Notebookcheck

OnePlus 3T Smartphone rövid értékelés

Manuel Masiero (fordította Tamás Somogyi), 12/16/2016
Android Touchscreen Smartphone

Zászlóshajó 2.0. Fél év sem telt bele, és a OnePlus máris bemutatta a OnePlus 3T-t, csúcstelefonjának a OnePlus 3-nak az utódját. Kiderítjük, hogy mire képes a javított verzió, és megérte-e a fejlesztés.

OnePlus 3T (3 Széria)
Processzor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro 2.4 GHz
Grafikus adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 530
Memória
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4
Kijelző
5.5 hüvelyk 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 401 PPI, kapacitív érintőkijelző, 10 pontos multi-touch, Corning Gorilla Glass 4, Optic-AMOLED, fényes: igen
Háttértár
64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 64 GB 
, 50.61 GB ingyenes
Csatlakozók
1 USB 2.0, Audió csatlakozók: 3.5 mm fejhallgatókimenet, 1 Ujjlenyomat olvasó, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Szenzorok: ujjlenyomatolvasó, Hall-szenzor, gyorsulásmérő, giroszenzor, közelségérzékelő, környezeti fény érzékelő, digitális iránytű, BeiDou
Hálózat
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS (band 1, 2, 5, 8), LTE Cat. 6 (band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40), Nano-SIM, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 7.35 x 152.7 x 74.7
Akkumulátor
0 Wh, 3400 mAh Lítium-Ion
Operációs rendszer
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix (Sony IMX 298, 1.12 µm, OIS, fázisfelismerő autofókusz (PDAF), f/2.0, UHD videó, RAW támogatás, Auto HDR)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (Samsung 3P8SP, 1.0 µm, EIS, fix fókusz , f/2.0, 1080p videó)
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: monó hangszóró, Billentyűzet: virtuális, hálózati adapter, USB kábel, SIM tű, Quick-start útmutató, OxygenOS 3.5, 24 Hónap Garancia
Súly
158 g, Tápegység: 100 g
Ár
439 Euro
Hivatkozások

 

» Top 10 Multimedia Notebooks 
» A Top 10 játékos noteszgép
» A Top 10 belépő szintű üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 üzleti noteszgép 
» Top 10 Workstation Notebooks
» A Top 10 subnotebook 
» Top 10 Ultrabooks 
» Top 10 Convertibles 
» A Top 10 táblagép
» A Top 10 okostelefon
» A Top 10 noteszgép 500 EUR (~160.000 HUF) alatt

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
532 MBit/s ∼100% +107%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
320 MBit/s ∼60% +25%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
281 MBit/s ∼53% +9%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
279 MBit/s ∼52% +9%
OnePlus 3T
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
257 MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
485 MBit/s ∼100% +55%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
335 MBit/s ∼69% +7%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
323 MBit/s ∼67% +3%
OnePlus 3T
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
313 MBit/s ∼65%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
185 MBit/s ∼38% -41%
OnePlus 3T: Overview
OnePlus 3T: Overview
OnePlus 3T: Forest
OnePlus 3T: Forest
OnePlus 3T: Bridge
OnePlus 3T: Bridge
Garmin Edge 500: Overview
Garmin Edge 500: Overview
Garmin Edge 500: Forest
Garmin Edge 500: Forest
Garmin Edge 500: Bridge
Garmin Edge 500: Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the zoom step. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
468
cd/m²
422
cd/m²
395
cd/m²
468
cd/m²
421
cd/m²
398
cd/m²
471
cd/m²
425
cd/m²
401
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 471 cd/m² Átlag: 429.9 cd/m² Minimum: 3.76 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 84 %
Centrumban: 421 cd/m²
Kontraszt: ∞:1 (Fekete: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.1 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 6.8 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.23
OnePlus 3T
Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Apple iPhone 7
IPS, 1334x750, 4.7
HTC 10
Super LCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.2
Huawei P9
IPS-NEO, JDI, 1920x1080, 5.2
OnePlus 3
Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy S7
SAMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.1
Screen
46%
30%
27%
23%
37%
Brightness
430
519
21%
434
1%
563
31%
431
0%
351
-18%
Brightness Distribution
84
90
7%
93
11%
91
8%
84
0%
98
17%
Black Level *
0.34
0.36
0.38
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
7.1
1.3
82%
2.8
61%
4.4
38%
4.1
42%
2.04
71%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.8
1.9
72%
3.7
46%
4.8
29%
3.3
51%
1.63
76%
Gamma
2.23 108%
2.26 106%
2.31 104%
2.2 109%
2.1 114%
2.07 116%
CCT
7866 83%
6818 95%
7164 91%
6175 105%
6550 99%
6391 102%
Contrast
1635
1236
1532
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
63.15
77.78
89.38
86.86
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.71
99.44
100
99.35

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 244 Hz10 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 244 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 244 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 59 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 655 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 28740) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (27.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 276 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (43.1 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
159866 Points ∼87%
Apple iPhone 7
142532 Points ∼77% -11%
HTC 10
131866 Points ∼72% -18%
Huawei P9
95743 Points ∼52% -40%
OnePlus 3 (Version 6.1.4)
142090 Points ∼77% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S7
127902 Points ∼69% -20%
Geekbench 4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
4236 Points ∼20%
Apple iPhone 7
5585 Points ∼26% +32%
Huawei P9
4904 Points ∼23% +16%
OnePlus 3
4097 Points ∼19% -3%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
1881 Points ∼37%
Apple iPhone 7
3490 Points ∼68% +86%
Huawei P9
1755 Points ∼34% -7%
OnePlus 3
1754 Points ∼34% -7%
3DMark
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.1 Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
1728 Points ∼68%
HTC 10
1688 Points ∼66% -2%
Huawei P9
2503 Points ∼98% +45%
OnePlus 3
1892 Points ∼74% +9%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2022 Points ∼79% +17%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.1 Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
2418 Points ∼45%
HTC 10
2889 Points ∼54% +19%
Huawei P9
829 Points ∼15% -66%
OnePlus 3
2864 Points ∼53% +18%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2216 Points ∼41% -8%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.1 (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
2221 Points ∼57%
HTC 10
2495 Points ∼64% +12%
Huawei P9
974 Points ∼25% -56%
OnePlus 3
2571 Points ∼66% +16%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2170 Points ∼56% -2%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
1452 Points ∼56%
Apple iPhone 7
1525 Points ∼59% +5%
HTC 10
1512 Points ∼58% +4%
Huawei P9
2510 Points ∼97% +73%
OnePlus 3
1789 Points ∼69% +23%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2010 Points ∼78% +38%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
3310 Points ∼43%
Apple iPhone 7
4057 Points ∼52% +23%
HTC 10
4581 Points ∼59% +38%
Huawei P9
1080 Points ∼14% -67%
OnePlus 3
4633 Points ∼60% +40%
Samsung Galaxy S7
3018 Points ∼39% -9%
Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
2577 Points ∼53%
Apple iPhone 7
2964 Points ∼61% +15%
HTC 10
3157 Points ∼65% +23%
Huawei P9
1237 Points ∼25% -52%
OnePlus 3
3424 Points ∼70% +33%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2715 Points ∼56% +5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
22426 Points ∼33%
Apple iPhone 7
15450 Points ∼23% -31%
HTC 10
20344 Points ∼30% -9%
Huawei P9
15517 Points ∼23% -31%
OnePlus 3
21771 Points ∼32% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S7
19944 Points ∼29% -11%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
34494 Points ∼8%
Apple iPhone 7
63974 Points ∼14% +85%
HTC 10
30061 Points ∼7% -13%
Huawei P9
21577 Points ∼5% -37%
OnePlus 3
34023 Points ∼8% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S7
33348 Points ∼7% -3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
30810 Points ∼16%
Apple iPhone 7
37676 Points ∼20% +22%
HTC 10
27176 Points ∼14% -12%
Huawei P9
19854 Points ∼10% -36%
OnePlus 3
30241 Points ∼16% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S7
29015 Points ∼15% -6%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
91 fps ∼8%
Apple iPhone 7
110.3 fps ∼10% +21%
HTC 10
73 fps ∼6% -20%
Huawei P9
40 fps ∼4% -56%
OnePlus 3
89 fps ∼8% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S7
84 fps ∼7% -8%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
59 fps ∼13%
Apple iPhone 7
57.7 fps ∼13% -2%
HTC 10
43 fps ∼9% -27%
Huawei P9
43 fps ∼9% -27%
OnePlus 3
60 fps ∼13% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S7
53 fps ∼12% -10%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
46 fps ∼8%
Apple iPhone 7
60.7 fps ∼11% +32%
HTC 10
39 fps ∼7% -15%
Huawei P9
18 fps ∼3% -61%
OnePlus 3
47 fps ∼9% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S7
40 fps ∼7% -13%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
45 fps ∼20%
Apple iPhone 7
58.5 fps ∼26% +30%
HTC 10
24 fps ∼11% -47%
Huawei P9
19 fps ∼8% -58%
OnePlus 3
46 fps ∼20% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S7
27 fps ∼12% -40%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
32 fps ∼11%
Apple iPhone 7
42.2 fps ∼14% +32%
HTC 10
24 fps ∼8% -25%
Huawei P9
10 fps ∼3% -69%
OnePlus 3
31 fps ∼10% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S7
28 fps ∼9% -12%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
32 fps ∼18%
Apple iPhone 7
59.4 fps ∼34% +86%
HTC 10
14 fps ∼8% -56%
Huawei P9
11 fps ∼6% -66%
OnePlus 3
30 fps ∼17% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S7
15 fps ∼9% -53%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
5664 Points ∼70%
HTC 10
5809 Points ∼71% +3%
Huawei P9
7058 Points ∼87% +25%
OnePlus 3 (OxygenOS 3.1.2)
7101 Points ∼87% +25%
Samsung Galaxy S7
4826 Points ∼59% -15%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
891 Points ∼58%
Apple iPhone 7
1531 Points ∼99% +72%
HTC 10
928 Points ∼60% +4%
Huawei P9
1029 Points ∼67% +15%
OnePlus 3
1112 Points ∼72% +25%
Samsung Galaxy S7
957 Points ∼62% +7%
Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
4444 Points ∼52%
Apple iPhone 7
6896 Points ∼80% +55%
HTC 10
5009 Points ∼58% +13%
Huawei P9
1583 Points ∼18% -64%
OnePlus 3
4813 Points ∼56% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S7
1723 Points ∼20% -61%
Memory (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
1954 Points ∼51%
Apple iPhone 7
1257 Points ∼33% -36%
HTC 10
1772 Points ∼46% -9%
Huawei P9
2627 Points ∼68% +34%
OnePlus 3
2052 Points ∼53% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2244 Points ∼58% +15%
System (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
3130 Points ∼48%
Apple iPhone 7
6097 Points ∼93% +95%
HTC 10
2806 Points ∼43% -10%
Huawei P9
3930 Points ∼60% +26%
OnePlus 3
3537 Points ∼54% +13%
Samsung Galaxy S7
4217 Points ∼64% +35%
Overall (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
2218 Points ∼68%
Apple iPhone 7
2999 Points ∼91% +35%
HTC 10
2193 Points ∼67% -1%
Huawei P9
2025 Points ∼62% -9%
OnePlus 3
2496 Points ∼76% +13%
Samsung Galaxy S7
1987 Points ∼61% -10%

Legend

 
OnePlus 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Apple iPhone 7 Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 128 GB NVMe
 
HTC 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P9 HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S7 Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T (Chrome 54.0.2840.85)
9798 Points ∼22%
Apple iPhone 7 (Safari Mobile 10.0)
24875 Points ∼55% +154%
HTC 10 (Chrome 49)
8905 Points ∼20% -9%
Huawei P9 (Chrome 48)
11783 Points ∼26% +20%
OnePlus 3 (Chrome 51)
9155 Points ∼20% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S7
13161 Points ∼29% +34%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T (Chrome 54.0.2840.85)
2719.3 ms * ∼5%
Apple iPhone 7 (Safari Mobile 10.0)
1113.4 ms * ∼2% +59%
HTC 10 (Chrome 49)
3146.3 ms * ∼5% -16%
Huawei P9 (Chrome 48)
2922.6 ms * ∼5% -7%
OnePlus 3 (Chrome 51)
2920.7 ms * ∼5% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2561.5 ms * ∼4% +6%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T (Chrome 54.0.2840.85)
135 Points ∼23%
Apple iPhone 7 (Safari Mobile 10.0)
202 Points ∼35% +50%
HTC 10 (Chrome 49)
108 Points ∼19% -20%
Huawei P9 (Chrome 48)
128 Points ∼22% -5%
OnePlus 3 (Chrome 51)
122 Points ∼21% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S7
166 Points ∼29% +23%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T (Chrome 54.0.2840.85)
54.526 Points ∼17%
Apple iPhone 7 (Safari Mobile 10.0)
165.86 Points ∼52% +204%
HTC 10 (Chrome 49)
52.1 Points ∼16% -4%
Huawei P9 (Chrome 48)
68.4 Points ∼21% +25%
OnePlus 3 (chrome 51)
54.4 Points ∼17% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S7
74 Points ∼23% +36%

* ... smaller is better

OnePlus 3TApple iPhone 7HTC 10Huawei P9OnePlus 3Samsung Galaxy S7
AndroBench 3-5
-56%
-49%
-19%
-27%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
65.44 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
24.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
53.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
55.05 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
72.33 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
Random Write 4KB
74.39
15.89
-79%
47.45
-36%
18.23
-75%
16.01
-78%
Random Read 4KB
123.57
29.92
-76%
39
-68%
137.62
11%
85.9
-30%
Sequential Write 256KB
165.3
115.56
-30%
72.19
-56%
153.3
-7%
145.72
-12%
Sequential Read 256KB
436.43
275.09
-37%
281.26
-36%
408.71
-6%
483.82
11%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 BeállításokÉrték
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
összehasonlítva
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016 (min)
 SC7731, Mali-400 MP2
14
   ...
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
 Z8550, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)
30
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP2
30
OnePlus 3T
 821 MSM8996 Pro, Adreno 530
30
Huawei Nova
 625, Adreno 506
30
   ...
HTC 10 (max)
 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
48
Dead Trigger 2
 BeállításokÉrték
 high59 fps
Max. terhelés
 36.9 °C33.7 °C32.9 °C 
 39.4 °C33.9 °C32.5 °C 
 39.2 °C34.2 °C32.2 °C 
Maximum: 39.4 °C
Átlag: 35 °C
34.7 °C35.8 °C37.5 °C
34.7 °C36 °C36.7 °C
34.6 °C36.2 °C37.4 °C
Maximum: 37.5 °C
Átlag: 36 °C
Tápegység (max.)  33.8 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 22.1 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2026.128.726.1252625.2263125.42725.44025.829.325.85025.226.125.26323.123.823.18033.430.833.410036.13336.112535.428.935.416034.724.734.720043.324.943.325049.71949.731553.319.153.340056.520.456.550059.318.159.363063.617.563.680064.71764.7100068.815.968.8125069.114.569.1160070.713.770.7200072.614.372.6250075.813.475.8315074.213.674.2400075.513.375.5500074.312.974.3630071.812.771.8800071.81371.81000072.212.772.21250066.61366.6160005512.755SPL84.427.584.4N56.9156.9median 66.6OnePlus 3Tmedian 14.5median 66.6Delta9.83.69.840.136.832.440.1382731.33834.330.631.734.334.529.72634.544.138.139.444.140.529.736.240.53331.428.63326.827.625.426.826.924.421.326.93724.823.33745.529.522.545.551.636.222.451.657.341.721.357.359.746.618.459.766.452.517.566.468.45217.568.469.952.517.269.971.853.816.871.872.554.817.372.575.256.917.475.278.459.716.678.477.659.717.377.678.260.817.678.281.363.817.681.378.561.817.778.575.958.817.475.976.259.417.776.274.357.517.974.370.354.818.170.354.437.618.154.488.671.129.888.67325.81.373median 70.3OnePlus 3median 53.8median 17.7median 70.311.910.41.611.929.635.529.628.529.528.526.328.226.329.631.529.627.927.427.925.125.725.124.729.424.733.831.333.843.732.143.742.620.442.64620.84647.920.247.950.419.750.451.922.351.960.820.160.866.318.966.367.517.767.567.116.767.166.91766.97014.87072.915.972.965.914.665.971.514.471.574.714.174.774.813.874.873.413.773.472.613.872.662.313.762.355.213.755.255.113.655.183.128.683.154.11.254.1median 65.9Apple iPhone 7median 16.7median 65.910.53.410.5hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
OnePlus 3T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.35 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 43%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

OnePlus 3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.61 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 43%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Apple iPhone 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.06 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 43%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.12 / 0.28 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 0.61 / 1.77 / 1.81 Watt
Terhelés midlight 6.67 / 10.98 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
OnePlus 3T
3400 mAh
Apple iPhone 7
1960 mAh
HTC 10
3000 mAh
Huawei P9
3000 mAh
OnePlus 3
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
28%
0%
3%
15%
26%
Idle Minimum *
0.61
0.54
11%
0.68
-11%
0.77
-26%
0.57
7%
0.68
-11%
Idle Average *
1.77
1.51
15%
1.49
16%
2.36
-33%
1.24
30%
1.02
42%
Idle Maximum *
1.81
1.54
15%
1.91
-6%
2.37
-31%
1.36
25%
1.14
37%
Load Average *
6.67
3.75
44%
7.4
-11%
3.09
54%
5.92
11%
4.73
29%
Load Maximum *
10.98
5.01
54%
9.71
12%
5.35
51%
10.53
4%
7.16
35%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
23h 43min
WiFi böngészés v1.3
8h 14min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13h 30min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
4h 42min
OnePlus 3T
3400 mAh
Apple iPhone 7
1960 mAh
HTC 10
3000 mAh
Huawei P9
3000 mAh
OnePlus 3
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-9%
-19%
-9%
16%
4%
Reader / Idle
1423
1770
24%
1273
-11%
1514
6%
1338
-6%
1810
27%
Load
282
126
-55%
203
-28%
206
-27%
268
-5%
242
-14%
WiFi
WiFi v1.3
494
517
5%
413
-16%
569
15%
840
70%
456
-8%
H.264
810
722
-11%
648
-20%
568
-30%
847
5%
892
10%

Pro

+ jó minőségű ház
+ nagy teljesítmény, lefojtás nélküli működés
+ jó kamera
+ gyors tárhelyelérés
+ gyors WLAN
+ dual-SIM
+ értesítések fül
+ USB-C
+ akár 128 GB belső tárhely
+ jó hangminőség, zajszűrővel
+ jó kijelző
+ gyorstöltő
+ hosszú akku üzemidő

Kontra

- csak LTE Cat. 6
- a régiótól függően eltérő frekvenciasávok elérhetők
- nem bővíthető a tárhely
- nincs FM-rádió
- a webkamera képe nem olyan éles, mint korábban
- nincs infra
- némi statikus zörej a hangszórónál
- nincs mellékelt fülhallgató
In review: OnePlus 3T. Test model courtesy of OnePlus Germany.
In review: OnePlus 3T. Test model courtesy of OnePlus Germany.

A OnePlus 3T méltó utódja a OnePlus 3-nak. A gyártónak nem volt nehéz feladata, mivel az előd modell így is az egyik legjobb felső kategóriás Androidos telefon volt. A változtatások meglehetősen aprók voltak, így a OnePlus 3T esetében sincs ez másként.

Sikeres fejlesztés: a OnePlus 3T csak egy kisebb felfrissítése a OnePlus 3-nak, és emiatt ugyanúgy az egyik legjobb csúcs okostelefon, mint az elődje.

Amennyiben valaki már a OnePlus 3-at használja, úgy nincs szüksége a OnePlus 3T-re, de mindenki másnak ajánlható. A vásárlóknak bizonyára tetszeni fog az is, hogy végre van belőle 128 GB-os verzió is. Csak 40 euróval kerül többe a 64 GB-os változatnál a gyártó online boltjában, úgyhogy valóban megéri vetni rá egy pillantást, különösen az microSD-kártya olvasó hiánya miatt. A valamivel erősebb lapkakészlet is előny, de gyakorlatban nem sok különbség tapasztalható, köszönhetően a hasonló hőmérsékleteknek.

A OnePlus nagyobb akkumulátorral szerelte fel a 3T-t, de üzemideje így is majdnem ugyanannyi maradt, mint a OnePlus 3 esetében, köszönhetően magasabb energiaigényének. A WLAN-teszt során felmerült problémákba nem szeretnénk komolyan belekötni, mert az elődje is hasonló gyengeségeket mutatott először, de aztán sikeresen javították az OxygenOS frissítésével. Ezen kívül még decemberre ígértek Android 7-re váltást.

Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű cikk itt olvasható.

OnePlus 3T - 12/12/2016 v6
Manuel Masiero

Váz
89%
Billentyűzet
70 / 75 → 93%
Érintőpad
97%
Csatlakoztathatóság
48 / 60 → 80%
Súly
92%
Akkumulátor
92%
Kijelző
83%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
64 / 63 → 100%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
63 / 70 → 90%
Hőmérséklet
90%
Zaj
100%
Audio
53 / 91 → 58%
Camera
77%
Átlag
78%
88%
Smartphone - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > OnePlus 3T Smartphone rövid értékelés
Manuel Masiero, 2016-12-16 (Update: 2016-12-16)