Notebookcheck

Acer Aspire E5-553G-109A Notebook rövid értékelés

Sven Kloevekorn (fordította Tamás Somogyi), 01/30/2017
AMD Notebook Windows Bristol Ridge / Stoney Ridge

Korlátozott versenyképesség. Néhány jó ötlet, az SSD és a megfelelő CPU teljesítménye ellenére sem tudtunk teljesen hozzászokni az új, AMD alapú Acer multimédia gépéhez. A hardver nem olyan hatékonyan és megbízhatóan működik, mint az Intel-es ellenfelek, és a betekintési szögeiben teljesen rugalmatlan TN-panel is maximum igen alacsony igényeknek felel meg.

Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A (Aspire E5 Széria)
Processzor
Grafikus adapter
AMD Radeon R8 M445DX - 2048 MB, Mag: 1020 MHz, Memória: 2000 MHz, DDR3/DDR4, 16.101.1201.1007, AMD Enduro
Memória
8192 MB 
, DDR4, 1866 MHz, Dual-Channel, 2/2 hely foglalt
Kijelző
15.6 hüvelyk 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 141 PPI, Chi Mei CMN15C4 / N156HGE-EAB, TN LED, fényes: nem
Alaplap
AMD CZ FCH
Háttértár
Liteonit CV3-8D128, 128 GB 
, + 1 x Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1 TB
Hangkártya
AMD Kabini - High Definition Audio Controller
Csatlakozók
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington zár, Audió csatlakozók: kombinált audio ki-/bemenet, 3.5mm jack, Kártyaolvasó: SD/SDHC/SDXC, Brightness Sensor
Hálózat
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1
Optikai meghajtó
Slimtype DVD A DA8AESH
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 25 x 382 x 256
Akkumulátor
40 Wh, 2800 mAh Lítium-Ion, 4 cellás
Operációs rendszer
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webkamera: 1.3 MP HD (720p), 30 FPS
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: sztereó, Billentyűzet: chiclet, Billentyűzet háttérvilágítás: nem, 24 Hónap Garancia
Súly
2.4 kg, Tápegység: 207 g
Ár
629 EUR

 

Acer Aspire E5-553G
Acer Aspire E5-553G
Acer Aspire E5-553G
Acer Aspire E5-553G
Acer Aspire E5-553G
Acer Aspire E5-553G
Acer Aspire E5-553G
Acer Aspire E5-553G
Acer Aspire E5-553G
Acer Aspire E5-553G
Acer Aspire E5-553G

Size Comparison

Left side: Kensington lock, air outlet, USB 3.1 Type-C, Ethernet (folds out), VGA, HDMI, 2 x USB 3.0
Left side: Kensington lock, air outlet, USB 3.1 Type-C, Ethernet (folds out), VGA, HDMI, 2 x USB 3.0
Right side: audio in/out, USB 2.0, DVD drive, power
Right side: audio in/out, USB 2.0, DVD drive, power
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A
57.3 MB/s ∼100%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
52.6 MB/s ∼92% -8%
Medion Akoya P6670
21.8 MB/s ∼38% -62%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
16.7 MB/s ∼29% -71%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A
83.15 MB/s ∼100%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
80.9 MB/s ∼97% -3%
Medion Akoya P6670
27.3 MB/s ∼33% -67%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
26.3 MB/s ∼32% -68%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
333 MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
346 MBit/s ∼100%
198
cd/m²
228
cd/m²
212
cd/m²
188
cd/m²
224
cd/m²
196
cd/m²
171
cd/m²
205
cd/m²
184
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 228 cd/m² Átlag: 200.7 cd/m² Minimum: 17.6 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 75 %
Centrumban: 224 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 487:1 (Fekete: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 10.5 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 11.23 | - Ø
59% sRGB (Argyll) 38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.12
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A
Chi Mei CMN15C4 / N156HGE-EAB, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
LG Philips LGD04A7 / LG Display LP156WF6-SPK2 , , 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Chi Mei CMN15C4, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Medion Akoya P6670
LG Philips LP156WF6-SPK3, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
-53%
-28%
-50%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
42.4 (22, 20.4)
40 (19, 21)
6%
39 (21, 18)
8%
42 (18, 24)
1%
Response Time Black / White *
14.6 (9.4, 5.2)
24 (9, 15)
-64%
24 (19, 5)
-64%
22 (6, 16)
-51%
PWM Frequency
28740
50 (90)
-100%
50
-100%
Screen
27%
1%
10%
Brightness
201
276
37%
169
-16%
269
34%
Brightness Distribution
75
80
7%
91
21%
74
-1%
Black Level *
0.46
0.33
28%
0.47
-2%
0.65
-41%
Contrast
487
861
77%
374
-23%
442
-9%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
10.5
7.21
31%
8.83
16%
5.42
48%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
11.23
6.86
39%
8.97
20%
5.14
54%
Gamma
2.12 113%
2.46 98%
2.43 99%
2.48 97%
CCT
11096 59%
6726 97%
10234 64%
6952 93%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
38
37
-3%
36.8
-3%
36
-5%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
59
58
-2%
57.3
-3%
57
-3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-13% / 5%
-14% / -5%
-20% / -7%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
14.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.4 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 20.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 56 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 28740 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 28740 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 28740 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6262 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

 
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
129 Points ∼66% +65%
Medion Akoya P6670
Intel Core i5-6200U
117 Points ∼60% +50%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U
109 Points ∼56% +40%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-3895
Intel Core i3-6100U
98 Points ∼50% +26%
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A
AMD A12-9700P
78 Points ∼40%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
331 Points ∼15% +45%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U
293 Points ∼14% +28%
Medion Akoya P6670
Intel Core i5-6200U
291 Points ∼14% +27%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-3895
Intel Core i3-6100U
250 Points ∼12% +9%
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A
AMD A12-9700P
229 Points ∼11%
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
2262
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
5148
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
0.76 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
1.92 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
78 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
229 Points
Segítség
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
4047 Points ∼62% +5%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB
3907 Points ∼60% +2%
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A
Radeon R8 M445DX, A12-9700P, Liteonit CV3-8D128
3844 Points ∼59%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Medion Akoya P6670
GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Phison S11-128G
3396 Points ∼57% +19%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB
3294 Points ∼55% +16%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
3162 Points ∼53% +11%
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A
Radeon R8 M445DX, A12-9700P, Liteonit CV3-8D128
2847 Points ∼48%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
2847 pontok
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
3844 pontok
Segítség
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A
Liteonit CV3-8D128
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Toshiba MQ01ABD100
Medion Akoya P6670
Phison S11-128G
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-91%
-90%
9%
Write 4k QD32
143.2
0.612
-100%
0.722
-99%
85.68
-40%
Read 4k QD32
171.6
0.602
-100%
0.647
-100%
258
50%
Write 4k
44.94
0.595
-99%
0.726
-98%
59.99
33%
Read 4k
23.76
0.326
-99%
0.366
-98%
31.19
31%
Write 512
185.8
28.08
-85%
25.93
-86%
75.51
-59%
Read 512
295.9
28.87
-90%
29.32
-90%
295.5
0%
Write Seq
311.8
69.91
-78%
85.61
-73%
398
28%
Read Seq
348.6
84.54
-76%
95.33
-73%
441.8
27%
Liteonit CV3-8D128
Sequential Read: 348.6 MB/s
Sequential Write: 311.8 MB/s
512K Read: 295.9 MB/s
512K Write: 185.8 MB/s
4K Read: 23.76 MB/s
4K Write: 44.94 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 171.6 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 143.2 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U
4251 Points ∼8% +12%
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A
AMD Radeon R8 M445DX, AMD A12-9700P
3811 Points ∼7%
Medion Akoya P6670
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
2516 Points ∼5% -34%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
2343 Points ∼5% -39%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U
3574 Points ∼9% +71%
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A
AMD Radeon R8 M445DX, AMD A12-9700P
2090 Points ∼5%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
1580 Points ∼4% -24%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U
22439 Points ∼14% +85%
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A
AMD Radeon R8 M445DX, AMD A12-9700P
12140 Points ∼7%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
8541 Points ∼5% -30%
3DMark 11 Performance
2992 pontok
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
6270 pontok
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1644 pontok
Segítség
alacsony közepes magas ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 24.315.3fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 23.914.8fps
Battlefield 1 (2016) 31.27.9fps
Civilization VI (2016) 36.89.7fps
Farming Simulator 17 (2016) 63.821.6fps
Dishonored 2 (2016) 13.8fps
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.93332.533.931.632.92530.631.831.832.830.730.63131.53433.63531.831.54030.231.334.832.230.730.25030.72934.330.629.630.76326.928.328.627.327.526.98029.529.827.929.726.529.51003029.42930.825.93012525.725.624.826.124.825.716024.822.623.324.723.724.820023.523.323.623.322.823.525022.622.722.222.122.322.631522.222.521.521.821.122.24002221.820.620.520.42250020.821.120.219.819.720.863020.22119.119.51920.28002423.72323.718.824100022.923.221.422.518.422.9125023.423.518.620.417.523.4160025.425.518.819.517.625.4200023.424.118.719.217.523.4250020.220.318.118.217.720.2315018.918.9181817.918.9400018.618.318.118.31818.6500018.618.318.118.318.318.6630018.618.118.318.318.218.6800018.618.318.418.418.318.61000018.818.318.418.418.318.81250018.718.318.218.318.218.71600019.418.318.318.418.219.4SPL33.733.831.431.930.533.7N1.91.91.61.71.41.9median 22Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109Amedian 21.8median 18.8median 19.5median 18.3median 22Delta2.62.11.72.61.92.635.537.436.732.835.534.234.63535.334.237.536.635.232.437.534.134.332.432.134.132.830.832.63332.83331.330.233333028.929.829.63029.231.429.328.629.227.227.526.526.927.230.731.631.325.730.727.126.826.426.427.125.125.525.623.525.125.925.925.823.825.924.52524.32224.523.724.923.121.523.724.225.623.321.424.224.827.323.520.824.824.128.323.319.924.122.627.521.319.222.622.527.421.61922.520.92620.318.720.920.524.120.318.620.519.822.92018.419.819.720.819.718.519.719.519.919.518.319.519.519.519.318.319.519.219.419.218.319.219.219.21918.219.219.619.2191819.619.519.21918.119.53436.933.531.6342.12.62.11.72.1median 22.6Medion Akoya P6670median 25.5median 21.6median 19.2median 22.63.22.532.63.236.338.337.138.136.335.137.438.135.835.134.5343334.834.534.233.731.933.634.232.532.132.632.932.535.436.337.435.235.431.13131.730.731.129.932.530.528.929.927.329.326.927.827.329.630.330.326.529.627.428.128.527.627.4252725.424.92525.326.126.52525.32425.324.523242324.223.722.62323.224.123.121.423.22425.324.421.12425.225.324.620.225.222.322.821.519.922.321.421.820.619.521.420.721.320.619.220.720.120.920.519.620.12020.62019.3202020.219.819.32019.72019.919.319.719.619.619.619.319.619.419.619.419.219.419.119.219.318.919.11919.21918.61919.219.119.218.919.233.834.533.932.433.82.12.32.11.82.1median 22.3Acer TravelMate P249-M-3895median 22.8median 21.5median 19.9median 22.333.43.12.83hearing rangehide median Fan Noise

Zajszint

Üresjárat
31.4 / 31.4 / 31.9 dB(A)
DVD
36.6 / dB(A)
Terhelés
33.7 / 33.8 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
csendes
40 dB(A)
hallható
50 dB(A)
hangos
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm távolságról)   environment noise: 30.5 dB(A)
Heat development upper side (load)
Heat development upper side (load)
Heat development underside (load)
Heat development underside (load)
Heat development upper side (idle)
Heat development upper side (idle)
Heat development underside (idle)
Heat development underside (idle)
Max. terhelés
 35.7 °C36.7 °C27.2 °C 
 36 °C36.8 °C27.3 °C 
 32.4 °C36.6 °C27.4 °C 
Maximum: 36.8 °C
Átlag: 32.9 °C
24.5 °C31.4 °C56.5 °C
24.8 °C40 °C50.1 °C
26.2 °C34.5 °C34.2 °C
Maximum: 56.5 °C
Átlag: 35.8 °C
Tápegység (max.)  55.3 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 21.4 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.731.632.72531.730.731.7313531.8354029.930.729.95029.629.629.66328.827.528.88029.526.529.510030.725.930.712528.624.828.616030.623.730.620036.322.836.325048.422.348.431553.621.153.640059.820.459.850058.719.758.763066.91966.980073.618.873.6100068.418.468.4125060.517.560.5160057.117.657.1200062.817.562.8250065.317.765.3315066.917.966.9400072.61872.6500071.318.371.3630067.518.267.580007118.3711000075.918.375.91250076.218.276.21600060.618.260.6SPL81.630.581.6N49.31.449.3median 62.8Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109Amedian 18.3median 62.8Delta9.41.99.429.53133.630.334.338.730.631.332.430.628.928.828.427.626.427.626.529.424.534.324.43823.146.822.656.721.261.220.460.719.666.619.464.81962.118.562.518.261.418.666.818.568.218.667.318.867.318.870.718.867.718.965.318.863.518.762.518.657.831.278.41.642.3median 18.9Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISKmedian 62.51.48.633.634.634.736.434.335.233.834.834.132.633.635.53436.736.934.537.237.131.634.431.347.630.157.930.259.830.559.229.163.128.266.43074.73172.731.568.132.464.232.166.128.963.126.767.42567.424.667.524.165.823.76323.559.823.361.723.154.641.279.83.946.4median 30Acer Aspire E5-575G-549Dmedian 63.12.66.143.532.843.544.435.344.443.632.443.643.432.143.445.53345.548.13348.147.329.647.348.828.648.849.926.949.951.725.751.755.526.455.56023.56064.623.864.665.12265.169.321.569.374.621.474.674.420.874.469.919.969.96519.26567.21967.267.718.767.766.418.666.465.918.465.966.718.566.767.618.367.662.818.362.864.318.364.367.318.267.370.31870.362.318.162.380.531.680.551.31.751.3median 65.9Medion Akoya P6670median 19.2median 65.93.62.63.6hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 82% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Medion Akoya P6670 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.43 / 0.5 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 7.2 / 10.3 / 11.9 Watt
Terhelés midlight 48.2 / 63 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A
A12-9700P, Radeon R8 M445DX, Liteonit CV3-8D128, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
6200U, GeForce 940MX, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba MQ01ABD100, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6
Medion Akoya P6670
6200U, GeForce 940MX, Phison S11-128G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Power Consumption
0%
3%
12%
Idle Minimum *
7.2
7.7
-7%
6
17%
6.7
7%
Idle Average *
10.3
11.7
-14%
8.1
21%
9.2
11%
Idle Maximum *
11.9
13.6
-14%
9.8
18%
9.7
18%
Load Average *
48.2
48.3
-0%
52.5
-9%
40.6
16%
Load Maximum *
63
41
35%
81.6
-30%
58
8%
Witcher 3 ultra *
51.8

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
5h 58min
WiFi böngészés v1.3
4h 17min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
0h 55min
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A
A12-9700P, Radeon R8 M445DX, 40 Wh
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
6200U, GeForce 940MX, 30 Wh
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 62 Wh
Medion Akoya P6670
6200U, GeForce 940MX, 44 Wh
Battery Runtime
15%
75%
9%
Reader / Idle
358
443
24%
767
114%
WiFi v1.3
257
225
-12%
451
75%
280
9%
Load
55
73
33%
75
36%
H.264
460


Pro

+ stabil ház
+ szervizfedél
+ hibátlan gyári munka
+ nagyon jó ClickPad
+ SSD + 1 TB HDD
+ árfekvésében jó port választék
+ nincs PWM
+ a fontosabb részein nem melegszik nagyon

Kontra

- teljesítménygondok
- céltalan kettős grafikus rendszer képkockavesztés esélyével
- a stressz-teszten kívül is jelentkező lefojtás
- majdnem teljesen alkalmatlan játékra
- nagyobb sebességeknél kissé visító ventilátor
- nagyon rossz kijelző:
- gyér kontraszt
- rossz színhűség
- csökkent színmélység
- katasztrofális betekintési stabilitás
In review: Acer Aspire E5-553G-109A. Test model provided by Cyberport.de
In review: Acer Aspire E5-553G-109A. Test model provided by Cyberport.de

Az Acer Aspire E5-553G-109A legjobb részei szerintünk a megfelelő (billentyűzet) és a nagyon jó (ClickPad) beviteli eszközök, valamint a stabil, jól összerakott ház. Az AMD processzor irodai alkalmazásokra használhatóbb, és olyan problémákkal küzd, mint lefojtás, szuboptimális négymagos, valamint gyenge egymagos teljesítmény. Még a Hyper-Threading nélküli kétmagos i3-akat is ritkán előzi le, ha multitaskingról van szó. A haszontalan Radeon R8 M445DX dupla grafikus rendszert is érheti kritika. A legtöbb esetben nem segít magasabb FPS-t elérni a dedikált R7 M440-nel összevetve, de növeli az esélyét a képkockavesztésnek. Végeredményben viszont ez mindegy is, mert a dual mód kikapcsolható (amit javaslunk is), és az R7 M440 egyedül is megoldja a feladatokat. Amennyiben elkerüljük a folyamatos terhelést, úgy az AMD technológia teljesen simán működik gyakorlatban. Ehhez természetesen az SSD is hozzájárul.


Az Acer új gépének legnagyobb gyengéje vitathatatlanul az átlag alatti TN kijelző, amelyben egyetlen pozitívumot is nehéz lenne találni. Egy ilyen kijelzővel a készülék messze van az ajánlhatótól.


Különösen a gyér betekintési szög stabilitás arcpirító, annak dacára, hogy a képminőség még most sem túl fontos sok laptoptulajdonosnak. Emellett a színátmenetek olyan sávosak, amilyet már régen nem láttunk, ez valószínűleg csökkentett színmélységet jelez.


A csatlakozókínálat viszont, amelyben USB-C is helyet kapott, jónak mondható ebben az árfekvésben, még ha az elhelyezkedésük nem ideális. A WLAN modul is jól teljesít, különösen azt szem előtt tartva, hogy csak egy antennával rendelkezik. Az pedig, hogy az Acer szervizfedelet is épített a gépbe, manapság kifejezetten dicséretes.


Legyünk őszinték: A mi szemszögünkből szinte semmi ok nincs arra, hogy az Acer E5-553G -t válasszuk bármelyik másik, ebben a tesztben felsorolt multimédia notebookkal szemben. Főleg a Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15ISK-t említhetnénk, amely ugyan kevéssel drágább, de jelentősen többet kapunk vele a pénzünkért.


Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű cikk itt olvasható.


Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A - 01/18/2017 v6
Sven Kloevekorn

Váz
78 / 98 → 79%
Billentyűzet
76%
Érintőpad
91%
Csatlakoztathatóság
44 / 81 → 54%
Súly
60 / 67 → 86%
Akkumulátor
77%
Kijelző
74%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
60 / 85 → 70%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
70 / 92 → 76%
Hőmérséklet
90%
Zaj
84 / 95 → 89%
Audio
63%
Camera
49 / 85 → 58%
Átlag
70%
76%
Multimedia - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Acer Aspire E5-553G-109A Notebook rövid értékelés
Sven Kloevekorn, 2017-01-30 (Update: 2017-01-30)