056.721.956.758.320.958.358.120.558.162.219.562.264.918.464.960.818.260.860.917.860.961.21861.267.817.867.865.217.865.260.317.960.35817.95855.81855.856.71856.757.117.957.156.117.856.145.117.745.142.517.842.57430.77432.31.532.3median 57.1Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5median 18median 57.15.92.15.9hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Huawei MateBook X audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 20%, worst was 47%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 20%, worst was 47%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.35 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 20%, worst was 47%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 20%, worst was 47%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 23%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.4 / 0.64 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 4.6 / 11 / 12 Watt
Terhelés midlight 39.5 / 34.6 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei MateBook X
7200U, HD Graphics 620, LITEON CB1-SD256, , 2160x1440, 13.3
HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA
6Y75, HD Graphics 515, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-512G-1006, IPS, 3200x1800, 13.3
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB
7500U, GeForce 940MX, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
7300U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3
Power Consumption
20%
38%
10%
28%
Idle Minimum *
4.6
4
13%
4.1
11%
3.6
22%
3.6
22%
Idle Average *
11
8
27%
4.2
62%
7.4
33%
8.1
26%
Idle Maximum *
12
8.6
28%
5.1
57%
8.7
27%
8.7
27%
Load Average *
39.5
26.5
33%
22.1
44%
43
-9%
25.5
35%
Load Maximum *
34.6
34.8
-1%
29.4
15%
42
-21%
23.5
32%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
8h 32min
WiFi böngészés v1.3
5h 37min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
2h 42min
Huawei MateBook X
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 40 Wh
HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA
6Y75, HD Graphics 515, 40 Wh
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB
7500U, GeForce 940MX, 46 Wh
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
7300U, HD Graphics 620, 45 Wh
Battery Runtime
0%
84%
-18%
77%
Reader / Idle
512
618
21%
1295
153%
468
-9%
1054
106%
WiFi v1.3
337
305
-9%
677
101%
338
0%
744
121%
Load
162
144
-11%
157
-3%
89
-45%
168
4%
H.264
377

Pro

+ jól összeszerelt ház
+ nagyon stabil fedél
+ kompakt, nagyon keskeny keretek
+ 3:2 képarány
+ jól átgondolt adapter
+ DisplayPort USB-C által
+ ujjlenyomat olvasó az on/off gombba építve
+ TPM 2.0
+ passzív hűtés, tökéletesen hangtalan
+ nagyon világos kijelző, jó színhűség
+ kellemes hangzás

Kontra

- csak 2x USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-C
- nincs Kensington, sem kártyaolvasó
- kissé szivacsos érzetű billentyűzet
- nem optimális kontraszt
- tükröződő kijelző
- kültéren alig használható
- masszív CPU/GPU lefojtás tartós, erős terhelés alatt
- CPU terhelés nélkül nem mozdul 3.1 GHz-ről
- közepes üzemidő
The Huawei MateBook X - provided by notebooksbilliger.de
The Huawei MateBook X - provided by notebooksbilliger.de

Véleményünk szerint a Huawei belépője a notebook piacra, jól sikerült. A remekül összerakott MateBook X az elterjedőben lévő 3:2 formátummal nagyon kompakt, strapabíró lett, emellett jól néz ki, és egy új, passzív MEPCM hűtéssel szerelték fel, amely elég a mindennapokban, így jól ki tudja aknázni a hardverben rejlő potenciált, és csak tartós terhelés esetén bicsaklik meg. A belepakolt biztonsági funkciók - például az ujjlenyomat olvasó és a TPM 2.0 - is mobilitását hangsúlyozzák

A tesztelő által szuboptimálisnak ítélt billentyűzet halványabb visszajelzéséhez hozzá lehet szokni. A túl magas fogyasztás - és az ebből következő, kiábrándító üzemidő - talán javítható egy BIOS/UEFI frissítéssel. A Huawei-nek ezen mindenképpen segítenie kell. A touchpaddal kapcsolatban még nincs végleges véleményünk.

A szegényes csatlakozókínálat, amelyet a mellé adott (amúgy átgondolt) adapterrel tudunk csak orvosolni, már más kérdés, hiszen az adaptert így mindig vinnünk kell magunkkal. Ugyanakkor a ház design megvalósíthatósága valószínűleg megkívánta ezt a lépést. Az egyébként remek kijelző egyetlen gyenge pontja pedig a kissé magas fekete értékek, és a tükröződő felület.

Ha a Huawei vissza tudná fogni a fogyasztását, és ezzel megnövelni az üzemidejét, az innovatív MateBook X még egy lépéssel közelebb lenne a 90%-os értékhez. Az, hogy ennek ellenére is elért 87%-ot, az önmagáért beszél.

Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű cikk itt olvasható.

Huawei MateBook X - 07/26/2017 v6
Sven Kloevekorn

Váz
91 /  98 → 92%
Billentyűzet
84%
Érintőpad
84%
Csatlakoztathatóság
41 / 80 → 51%
Súly
74 / 78 → 92%
Akkumulátor
86%
Kijelző
89%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
53 / 68 → 79%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
75 / 87 → 86%
Hőmérséklet
92 / 91 → 100%
Zaj
100%
Audio
69 / 91 → 76%
Camera
73 / 85 → 85%
Átlag
78%
88%
Subnotebook - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Huawei MateBook X (i5-7200U, 256 GB) Subnotebook rövid értékelés
Sven Kloevekorn, 2017-07-31 (Update: 2017-07-31)