Notebookcheck

Asus Zephyrus G15 laptop rövid értékelés: Szembetűnő

A nagy fehér cápa. Első látásra a Zephyrus G15 stílusos, sokoldalú laptopnak tűnhet. Viszont erős csúcskategóriás AMD és Nvidia hardver található a motorháztető alatt. Alaposan teszteltük a 15 hüvelykes gamer gépet.
Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (fordította Zoltán Kiss), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Cezanne (Zen 3) Geforce Gaming Laptop / Notebook
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q (ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503 Széria)
Processzor
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS 8 x 3.3 - 4.6 GHz, Cezanne H (Zen 3)
Grafikus adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU - 8192 MB, Mag: 1245 MHz, Memória: 1500 MHz, 100 W TDP, GDDR6, ForceWare 461.23, Optimus
Memória
32768 MB 
, 16 GB beépített 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-3200, max. 48 GB, minden hely foglalt
Kijelző
15.60 hüvelyk 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 188 PPI, CMN N156KME-GNA (CMN152A), IPS level, WQHD, fényes: nem, 165 Hz
Alaplap
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Háttértár
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N, 1024 GB 
, NVMe SSD M.2 2280 (1 hely üres)
Hangkártya
Realtek ALC289 @ AMD K17.6 - Audio Processor - High Definition Audio Controller
Csatlakozók
4 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington zár, Audió csatlakozók: 1 combined port (mic/headset), Kártyaolvasó: microSD
Hálózat
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 20 x 355 x 243
Akkumulátor
90 Wh Lítium-Ion
Operációs rendszer
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webkamera: HD
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: 6 hangszóró, Billentyűzet: chiclet, Billentyűzet háttérvilágítás: igen, 200 wattos hálózati adapter, Armoury Crate, 24 Hónap Garancia
Súly
1.99 kg, Tápegység: 490 g
Ár
2,799 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

, , , , , ,
hasonló találatok
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
84 %
07/2021
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
R9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2 kg20 mm15.60"2560x1440
84 %
05/2020
MSI GS66 10SGS
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
2.2 kg20 mm15.60"1920x1080
86 %
08/2020
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
2.2 kg17.8 mm15.60"1920x1080
06/2020
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
2.1 kg18 mm15.60"1920x1080
86 %
06/2021
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
2.4 kg19.9 mm15.60"1920x1080

Size comparison

359.34 mm 259.04 mm 19.9 mm 2.4 kg358 mm 248 mm 20 mm 2.2 kg359 mm 255 mm 18 mm 2.1 kg355 mm 243 mm 20 mm 2 kg355 mm 235 mm 17.8 mm 2.2 kg
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1444 (777min - 1768max) MBit/s ∼100% +6%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1386 (1331min - 1568max) MBit/s ∼96% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1360 MBit/s ∼94%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1340 MBit/s ∼93% -1%
MSI GS66 10SGS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1243 (1000min - 1395max) MBit/s ∼86% -9%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
  (447 - 1645, n=105)
1091 MBit/s ∼76% -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (294 - 1645, n=164, last 2 years)
1053 MBit/s ∼73% -23%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1422 (1349min - 1450max) MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1419 (1355min - 1443max) MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1410 MBit/s ∼99%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1390 MBit/s ∼98% -1%
MSI GS66 10SGS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1349 (804min - 1497max) MBit/s ∼95% -4%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
  (523 - 1640, n=106)
1170 MBit/s ∼82% -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (274 - 1743, n=164, last 2 years)
1124 MBit/s ∼79% -20%
ROG Zephyrus G15
ROG Zephyrus G15
ROG Zephyrus G15
ROG Zephyrus G15
ROG Zephyrus G15
ROG Zephyrus G15
316
cd/m²
305
cd/m²
308
cd/m²
321
cd/m²
327
cd/m²
303
cd/m²
311
cd/m²
295
cd/m²
292
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
CMN N156KME-GNA (CMN152A)
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 327 cd/m² Átlag: 308.7 cd/m² Minimum: 15 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 89 %
Centrumban: 327 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 991:1 (Fekete: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.49 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6, calibrated: 2.27
ΔE Greyscale 4.2 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
99% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
86% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
86.17% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.92% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.25% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.173
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
CMN N156KME-GNA (CMN152A), IPS-Level, 2560x1440, 15.60
MSI GS66 10SGS
AU Optronics B156HAN12.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
AU Optronics B156HAN12.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO7A8C), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE
AUO048E, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Display
-15%
-15%
-15%
-15%
Display P3 Coverage
97.25
69.91
-28%
70.23
-28%
70.31
-28%
70.31
-28%
sRGB Coverage
99.92
99.07
-1%
99.01
-1%
99.47
0%
99.38
-1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
86.17
71.1
-17%
71.45
-17%
72.22
-16%
71.32
-17%
Response Times
-8%
26%
-29%
19%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
8.8 (4.4, 4.4)
11.2 (6, 5.2)
-27%
6 (3, 3)
32%
14.4 (7.2, 7.2)
-64%
8 (4, 4)
9%
Response Time Black / White *
11.2 (6.8, 4.4)
10 (5.2, 4.8)
11%
9 (5, 4)
20%
10.4 (5.2, 5.2)
7%
8 (4, 4)
29%
PWM Frequency
Screen
24%
18%
6%
30%
Brightness middle
327
339.4
4%
347
6%
320
-2%
470
44%
Brightness
309
331
7%
328
6%
318
3%
468
51%
Brightness Distribution
89
92
3%
89
0%
88
-1%
85
-4%
Black Level *
0.33
0.24
27%
0.285
14%
0.24
27%
0.21
36%
Contrast
991
1414
43%
1218
23%
1333
35%
2238
126%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.49
1.58
65%
2.35
48%
4.03
10%
3.28
27%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.42
3.8
55%
4.15
51%
8.43
-0%
7.31
13%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.27
1.47
35%
1.16
49%
0.98
57%
0.8
65%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.2
2.3
45%
3.04
28%
5.94
-41%
4.49
-7%
Gamma
2.173 101%
2.24 98%
2.35 94%
2.42 91%
2.4 92%
CCT
7014 93%
6952 93%
6658 98%
6751 96%
7438 87%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
86
64.8
-25%
65
-24%
66
-23%
65
-24%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99
99.4
0%
99
0%
99
0%
99
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
0% / 12%
10% / 13%
-13% / -2%
11% / 20%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.4 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 14825 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark
010521031542052563073584094510501155126013651470157516801785189019952020.12000.61987.871964.151958.381974.141957.711899.521878.91870.211880.941871.871865.061881.641880.941867.761891.161875.471887.331885.191971.511973.551973.551982.551989.061670.361662.721636.191645.621637.21658.441645.621644.61632.051656.251646.71653.031656.251664.931650.911659.541657.341660.581643.521636.191663.821633.051645.621629.931631.99Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS: Ø1928 (1865.06-2020.1)
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE Intel Core i9-10980HK: Ø1649 (1629.93-1670.36)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
211 Points ∼100%
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE
Intel Core i9-10980HK
205 Points ∼97% -3%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
196 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (108 - 254, n=200, last 2 years)
196 Points ∼93% -7%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
190 Points ∼90% -10%
MSI GS66 10SGS
Intel Core i7-10750H
188 Points ∼89% -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
2020 (1865.06min - 2020.1max) Points ∼100%
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1670 (1629.93min - 1670.36max) Points ∼83% -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (536 - 2804, n=212, last 2 years)
1489 Points ∼74% -26%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
1288 (1201.27min - 1287.87max) Points ∼64% -36%
MSI GS66 10SGS
Intel Core i7-10750H
1273 (1209.12min - 1272.47max) Points ∼63% -37%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
1187 Points ∼59% -41%
Blender 2.79 - BMW27 CPU
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
374.7 Seconds * ∼100% -50%
MSI GS66 10SGS
Intel Core i7-10750H
371 Seconds * ∼99% -49%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
368 Seconds * ∼98% -48%
Average of class Gaming
  (179 - 633, n=151, last 2 years)
331 Seconds * ∼88% -33%
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE
Intel Core i9-10980HK
268 Seconds * ∼72% -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
249 Seconds * ∼66%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
5669 MIPS ∼100%
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE
Intel Core i9-10980HK
5542 MIPS ∼98% -2%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
5423 MIPS ∼96% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (2945 - 6174, n=152, last 2 years)
5182 MIPS ∼91% -9%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
5015 MIPS ∼88% -12%
MSI GS66 10SGS
Intel Core i7-10750H
4923 MIPS ∼87% -13%
7z b 4
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
59680 MIPS ∼100%
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE
Intel Core i9-10980HK
49192 MIPS ∼82% -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (15146 - 75612, n=152, last 2 years)
43081 MIPS ∼72% -28%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
38249 MIPS ∼64% -36%
MSI GS66 10SGS
Intel Core i7-10750H
35505 MIPS ∼59% -41%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
35130 MIPS ∼59% -41%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
560 Points ∼100%
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE
Intel Core i9-10980HK
498 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (312 - 634, n=188, last 2 years)
482 Points ∼86% -14%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
479 Points ∼86% -14%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
468 Points ∼84% -16%
MSI GS66 10SGS
Intel Core i7-10750H
454 Points ∼81% -19%
CPU (Multi Core)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
4733 Points ∼100%
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE
Intel Core i9-10980HK
3984 Points ∼84% -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (1397 - 6321, n=189, last 2 years)
3481 Points ∼74% -26%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
2932 Points ∼62% -38%
MSI GS66 10SGS
Intel Core i7-10750H
2928 Points ∼62% -38%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
2860 Points ∼60% -40%
Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
1410 Points ∼100%
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1365 Points ∼97% -3%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
1300 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (703 - 1777, n=147, last 2 years)
1292 Points ∼92% -8%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
1233 Points ∼87% -13%
MSI GS66 10SGS
Intel Core i7-10750H
1207 Points ∼86% -14%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE
Intel Core i9-10980HK
8405 Points ∼100% +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
7910 Points ∼94%
Average of class Gaming
  (2783 - 11393, n=147, last 2 years)
7126 Points ∼85% -10%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
6991 Points ∼83% -12%
MSI GS66 10SGS
Intel Core i7-10750H
6522 Points ∼78% -18%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
6216 Points ∼74% -21%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
13.8 fps ∼100%
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE
Intel Core i9-10980HK
13.6 fps ∼99% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (4.4 - 19.8, n=151, last 2 years)
11.9 fps ∼86% -14%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
10.3 fps ∼75% -25%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
10.1 fps ∼73% -27%
MSI GS66 10SGS
Intel Core i7-10750H
9.89 fps ∼72% -28%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
MSI GS66 10SGS
Intel Core i7-10750H
56.9 s * ∼100% -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
54.9 s * ∼96%
Average of class Gaming
  (23.9 - 98.2, n=139, last 2 years)
53.8 s * ∼95% +2%
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE
Intel Core i9-10980HK
53.7 s * ∼94% +2%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
52.1 s * ∼92% +5%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
47.94 s * ∼84% +13%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
MSI GS66 10SGS
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.631 sec * ∼100% -17%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.606 sec * ∼96% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.4907 - 1.088, n=143, last 2 years)
0.588 sec * ∼93% -9%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.579 sec * ∼92% -8%
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE
Intel Core i9-10980HK
0.571 sec * ∼90% -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
0.538 sec * ∼85%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2020 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
142 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
211 Points
Segítség
PCMark 10 - Score
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
6896 Points ∼100%
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
6574 Points ∼95% -5%
MSI GS66 10SGS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6154 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (3952 - 7884, n=182, last 2 years)
5921 Points ∼86% -14%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
5484 Points ∼80% -20%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5093 Points ∼74% -26%
PCMark 10 Score
6896 pontok
Segítség
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
6243.8 μs * ∼100% -1658%
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
1622.8 μs * ∼26% -357%
MSI GS66 10SGS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
1387.9 μs * ∼22% -291%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
785 μs * ∼13% -121%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
355.1 μs * ∼6%

* ... smaller is better

Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
MSI GS66 10SGS
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE
2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-16%
-6%
-5%
-6%
Write 4K
156.4
132.5
-15%
135.7
-13%
131.7
-16%
110.42
-29%
Read 4K
66.69
45.03
-32%
46.98
-30%
47.34
-29%
55.12
-17%
Write Seq
2318
1987
-14%
2180
-6%
2884
24%
Read Seq
2151
1434
-33%
1949
-9%
2303
7%
Write 4K Q32T1
525
467.5
-11%
510.1
-3%
423.9
-19%
466.56
-11%
Read 4K Q32T1
452.1
536
19%
569.3
26%
487.7
8%
516.87
14%
Write Seq Q32T1
3055
2003
-34%
2984
-2%
2822
-8%
3423.6
12%
Read Seq Q32T1
3607
3306
-8%
3238
-10%
3478
-4%
3519.4
-2%
AS SSD
-31%
-6%
-5%
-4%
Seq Read
2949.59
1086.4
-63%
1949.74
-34%
2766.61
-6%
3088
5%
Seq Write
1600.23
1901.41
19%
2322.09
45%
2612.8
63%
2561
60%
4K Read
53.56
50.96
-5%
45.48
-15%
47.55
-11%
43.01
-20%
4K Write
126.8
117.25
-8%
95.45
-25%
98.89
-22%
102
-20%
4K-64 Read
1429.48
1502.66
5%
1484.47
4%
1205.16
-16%
1549.29
8%
4K-64 Write
2177.16
1721.47
-21%
1886.93
-13%
2007.16
-8%
1378.48
-37%
Access Time Read *
0.064
0.059
8%
0.051
20%
0.065
-2%
0.051
20%
Access Time Write *
0.029
0.1
-245%
0.038
-31%
0.038
-31%
0.037
-28%
Score Read
1778
1662
-7%
1725
-3%
1529
-14%
1901
7%
Score Write
2464
2029
-18%
2215
-10%
2367
-4%
1737
-30%
Score Total
5090
4588
-10%
4843
-5%
4677
-8%
4583
-10%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-24% / -25%
-6% / -6%
-5% / -5%
-5% / -5%

* ... smaller is better

SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3607 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3055 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 452.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 525 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2151 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2318 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 66.69 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 156.4 MB/s

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

0185370555740925111012951480166518502035222024052590277529603145333035153397.723590.323590.953591.323591.323591.373591.793591.953592.373592.373592.633592.793592.793592.843592.993593.623593.743594.253594.313594.463594.463594.523594.673594.943595.093595.33595.513595.513595.723595.723596.133596.263596.343596.553596.553596.973596.973597.393598.443598.653598.653598.923599.063599.273599.93600.113600.183600.533601.513606.39Tooltip
: Ø3592 (3397.72-3606.39)
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
42022 pontok
3DMark Fire Strike Score
20784 pontok
3DMark Time Spy Score
9391 pontok
Segítség
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (20538 - 32366, n=27)
28291 Points ∼100% +24%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
22826 Points ∼81%
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
22630 Points ∼80% -1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
22326 Points ∼79% -2%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
21479 Points ∼76% -6%
MSI GS66 10SGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
20117 Points ∼71% -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (1360 - 34993, n=201, last 2 years)
19320 Points ∼68% -15%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (9023 - 13210, n=26)
11212 Points ∼100% +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
9439 Points ∼84%
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
8526 Points ∼76% -10%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
8379 Points ∼75% -11%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
7766 Points ∼69% -18%
MSI GS66 10SGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
7618 Points ∼68% -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (429 - 13210, n=200, last 2 years)
7402 Points ∼66% -22%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (5611 - 8032, n=17)
6890 Points ∼100% +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
5914 Points ∼86%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
5086 Points ∼74% -14%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
4814 Points ∼70% -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (1097 - 8032, n=115, last 2 years)
4778 Points ∼69% -19%
MSI GS66 10SGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
4657 Points ∼68% -21%
05101520253035404550556065707580859089888888888889888888888888888888888788888988888888888889888889888989888988898889888988888888888988888889888788878789888888888988888889888889888889888988898888888989908989899089898989898989898989898989898989898889898889898989898889888988898989888989888988898988898988908889898989898889898989898989898989908989898989898989888988898989908989899089898990898989909089908990899089908990899090898989908990899090898990899089899088898989898889888889888888898888898888888988888888888888888987878485878788898888888889888889888988888988898889898889898988898988898988888888898889888988888989888988898889888988888989898988898889898888898988898889888888898889888989888988898989898989898989898989898989898988898989899089908989898989898988888989898989908989898989898989898989898989908889898989898989898989888888898988898989898989898988898989898889898889898988898888888889898889888989888988898888888888898889888988888988898888888988888889888887888887888888888988888888888888888888888888888888888888888888878787878787888788878788878788878787888787878787888787888787888788878788878787878887888787888688878887878887878887878887878787878787878788878787878787878787878787878787878687878787878687878787868787878786878787868787868786878786878787868787868787868786878787878786878787878787878787878787868886888787878788878787878787878887878787878786878887878788878788878787888787888787878787888787878887878887878787888787868887878787878787868787878887878788878787878788878787888787888787888788878887888788878888878887888788888888878888878888878888888788888888888888878888888888888888878888878888878887888887888788888788888788888788888887888888878888878888878888888888878788888887898788888888888888888988888889888889888889888888888888878888888889888988888888888888888888888888898789878889888888888888888888888888888887888888898888898888888888898888888988898888888889888988888989888988898889888988888988888988898988888988898988898889888988898889888989898889898989898889898989888989898988898988898989898989888989898989888989888889888989898989888989898989898989898989908989898989898989898989908989898989899089898989898989898989898989898989898989898989898989898989898989898989898990898989899089898989908989898989898989899089898989898989898989898989898989908890898989898989898989908989898989898989898989898989898990898989898989898888898889888989878988898889888988898889898989898989898989898988898989898988898888898989888989888989888989898989898989898889898989898989908989898989898989898989888889878888898888898888898889888988898888898888898889888888898889888988888988898889888988898988898989908989908990908990898990899089908988909089909090899090908990908990908990899090899089909089899090899090899089909089908990908990909089898990899090908990908990909090899090899090899090899089908990899089908990908989908990899089908990899089908990908990908990899089908990899090909089909089908990898990898990898989908989898989898989898989898988899089898989898990898989898989898889898989898889898989888989898989888989898889898988888888898889898989898889898988898889898889888989898889898888898889888889888889888988898889888889888888888988888988898888898988888888888988888888898888888988888888898887888888898888888888898888888889888888888988888988888988888888888987888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888788888988888888888887888889888889898988898988898889898988888990909089909090909089909090908990909089909090899090898989908989898989898989898990898988898989898989898989908990899089898990898990899089898989898989898989898989898988898989898889888988898988898989898888898989888989898889898888898988898989898989898889898989888989888989898988898988898989898989898988898989898989898889898989888889898989898989898988898989898989898989898889898989888989898989898989889088898989888989898989908989898989898989898989898989898989898989898989898889899088899088899089898988908989898989898989898989898989898989898888898989898989888989898988898989898989898989898989898989898989898889909089908990899089908990908990908990908990909089908989909089909090899090899089908990899090908990908990899089908990898990899089899089908990899089908990908990908990909089909089908990908990909089909089909090908990909090899090909089919090909090909090919090909090899189909190909090908990909090909090909089909089909090899090909090909090899090899090899089909090908990908990909089908990909090899090909090909090909089899090899090909089909090909090908990909090909089909089908990898989898988898989899089898990898990898989898989899089898989898989898990898989898989908889898989899089899089898989898989898989898989898989898989898989898989898990898989898990898989888989908989898989898989898989898888888888888888888888888888888888898888898889888889888888888988898789888989888988888989888989898888898889888989888987898889888988888988898989898989898889898889898989898988898889888888888989888988898888898888888988898889888988898889888889888888898888888888898888898888888888888988888788878987898888888888878888878888878788878888878888878888878887868786878687878687878786878786878687878687868787868787878686878787878687878786878786878787868787878786878787868787878787878687878686878787868787878787878687878787878787878787868787878786878787878786878787878787868787868786878787868787878687878787878687878788878787878787888787878788878787878788868787888787878787878787878887878787878787888787888688878787878787878887878887878787888787878687878787878887878788877984858484848484848484848484838483848484838484848385838484848484848484848484848485848385848484838483848483848384848384848482838382838283838283838282838283838283828382838382838283828382838383828383838383838483838383838383838383838483838483838483858484848583848484848584858484858584848584858484858485848485848584858485Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N: Ø88.2 (79-91)
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS
90.2 fps ∼100%
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK
88.8 (73min, 83P1 - 93max) fps ∼98% -2%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
87.7 fps ∼97% -3%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H
83.4 (67min) fps ∼92% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (24.3 - 123, n=194, last 2 years)
74.5 fps ∼83% -17%
MSI GS66 10SGS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H
74.3 fps ∼82% -18%
3840x2160 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS
62.2 (7.22min, 44P0.1, 51.4P1 - 208max) fps ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (24.8 - 80.5, n=25, last 2 years)
58.5 fps ∼94% -6%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H
58.2 (47min) fps ∼94% -6%
alacsony közepes magas ultraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 177 152 90 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 155 90.2 62.2 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 148 140 126 119 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 103 88 72.4 fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 111 106 79 43 fps
Battlefield V (2018) 131 125 98.3 59.2 fps
Apex Legends (2019) 144 144 120 69.2 fps
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 101 90 78 50 fps
Metro Exodus (2019) 85 68.7 53.8 35.4 fps
The Division 2 (2019) 105 82 56 31 fps
Anno 1800 (2019) 77.6 44.3 37.9 25.2 fps
Rage 2 (2019) 116 115 75.5 37.8 fps
Control (2019) 82.3 55.7 29 fps
Borderlands 3 (2019) 94.5 76.5 55.7 32.3 fps
GRID 2019 (2019) 113 84.8 69.8 48.7 fps
Need for Speed Heat (2019) 94.3 89.4 67.9 40.7 fps
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) 97.8 91.5 79 42.1 fps
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019) 85.1 57.5 46.9 31.2 fps
Hunt Showdown (2020) 111 71.4 36.8 fps
Doom Eternal (2020) 165 163 123 68 fps
Gears Tactics (2020) 136 107 72.4 39.4 fps
F1 2020 (2020) 162 131 103 60 fps
Death Stranding (2020) 83.6 82.3 73.7 52.1 fps
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) 93 84 67 41 fps
Crysis Remastered (2020) 79.2 56.9 45.2 29.4 fps
Serious Sam 4 (2020) 93.3 80.2 67.2 fps
Mafia Definitive Edition (2020) 98.7 70.7 37.2 fps
Star Wars Squadrons (2020) 198 189 134 79.4 fps
FIFA 21 (2020) 198 190 156 104 fps
Watch Dogs Legion (2020) 82 65 52 31 fps
Dirt 5 (2020) 85.6 56.4 42.7 39.6 fps
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020) 74 64 52 33 fps
Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War (2020) 89.4 81.7 62.8 36.9 fps
Yakuza Like a Dragon (2020) 112 101 67.1 35.8 fps
Immortals Fenyx Rising (2020) 88 82 64 44 fps
Cyberpunk 2077 (2020) 70 60.2 39.8 19.7 fps
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.142.342.437.241.92536.438.437.337.535.43144.945.646.644.248.64031.832.631.629.232.25041.840.635.635.538.46329.83231.426.4298026.425.819.517.229.410029.123.919.117.924.61252829.120.418.529.616027.530.824.925.330.420031.429.726.824.82925033.630.324.921.833.831537.22520.91834.640034.321.819.315.435.750035.122.417.915.736.963037.120.714.112.138.180038.219.712.111.340.1100037.417.811.511.439.7125039.618.811.21141.6160038.416.411.311.340.1200038.814.811.811.341.1250038.614.311.811.640.6315036.813.912.212.239.540003413.412.512.336.6500031.113.312.812.533.2630029.813.112.812.732.7800024.713.513.112.728.61000019.613.813.212.621.31250017.612.812.912.317.21600017.612.312.211.713.7SPL48.530.426.425.450.5N6.31.40.80.77.2median 34median 17.8median 12.9median 12.5median 34.6Delta5.15.23.835.1hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q

Zajszint

Üresjárat
26 / 27 / 31 dB(A)
Terhelés
49 / 51 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
csendes
40 dB(A)
hallható
50 dB(A)
hangos
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm távolságról)   environment noise: 25 dB(A)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
R9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
MSI GS66 10SGS
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
Noise
-5%
-4%
-10%
5%
off / environment *
25
28.5
-14%
30.1
-20%
30
-20%
24.4
2%
Idle Minimum *
26
30
-15%
30.1
-16%
30
-15%
24.4
6%
Idle Average *
27
30
-11%
30.1
-11%
33
-22%
24.4
10%
Idle Maximum *
31
30.9
-0%
30.1
3%
36
-16%
24.4
21%
Load Average *
49
39.5
19%
46.8
4%
50
-2%
49.3
-1%
Witcher 3 ultra *
49
48
2%
48.4
1%
48
2%
54
-10%
Load Maximum *
51
59.4
-16%
46
10%
50
2%
46.6
9%

* ... smaller is better

Max. terhelés
 49 °C51 °C49 °C 
 45 °C47 °C43 °C 
 36 °C39 °C36 °C 
Maximum: 51 °C
Átlag: 43.9 °C
55 °C56 °C55 °C
50 °C52 °C48 °C
40 °C46 °C39 °C
Maximum: 56 °C
Átlag: 49 °C
Tápegység (max.)  44 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.6 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40 °C / 104 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 42.9 °C / 109 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.6 °C / 92 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the device average of 33.6 °C / 92 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39 °C / 102.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-10.1 °C / -18.2 F).
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
R9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
MSI GS66 10SGS
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
Heat
5%
3%
9%
21%
Maximum Upper Side *
51
47.8
6%
52
-2%
44
14%
35.2
31%
Maximum Bottom *
56
54.4
3%
53
5%
50
11%
32.5
42%
Idle Upper Side *
29
27.4
6%
29.3
-1%
29
-0%
29.4
-1%
Idle Bottom *
34
32
6%
30.2
11%
31
9%
29.6
13%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.247.72537.544.23144.252.74029.234.25035.537.36326.4378017.243.510017.952.912518.55816025.358.820024.859.425021.863.23151863.440015.463.850015.767.563012.168.380011.368.2100011.46912501168160011.367.8200011.369.4250011.667.7315012.263.8400012.362.8500012.559.6630012.756.9800012.760.51000012.656.41250012.352.71600011.751.1SPL25.478.1N0.743.6median 12.5median 63.2Delta35.535.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503QApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.4 / 1.8 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 10 / 12 / 17 Watt
Terhelés midlight 108 / 182 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
R9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
MSI GS66 10SGS
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
Power Consumption
-32%
-7%
-17%
-8%
Idle Minimum *
10
14.9
-49%
10.6
-6%
11
-10%
9
10%
Idle Average *
12
17.5
-46%
13.1
-9%
15
-25%
12.6
-5%
Idle Maximum *
17
29.5
-74%
15.8
7%
25
-47%
17
-0%
Load Average *
108
94.8
12%
131
-21%
95
12%
115
-6%
Witcher 3 ultra *
123
146.1
-19%
146
-19%
140
-14%
159
-29%
Load Maximum *
182
210.9
-16%
169
7%
211
-16%
216
-19%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
12h 08min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
9h 24min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
1h 30min
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
R9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
MSI GS66 10SGS
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 99.99 Wh
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 80 Wh
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 84 Wh
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 80 Wh
Battery Runtime
-13%
-12%
-26%
-35%
Reader / Idle
728
614
-16%
522
-28%
495
-32%
WiFi v1.3
564
413
-27%
366
-35%
378
-33%
204
-64%
Load
90
94
4%
113
26%
78
-13%
85
-6%
H.264
437
92

Pro

+ könnyű és kompakt ház
+ színgazdag WQHD panel
+ hosszú üzemidő
+ letisztult dizájn
+ jó hangzás

Kontra

- Részben forrasztott RAM
- Nem optimális billentyűzet elrendezés
- 3D módban elég zajos
- nincs webkamera
ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q: Test device provided by Asus Germany
ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q: Test device provided by Asus Germany

GeForce RTX 3080 laptop verziója csak korlátozottan képes a benne rejlő potenciált kibontakoztatni az Asus alacsony TDP beállítása miatt, és lassúbb lehet, mint egy gyors RTX 3070 laptop, de ettől eltekintve a ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q egy vonzó gép.

Egyik legnagyobb fénypontja a WQHD panel, amely 165 Hz-es, aránylag gyors válaszidővel, FreeSync-kel és jó színtérlefedettséggel vonzza a vásárlókat.

További vonzó jellemzők a meglepően gazdag hangzás, a hosszú üzemidő és a letisztult dizájn. Ami a külsőt illeti, a fehér kiadás szépen kiemelkedik a mezőnyből.

Ami nem tetszett túlságosan, az 3D módban a zajszint, valamint a billentyűzet elrendezése. Az is bosszantó, hogy az Asus kihagyta a webkamerát, és a RAM részben az alaplapra van forrasztva.

Ár és elérhetőség

Nemsokára 2499,99 dollárért beszerezhető lesz a mi tesztkonfigurációnk is egyenesen a gyártótól. Egy 16 GB RAM-os RTX 3070-es verzió is beszerezhető lesz Eclipse Gray színben a BestBuy-on 1799,99 dollárért.

Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q - 01/31/2021 v7
Florian Glaser

Váz
81 / 98 → 83%
Billentyűzet
73%
Érintőpad
88%
Csatlakoztathatóság
55 / 80 → 69%
Súly
63 / 10-66 → 95%
Akkumulátor
87 / 95 → 92%
Kijelző
86%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
96%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
95%
Hőmérséklet
77 / 95 → 81%
Zaj
75 / 90 → 83%
Audio
88%
Átlag
74%
84%
Gaming - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

ROG Zephyrus G15
ROG Zephyrus G15
ROG Zephyrus G15
ROG Zephyrus G15
ROG Zephyrus G15
ROG Zephyrus G15
Stephanie Chamberlain
Editor of the original article: Stephanie Chamberlain - Translator - 361 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020
contact me via: LinkedIn
Ninh Duy
Translator: Ninh Duy - Editorial Assistant - 186207 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017
contact me via: Facebook
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Asus Zephyrus G15 laptop rövid értékelés: Szembetűnő
Florian Glaser, 2021-07- 3 (Update: 2021-07- 3)