Notebookcheck

Dell Vostro 15 3568 (7200U, 256GB) Laptop rövid értékelés

Sven Kloevekorn, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, Felicitas Krohn (fordította Tamás Somogyi), 12/18/2017
Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Windows

"I'm blue da ba dee..." A kijelző nem csak az extrém erős kékes színeltolódás miatt nem az ékköve ennek a 15 inches gazdaságos irodai notebooknak. A laptop egyébiránt elég alkalmas a tervezett céljára, mivel használható beviteli eszközökkel, TPM chippel, Windows 10 Pro-val, és opcionálisan még SSD-vel is ellátták.

Dell Vostro 15 3568 (Vostro 15 Széria)
Processzor
Intel Core i5-7200U
Grafikus adapter
Intel HD Graphics 620, Mag: 300 - 1000 MHz, megosztott memória, 21.20.16.4627
Memória
8 MB 
, DDR4, 2.400 MHz, single channel, 1/2 hely foglalt
Kijelző
15.6 hüvelyk 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, BOE0690 / NT15N41 / Dell C1JFR, TN LED, fényes: nem
Alaplap
Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH
Háttértár
Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, 256 GB 
Hangkártya
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Csatlakozók
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington zár, Audió csatlakozók: kombinált audio/mikrofon jack (3.5 mm), Kártyaolvasó: SD/SDHC/SDXC, Brightness Sensor
Hálózat
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1
Optikai meghajtó
HL-DT-ST DVD+-RW GU90N
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 23.6 x 380 x 260
Akkumulátor
40 Wh Lítium-Ion, removeable
Operációs rendszer
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webkamera: HD
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: sztereo, Billentyűzet: chiclet, Billentyűzet háttérvilágítás: nem, 12 Hónap Garancia
Súly
2.18 kg, Tápegység: 160 g
Ár
749 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

379 mm 261 mm 25.4 mm 2.3 kg380 mm 260 mm 23.6 mm 2.2 kg381.6 mm 259 mm 21.6 mm 2.4 kg361.4 mm 243.5 mm 17.9 mm 1.6 kg
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
77 MB/s ∼100% +247%
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
31.8 MB/s ∼41% +43%
Dell Vostro 15 3568
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
22.2 MB/s ∼29%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
86 MB/s ∼100% +274%
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
33.62 MB/s ∼39% +46%
Dell Vostro 15 3568
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
23 MB/s ∼27%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
639 MBit/s ∼100% +89%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
521 MBit/s ∼82% +54%
Dell Vostro 15 3568
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
338 MBit/s ∼53%
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
311 MBit/s ∼49% -8%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
650 MBit/s ∼100% +95%
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
490 MBit/s ∼75% +47%
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
345 MBit/s ∼53% +3%
Dell Vostro 15 3568
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
334 MBit/s ∼51%
207
cd/m²
197
cd/m²
200
cd/m²
195
cd/m²
195
cd/m²
187
cd/m²
188
cd/m²
198
cd/m²
184
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 207 cd/m² Átlag: 194.6 cd/m² Minimum: 11.6 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 89 %
Centrumban: 195 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 443:1 (Fekete: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 12.23 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 13.39 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
59% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.5
Dell Vostro 15 3568
BOE0690 / NT15N41 / Dell C1JFR, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4
AU Optronics AUO38ED, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00
Lenovo NT156WHM-N42, , 1366x768, 15.6
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
ID: LGD0573, Name: LG Display LP156WF9-SPK2, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
-11%
-45%
-69%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
39 (21, 18)
44 (22, 22)
-13%
46 (24, 22)
-18%
38.4 (19.2, 19.2)
2%
Response Time Black / White *
11 (7, 4)
12 (8, 4)
-9%
13 (8, 5)
-18%
26.4 (15.6, 10.8)
-140%
PWM Frequency
28410 (90)
200 (90)
-99%
Screen
26%
-2%
35%
Brightness middle
195
241
24%
242
24%
277.5
42%
Brightness
195
229
17%
233
19%
265
36%
Brightness Distribution
89
87
-2%
73
-18%
89
0%
Black Level *
0.44
0.46
-5%
0.59
-34%
0.35
20%
Contrast
443
524
18%
410
-7%
793
79%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
12.23
3.4
72%
10.9
11%
4.8
61%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
20.85
7.61
64%
20.84
-0%
17.8
15%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
13.39
1.7
87%
13.07
2%
3
78%
Gamma
2.5 88%
2.36 93%
2.37 93%
2.39 92%
CCT
15759 41%
6750 96%
13123 50%
6854 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
38
34
-11%
35
-8%
37.7
-1%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
59
54
-8%
55
-7%
69.3
17%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
8% / 20%
-24% / -12%
-17% / 17%

* ... smaller is better

vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.2 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (40.3 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 28410 Hz ≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 28410 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 28410 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9533 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
Intel Core i5-7200U
131 Points ∼100% +2%
Dell Vostro 15 3568
Intel Core i5-7200U
128 Points ∼98%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00
Intel Core i5-7200U
125 Points ∼95% -2%
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4
Intel Core i5-7200U
108 Points ∼82% -16%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
Intel Core i5-7200U
335 Points ∼100% +4%
Dell Vostro 15 3568
Intel Core i5-7200U
321 Points ∼96%
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4
Intel Core i5-7200U
318 Points ∼95% -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00
Intel Core i5-7200U
316 Points ∼94% -2%
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
321 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
128 Points
Segítség
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4857 Points ∼100% +7%
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY
4746 Points ∼98% +4%
Dell Vostro 15 3568
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
4544 Points ∼94%
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
4541 Points ∼93% 0%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY
3831 Points ∼100% +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3714 Points ∼97% +9%
Dell Vostro 15 3568
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
3417 Points ∼89%
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
3295 Points ∼86% -4%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3417 pontok
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4544 pontok
Segítség
Dell Vostro 15 3568
Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4
Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
53%
237%
21%
Write 4k QD32
147.1
300.2
104%
428.7
191%
94.27
-36%
Read 4k QD32
242.4
245.9
1%
473.6
95%
250.3
3%
Write 4k
68.66
86.66
26%
148.8
117%
64.61
-6%
Read 4k
26.01
26.95
4%
59.65
129%
19.48
-25%
Write 512
183.7
446.8
143%
782.9
326%
342
86%
Read 512
359.6
328
-9%
1155
221%
417.7
16%
Write Seq
179.7
456.1
154%
1217
577%
396
120%
Read Seq
469.3
485.8
4%
1589
239%
502.6
7%
Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
Sequential Read: 469.3 MB/s
Sequential Write: 179.7 MB/s
512K Read: 359.6 MB/s
512K Write: 183.7 MB/s
4K Read: 26.01 MB/s
4K Write: 68.66 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 242.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 147.1 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1587 Points ∼100% +11%
Dell Vostro 15 3568
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1424 Points ∼90%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1401 Points ∼88% -2%
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1067 Points ∼67% -25%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1055 Points ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
822 Points ∼78%
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
605 Points ∼57%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
8861 Points ∼100% +30%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
7152 Points ∼81% +5%
Dell Vostro 15 3568
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
6794 Points ∼77%
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
5790 Points ∼65% -15%
3DMark 11 Performance
1532 pontok
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
5611 pontok
Segítség
alacsony közepes magas ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 13.3fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 13.1fps
Farming Simulator 17 (2016) 42.716.6fps

Zajszint

Üresjárat
30.2 / 30.2 / 30.2 dB(A)
DVD
35.2 / dB(A)
Terhelés
36.4 / 36.5 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
csendes
40 dB(A)
hallható
50 dB(A)
hangos
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm távolságról)   environment noise: 30.2 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper HighsF(Hz) SPL(dB)202531405063801001251602002503154005006308001000125016002000250031504000500063008000100001250016000SPL 36.44 30.22 36.50 36.44N(Sone) 2.35 1.38 2.34 2.35Delta3230.529.129.834.331.131.628.731.230.931.231.130.830.432.231.53028.928.930.242.74129.429.443.228.628.425.827.82826.826.225.725.925.525.725.724.727.124.325.524.224.324.924.823.823.623.424.223.526.62322.622.526.823.121.721.421.523.123.922.221.120.724.123.72120.220.223.121.419.419.119.221.621.719.318.318.421.723.92017.718.123.826.321.517.617.525.924.42017.917.224.123.718.917.317.523.524.518.717.517.324.22218.117.617.321.621.217.917.717.620.919.617.717.817.619.319.317.817.817.719.418.517.91817.918.618.41818.21818.418.318.418.318.218.318.218.618.318.218.318.418.818.818.318.534.531.230.230.134.32.11.51.41.42.1median 23.1median 19.3median 18.3median 18.2median 23.12.41.71.31.42.234.235.533.135.534.234.436.133.538.634.43640.34248.23636.23637.935.636.233.133.536.13433.131.532.831.832.231.529.228.926.828.229.226.726.127.62726.726.526.426.424.326.523.823.82423.223.8232423.122.82322.222.422.522.322.221.121.52221.521.120.920.82120.220.92020.42019.22019.319.619.718.919.32019.118.918.42020.119.519.417.920.119.819.2191819.819.61919.417.619.620.819.719.617.520.820.319.219.517.920.318.918.418.51818.918.518.218.518.218.518.618.418.518.518.618.618.518.618.618.618.818.918.818.818.818.918.818.918.718.919191918.91919.219.219.219.119.231.731.431.430.731.71.61.61.61.51.6median 20median 19.2median 19.4median 18.8median 201.81.22.11.81.8hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAcer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00
Üresjárat
 25.1 °C24.5 °C22.7 °C 
 25 °C24.6 °C22.8 °C 
 24.6 °C24.4 °C23.4 °C 
Maximum: 25.1 °C
Átlag: 24.1 °C
22.7 °C24.4 °C25.1 °C
22.2 °C24.7 °C26.1 °C
22.5 °C23.5 °C24.1 °C
Maximum: 26.1 °C
Átlag: 23.9 °C
Tápegység (max.)  27 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 22 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 29.4 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 36.4 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.1 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 29.4 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.2 °C / 86.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (-2 °C / -3.6 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.531.732.5253035.1303130.734.730.74029.934.629.95034.437.634.46327.42827.48026.827.126.810027.925.227.912535.323.835.316042.223.542.220042.722.642.725053.72253.731555.220.755.240054.620.254.650053.719.253.763058.21858.280063.217.863.2100071.118.171.1125068.917.568.9160066.517.266.5200066.917.566.9250063.617.663.6315061.217.561.2400063.517.963.5500063.51863.5630065.818.165.880006118.3611000058.618.358.61250064.218.264.21600068.618.368.6SPL77.430.277.4N38.91.438.9median 61.2median 18.2median 61.2Delta5.61.35.630.829.830.831.131.231.130.230.430.231.328.931.343.229.443.228.327.828.325.825.925.825.627.125.626.524.926.530.824.230.832.722.532.741.321.541.347.120.747.153.420.253.451.119.251.154.818.454.86518.1657217.57269.717.269.762.117.562.164.417.364.46117.36162.317.662.364.117.664.162.617.762.654.617.954.657.31857.355.518.255.560.718.260.760.418.360.476.730.176.734.71.434.7median 57.3median 18.2median 57.38.31.48.334.635.534.634.738.634.742.748.242.736.835.636.837.43437.43532.2352928.22930.62730.635.624.335.647.823.247.853.922.853.951.922.351.950.421.550.462.420.262.462.219.262.259.718.959.764.318.464.364.117.964.170.31870.369.517.669.571.417.571.465.317.965.363.81863.867.418.267.466.218.566.267.318.667.359.918.859.959.618.759.651.218.951.246.719.146.778.830.778.843.11.543.1median 62.2median 18.8median 62.27.31.87.336.339.837.136.934.936.233.934.632.934.232.633.931.733.229.931.830.334.429.544.628.347.928.45326.956.526.358.62660.925.362.62560.825.156.924.46023.9632461.323.657.123.755.623.559.123.466.523.562.323.365.923.363.723.362.923.362.136.473.92.733.8median 24.4median 601.55.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseDell Vostro 15 3568Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
Dell Vostro 15 3568 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (71.05 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (71.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (66.45 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.24 / 0.31 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 3 / 5.5 / 5.7 Watt
Terhelés midlight 27 / 27.4 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Dell Vostro 15 3568
7200U, HD Graphics 620, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4
7200U, HD Graphics 620, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00
7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Power Consumption
-27%
-6%
-38%
Idle Minimum *
3
4.1
-37%
2.9
3%
4.6
-53%
Idle Average *
5.5
7.5
-36%
5.8
-5%
7.6
-38%
Idle Maximum *
5.7
8.9
-56%
6.6
-16%
7.7
-35%
Load Average *
27
28.1
-4%
29
-7%
35.1
-30%
Load Maximum *
27.4
28.3
-3%
29.4
-7%
36.2
-32%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
14h 34min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
6h 19min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
1h 49min
Dell Vostro 15 3568
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 40 Wh
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 37 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 42 Wh
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 42 Wh
Battery Runtime
-12%
8%
-33%
Reader / Idle
874
855
-2%
1083
24%
614
-30%
WiFi v1.3
379
350
-8%
430
13%
259
-32%
Load
109
81
-26%
95
-13%
70
-36%
H.264
387

Pro

+ nagyon olcsó
+ nem csúszós ház
+ TPM 2.0
+ könnyen kivehető telep
+ megfelelő-jó beviteli eszközök
+ nagyon energiatakarékos
+ az árához képest remek üzemidő
+ csendes és hűvös

Kontra

- viszonylag nagy és nehéz
- nem lehet egy kézzel kinyitni
- lassú USB 2.0 kártyaolvasó
- gyenge minőségű TN kijelző
- a színhőmérséklet 15759 K (normál: 6500 K), extrém kékes kép
- csak 1 év garancia
- magas hangú ventilátor
The Dell Vostro 15 3568 - provided by cyberport
The Dell Vostro 15 3568 - provided by cyberport

Az egyetlen alkatrész, amelyet igazán nem talált el a gyártó a Dell Vostro 15 3568 tervezésekor, az a gép árához képest is nagyon gyatra kijelző, amely gyárilag olyan erősen kékes elszíneződést mutat, amilyet még nem is láttunk. A képernyő többi hátránya azért messze nem ennyire vészes, a legjobb tulajdonsága a matt felszín.

Amennyiben a fentiektől el tudunk tekinteni (ez meglepően sok felhasználónak sikerül), egy egyszerű, korlátozottan mobilis irodai notebookot kapunk, amely megfelelően képes ellátni a feladatait. A telepe könnyen cserélhető, beépített TPM modul gondoskodik a biztonságosságáról, és a Windows 10 Pro lehetővé teszi a merevlemez titkosítását, valamint a bővített adminisztrátori funkciók elérését. A gép további előnyei közé tartoznak a jó beviteli eszközök, valamint a normális esetben halk és hűvös működés.

A Dell Vostro 15 3568 erényei a 256 GB SSD és a W10 Pro, amelyek egyesekkel feledtethetik a gyatra kijelzőt.

Az SSD és a Windows 10 Pro verziója feláras, és így a riválisokhoz közelebb tolja a készülék árát. Aki a minimalista változatot választja, az is elegendő teljesítményre számíthat az irodai munkához. A kijelző miatt viszont ajánlani nem tudjuk ezt a gépet.

Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű cikk itt olvasható.

Dell Vostro 15 3568 - 12/12/2017 v6
Sven Kloevekorn

Váz
74 / 98 → 76%
Billentyűzet
Érintőpad
88%
Csatlakoztathatóság
44 / 80 → 55%
Súly
62 / 20-67 → 89%
Akkumulátor
88%
Kijelző
73%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
55 / 68 → 81%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
84 / 92 → 91%
Hőmérséklet
95%
Zaj
91%
Camera
42 / 85 → 50%
Átlag
72%
81%
Office - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Dell Vostro 15 3568 (7200U, 256GB) Laptop rövid értékelés
Sven Kloevekorn, 2017-12-18 (Update: 2017-12-18)