Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL rövid értékelés: Színes laptop stabil házzal

Name: Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Brand: Asus

Életstílus laptop. Az Asus vizuálisan fűszerezi a VivoBook S14-et, és egy robusztus készüléket ad ki különféle színekben. Emellett több funkció van, amelyek részben kizárják egymást. Értékelésünkből kiderül, hogy mi mást kínál a VivoBook S14.

Mike Wobker, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch (fordította Zoltán Kiss), 09/23/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Comet Lake Laptop / Notebook Windows

Test device courtesy of ASUS Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T (VivoBook S14 Széria)

Processzor

Intel Core i7-10510U 4 x 1.8 - 4.8 GHz, Comet Lake-U

Grafikus adapter

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 - 2048 MB, Mag: 1519 MHz, Memória: 1752 MHz, GP108 A1, NVIDIA 441.45, Intel UHD Graphics 620

Memória

16384 MB

, kétcsatornás

Kijelző

14.00 hüvelyk 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, Chi Mei CMN14D4, IPS, fényes: nem

Alaplap

Intel Comet Lake-U PCH-LP Premium

Háttértár

Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H), 512 GB

, 420 GB ingyenes

Hangkártya

Intel Comet Lake PCH-LP - cAVS

Csatlakozók

2 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 HDMI, Audió csatlakozók: kombinált 3,5 mm-es audió jack, Kártyaolvasó: microSD, 1 Ujjlenyomat olvasó

Hálózat

Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1

Méret

magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 16 x 325 x 214

Akkumulátor

50 Wh Lítium-Polimer

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operációs rendszer

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webkamera: 0.9 MP, 16:9 (1280x720)

További jellegzetességek

Hangszórók: 2, sztereó, Billentyűzet: chiclet, Billentyűzet háttérvilágítás: igen, ASUS Splendid, ASUS Tru2life Video, ASUS AudioWizard, 24 Hónap Garancia

Súly

1.4 kg, Tápegység: 203 g

Ár

1100 Euró

Hivatkozások

Asus honlap
Asus noteszgépek

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
81 %	09/2020	Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T i7-10510U, GeForce MX250	1.4 kg	16 mm	14.00"	1920x1080
87 %	07/2020	Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ R7 4700U, Vega 7	1.2 kg	16.55 mm	14.00"	1920x1080
86 %	04/2020	Schenker VIA 14 i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620	1.1 kg	16.5 mm	14.00"	1920x1080
78 %	04/2020	HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng i7-1065G7, GeForce MX250	1.6 kg	18 mm	14.00"	1920x1080

» A Top 10 multimédiás noteszgép - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 játékos noteszgép
» A Top 10 belépő szintű üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 notebook munkaállomása
» A Top 10 okostelefon - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 táblagép
» A Top 10 Windows tabletje
» A Top 10 subnotebook - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 300 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 120 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 phabletje (>5.5-inch)
» A Top 10 noteszgép 500 EUR (~160.000 HUF) alatt
» A Top 10 "pehelysúlyú" gaming notebookja

Size comparison

HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ Schenker VIA 14 ❌

Port configuration

Left side: power supply, HDMI, 1x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, 1x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-C, 3.5 mm headset connection

Right side: microSD card reader, 2x USB 2.0

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Schenker VIA 14	77.5 MB/s ∼100% +230%
Average of class Multimedia (18.1 - 222, n=66, last 2 years)	76.6 MB/s ∼99% +226%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	32 MB/s ∼41% +36%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)	23.5 MB/s ∼30%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Schenker VIA 14 (Toshiba Exceria pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)	87.1 MB/s ∼100% +244%
Average of class Multimedia (15.9 - 217, n=65, last 2 years)	87.1 MB/s ∼100% +244%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	33 MB/s ∼38% +30%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)	25.3 MB/s ∼29%

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker VIA 14 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1532 (788^min - 1670^max) MBit/s ∼100% +75%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (289 - 1722, n=193)	1234 MBit/s ∼81% +41%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1070 MBit/s ∼70% +22%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	904 (879^min - 923^max) MBit/s ∼59% +3%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	875 (787^min - 909^max) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker VIA 14 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1472 (1403^min - 1492^max) MBit/s ∼100% +137%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (49.8 - 1775, n=193)	1130 MBit/s ∼77% +82%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	928 MBit/s ∼63% +49%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	660 (642^min - 680^max) MBit/s ∼45% +6%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	621 (554^min - 657^max) MBit/s ∼42%

Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø875 (787-909)

Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø904 (879-923)

Schenker VIA 14 Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1506 (788-1670)

Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø621 (554-657)

Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø660 (642-680)

Schenker VIA 14 Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1471 (1403-1492)

ColorChecker Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T: 13.65 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 24.42 ∆E

<a href="https://www.notebookcheck-hu.com/Asus-VivoBook-S14-S433FL-roevid-ertekeles-Szines-laptop-stabil-hazzal.495054.0.html">Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T</a> — Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T


201 cd/m²	236 cd/m²	238 cd/m²
187 cd/m²	220 cd/m²	217 cd/m²
163 cd/m²	195 cd/m²	177 cd/m²

Fényerő megoszlás

Chi Mei CMN14D4

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 238 cd/m² Átlag: 203.8 cd/m² Minimum: 12.1 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 68 %
Centrumban: 216 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1419:1 (Fekete: 0.155 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.23 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6, calibrated: 4.4
ΔE Greyscale 3.77 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
62% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 40% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.35

ICC Fájl (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T Chi Mei CMN14D4, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00	Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AU Optronics B140HAN04.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00	Schenker VIA 14 B140HAN06.2, a-Si AHVA-IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14.00	HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng AUO543D, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
Response Times		-13%	-63%	-51%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	34 (16, 18)	41 (19, 22) -21%	60.8 (28.4, 32.4) -79%	60.8 (29.2, 31.6) -79%
Response Time Black / White *	24 (14, 10)	25 (14, 11) -4%	35.2 (17.2, 18) -47%	29.6 (13.2, 16.4) -23%
PWM Frequency	250 (20)
Screen		3%	44%	27%
Brightness middle	220	269 22%	335 52%	395 80%
Brightness	204	244 20%	309 51%	375 84%
Brightness Distribution	68	83 22%	84 24%	91 34%
Black Level *	0.155	0.23 -48%	0.17 -10%	0.26 -68%
Contrast	1419	1170 -18%	1971 39%	1519 7%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	5.23	4.94 6%	2.3 56%	5.92 -13%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	21.51	20.37 5%	5 77%	9.79 54%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *	4.4	5.03 -14%	1 77%	0.91 79%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	3.77	1.71 55%	3.9 -3%	6.69 -77%
Gamma	2.35 ^94%	2.52 ^87%	2.19 ^100%	2.78 ^79%
CCT	6666 ^98%	6535 ^99%	6556 ^99%	7596 ^86%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	40	35 -12%	65.5 64%	63 58%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	62	56 -10%	99.6 61%	98 58%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-5% / 0%	-10% / 28%	-12% / 15%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14 ms rise
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 16 ms rise
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

250 Hz

≤ 20 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9704 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 151500) Hz was measured.

Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T Intel Core i7-10510U, Intel Core i7-10510U: Ø568 (535.78-642.12)

Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Ryzen 7 4700U: Ø932 (907.83-1035.01)

Schenker VIA 14 Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel Core i5-10210U: Ø574 (555-722)

HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Core i7-1065G7: Ø625 (592.25-691)

Cinebench R20: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng Intel Core i7-1065G7	474 Points ∼100% +5%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	466 Points ∼98% +3%
Average of class Multimedia (93 - 585, n=81, last 2 years)	456 Points ∼96% +1%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T Intel Core i7-10510U	451 Points ∼95%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (362 - 497, n=35)	436 Points ∼92% -3%
Schenker VIA 14 Intel Core i5-10210U	395 Points ∼83% -12%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	2401 Points ∼100% +57%
Average of class Multimedia (272 - 4094, n=82, last 2 years)	2076 Points ∼86% +36%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng Intel Core i7-1065G7	1543 Points ∼64% +1%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T Intel Core i7-10510U	1525 Points ∼64%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (1015 - 1897, n=36)	1410 Points ∼59% -8%
Schenker VIA 14 Intel Core i5-10210U	1150 Points ∼48% -25%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng Intel Core i7-1065G7	190 Points ∼100% +7%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	180 Points ∼95% +1%
Average of class Multimedia (41 - 228, n=94, last 2 years)	180 Points ∼95% +1%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (113 - 202, n=40)	178 Points ∼94% 0%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T Intel Core i7-10510U	177.6 Points ∼93%
Schenker VIA 14 Intel Core i5-10210U	154 Points ∼81% -13%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	1035 Points ∼100% +61%
Average of class Multimedia (125 - 1815, n=104, last 2 years)	897 Points ∼87% +40%
Schenker VIA 14 Intel Core i5-10210U	722 (555^min - 722^max) Points ∼70% +12%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng Intel Core i7-1065G7	691 Points ∼67% +8%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (482 - 856, n=43)	666 Points ∼64% +4%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T Intel Core i7-10510U	642 (535.78^min - 642.12^max) Points ∼62%

Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU
Schenker VIA 14 Intel Core i5-10210U	1004 Seconds * ∼100% -28%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (649 - 1051, n=29)	804 Seconds * ∼80% -3%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T Intel Core i7-10510U	781.8 Seconds * ∼78%
Average of class Multimedia (279 - 4564, n=65, last 2 years)	647 Seconds * ∼64% +17%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	523.9 Seconds * ∼52% +33%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Multimedia (1454 - 5412, n=64, last 2 years)	4758 MIPS ∼100% +2%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T Intel Core i7-10510U	4681 MIPS ∼98%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (3747 - 4981, n=29)	4580 MIPS ∼96% -2%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	4292 MIPS ∼90% -8%
Schenker VIA 14 Intel Core i5-10210U	4282 MIPS ∼90% -9%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	26652 MIPS ∼100% +62%
Average of class Multimedia (4569 - 47797, n=64, last 2 years)	26097 MIPS ∼98% +58%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (12196 - 21298, n=29)	17635 MIPS ∼66% +7%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T Intel Core i7-10510U	16487 MIPS ∼62%
Schenker VIA 14 Intel Core i5-10210U	15424 MIPS ∼58% -6%

Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Multimedia (813 - 1586, n=57, last 2 years)	1284 Points ∼100% +6%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T Intel Core i7-10510U	1211 Points ∼94%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (977 - 1287, n=29)	1200 Points ∼93% -1%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	1101 Points ∼86% -9%
Schenker VIA 14 Intel Core i5-10210U	1089 Points ∼85% -10%

Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Multimedia (1604 - 8053, n=57, last 2 years)	5174 Points ∼100% +39%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	4792 Points ∼93% +29%
Schenker VIA 14 Intel Core i5-10210U	3831 Points ∼74% +3%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T Intel Core i7-10510U	3721 Points ∼72%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (2474 - 4484, n=29)	3677 Points ∼71% -1%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	7.81 fps ∼100% +70%
Average of class Multimedia (0.98 - 11.7, n=62, last 2 years)	6.84 fps ∼88% +49%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T Intel Core i7-10510U	4.6 fps ∼59%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (3.41 - 5.5, n=29)	4.58 fps ∼59% 0%
Schenker VIA 14 Intel Core i5-10210U	3.69 fps ∼47% -20%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	59.83 s * ∼100% -7%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (50.7 - 77.8, n=25)	59 s * ∼99% -6%
Average of class Multimedia (16.5 - 99.2, n=57, last 2 years)	55.8 s * ∼93% -0%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T Intel Core i7-10510U	55.76 s * ∼93%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Schenker VIA 14 Intel Core i5-10210U	0.712 sec * ∼100% -12%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (0.637 - 0.81, n=26)	0.681 sec * ∼96% -7%
Average of class Multimedia (0.56 - 1.002, n=57, last 2 years)	0.641 sec * ∼90% -0%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T Intel Core i7-10510U	0.638 sec * ∼90%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	0.629 sec * ∼88% +1%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

177.6 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

642 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

75.36 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.62 %

Segítség

... összehasonlítva

PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB	4709 Points ∼30% +62%
Average of class Multimedia (1001 - 9234, n=87, last 2 years)	4394 Points ∼28% +51%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng GeForce MX250, i7-1065G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	3233 Points ∼21% +11%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (2621 - 5547, n=11)	3225 Points ∼21% +11%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)	2903 Points ∼19%
Schenker VIA 14 UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP1000GM30002	2649 Points ∼17% -9%
Productivity
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng GeForce MX250, i7-1065G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	7433 Points ∼67% +9%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (6625 - 7972, n=11)	7331 Points ∼66% +7%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB	7273 Points ∼65% +6%
Average of class Multimedia (1407 - 8921, n=87, last 2 years)	7004 Points ∼63% +2%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)	6845 Points ∼61%
Schenker VIA 14 UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP1000GM30002	6450 Points ∼58% -6%
Essentials
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB	9244 Points ∼81% +11%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng GeForce MX250, i7-1065G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	8912 Points ∼78% +7%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (8021 - 9764, n=11)	8892 Points ∼78% +7%
Schenker VIA 14 UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP1000GM30002	8791 Points ∼77% +6%
Average of class Multimedia (2891 - 10539, n=87, last 2 years)	8787 Points ∼77% +6%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)	8310 Points ∼73%
Score
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB	4886 Points ∼56% +24%
Average of class Multimedia (1144 - 6514, n=88, last 2 years)	4606 Points ∼52% +17%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng GeForce MX250, i7-1065G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	4289 Points ∼49% +9%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (3861 - 5409, n=11)	4243 Points ∼48% +8%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)	3933 Points ∼45%
Schenker VIA 14 UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP1000GM30002	3810 Points ∼43% -3%

PCMark 10 Score		3933 pontok
Segítség

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Schenker VIA 14 UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP1000GM30002	2339 μs * ∼100% -308%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB	1086.5 μs * ∼46% -90%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)	573 μs * ∼24%

* ... smaller is better

	Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)	Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB	Schenker VIA 14 Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP1000GM30002	HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	Average Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)	Average of class Multimedia
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		13%	74%	63%	-3%	27%
Write 4K	124.9	98.85 -21%	201 61%	181.6 45%	116 (88 - 163, n=9) -7%	137 (55.5 - 263, n=84, last 2 years) 10%
Read 4K	147.9	32.44 -78%	60.17 -59%	57.41 -61%	137 (113 - 191, n=9) -7%	49.7 (13 - 148, n=84, last 2 years) -66%
Write Seq	753	1582 110%	2471 228%	1982 163%	520 (450 - 753, n=9) -31%	1595 (214 - 4139, n=83, last 2 years) 112%
Read Seq	1223	1471 20%	2104 72%	1899 55%	1370 (1223 - 1624, n=9) 12%	1675 (423 - 4133, n=83, last 2 years) 37%
Write 4K Q32T1	369.2	375.4 2%	323.6 -12%	509.4 38%	388 (237 - 556, n=9) 5%	409 (81.3 - 697, n=84, last 2 years) 11%
Read 4K Q32T1	358.1	491.9 37%	551 54%	544.7 52%	364 (287 - 531, n=9) 2%	446 (92.1 - 767, n=84, last 2 years) 25%
Write Seq Q32T1	1057	1574 49%	3407 222%	3072 191%	1178 (937 - 1320, n=9) 11%	2000 (211 - 5187, n=84, last 2 years) 89%
Read Seq Q32T1	2738	2329 -15%	3475 27%	3281 20%	2471 (2145 - 2738, n=9) -10%	2684 (390 - 7117, n=84, last 2 years) -2%
AS SSD		37%	215%	166%	1%	78%
Score Total	1581	1552 -2%	5782 266%	4568 189%	1755 (1420 - 2594, n=9) 11%	3327 (479 - 7069, n=84, last 2 years) 110%
Score Write	763	533 -30%	2180 186%	1853 143%	818 (580 - 1117, n=9) 7%	1440 (136 - 2992, n=84, last 2 years) 89%
Score Read	544	682 25%	2373 336%	1801 231%	624 (531 - 975, n=9) 15%	1257 (186 - 2825, n=84, last 2 years) 131%
Access Time Write *	0.046	0.034 26%	0.022 52%	0.03 35%	0.0879 (0.045 - 0.151, n=9) -91%	0.1162 (0.019 - 1.075, n=84, last 2 years) -153%
Access Time Read *	0.107		0.06 44%	0.094 12%	0.0829 (0.065 - 0.107, n=9) 23%	0.0772 (0.032 - 0.421, n=79, last 2 years) 28%
4K-64 Write	605.09	262.07 -57%	1745.72 189%	1456.46 141%	666 (438 - 948, n=9) 10%	1170 (56.6 - 2716, n=84, last 2 years) 93%
4K-64 Read	386.2	454.71 18%	2051.94 431%	1473.01 281%	456 (366 - 789, n=9) 18%	1018 (139 - 2209, n=84, last 2 years) 164%
4K Write	122.82	116.61 -5%	172.28 40%	147.5 20%	112 (88 - 128, n=9) -9%	121 (15.2 - 233, n=84, last 2 years) -1%
4K Read	62.4	31.56 -49%	72.76 17%	52.09 -17%	65.7 (51.5 - 76, n=9) 5%	46.7 (7.36 - 73.2, n=84, last 2 years) -25%
Seq Write	353.13	1547.44 338%	2615.01 641%	2493.03 606%	402 (305 - 836, n=9) 14%	1486 (134 - 3886, n=84, last 2 years) 321%
Seq Read	957.04	1960.06 105%	2487.9 160%	2762.37 189%	1025 (769 - 1241, n=9) 7%	1922 (341 - 5529, n=84, last 2 years) 101%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		25% / 26%	145% / 156%	115% / 123%	-1% / -1%	53% / 57%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2738 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1057 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 358.1 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 369.2 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1223 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 753 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 147.9 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 124.9 MB/s

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

: Ø1425 (829.65-1440.95)

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Multimedia (765 - 31866, n=85, last 2 years)	8346 Points ∼100% +74%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	4990 Points ∼60% +4%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i7-10510U	4785 Points ∼57%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i7-1065G7	4614 Points ∼55% -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (3585 - 4942, n=29)	4404 Points ∼53% -8%
Schenker VIA 14 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-10210U	1537 Points ∼18% -68%

3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Multimedia (142 - 9323, n=72, last 2 years)	2076 Points ∼100% +79%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i7-10510U	1163 Points ∼56%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i7-1065G7	1105 Points ∼53% -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (881 - 1169, n=22)	1070 Points ∼52% -8%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	973 Points ∼47% -16%
Schenker VIA 14 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-10210U	357 Points ∼17% -69%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Multimedia (1065 - 23674, n=91, last 2 years)	6208 Points ∼100% +63%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i7-10510U	3819 Points ∼62%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i7-1065G7	3580 Points ∼58% -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (2939 - 3885, n=29)	3531 Points ∼57% -8%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	3134 Points ∼50% -18%
Schenker VIA 14 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-10210U	1230 Points ∼20% -68%

3DMark 11 Performance		5022 pontok
3DMark Fire Strike Score		3460 pontok
3DMark Time Spy Score		1282 pontok
Segítség

... összehasonlítva

The Witcher 3 | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Multimedia (5.8 - 92.1, n=66, last 2 years)	27.7 fps ∼100% +113%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	13 fps ∼47%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (9 - 16, n=24)	11.6 fps ∼42% -11%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	10.9 (8^min) fps ∼39% -16%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	10.7 fps ∼39% -18%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Multimedia (10.1 - 168, n=68, last 2 years)	45.8 fps ∼100% +118%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	21 fps ∼46%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (16.3 - 23.1, n=27)	20.1 fps ∼44% -4%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	18.8 (15^min) fps ∼41% -10%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	16.5 fps ∼36% -21%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Multimedia (10.5 - 243, n=59, last 2 years)	78.5 fps ∼100% +118%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	36 fps ∼46%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (30 - 40, n=27)	35.3 fps ∼45% -2%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	33.5 (26^min) fps ∼43% -7%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	33.5 fps ∼43% -7%
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Multimedia (16 - 335, n=62, last 2 years)	121 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (47.4 - 70, n=24)	60.8 fps ∼50%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	56.4 (37^min) fps ∼47%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	51.6 fps ∼43%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 high (2/3)
Average of class Multimedia (18.2 - 139, n=70, last 2 years)	81.9 fps ∼100% +15%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	71.3 (62^min) fps ∼87%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (8.6 - 77.4, n=20)	61.4 fps ∼75% -14%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	46.4 (41.6^min) fps ∼57% -35%
Schenker VIA 14 Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	18.2 (15.8^min) fps ∼22% -74%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Multimedia (10.3 - 84.3, n=60, last 2 years)	48.8 fps ∼100% +24%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	39.3 fps ∼81%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (9.8 - 52.6, n=16)	39 fps ∼80% -1%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	24.9 fps ∼51% -37%
Schenker VIA 14 Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	9.6 fps ∼20% -76%

	alacsony	közepes	magas	ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015)		36	21	13	fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	102.4	90.5	71.3	63.8	fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	47.7	42.8	39.3		fps

Zajszint

Üresjárat		31 / 31 / 31.3 dB(A)
Terhelés		43.4 / 41.5 dB(A)

	30 dB csendes 40 dB(A) hallható 50 dB(A) hangos
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm távolságról) environment noise: 30.7 dB(A)

Max. terhelés

Üresjárat

Witcher 3


38.5 °C	43 °C	36.3 °C
36.6 °C	41.1 °C	34 °C
33.2 °C	30.6 °C	31.4 °C

Maximum: 43 °C
Átlag: 36.1 °C


40.2 °C	44.8 °C	40.4 °C
36.5 °C	39.4 °C	37.6 °C
32.8 °C	34.5 °C	34.5 °C

Maximum: 44.8 °C
Átlag: 37.9 °C

Tápegység (max.) 46.2 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 23.9 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

Max. terhelés

Üresjárat

Witcher 3


25.7 °C	26.2 °C	25.9 °C
25.8 °C	26 °C	26.2 °C
25.2 °C	25.1 °C	25.5 °C

Maximum: 26.2 °C
Átlag: 25.7 °C


27 °C	27 °C	26.7 °C
26.7 °C	26.4 °C	26.3 °C
26 °C	26 °C	25.7 °C

Maximum: 27 °C
Átlag: 26.4 °C

Tápegység (max.) 32 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 22.7 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

Max. terhelés

Üresjárat

Witcher 3


36 °C	39.7 °C	36.4 °C
35.7 °C	39.1 °C	35.6 °C
32.1 °C	30.7 °C	31.3 °C

Maximum: 39.7 °C
Átlag: 35.2 °C


40 °C	42 °C	38.2 °C
36.4 °C	36 °C	36.2 °C
32.3 °C	33.4 °C	33.3 °C

Maximum: 42 °C
Átlag: 36.4 °C

Tápegység (max.) 44.7 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 23.9 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 31 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 36.6 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 31 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 31 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.2 °C / 91.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.3 °C / -7.8 F).

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.22 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.1% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Energiafogyasztás

Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlét	0.3 / 0.5 Watt
Üresjárat	2.4 / 4.2 / 7.8 Watt
Terhelés	57 / 64 Watt


Kulcs: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing 1.3
Schenker VIA 14 i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, 73 Wh	843 min ∼32% +64%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ R7 4700U, Vega 7, 48.85 Wh	715 min ∼27% +39%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T i7-10510U, GeForce MX250, 50 Wh	514 min ∼19%
Average of class Multimedia (198 - 912, n=86, last 2 years)	494 min ∼19% -4%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng i7-1065G7, GeForce MX250, 41 Wh	368 min ∼14% -28%

Akkumulátor üzemidő


NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		8h 34min

Pro

+ stabil ház

+ széles körben alkalmazható

+ jó üzemidő

Kontra

- lassú MicroSD kártyaolvasó

- a kijelző lehetne élénkebb

- enyhe „coil whine” hallható

Összegzés - Életstílus laptop sokféle felhasználásra.

Asus VivoBook S14 rövid értékelés. Test device provided by: Asus Germany

Az Asus VivoBook S14 nagyon sokoldalú laptopnak bizonyult a tesztünkben. Irodai alkalmazásokhoz bőven van teljesítmény, és az Nvidia GeForce MX250 teljesítménye alkalmi játszáshoz is elegendő. A jó üzemidővel és a kis mérettel kombinálva a 14 hüvelykes laptop utazótársként is jó.

Az Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL egy jó mindenes, amely számos helyzetben jó teljesítményre képes.

Egyedül a lassú microSD kártyaolvasó és a billentyűzet adnak okot panaszra, ez utóbbi kissé túl finom a mi ízlésünknek. A konfiguráció többi része határozottan kielégítő a laptop árszintjéhez képest. Érzékenyebb felhasználóknak viszont gondot okozhat az enyhe „coil whine”, amikor a hálózati adapter be van dugva, és a PWM (impulzusszélesség-moduláció), amely alacsony fényerőszinteken jelen van. Akik értékelik az ujjlenyomat-olvasót, azok számbillentyűzet nélkül fognak maradni. Másrészt pedig azok a felhasználók, akik szeretnének számbillentyűzetet használni, kénytelenek lesznek feladni az ujjlenyomat-olvasót.

Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T - 2020-07-2007/20/2020 v7
Mike Wobker

Váz

85 / 98 → 87%

Billentyűzet

77%

Érintőpad

87%

Csatlakoztathatóság

51 / 80 → 64%

Súly

70 / 20-72 → 97%

Akkumulátor

83 / 95 → 87%

Kijelző

79%

Játékok alatti teljesítmény

64 / 90 → 71%

Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény

85 / 90 → 94%

Hőmérséklet

90%

Zaj

85 / 95 → 89%

Audio

59%

Camera

32 / 85 → 37%

Átlag

73%

81%

Multimedia - Súlyozott átlag

Linked Articles

Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T (VivoBook S14 Széria)

Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL rövid értékelés: Színes laptop stabil házzal

Size comparison

Port configuration

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T audio analysis

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

Pro

Kontra

Összegzés - Életstílus laptop sokféle felhasználásra.

Linked Articles

Pricecompare